Logging Request in Laravel RouteCollection match - exception

So I'm getting a NotFoundHttpException in my laravel log file, but irritatingly, the exception doesn't particularly pass along too much information as to what exactly happened. In particular, I'm hoping to send the $request variable into the log when the exception is called - any idea on how to do this?
Calling Log::error(print_r($request)) just mentions that Illuminate\Routing\Log is not found.

Try this instead:
\Log::error(...);
It's a namespacing problem.

Related

The noticeError method was not found. while using Coldbox and NewRelic for Error tracking

I'm just using NewRelic error trapping for my coldbox application. From OnException method, I'm just sending the error struct to log the error.
My code in onexception method
public function onException(event,rc,prc){
NewRelic.logError( prc.exception.getExceptionStruct());
}
The logerror() method resides in NewRelic.cfc and contains the following code
public boolean function logError(
required struct exception
) {
var cause = arguments.exception;
var params = {
error_id = createUUID(),
type: arguments.exception.type,
message: arguments.exception.message
};
writeDump(this.newRelic);
this.newRelic.noticeError(cause, params);abort;
return true;
}
So while error, I'm gettig the following error.
The noticeError method was not found.
You can see that, the noticeError() method is there in the object, but it is overloaded with arguments.
I'm using the same code for NewRelic error trapping in another coldfusion project without any frameworks.
Calling error.cfm through Cferror tag, and the code in error.cfm as follows
<cfset Application.newRelic.logError( variables.error )>
And in NewRelic.cfc, the logerror() method contains the same code as in the coldbox application. But it is logging errors in NewRelic without any issues.
This is the method I need to notice errors and log it in NewRelic.
noticeError(java.lang.Throwable, java.util.Map)
So I just thought to get the classname of the first argument Cause through the following code from both applications within logError() in NewRelic.cfc, to get the difference.
writeDump(cause.getClass().getName());
I'm getting
coldfusion.runtime.ExceptionScope for Coldbox application
and
coldfusion.runtime.UndefinedVariableException for normal coldfusion application
The cause argument is not throwable from coldbox application. So how to get the original error struct from coldbox application? and make it throwable to fix the noticeError method was not found issue.
The change in the underlying class happens when ColdBox duplicates the error object with CFML's duplicate() method. I doubt that ColdFusion behavior is documented anywhere, but I don't see an easy way to get around it right now other than creating your own instance of a java.langException and populating it with the details of the original error.
If you want to modify the ColdBox core code, this happens here:
https://github.com/ColdBox/coldbox-platform/blob/master/system/web/context/ExceptionBean.cfc#L43
I have entered this ticket for the ColdBox framework for us to review if we can stop duplicating the error object in future versions of the framework.
https://ortussolutions.atlassian.net/browse/COLDBOX-476
Update: Adam Cameron pointed out this ticket in the Adobe bug tracker that details this behavior in the engine. It was closed as "neverFix".
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3976478

Handle specific exception that is not related to an exchange

I created a custom component for a proprietary service. If this service is down i get noticed via a call of a callback function. I am throwing a custom exception at this point.
Sending exchanges to the producer/ consumer will yield no errors or exceptions (all seems to fine).
So i need to implement an emergency stop if my custom exception is thrown. I read a bit about exception handling in camel. I think i need a context-scoped onException(MyException.class).??? but what then?
Is this working on exceptions that are called without relation to an exchange? If this is working how to handle it. I want to stop certain routes in this case.
here you can find to stop routes from a route: http://camel.apache.org/how-can-i-stop-a-route-from-a-route.html.
If you do the call of the proprietary service in a route you do have an exchange btw.
kind regards,
soilworker
I created a little workaround: I set a boolean i the callback method is called. On each call of process i check this boolean and if true i throw an exception.
With this the exception is within normal camel exception handling and onException could be used.

