I want to have two horizontal divs.
The width of the left div is 200px and is fixed.
The width of the right div is 600px by default and should be responsive. If user resizes the browser, the width of right div may decrease and scroll bar appears on right div.
I am trying to use float and overflow to do it. But I can't think of the right solution.
What should I do?
Use display:table and display:table-cell for getting better result.
<div class="main">
<div class="left">sdfsf</div>
<div class="right">sfsdfdsfsfdsfds</div>
</div>
.main{display:table; width:100%;}
.left
{
display:table-cell;
min-width:200px;
width:200px;
border:1px solid red;
}
.right
{
display:table-cell;
width:auto;
border:1px solid green;
}
DEMO
Your request is a bit odd and can be done though not using purely CSS level 1 unfortunately. In order to have the elements "float" and have the second div overflow instead of the body element you'll have to use a combination of position and overflow.
Copy this to an (x)html file and resize the browser...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
</head>
<body style="overflow: hidden">
<div style="overflow: auto; max-width: 800px;">
<div style="background-color: #ff0; height: 200px; width: 200px; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;">left</div>
<div style="background-color: #0ff; height: 200px; overflow-x: auto; position: absolute; left: 200px; top: 0px; max-width: 600px;">
<div style="min-width: 800px;">right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, right child, </div></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I highly recommend not using this even if your browser support requirement is extremely relaxed simply because using static layouts alone is really IE6 era sort of in-the-box-of-a-box type thinking. If it's for a client you really need to force-override them.
Just because I don't like display:table:
it is possible to achieve what you're looking for using flexbox.
The idea is to set the right element's width using width:100% and the left using width: 200px; min-width:200px.
I'm not sure what you mean regarding the overflow, but my solution has the right element's overflow set to scroll, and the contentn is put within another div whose width is 600px
Here's a demo.
Related
I'm attempting to have a horizontally-scrolling (left-to-right) DIV in a dynamic width table cell (DIVs with display:table-cell). The scrolling DIV should be allowed to take up 100% of the containing element without causing it to grow beyond all ancestors' widths. I'd prefer to have a pure markup/CSS fix to this problem, without JavaScript or static widths.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<style>
#page
{
width: 100%;
max-width: 500px;
}
.tcell
{
display: table-cell;
min-width: 150px;
padding: 10px;
}
#scrollbox
{
width: 100%;
height: 90px;
background-color: red;
overflow: auto;
}
#scrollcontent
{
background-color: green;
width: 900px;
height: 50px;
margin: 10px;
white-space: nowrap;
}
</style>
</head>
<body style="width:100%;">
<div id="page">
<div class="tcell" style="background-color: teal;">Hello world</div>
<div class="tcell" style="background-color: yellow;">
<div id="scrollbox">
<div id="scrollcontent"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/L69qJ/
The issue is visible in IE8, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
In this example, the yellow div is being forced to grow beyond it's container (we expect the entire page to be no larger than 500px. See the max-width style for #page) because the red DIV isn't respecting overflow:auto and therefore trying to expand to show the green DIV completely.
Expected behavior: I'd like for the teal and yellow cells to add up to 100% of their parent (#page). The green cell is so wide that it's making the red cell expand, which is making the yellow cell expand. It's expected that the red cell use a horizontal (left-to-right) scrollbar instead of making the yellow cell expand.
display:table;
table-layout:fixed;
to #page.
There it is:
http://jsfiddle.net/L69qJ/8/
To answer your question, the problem is that you are using table-cells. Table cells inherently take the shape of their children, so if you set something wide inside of a table cell, you can't just add a width to the table cell and expect it to follow that rule. You need to transition to using percentage width inline divs, or floats to achieve your layout.
I would like to build a fluid layout and would like to achieve something like
width:100%-200px;
i.e. have a div with content, call it div id="content" with a fixed margin on either side. I have tried to use the trick of putting the div id="content" into another div container with a margin, but I don't know how to fill out the background of div id="content". Is there a way of telling the div id="content" to use 100% of the available space as background, such that the width of the content plus the width of the margin does not exceed 100% of the browser window size?
Having the DIV set to be 100% with a margin of XXX on either side won't work as that will exceed the size of the browser window.
You could try the following:
body {
padding:0 2%;
}
#content {
width:96%;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/YYhvT/
Use position absolute...
#content {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 200px;
}
See my Fiddle.
PS Advantage is that you don't need values on other elements.
