I have a simple div wrapper with four spans inside.
<body>
<main>
<div>
<span>One</span>
<span>Two</span>
<span>Three</span>
<span>Four</span>
</div>
</main>
</body>
The div is positioned absolutely so that I can get it to touch the bottom of the screen, and text-align is justify so the spans inside are evenly spaced. This works fine until I try to make my spans height: 100%, then a mysterious white space appears outside of the actual flow on the very bottom. I think this has something to do with my div:after psudo-element but I have absolutely no idea what's going on.
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
main {
position: relative;
height: 100vh;
width: 100%;
background-color: rgb(45, 45, 65);
text-align: center;
}
div {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 25%;
right: 25%;
bottom: 0;
text-align: justify;
display: block;
}
div:after {
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
span {
background-color: rgb(25, 25, 45);
box-sizing: border-box;
display: inline-block;
font-size: 1em;
padding: 10px;
height: 100%;
}
span:hover {
background-color: white;
}
Do I not understand how :after works, or is this some kind of a glitch? Where in the world is that white spacing coming from on the bottom?
Here's a reproduction of the problem: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/qdpERR?editors=110
simply add an overflow: hidden; to the main or even the parent of the main should works.
Check the link
http://codepen.io/TibicenasDesign/pen/yNpyLr?editors=110
Uncomment overflow: hidden; or box-sizing: border-box then, the white space at the end of the web will be removed.
Also the box-sizing works ! i always have it with border-box so forgot it haha, and maybe its a better solution
Another option may be to add box-sizing:border-box, becauase you have padding on those link elements.
I have a content div with a ragged border (using a border-image) and I place another div each below the content div left and right to hold an image. This image is supposed to have a link. While the image shows nicely through the border the link area gets hidden by it. Given that my ragged border is rather wide (almost 100px), this feels quite confusing. Therefore I would like to "float" the image below the border and the actual link area above so that the link is clickable as well were the image is under the border or visible through the border.
Despite not having the background-image uploaded the effect becomes visible since the border is wide black. The structure includes a minimal header, which is not vital to the problem but is part of the root structure.
Another problem is that the link area expands to more than the wrapped image in height, however this is a minor issue.
http://jsfiddle.net/hc3jrkku/
Basestructure:
<header>
<nav>
<a href='?p=faq#faq' id='faq'>
FAQ
</a>
</nav>
</header>
<div class='leftSide'>
<a href="#anchor" class="bgImage"><img src="img/some.png" style="
position: relative;
z-index: -1;
opacity: .99;
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
height: 200px;
background-color: red,
"></a>
</div>
<div class='rightSide'>{$right}</div>
<main>
<div class='container'>
{$content}
</div>
</main>
</body>
CSS:
* {
box-sizing: border-box
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
.leftSide{
position: fixed;
z-index: 0;
top: 20px;
right: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
width: 808px;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
margin-right:-93px;
padding: 15px 93px 90px 0;
}
.rightSide{
position: fixed;
z-index: 0;
top: 20px;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(50%);
width: 808px;
height: 100%;
margin-left:-93px;
padding: 15px 0 90px 93px;
}
a.bgImage {
z-index:900;
opacity:.99;
border:2px dashed blue
}
.rightSide .bgImage {
margin-left: -93px;
}
.leftSide .bgImage {
margin-right: -93px;
}
main {
width: 808px;
min-height: 400px;
margin: 20px auto 0;
position: relative;
z-index: 50;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 0px 93px 127px 93px;
border-image: url(img/paperedge.png) 0 93 127 93 fill round;
padding-top:10px;
}
header {
height: 20px;
background: #ffffff url(img/header_bg.png) repeat-x bottom;
border-bottom: 1px solid #000000;
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
z-index: 100
}
nav {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
Having read http://philipwalton.com/articles/what-no-one-told-you-about-z-index/, I tried creating new context(s) as well, and stripping the divs containing left/right background image of the z-index, However my current code depends on the transform/position thus creating a new context for the parent element either way. Is the sandwich stacking (some children above other parts of the page/others below) possible anyways?
If you want the image to be behind the border (or your content div), you can add this to the CSS of your div in the front:
main {
pointer-events: none;
}
This will kill the events on your div and make the behind events visible in the front: DEMO
You can also search more and find these similar topics:
HTML "overlay" which allows clicks to fall through to elements behind it
HTML/CSS: Make a div "invisible" to clicks?
Got an issue where I'm trying to have text stay centered in the middle of a div that's on top of an image. Looks good on desktop but once I start to attempt to make it mobile, it gets screwed up. I think it's because I'm using fixed heights in the div but I tried height:auto; and all that did was place the text to align to the top because it has no idea what the div height really is. Anyone know a better solution to this?
First here, here's the site in question: http://originalchuck.com/
It's in the middle of the page. The three large images.