gwt, rpc service, StatusCodeException, and no logs available

sorry if my english is bad.
I have a problem while calling one of my GWT services.
On the client side, I have the following error.
[ERROR] com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.StatusCodeException: 500 The call failed on the server; see server log for details
[ERROR] at com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.impl.RequestCallbackAdapter.onResponseReceived(RequestCallbackAdapter.java:209)
[ERROR] at com.google.gwt.http.client.Request.fireOnResponseReceived(Request.java:287)
[ERROR] at com.google.gwt.http.client.RequestBuilder$1.onReadyStateChange(RequestBuilder.java:395)
...
Unhappily, I can't find any information related to this error on the server logs.
I'm in devlopment mode, and the only thing I can see in jetty is
[ERROR] 500 - POST /my/maping (127.0.0.1) 57 bytes
However, I know that my service implementation is called and that it returns a result without throwing any exception (because I use logs just before the return...) .
I have seen that this problem could be a serialization issue, but I really don't see where I miss something to make my objects serializables, ( plus, gwt compilator generally says me when something is not serializable).
And my/mapping should be finely defined, because it was working previously, and I am pretty sure that I have not modified anything related to this...
Finally, I don't find any interesting answer to my problem.
If you have any ideas, thanks in advance for your help.
ps: I use gwt 2.5.0-rc2.
This problem is mostly related to a class that forgot to implement the isSerializable or Serializable interface. Also Check if all subclassess in that class also implement isSerializable or Serializable interface.
Then verify that all class have a default no argument constructor.
If you are using JPA and the class relations are setup incorrectly, a general 500 will be thrown without an specific error messages

Entity Exception Message At least one of the input paths is not valid because either it is too long or it has incorrect format

using EF4
I atempt to make a connection but get this error message
"Entity Exception Message At least one of the input paths is not valid because either it is too long or it has incorrect format."
This used the example from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb738533.aspx but passing in my own server name. What is the "input paths"
When I run it from a web app its fine, when I try and run it in a unit/integration test passing in the connection (as app.config might not be there) I get this error.
Whats going on?
I had the same issue. I was writing the code in the following way
ebuilder.Metadata = #"Model1.csdl, Model1.ssdl,Model1.msl";
Then after some research I changes it to
ebuilder.Metadata = #"res://*/Model1.csdl|res://*/Model1.ssdl|res://*/Model1.msl";
The magic happened and it started working.
I had same error in EF6. when I try to fetch something from DB, this error was thrown.
I solved this problem with correcting the MetaData part of my connectinString.
you must have MetaData part like below:
metadata=res:///myModel.csdl|res:///myModel.ssdl|res://*/myModel.msl;

Should I return null or throw an exception?