You can put a container around the content and give it 200px left/right padding. This should do the trick (at least, from what I understand of what you are trying to accomplish). Also see this code example:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
body { margin: 0 50px; }
#container { padding: 0 200px; background: #FF0000; }
#content { width: 100%; background: #00FF00; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="content">
Here goes my content
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Note that the body margin is just for illustrating purposes, to let you see the background differences.
(I would post a jsFiddle, however I am not able to use it since I can only use IE7 at this point.)
here is my solution,
html:
<div id="content" class="content">
My Content
</div>
css:
.content {
position: absolute;
right: 100px;
left: 100px;
background-color:#A5112C;
}
and link to it: http://jsfiddle.net/MPYHs/
also if you want to put sort of image as a background I suggest you use small pattern like https://ssl.gstatic.com/android/market_images/web/background_stripes.gif
hope it helps,
regards
I am trying to build the html with css styling schematically presented in the picture below:
I manage to position the inner div with the following html:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<body>
<div style="background-color: yellow; width: 100px; height: 100px;
position: relative;">
<div style="background-color: gray; position: absolute;
top: 8px; left: 8px; right: 8px; bottom: 8px"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
but the problem is that it stops to work if I want the height of outer div to be dynamic. Removing height value hides outer div.
How that could be achieved under all conditions?
Is width 'W' known? Ah, it is somewhat irrelevant...
OK, you need to do something like this (assuming you position the outer div where you want it). :
<div style="float:left; background-color:yellow; width:100px;">
<div style="background-color:gray; margin:8px;">You need enough content here to push the width out far enough...</div>
</div>
You may need to place the outside div in a further outside div to get the positioning correct, but the outside div must have a the float variable (left or right - it doesn't matter).
You can add borders and padding etc to these divs to suit. The key to the whole process is the float value existing in the outer div.
Not really sure where you're going with this. But it seems you want to just have padding around the inner div?
<div style="background-color: yellow; width: 100px;
position: relative; padding: 8px">
<div style="background-color: gray;">Hello</div>
This way, the content of the inner div will alter the height of the outer div...
If you have only absolute position object[s] in Relative position object, you must fix height value of Relative position object.
Hint. You can change height value via javascript or define min-height(CSS 2+) property of relative position object.
How to size a div's height to its container height, using CSS ?
<div class='container'><br>
<div style='display: block; height: 500px'>left</div><br>
<div id='to-be-sized' >right</div><br>
</div>
You can either:
use the incomplete but philosophically correct path of pure CSS and face every kind of incompatibility between browsers
or
write 3 lines of dirty semantically incorrect and devil made table and have it work perfectly everywhere
Your pick :)
There's a way to do this IF you happen to be using jQuery. As you asked for CSS this might not be an option available to you, but if you can utilise it it will do exactly what you want.
$(divToResize).css('height',$(container).innerHeight());
$(divToResize) is the selector for the DIV you wish to match the height of it's container and $(container) is logically the container whose height you want to get.
This will work regardless of if the container's height is specified in CSS or not.
I know this was answered forever ago, but when I run into this issue nowadays, I use Flex Box. It's awesome. See A Complete Guide to Flexbox by Chris Coyier
.parent {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: -webkit-flex;
display: flex;
width: 100%;
}
.child {
flex-grow: 1;
}
.child1 {
min-height: 200px;
background-color: #fee;
}
.child2 {
background-color:#eef;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child child1">Child 1</div>
<div class="child child2">Child 2</div>
</div>
The Flexbox Layout (Flexible Box) module aims at providing a more efficient way to lay out, align and distribute space among items in a container, even when their size is unknown and/or dynamic (thus the word "flex").
The main idea behind the flex layout is to give the container the ability to alter its items' width/height (and order) to best fill the available space (mostly to accommodate to all kind of display devices and screen sizes). A flex container expands items to fill available free space, or shrinks them to prevent overflow.
Most importantly, the flexbox layout is direction-agnostic as opposed to the regular layouts (block which is vertically-based and inline which is horizontally-based). While those work well for pages, they lack flexibility (no pun intended) to support large or complex applications (especially when it comes to orientation changing, resizing, stretching, shrinking, etc.).
If my understanding is correct and the default height of a div where no height is specified is auto then this is not possible without setting an explicit height on the containing div. If an explicit height is set on the containing div then height:100% on the contained div will mean that it grows to the height of the container.
It seems like you are trying to get equal height columns. You could use the fauxcolumns method where a background image is used to fake the equal height. There are other methods out there.
You can tell the container div to display as table and have the inner div to display as a table cell.
