Selecting all links except hovered one CSS only - html

I'm trying to make a CSS selector that matches all links except the hovered one.
Naturally I though of using the ~ operator to catch around elements:
a:hover ~a
This works fine but it only matches elements after the hovered one, and I would like to get the ones before as well. So I though of using this:
a:hover ~a, a ~a:hover
But no success.
Here is a JSFiddle that shows what I am talking about.Of course I know I could do it easily with jQuery but I like to exploit CSS as much as possible when I think javascript can be avoided.

You cant do what you are explicitly after, without using JavaScript due to the way CSS selectors work based on DOM hierarchy and their limited potential for traversal.
However, given what I imagine you are trying to achieve, why not apply the hover to the parent element and exclude the currently hovered a?
Demo Fiddle
(and an alternative)
div:hover a:not(:hover){
color:red;
}

Demo (with green and red color)
css
a {
color: #f00;
}
div {
display: inline-block;
}
#scope1:hover > a, #scope2:hover > a{
color : #0f0;
}
#scope1 a:hover, #scope2 a:hover {
color : #f00 ;
}

The following selector matches all links except a hovered link:
a[href]:not(:hover)
When no link is hovered, this matches all links, which logically satisfies the requirement.
Note that a matches all a elements, including <a name=...>...</a> (outdated, but works) and <a>...</a> (valid, mentioned in HTML5 specs). Using a[href] restricts us to a elements that have href attribute, i.e. to links.
If you actually meant to ask for a selector that matches all links except a hovered link if there is a hovered link and no element otherwise, then there is no CSS solution (but there are JavaScript solutions).

Related

parent class properties not getting applied to child anchor tag element

I was creating a navbar that has a class top-navbar. I included a few anchor tags in the div. When I used the CSS property color: black on the class, the anchor text was still blue(the original color). Instead when I used the property color: black on the anchor tag itself it works? Why doesn't it work on the class property, isn't it inherited by all elements that follow in the div with class = nav-bar-items The markup is as follows:
<div class="top-navbar">
<img class="logo-img" src="https://freesvg.org/download/47093">
<div class="nav-bar-items">
about
notes
contact
</div>
</div>
There are lot of solution you already know how to turn your anchor text black.
But your question was why is is not inheriting? Here is my explanation of why it didn't work for you for provided css.
CSS Specificity
Rule to calculate specificity is defined by {style, ids, [classes, attributes and pseudo-classes], [elements and pseudo-elements] }
If we calculate the specificity of selectors on anchor tag, we will have the answer.
a:-webkit-any-link (User Agent) -> 0011 (1 for pseudo-classes and 1
for element)
.top-navbar -> 0010
So clearly here user agent styling wins and take over so the color is still blue, check below snapshot.
Reference to read more about it -
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/07/css-specificity-things-you-should-know/
https://specificity.keegan.st/
https://css-tricks.com/specifics-on-css-specificity/
I honestly don't know why and I am pretty sure it was already answered here on SO, but why even bother with it when you can just target your links? Just some Examples, there's even more ways:
.nav-bar-items a {
color:red;
}
.nav-bar-items > *{
color:red;
}
Read about selectors:
CSS_Selectors
The a tags are getting browser default styling and need something more specific to override it:
.nav-bar-items a {
color: black;
}
The <a> tags are loaded with default styling properties. There are different methods to customize.
1. By using inheritance
.nav-bar-items > a {
color: inherit;
text-decoration: inherit;
};
2. override
.nav-bar-items a {
color:color-name;
};
3. This one is only, if your parent class has a single child <a> tag then you can use it.
a:only-child {
color: color-name;
};

Can I use CSS to change a bookmark's properties when its link is being hovered over?