Now, here's the CSS I'm currently using:
span.text-content, div.homepage-bags span.text-content-bags { color: #fff; display: table; font-size: 30px; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; text-shadow: 2px 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5), 0px 1px 3px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); text-transform: uppercase; width: 100%; }
div.homepage-featured span.text-content { height: 620px!important; }
div.homepage-buckets span.text-content { height: 288px!important; }
div.homepage-bags span.text-content-bags { height: 288px!important; }
div.homepage-featured span.text-content span, div.homepage-bags span.text-content-bags span { display: table-cell; text-align: center; vertical-align: middle; }
Don't use height !important for each span.text-content. It should work fine just with height: 100%; here.
Also remove display: table; from span.text-content, we'll center inner span absolutely.
For inner span:
span.text-content span {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
margin-top: -12px;
text-align: center;
}
Text in the hover layer is short, so we can expect that it will never wrap. This means that useing top:50% with matgin-top minus half of text height is ok for vertical centering.
Also you'd better set display: inline-block for tag a here as there is an issue with overlay width on the first image on mobile.
After many tries, i've come to a possible solution for you. Use this CSS on your span.text-content :
display: block;
height: 0 !important;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
line-height: 0;
text-align: center;
And unwrap your text out of its span so you just have your naked text inside your span.text-content
Basically, the margin: auto causes the browser to resolve the conflicting height properties (100% given by top: 0; and bottom: 0; and the height: 0; and use the specified height (here, 0) and center it inside the container from the specified positions.
PS: The !important was solely here to override the heights you had hard-coded.
I try to create heading like this...
Title --------------------
This line with a custom image background
HTML :
<h2>Title</h2>
CSS :
h2 {background:url('line.png') repeat-x 15px 10px;}
Result :
Live : http://jsfiddle.net/5G2aq/
I try to repeat this image with X-axis and add some padding into the left.
But it doesnt work, 15px doenst work... or what ?
PS :Try to do with a single element <h2>, not :after or full-long image
Any trick ?
Do it like this, use :after pseudo with content: ""; and be sure you use display: block;, now we use position: absolute; and assign position: relative; to the container element. Last but not the least we use overflow: hidden; so that we don't get dirty scroll.
Demo
h2 {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
h2:after {
position: absolute;
height: 2px;
content: "";
display: block;
width: 100%;
top: 50%;
left: 60px;
background:url(http://oi39.tinypic.com/m7t8xw.jpg) repeat-x;
}
Coming to your solution, you are using repeat-x, so you won't see the background-position changing on the x axis as the image is repeating, if you want to go for this approach, you shouldn't repeat.
Even better approach
Demo 2 OR Demo 3 (Using your image)
<div><span>Hello</span></div>
div {
border-top: 1px solid #000;
margin: 20px;
position: relative;
}
div span {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: -12px;
background: #fff;
padding-right: 10px;
}
The above way will be title width independent, I would've chosen this way
Note: You can replace div with h2
I want to achieve this using html and css:
I have tried to set the opacity of the container to 0.3 and the box to 1, but it doesn't work: both divs have 0.3 opacity.
jsFiddle of my try here
The effect I am trying to achive is a popup box that comes on top of the page. It is highlighted by fading the content below (by lowering the opacity).
You can use opacity in combination with background color, like this:
#container {
border: solid gold 1px;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
background:rgba(56,255,255,0.1);
}
#box {
border: solid silver 1px;
margin: 10px;
width: 300px;
height: 100px;
background:rgba(205,206,255,0.1);
}
<div id="container">
containter text
<div id="box">
box text
</div>
</div>
Live demo
As far as I know you can't do it in a simple way. There a couple of options here:
Use absolute positioning to position box "inside" the container.
#container {
opacity: 0.3;
background-color: #777788;
position: absolute;
top: 100px;
left: 100px;
height: 150px;
width: 300px;
}
#box {
opacity: 1;
background-color: #ffffff;
position: absolute;
top: 110px;
left: 110px;
height: 130px;
width: 270px;
}
<div id="container"></div>
<div id="box">
<p>Something in here</p>
</div>
Use Javascript - almost the same as above, but position and size don't have to be hardcoded.
You can't apply an opacity property without affecting a child element!