The HTML
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">
<h1>
My Header</h1>
</div>
<div id="main">
<ul id="nav">
<li>1</li>
<li>2</li>
<li>3</li>
<li>4</li>
</ul>
<div id="primaryContent">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<h1>
My Footer</h1>
</div>
</div>
The CSS
#wrap
{
width: 800px;
margin: auto;
}
#header
{
background: red;
}
#main
{
display: table;
}
#nav
{
background: gray;
width: 150px;
display: table-cell;
}
#primaryContent
{
background: yellow;
padding: 0 .5em;
display: table-cell;
}
Fixes for IE
#wrap
{
width: 800px;
margin: auto;
}
#header, #footer
{
background: red;
}
#main
{
background: url(../bg.png) repeat-y;
}
#nav
{
background: gray;
width: 150px;
float: left;
}
#primaryContent
{
background: yellow;
margin-left: 150px;
padding: 0 .5em;
}
It's a tricky thing to do--there's no clear-cut best approach, but there are a few common ones.
If we assume that what you REALLY need is for the height of the right column to be (or appear to be) equivalent to the height of the left column, you can use any of the techniques frequently used to get equal height columns. This piece contains a few tricks to get the right look and behavior. I recommend reading it to see if it solves your problem.
The other approach uses Javascript to determine the height of the container, and setting your right-hand column to that. That technique has been discussed on SO here. As long as your container's size is not the only thing determining the size of your outer container, that should be a valid approach (if that's not the case, you'll have a chicken-egg problem that could cause weird behavior).
Sample code, you need to start from the html element so you can make use of the flexible height in the containers.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>100% Test</title>
<style type="text/css">
html, body, #inner { height: 100% }
#inner { border: 4px blue solid }
#container { height: 200px; border: 4px red solid }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="inner">
lorem ipsum
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">
.container{
position:relative;
background-color:#999;
}
#to-be-sized{
position:absolute;
top:0;
height:100%;
background-color:#ddd;
}
</style>
<body>
<div class='container'>
<br>
<div style='display: block; height: 500px'>left</div>
<br>
<div id='to-be-sized' >right</div><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS files use the 'padding' function to determine the height and depth of containers. To change the height of the container field simple insert of adjust the padding fields for the specified containers.
The code excerpt below is an example of the CSS used for a container class (you'd find this as in the html file.
.container{padding-top:100px;padding-bottom:50px}header
i use the overflow:hidden it work properly.
.bu {
overflow: hidden;
background-color:blue;
}
<div class="bu">
<button>english</button>
</div>
try adding this to the div to be resized
.layout-fill {
margin: 0;
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
I did something similar to KyokoHunter:
$('div.row').each(function(){
var rowHeight = $(this).innerHeight();
$(this).children('div.column').css('height',rowHeight);
});
This goes through every row in a div "table" and makes the heights all match, as long as the divs are classed accordingly.
I want to put two <div>s next to each other. The right <div> is about 200px; and the left <div> must fill up the rest of the screen width? How can I do this?
You can use flexbox to lay out your items:
#parent {
display: flex;
}
#narrow {
width: 200px;
background: lightblue;
/* Just so it's visible */
}
#wide {
flex: 1;
/* Grow to rest of container */
background: lightgreen;
/* Just so it's visible */
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="wide">Wide (rest of width)</div>
<div id="narrow">Narrow (200px)</div>
</div>
This is basically just scraping the surface of flexbox. Flexbox can do pretty amazing things.
For older browser support, you can use CSS float and a width properties to solve it.
#narrow {
float: right;
width: 200px;
background: lightblue;
}
#wide {
float: left;
width: calc(100% - 200px);
background: lightgreen;
}
<div id="parent">
<div id="wide">Wide (rest of width)</div>
<div id="narrow">Narrow (200px)</div>
</div>
I don't know if this is still a current issue or not but I just encountered the same problem and used the CSS display: inline-block; tag.
Wrapping these in a div so that they can be positioned appropriately.
<div>
<div style="display: inline-block;">Content1</div>
<div style="display: inline-block;">Content2</div>
</div>
Note that the use of the inline style attribute was only used for the succinctness of this example of course these used be moved to an external CSS file.
Unfortunately, this is not a trivial thing to solve for the general case. The easiest thing would be to add a css-style property "float: right;" to your 200px div, however, this would also cause your "main"-div to actually be full width and any text in there would float around the edge of the 200px-div, which often looks weird, depending on the content (pretty much in all cases except if it's a floating image).
EDIT:
As suggested by Dom, the wrapping problem could of course be solved with a margin. Silly me.