If I have a simple HTML and CSS document using bookmarks (named links) and ordinary links, is it possible to alter a bookmark (eg. change its color) when its link is being hovered over.
For example, if I have the following HTML
...
<a name="bookmark1">Bookmark One</a>
<a name="bookmark2">Bookmark Two</a>
<a name="bookmark3">Bookmark Three</a>
...
Link to BM#1
...
can I write CSS along the lines of:
a:hover
{
"the bookmark's color": red
}
which would have the effect of changing the bookmark's font (and not its link's) color to red? That is, the text "Bookmark One" changes color, not "Link to BM#1".
UPDATE: thanks to everyone who answered. In summary, it seems you can't affect the target of a link while hovering over it using just CSS. You need to resort to javascript. For my simple purposes I didn't want to go the trouble, so I selected the answer that was CSS only but required clicking on the link.
This can be done using the general sibling combinator but the source order will have to be different, the links that reference the named links must come before the named links since your selector is targeting the named links.
Link to BM#1
Link to BM#2
<a name="bookmark1">Bookmark One</a>
<a name="bookmark2">Bookmark Two</a>
<a name="bookmark3">Bookmark Three</a>
Another problem with this is that since there aren't variables or back-references in CSS you must explicitly make a CSS selector for each of the links you want to do this with.
a:hover[href="#bookmark1"] ~ a[name="bookmark1"],
a:hover[href="#bookmark2"] ~ a[name="bookmark2"] {
color: red;
}
Example 1
You'll notice in Example 1 "bookmark3" doesn't highlight since there is no rule referencing it.
A much more general and easier to maintain approach would be to highlight the named link after the link to it was clicked instead of on hover. You could do this with a simple :target selector
a:target {
color: red;
}
Example 2
If you are absolutely married to the idea that it must be on hover and don't mind using JavaScript you could do it with a little bit of jQuery:
$('a[href^="#bookmark"]').hover(function() {
// grab target of this link and remove the leading hash
var name = $(this).attr('href').replace(/^.*#/, '');
$('a[name="' + name + '"]').addClass('highlightedbookmark');
}, function() {
// grab target of this link and remove the leading hash
var name = $(this).attr('href').replace(/^.*#/, '');
$('a[name="' + name + '"]').removeClass('highlightedbookmark');
});
Example 3
Better yet this solution doesn't have the HTML source order restrictions that the pure CSS method does: Example 4
Assuming the ellipses in your question imply the location of your bookmarks, and they are the immediately following sibling of the links, you can use the adjacent-sibling selector:
div:hover + div {
color: blue;
}
JS Fiddle demo
Reference:
adjacent-sibling selector (CSS2).
You can assign a class to the bookmark link. See the below example:
HTML
<a name="bookmark1" class="bookmark">Bookmark One</a>
Link to BM#1
CSS
a:hover{
color: red;
}
a.bookmark:hover{
color: blue;
}
That way your normal links will hover RED (in this example) and your bookmark links will hover BLUE.
Use attribute selector:
a[name]:hover {
color: red;
}
You have to use the color tag to alter the color of text. It'd be also better if you use an id or class.
a:hover{
color:red;
}
#bookmark a:hover{
color:red;
}
EDIT
In case the text to be changes is different from the link text then you can use jQuery to do it, ex:
$("#boomkark-link").hover( function(){
$("#bookmark").css('color', 'RED');
}
#dave; may be you can define it with simple css declaration.
.wrap1 a, .wrap2 a{
background:green;
}
.wrap1 a:hover, .wrap2 a:hover{
background:red;
}
a{background:yellow;}
a:hover{background:pink;}
If the links are in different divs & you want to target an specific a tag.
check this for more http://jsfiddle.net/sandeep/RsmAg/
EDIT:
may be nth-child is also an option. Check THIS

How to script CSS to achieve hide/appear effect based on hover

Ignoring internet explorer 6 and latter, how do I script the css to achieve the following results:
It would hide the information until UpgradeI, UpgradeII or UpgradeIII is hovered. Site link is Here
There is around 500 pages like that, so tweaking or adding javascript in the html is not feasible. I think CSS is the way to go to do this, but I've tried:
div.UpgradeI {display:none;}
div.UpgradeI:hover {display:inline;}
but it just hides everything and doesn't show the information when hovered. Anyway, if its not possible to achieve the same result using css only, please show me what code to add. Thanks!
Okay, it's possible to do this with CSS. First of all, those styles you suggest don't work because if it starts out with display:none, there is nothing to hover on for the next style to kick in.
I was able to add this to your site with Firebug:
div.UpgradeI,
div.UpgradeII,
div.UpgradeIII {
height:20px;
overflow:hidden;
}
div.UpgradeI:hover,
div.UpgradeII:hover,
div.UpgradeIII:hover {
height:auto;
}
That is the ugliest hack in history, but it achieves the desired effect without changing the HTML or adding Javascript. The paragraph below doesn't slide up because everything is positioned absolutely. If you start using float styles for everything else, though, it'll work.
Obviously, you can edit the height to show more/less of the div as necessary.
It would be hard to do it with only css. Because once you set the element style to display:none, it's not possible to catch the :hover event by the element.
I would suggest to use jquery to create a place holder element at the empty place. When the mouse hover over this element, then display the alternative "real" element.
you can try this plug in to see if you like it.
http://cherne.net/brian/resources/jquery.hoverIntent.html
UpgradeI table, UpgradeII table, UpgradeIII table {
display: none;
}
UpgradeI table:first-child, UpgradeII table:first-child, UpgradeIII table:first-child {
display: inline;
}
UpgradeI:hover table, UpgradeII:hover table, UpgradeIII:hover table {
display: inline;
}
By the way: Your markup is painfully.
This works on Firefox 4.0 (and probably Firefox 3.0, Chrome, Safari, etc; though I did not test on them). This definitely won't work on IE6, because IE6 does not support :hover on arbitrary element, :nth-child() selector, and the sibling selector (~):
div.UpgradeI table:first-child ~ *:nth-child(n+3), div.UpgradeII table:first-child ~ *:nth-child(n+3), div.UpgradeIII table:first-child ~ *:nth-child(n+3) {
display: none;
}
div.UpgradeI table:first-child:hover ~ *, div.UpgradeII table:first-child:hover ~ *, div.UpgradeIII table:first-child:hover ~ * {
display: block;
}