"Opacity applies to the element as a whole, including its contents, even though the value is not inherited by child elements. Thus, the element and its children all have the same opacity relative to the element's background, even if they have different opacities relative to one another... If you do not want to apply opacity to child elements, use the background property instead." https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/opacity
If you want the opacity to be applied only to the background, without affecting the child elements, use:
background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, .3)
However, you can achieve the desired effect if you place them inside a div parent element and use CSS position property:
.parent {
border: solid green 3px;
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
}
.sibling-one {
border: solid red 3px;
position: absolute;
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
opacity: .3;
}
.sibling-two {
border: solid blue 1px;
margin: 10px;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
transform: translateY(50%);
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="sibling-one">
<p>A sibling's one element</p>
</div>
<div class="sibling-two">
<p>A sibling's two element</p>
</div>
</div>
Try using rgba as a 'pre content' overlay to your image, its a good way to keep things responsive and for none of the other elements to be effected.
header #inner_header_post_thumb {
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
position: relative;
background-image: url(https://images.pexels.com/photos/730480/pexels-photo-730480.jpeg?w=1260&h=750&auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb);
border-bottom: 4px solid #222;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay {
position: relative;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt {
padding-top: 220px;
padding-bottom: 220px;
color: #ffffff;
text-align:center;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt h1 {
font-size: 40px;
color: #ffffff;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt h3 {
font-size: 24px;
color: #ffffff;
font-weight: 300;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt p {
font-size: 18px;
font-weight: 300;
}
header #inner_header_post_thumb .dark_overlay .container .header-txt p strong {
font-weight: 700;
}
<header>
<div id="inner_header_post_thumb">
<div class="dark_overlay">
<div class="container">
<div class="row header-txt">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12">
<h1>Title On Dark A Underlay</h1>
<h3>Have a dark background image overlay without affecting other elements</h3>
<p>No longer any need to re-save backgrounds as .png ... <strong>Awesome</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
See a working codepen here
Using background-color: rgba(#777788, 0.3); instead of opacity could maybe fix the problem.
Apply this css rule
.alpha60 {
/* Fallback for web browsers that doesn't support RGBa */
background: rgb(0, 0, 0);
/* RGBa with 0.6 opacity */
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.6);
/* For IE 5.5 - 7*/
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#99000000, endColorstr=#99000000);
/* For IE 8*/
-ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#99000000, endColorstr=#99000000)";
}
In addition to this, you have to declare background: transparent for IE web browsers.
For more details visit the following link:
http://robertnyman.com/2010/01/11/css-background-transparency-without-affecting-child-elements-through-rgba-and-filters/
Any child of an element with opacity set will take on that opacity.
To achieve this style you could use rgba colours and filters for IE for the background, and opacity on the textual elements. So long as the second box isn't a child of one of the text elements, then it won't inherit the opacity.
Another workaround is to simply use an overlay background to create a similar effect.
I personally like a black overlay with about a 65% opacity, but for what you are trying to do you may want to use a white overlay at round 70%.
Create a small (100 x 100 or less) PNG in Photoshop or GIMP that has the color and opacity you want. Then just set that as the background of your light box.
If you create multiple PNGs at different opacities you can easily switch between them with JS or dynamically at load via backend scripting.
It's not technically what you are trying to do, but aesthetically it can give a very similar effect and UX wise accomplishes the same thing. It is also very easy to do, and widely supported across pretty much everything.
Opacity will always inherits by the child element regardless whatever the element in there, there is no workaround up to today have suggested, when the moving of the child element outside the transparency background is not an option like in a popup menu/dialog box creation, use of background with the rgba is the solution.
Here is a input box that i created that i can turn on or off with the class property invisible by javascript
<div id="blackout" class="invisible">
<div id="middlebox">
<p>Enter the field name: </p>
<input type="text" id="fieldvalue" />
<input type="button" value="OK" id="addfname" />
</div>
</div>
CSS
#blackout {
z-index: 9999;
background: rgba(200, 200, 200, 0.6);
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: block;
padding: 0px;
clear: both;
float: left;
position: absolute;
margin-top: -10px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: -10px;
}
#blackout #middlebox {
border: thick solid #333;
margin: 0px;
height: 150px;
width: 300px;
background-color: #FFF;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
-ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
padding: 10px 50px 0px 50px;
}
#middlebox p {
float: left;
width:100%;
clear:both;
}
#middlebox input {
clear:both;
margin-bottom:10px;
}
#middlebox input[type=text]{
width:100%;
}
#middlebox input[type=button]{
float:right;
width:30%;
}
.invisible{
visibility:hidden !important;
}
Use such elements that you can add :before or :after. My solution
<div class="container">
<div>
Inside of container element is not effected by opacity.
</div>
</div>
Css.
.container{
position: relative;
}
.container::before{
content: '';
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
background-color: #000000;
opacity: .25
}
This might not be the most orthodox method but you can use a small semi-transparent background image for each div / container that repeats. It does seem that in this day and age you should be able to achieve this in pure (simple not hackish) css with no js but as the answers above show it isn't that straight forward...
Using a tiled image might seem dated but will work no worries across all browsers.
You can add a container's sibling absolutely positioned behind container, with the same size, and apply opacity to it.
And use no background on your container.
Now container's children have no opaque parent and the problem vanishes.