I was wondering if there is an easy way of moving some (not all) data from one column to another.
My MySQL table has 200 entries but this is the simplified version of what I am trying to do:
| ID | A | B |
| 1 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 3 | | aa|
| 4 | | bb|
| 5 | | cc|
So I need to get data from column B to Column A but only the ones that have ID greater than (>) 2. so that aa from 3B will go to 3A, bb from 4B will go to 4A...
UPDATE <tablename> SET
A=B,
-- B=''
WHERE ID>2
Might help. The commented-out line needs to be enabled or disabled, depending on whether you want to move or copy the values between columns.
Related
Delphi 10.3.3
FireDAC: DBGrid / FDQuery / MySQL
VCL
Hi all,
I have a table with these fields
----------------------
| id | data |
----------------------
| 1 | 0=A;1=B;2=C |
| 2 | 2=Z |
| 3 | |
| 4 | 0=Y;1=X |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
Each row of data represents only the change in the table
I would like this to be display in a DBGRID:
-----------------------
| id | C0 | C1 | C2 |
-----------------------
| 1 | A | B | C |
| 2 | A | B | Z |
| 3 | A | B | Z |
| 4 | Y | X | Z |
| 5 | Y | X | Z |
| 6 | Y | X | Z |
What I can do for now is only the following table:
-----------------------
| id | C0 | C1 | C2 |
-----------------------
| 1 | A | B | C |
| 2 | | | Z |
| 3 | | | |
| 4 | Y | X | |
| 5 | | | |
| 6 | | | |
To obtain this result, I create additional columns in the event FDQuery1.BeforeOpen
And in the event OnCreateFields, I fill each column but I don't know the previous row content,
So, how can I do to fill in the missing fields in the DBgrid?
Thanks
Franck
I think you mean OnCalcFields, rather than OnCreateFields.
What you need
is certainly possible, either server-side by deriving the necessary values from the prior
row using e.g. a SQL subquery or client-side using calculated fields. This answer is about doing it
client-side.
The problem with doing client-side calculations involving another dataset row is that
to do this you need to be able to move the dataset cursor during the OnCalcFields event. However, at the time, the DataSet will be in either dsCalcFields or dsInternalCalc state
and, while it is, you can't easily move to another row in the dataset. It is possible to do this, but
requires declaring a descendant dataset class (TMyFDQuery) so that you can access the SetTempState
necessary to do revert to the prior state after you've picked up the necessary info from the "other"
row and, if what you need involves more that one field, you need somewhere to store the values temporarily.
So doing it that way gets messy.
A much cleaner approach involves using functional similarity between FireDAC's datasets and TClientDataSets.
One of the nice features of TClientDatasSets is the ease with which you can move the dataset contents between
two CDSs simply by doing
CDS2.Data := CDS1.Data;
FireDAC datasets can do the same trick, but between any FD dataset types. So here is what I would do in your
situation:
Add an FDMemTable to your form/datamodule and copy the query data into it in the FDQuery's AfterOpen event like
this:
procedure TForm2.FDQuery1AfterOpen(DataSet: TDataSet);
begin
FDQuery1.DisableControls;
try
FDMemTable1.Data := FDQuery1.Data;
FDMemTable1.Open;
finally
FDQuery1.First;
FDQuery1.EnableControls;
end;
end;
The FDQuery1.First is to force it to re-do its calculated fields once the FDMemTable data is available
(during the initial FDQuery1.Open, it can't be, of course).
In the FDQuery's OnCalcFields event, use code like this to base the calculated fields'
values on values picked up from the prior row (if there is one of course, the first
row can't hae a "prior" row):
procedure TForm2.FDQuery1CalcFields(DataSet: TDataSet);
begin
if FDMemTable1.Active then begin
if FDMemTable1.Locate('ContactID', FDQuery1.FieldByName('ContactID').AsInteger, []) then begin
FDMemTable1.Prior;
if not FDMemTable1.Bof then begin
// Set FDQuery1's calculated fields that depend on prior row
FDQuery1.FieldByName('PriorRowID').AsInteger := FDMemTable1.FieldByName('ContactID').AsInteger;
end;
end;
end;
end;
In this example, my queried dataset has a ContactID primary key and the calculated value is simply the ContactID value from the prior row. In real life, of course, it
would be more efficient to use persistent field variables rather than keep calling FieldByName.
I suppose another possibility might be to use the CloneCursor method to obtain a lookup cursor
to access the "prior" row, but I've not tried that myself and it may not be possible anyway
(what happens about the calculated fields in the CloneCuror copy?).
I created a table (t_subject) like this
| id | description | enabled |
|----|-------------|---------|
| 1 | a | 1 |
| 2 | b | 1 |
| 3 | c | 1 |
And another table (t_place) like this
| id | description | enabled |
|----|-------------|---------|
| 1 | d | 1 |
| 2 | e | 1 |
| 3 | f | 1 |
Right now data from t_subject is used for each of t_place records, to show HTML dropdowns, with all the results from t_subject.
So I simply do
SELECT * FROM t_subject WHERE enabled = 1
Now just for one of t_place records, one record from t_subject should be hidden.
I don't want to simply delete it with javascript, since I want to be able to customize all of the dropdowns if anything changes.
So the first thing I though was to add a place_id column to t_subject.
But this means I have to duplicate all of t_subject records, I would have 3 of each, except one that would have 2.
Is there any way to avoid this??
I thought adding an id_exclusion column to t_subject so I could duplicate records only whenever a record is excluded from another id from t_place.
