http://www.dirkdunn.com/web2
I recently made a responsive layout, setting the..
max-width:100%;
property in google chrome, which works perfectly for adjusting the header image size, however, in other broweser's such as firefox, the image overlaps the parent container on the left size.
I am familiar with scott jehls picture.js polyfill, however specifying the image size for each screen size sounds like a headache inside the picture tags, is there any way to combat this in other browsers similarly to how google chrome resizes this naturally?
or at the very least, is there some kind of math formula for knowing the right picture size via the browser width? thanks.
You have set the max-height of img to 100%, however you don't have the width of it's parent defined. So, it becomes confusing to the browser to determine 100% of what thing.
Let's give the parent a width -
#headlogo {
width: 100%;
}
Also set the margin accordingly, you might wanna use margin: 0 for #headlogo.
Simply remove the h1-parent of the image and it works. (FF 32)
Try this one
max-width: 100%;
display:block;
height: auto;
Assuming you are trying to center the logo.
I would remove the float: right from the H1 and remove the margin you have. Than I would add a text-align: center to the H1. This will solve your responsive logo issue and keep the logo centered.
Your Current CSS
#headlogo {
float: right;
margin: 0 15% 0 0;
}
Proposed Solution CSS
#headlogo {
text-align: center;
}
Related
I have an image that jumps down and out of its div when I narrow my browser. I've tried all kinds of things to prevent this from happening and haven't been able to turn the right key (I'm not taking to responsive web coding very naturally. I might have hit my limit here....).
Any suggestions are welcome.
It's the contents of the <div id="fadeshow"></div> that jump downward upon narrowing the browser.
At first glance I'm thinking it has something to do with the min-width setting in the #fadeshow div. If you notice the min-width is set to 580px which is about where the image jumps when downsizing the browser. Is there a particular reason for the min-width setting and can it be removed?
#fadeshow {
max-width: 800px;
margin: 0 auto;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
line-height: normal;
min-width: 580px;
}
The problem is that the 'outer' div in which the image is contained does not have a CSS min-width.
So when the screen size is reduced so that the screen width is less than the width of the image (580px), the outer div keeps shrinking and the image pops out.
If you add min-width: 590px; to the .outer style you should find that the problem is fixed.
I tested it in developer tools and it was fine.
the problem is with this line
<div class="emptyDiv verticalCenter"></div>
i dont know why u have included this but surely its the reason your image jumps downward upon narrowing the browser.
and foraligning your image in the center u can change the
.outer .inner {
padding: 10px;
}
to
.outer .inner {
padding: 45px; //or whatever suits your design
}
I made a website which displays correctly on desktop but on mobile devices I get a large white margin on the right side of the screen. I tried every solution I found so far, meaning the following basically:
html,body
{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
}
Tried every combination but the most I could get out of it is that I didnt have the margin but instead a vertical scrolllbar which isnt too good either. Could please someone help me with my issue?
You can see this problem here.
You should set also max-width: 100%;, or try to find element in your html code (using development tools in your browser) which has width property value higher than mobile screen resolution.
I found that the .menu2 class element have negative margin value. Setting this to 0, and changing width of .main element to 100% instead of value in ems solved this problem in my browser.
My blog/website is iamdonle.com
An example of what I want is 13thwitness.com
The images on mine doesn't scale and a scroll bar will appear. On his website the images get smaller with the window. I'm sure it's simple but I'm a noob. Please help!
You images are scaling down, but your logo is not!
Try:
.logo {
max-width: 100%;
}
First, you'll need to make sure your container is able to scale. Right now it has a set width of 1150px, this needs to be either a max-width or percentage based.
First, remove the width declared on #container and add this CSS:
#container {
max-width: 1150px;
padding: 5px 30px 0;
}
Then you'll need to remove the width declared for your header. You can do this by either removing the line completely (line 82 of your CSS file) or by overriding it in your 'Custom CSS' field box in the Customization screen by doing:
#header {
width: 100%;
}
Then, as others have mentioned, you'll need to add a max-width to your logo as well.
#header img {
max-width: 100%;
}
Note: when I viewed the blog you were using the "Quite Big" theme, the code above only applies to that theme.
i'm currently trying to make an image resize depending on the browser dimensions. I've managed to get the image to resize horizontally, if I make the browser window narrow the image will resize proportionally just fine. However when I resize the window vertically, Firefox just doesn't seem to want to do it! The code is pretty simple
<body>
<div id="content">
<img src="images/abc.jpg">
</div>
</body>
and the CSS:
#content {
height: 100%;
padding: 50px;
}
#content img{
max-height:100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
Another issue is that the image does seem to resize vertically in chrome, but i have to drag the bottom of the browser well over the image before it start doing this. I'd rather the image start to rezise as soon as the bottom content padding "hits" the bottom of the image so to speak. Hope this is making sense.
Any help much appreciated
try this, taken from Twitter bootstrap 2
html,body{height:100%;}
#content {padding: 5%;}
#content img {
max-height: 100%;/* Part 1: Set a maxium relative to the parent */
width: auto\9;
/* IE7-8 need help adjusting responsive images */
max-width: auto;
/* Part 2: Scale the height according to the width, otherwise you get stretching */
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0;
-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic;
}
Because height could potentially go on forever, you cant set the height of anything relative to the browser window to be a function of percent. What i'm saying is that you will need to put it inside of something with a fixed height to use a per-cent value. Good Luck!
-b
You've only specified the "max-height" and "max-width" properties.
If you don't specify the actual "width" or "height" properties, the image initialy takes the width and height of its physical dimensions (if not larger than the specified max-height and max-width).
Said that, the behaviour you've noticed, is correct.
The answer is, as already mentioned, to specify also a initial width or height property, dependig wether your image is portrait or landscape.
Is that what you want?
I actually just added a height to html and body, so that #contents height doesn't get to high.
body, html {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
(And box-sizing: border-box to #content, because it seems like you'd want that)
I'm working on a site for a client in which there's a background image that will be centered on the page with text, links, etc. overlayed.
I currently have the image resized as follows:
img.bg
{
height:100%;
position:absolute;
}
This fits the image to the height of the browser, but aligns it to the left. I need it to be centered.
Since I need it to be conditionally responsive to browser-height variations, the usual centering tricks aren't working.
Thanks!
Try removing "position:absolute" and adding margin: 0 auto. For example:
img.bg
{
height:100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
or may be just place it inside a table <table align="center"> <tr><td>"image goes here"</td></tr> it's easier to manage cause you can add more items to the webpage in future without difficulty, add borders, change colours of tables, etc.
I can think of a couple ways to go about it (untested, so you'll probably have to tweak):
img.bg {
position: absolute;
/* Top and/or bottom for stretching it vertically as needed. Setting both will likely make it the size of the whole body, so beware. Remove bottom to keep it from doing that if necessary. */
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
/* Left and/or right for sizing/positioning */
left: 25%; /* Percentage position will make it adjust to browser window size, exact percent may need to be tweaked to get right and will depend on the image's size. */
}
img.bg {
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 500px; /* Whatever your desired width is. */
margin: 0 auto; /* This should work as long as width is set. */
}
Depending on your exact design, either of these should work and be responsive to the size of the browser window. The second one is probably the most flexible and easiest to implement, since you don't have to fiddle with positioning.
The answer depends on exactly what you are after.
If you want an image displayed in the background of the website (which I think you are saying) then I am not sure what method you are using, but if you do away with your img.bg{} in your html and css, and just put the following into your CSS you will get what you want...
body{
background-image:url('background.gif'); // substitute background.gif for the correct file path
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-attachment:fixed;
background-position:center;
background-size:auto 100%;
}