I found questions here Should a retrieval method return 'null' or throw an exception when it can't produce the return value? and Should functions return null or an empty object?, but I think my case is quite different.
I'm writing an application that consists of a webservice and a client. The webservice is responsible to access data, and return data to the client. I design my app like this:
//webservice
try
{
DataTable data = GetSomeData(parameter);
return data
}
catch (OopsException ex)
{
//write some log here
return null;
}
//client:
DataTable data = CallGetSomeData(parameter);
if(data == null)
{
MessageBox.Show("Oops Exception!");
return;
}
Well, there is a rule of not returning null. I don't think that I should just rethrow an exception and let the client catch SoapException. What's your comment? Is there better approach to solve this problem?
Thank you.
In your case, an exception has already been thrown and handled in some manner in your web service.
Returning null there is a good idea because the client code can know that something errored out in your web service.
In the case of the client, I think the way you have it is good. I don't think there is a reason to throw another exception (even though you aren't in the web service anymore).
I say this, because, technically, nothing has caused an error in your client code. You are just getting bad data from the web service. This is just a matter of handling potentially bad input from an outside source.
Personally, as a rule of thumb, I shy away from throwing exceptions when I get bad data since the client code can't control that.
Just make sure you handle the data == null condition in such a way that it doesn't crash your client code.
In general i try to design my webservices in such way that they return a flag of some sort that indicates whether there was a technical/functional error or not.
additionally i try to return a complex object for result not just a string, so that i can return things like:
result->Code = "MAINTENANCE"
result->MaintenanceTill = "2010-10-29 14:00:00"
so for a webservice that should get me a list of dataEntities i will return something like:
<result>
<result>
<Code>OK</Code>
</result>
<functionalResult>
<dataList>
<dataEntity>A</dataEntity>
</dataList>
</functionalResult>
</result>
so every failure that can occur behind my webservice is hidden in a error result.
the only exceptions that developers must care about while calling my webservice are the exceptions or errors that can occur before the webservice.
All the WebServices that I've used return objects, not simple data types. These objects usually contain a bool value named Success that lets you test very quickly whether or not to trust the data returned. In either event, I think any errors thrown should be untrappable (i.e. unintentional) and therefore signify a problem with the service itself.
I think there may be a few factors to consider when making a decision:
what is the idiomatic way to do this in the language your using (if it wasn't a webservice)
how good your soap/webservice library is (does it propogate exceptions or no)
what's the easiest thing for the client to do
I tend to make the client do the easiest, idiomatic thing, within the limitations of the library. If the client lib doesn't take care of auto restoring serialized exceptions I would probably wrap it with a lib that did so I could do the following.
Client:
try:
# Restore Serialized object, rethrow if exception
return CallGetSomeData(parameter);
except Timeout, e:
MessageBox.Show("timed out")
except Exception, e:
MessageBox.Show("Unknown error")
exit(1)
WebService:
try:
return GetSomeData(parameter) # Serialized
except Exception, e:
return e # Serialized
Your first problem is "a rule of not returning null". I would strongly suggest reconsidering that.
Returning a SoapException is a possibility, but like hacktick already mentioned, it would be better to return a complex object with a status flag {Success,Fail} with every response from the web service.
I think it all boils down to the question whether or not your client can use any info as to why no data was returned.
For example - if no data was returned because the (say sql) server that is called in GetSomeData was down, and the client can actually do something with that information (e.g. display an appropriate message) - you don't want to hide that information - throwing an error is more informative.
Another example - if parameter is null, and that causes an exception.. (although you probably should have taken care of that earlier in the code.. But you get the idea) - should have throw an appropriate (informative) exception.
If the client doesn't care at all why he didn't get any data back, you may return null, he'll ignore the error text anyhow and he's code will look the same..
If your client and service are running on different machines or different processes, it will be impossible to throw an error from the service and catch it on the client. If you insist on using exceptions, the best you can hope for is some proxy on the client to detect the error condition (either null or some other convention) and re-throw a new exception.
The general practice in handling exception is, when the sequence of flow is expected in the normal circumstance where as the sequence could not be completed due to non-availability of resources or expected input.
In your case, you still need to decide how do you want your client side code to react for null or exception.
How about passing in a delegate to be invoked when anything bad happens? The delegate could throw an exception if that's what the outside could would like, or let the function return null (if the outside code will check for that), or possibly take some other action. Depending upon the information passed to the delegate, it may be able to deal with problem conditions in such a way as to allow processing to continue (e.g. the delegate might set a 'retry' flag the first few times it's called, in case flaky network connections are expected). It may also be possible for a delegate to log information that wouldn't exist by the time an exception could get caught.
PS--It's probably best to pass a custom class to the problem-detected delegate. Doing that will allow for future versions of the method to provide additional information to the delegate, without breaking any implementations that expect the simpler information.
Exceptions are recommended in the same process space. Across processes, it is only through information that a success/failure is evaluated.
Since you are the client to your webservice, you can log the exception at the service layer and return null to the client, yet the client should still know if the CallGetSomeData returned null because a) data is not available, or b) there is a database exception as the table is locked. Hence its always good to know what has caused the error for easier reporting at client side. You should have a error code and description as part of your message.
If you are not consuming your webservice then you should definetly throw exception for the same reasons mentioned above, client should know what has happened and its upto them to decide to what to do with that.