How bad would that be?? This way I would have no duplicates, so far.
Hope all of this makes sense.
While you only need to exclude one course, I would still recommend setting up a full 'place-course' association. You essentially have a many-to-many relationship, despite not explicitly linking your tables.
I would recommend an additional 'bridging' or 'associative entity' table to represent which courses are offered at which places. This new table would have two columns - one foreign key for the ID of t_subject, and one for the ID of t_place.
For example (t_place_course):
| place_id | course_id |
|----------|-----------|
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 |
As you can see in my example above, place 3 doesn't offer course 2.
From here, you can simply query all of the courses available for a place by querying the place_id:
SELECT * from t_place_course WHERE place_id = 3
The above will return both courses 1 and 3.
You can optionally use a JOIN to get the other information about the course or place, such as the description:
SELECT `t_course`.`description`
FROM `t_course`
INNER JOIN `t_place_course`
ON `t_course`.`id` = `t_place_course`.`course_id`
INNER JOIN `t_place`
ON `t_place`.`id` = `place_id`
I have two columns in my database that I want to combine before matching them using LIKE statement.
My table:
|---------------------------------|
| ID | PREFIX | SUFFIX |
|---------------------------------|
| 1 | 31 | 523 |
|---------------------------------|
| 2 | 62 | 364 |
|---------------------------------|
I want to be able to supply 315 and ID 1 would be returned. Is there any easy way of doing it? At the moment I am splitting search string and matching separate columns.
Thanks.
SELECT * FROM table WHERE CONCAT(PREFIX, SUFFIX) LIKE '%315%'
I have two mysql tables as
Component
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| OldComponentId | NewComponentId |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| 15 | 85 |
| 16 | 86 |
| 17 | 87 |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
Formulae
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| id | formula_string |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| 1 | A+15-16+17 |
| 2 | 16+15-17 |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
I want to replace value of formula_string on the basis of NewComponentId as
Formulae
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| id | formula_string |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
| 1 | A+85-86+87 |
| 2 | 86+85-87 |
+----+-------------------------+--------+
I have tried with following mysql query but its not working
update Formulae fr, Component comp set formula_string=REPLACE(fr.formula_string,comp.OldComponentId,comp.NewComponentId).
Please suggest the solutions
thanks.
There is no easy way to do this. As you observed in your update statement, the replacements don't nest. They just replace one at a time.
One thing that you can do is:
update Formulae fr cross join
Component comp
set formula_string = REPLACE(fr.formula_string, comp.OldComponentId, comp.NewComponentId)
where formula_string like concat('%', comp.OldComponentId, '%')
Then continue running this until row_count() returns 0.
Do note that your structure could result in infinite loops (if A --> B and B --> A). You also have a problem of "confusion" so 10 would be replaced in 100. This suggests that your overall data structure may not be correct. Perhaps you should break up the formula into separate pieces. If they are just numbers and + and -, you can have a junction table with the value and the sign for each component. Then your query would be much easier.
A previous DBA managed a non relational table with 2.4M entries, all with unique ID's. However, there are duplicate records with different data in each record for example:
+---------+---------+--------------+----------------------+-------------+
| id | Name | Address | Phone | Email | LastVisited |
+---------+---------+--------------+---------+------------+-------------+
| 1 | bob | 12 Some Road | 02456 | | |
| 2 | bobby | | 02456 | bob#domain | |
| 3 | bob | 12 Some Rd | 02456 | | 2010-07-13 |
| 4 | sir bob | | 02456 | | |
| 5 | bob | 12SomeRoad | 02456 | | |
| 6 | mr bob | | 02456 | | |
| 7 | robert | | 02456 | | |
+---------+---------+--------------+---------+------------+-------------+
This isnt the exact table - the real table has 32 columns - this is just to illustrate
I know how to identify the duplicates, in this case i'm using the phone number. I've extracted the duplicates into a seperate table - there's 730k entires in total.
What would be the most efficient way of merging these records (and flagging the un-needed records for deletion)?
I've looked at using UPDATE with INNER JOIN's, but there are several WHERE clauses needed, because i want to update the first record with data from subsequent records, where that subsequent record has additional data the former record does not.
I've looked at third party software such as Fuzzy Dups, but i'd like a pure MySQL option if possible
The end goal then is that i'd be left with something like:
+---------+---------+--------------+----------------------+-------------+
| id | Name | Address | Phone | Email | LastVisited |
+---------+---------+--------------+---------+------------+-------------+
| 1 | bob | 12 Some Road | 02456 | bob#domain | 2010-07-13 |
+---------+---------+--------------+---------+------------+-------------+
Should i be looking at looping in a stored procedure / function or is there some real easy thing i've missed?
U have to create a PROCEDURE, but before that
create ur own temp_table like :
Insert into temp_table(column1, column2,....) values (select column1, column2... from myTable GROUP BY phoneNumber)
U have to create the above mentioned physical table so that u can run a cursor on it.
create PROCEDURE myPROC
{
create a cursor on temp::
fetch the phoneNumber and id of the current row from the temp_table to the local variable(L_id, L_phoneNum).
And here too u need to create a new similar_tempTable which will contain the values as
Insert into similar_tempTable(column1, column2,....) values (Select column1, column2,.... from myTable where phoneNumber=L_phoneNumber)
The next step is to extract the values of each column u want from similar_tempTable and update into the the row of myTable where id=L_id and delete the rest duplicate rows from myTable.
And one more thing, truncate the similar_tempTable after every iteration of the cursor...
Hope this will help u...