The method suggested by #roe and #MohitNanda work, but if the right div is set as float:right;, then it must come first in the HTML source. This breaks the left-to-right read order, which could be confusing if the page is displayed with styles turned off. If that's the case, it might be better to use a wrapper div and absolute positioning:
<div id="wrap" style="position:relative;">
<div id="left" style="margin-right:201px;border:1px solid red;">left</div>
<div id="right" style="position:absolute;width:200px;right:0;top:0;border:1px solid blue;">right</div>
</div>
Demonstrated:
left
right
Edit: Hmm, interesting. The preview window shows the correctly formatted divs, but the rendered post item does not. Sorry then, you'll have to try it for yourself.
I ran into this problem today. Based on the solutions above, this worked for me:
<div style="width:100%;">
<div style="float:left;">Content left div</div>
<div style="float:right;">Content right div</div>
</div>
Simply make the parent div span the full width and float the divs contained within.
UPDATE
If you need to place elements in a row, you can use Flex Layout. Here you have another Flex tutorial. It's a great CSS tool and even though it is not 100% compatible, each day its support is getting better. This works as simple as:
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="contentA"></div>
<div class="contentB"></div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
.contentA {
flex: 1;
}
.contentB {
flex: 3;
}
And what you get here is a container with a total size of 4 units, that share the space with its children in a relation of 1/4 and 3/4.
I have done an example in CodePen that solves your problem. I hope it helps.
http://codepen.io/timbergus/pen/aOoQLR?editors=110
VERY OLD
Maybe this is just a nonsense, but have you tried with a table? It not use directly CSS for positioning the divs, but it works fine.
You can create a 1x2 table and put your divs inside, and then formatting the table with CSS to put them as you want:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<div></div>
</td>
<td>
<div></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Note
If you want to avoid using the table, as said before, you can use float: left; and float: right;and in the following element, don't forget to add a clear: left;, clear: right; or clear: both; in order to have the position cleaned.
div1 {
float: right;
}
div2 {
float: left;
}
This will work OK as long as you set clear: both for the element that separates this two column block.
I ran into the same problem and Mohits version works. If you want to keep your left-right order in the html, just try this. In my case, the left div is adjusting the size, the right div stays at width 260px.
HTML
<div class="box">
<div class="left">Hello</div>
<div class="right">World</div>
</div>
CSS
.box {
height: 200px;
padding-right: 260px;
}
.box .left {
float: left;
height: 200px;
width: 100%;
}
.box .right {
height: 200px;
width: 260px;
margin-right: -260px;
}
The trick is to use a right padding on the main box but use that space again by placing the right box again with margin-right.
I use a mixture of float and overflow-x:hidden. Minimal code, always works.
https://jsfiddle.net/9934sc4d/4/ - PLUS you don't need to clear your float!
.left-half{
width:200px;
float:left;
}
.right-half{
overflow-x:hidden;
}
As everyone has pointed out, you'll do this by setting a float:right; on the RHS content and a negative margin on the LHS.
However.. if you don't use a float: left; on the LHS (as Mohit does) then you'll get a stepping effect because the LHS div is still going to consume the margin'd space in layout.
However.. the LHS float will shrink-wrap the content, so you'll need to insert a defined width childnode if that's not acceptable, at which point you may as well have defined the width on the parent.
However.. as David points out you can change the read-order of the markup to avoid the LHS float requirement, but that's has readability and possibly accessibility issues.
However.. this problem can be solved with floats given some additional markup
(caveat: I don't approve of the .clearing div at that example, see here for details)
All things considered, I think most of us wish there was a non-greedy width:remaining in CSS3...
This won't be the answer for everyone, since it is not supported in IE7-, but you could use it and then use an alternate answer for IE7-. It is display: table, display: table-row and display: table-cell. Note that this is not using tables for layout, but styling divs so that things line up nicely with out all the hassle from above. Mine is an html5 app, so it works great.
This article shows an example: http://www.sitepoint.com/table-based-layout-is-the-next-big-thing/
Here is what your stylesheet will look like:
.container {
display: table;
width:100%;
}
.left-column {
display: table-cell;
}
.right-column {
display: table-cell;
width: 200px;
}
To paraphrase one of my websites that does something similar:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<style TYPE="text/css"><!--
.section {
_float: right;
margin-right: 210px;
_margin-right: 10px;
_width: expression( (document.body.clientWidth - 250) + "px");
}
.navbar {
margin: 10px 0;
float: right;
width: 200px;
padding: 9pt 0;
}
--></style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="navbar">
This will take up the right hand side
</div>
<div class="section">
This will fill go to the left of the "navbar" div
</div>
</body>
</html>
just use a z-index and everything will sit nice. make sure to have positions marked as fixed or absolute. then nothing will move around like with a float tag.