changing html text colors with css

I have the following html snippet:
page title goes here<br />
<span class="username">username goes here: </span><span class="dateandtime">date the time go here</span>
Here is the css for these classes
.title
{
color:#707070;
}
.username
{
color:#8DAAB8;
}
.dateandtime
{
color:#A5A7AC;
}
Is it possible to change the colors of these 3 items when hovering over the title?
The colors I want the items to change to are as follows
title = 000000
username = DF821B
dateandtime = 3185B6
Not sure if this is possible with css, if the html snippet structure needs to change, that will not be a problem.
I know this can be done with javascript, but wanted to know if it is possible without javascript.
Use the :hover pseudoclass:
.title:hover
{
color: #000000;
}
etc. This works in all browsers, except in IE6 and earlier, which doesn't support :hover on anything other than hyperlinks (A elements).
Edit 1: I see you want to change them all while hovering over the title. In that case, it becomes a little more complicated. You should put a <div> around it and apply the :hover pseudoclass on that. It won't just be the title (which is also possible, but has even less chance of working in IE). For that:
<div class="someclass">Title<span class="username">username</span><span class="dateandtime">date and time</span></div>
is your HTML, but your CSS would be:
.someclass .title:hover { color: #000000; }
.someclass .title:hover ~ .username { color: #DF821B; }
.someclass .title:hover ~ .dateandtime { color: #3185B6; }
Where ~ is the sibling selector (meaning it should have the same parent (.someclass) as the .title:hover).
#Harry Joy: No, it's not. My answer is different, not to mention I don't have enough rep to post comments.
Edit 2:
As requested, to make them all change while hovering over the entire container, use the above HTML with the following CSS:
.someclass:hover .title { color: #000000; }
.someclass:hover .username { color: #DF821B; }
.someclass:hover .dateandtime { color: #3185B6; }
(though basically credit for that goes to Spudley for suggesting it first).
Not totally clear on the question -- do you want each of them to have their own hover colour, or do you want all three to change colour at once, when you hover on any of them?
In the first case, it's easy: just add a :hover style for each of the three elements (you already have answers to this effect, so I won't repeat them here).
In the second case, you'll need a container element that would take the hover, so your code would look like this:
<span class='container'>
page title goes here<br />
<span class="username">username goes here: </span><span class="dateandtime">date the time go here</span>
</span>
(you may want to use <div> rather than <span>, but I'll leave that up to you)
Your CSS would then look like this:
.title {color:#707070;}
.username {color:#8DAAB8;}
.dateandtime {color:#A5A7AC;}
.container:hover .title {color:#000000;}
.container:hover .username {color:#DF821B;}
.container:hover .dateandtime {color:#3185B6;}
Obviously, change the colours in the new styles to whatever you want them to be. If all three should be the same, then you could simplify the three new styles down to something like this:
.container:hover span, .container:hover a, {color:#000000;}
Hope that helps.
One final thing to note: IE6 and below do not support the :hover style on anything except <a> elements. My recommendation to you is simply not to support IE6 for your site (there are plenty of other things broken in IE6 too), but if you do need to support it, there are hacks available to get :hover to work with it. See Whatever:Hover.
It's definitely possible, just append this to your CSS:
.title:hover
{
color:#000000;
}
.username:hover
{
color:#DF821B;
}
.dateandtime:hover
{
color:#3185B6;
}
This called a pseudo-class and will make your anchors change color when hovered )
Edit:
At first I misunderstood your question, this isn't the solution!
You can't do this in CSS alone, but you can do it jQuery easily!
Here's an example.
What you need to do is set up a class for each of the hovered states, then use jQuery to replace add a class that will change the colors as you want :)
You just have to include the jQuery framework if you haven't already:
In the <head>:
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
Well you could do this one of two ways but not with CSS, you can either add and remove the appropriate classes (unobtrusive JavaScript) or change the styles directly. For instance:
document.getElementById('someElement').style.color = '#FF0000';
Or you can use a JavaScript library such as jQuery.
jQuery('p.someClass').mouseOver(function(e) {
e.target.style.color = '#FF0000';
})
.mouseOut(function(e) {
e.target.style.color = '#000000';
});

Proper way to change individual list item bullets

I have css like this:
.done {list-style-image:url('images/tick.gif')}
.notdone {list-style-image:url('images/cross.gif')}
And html like this:
<ul>
<li class="done">Done</li>
<li class="notdone">Not Done</li>
</ul>
Works great on IE6 and FF. Each li item has a different image for the bullet. But all of the docs I see on list-style-image says it should be applied to to the ul tag.
Is there a proper or standards-based way of doing what I am trying to do, or is this it?
EDIT: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html
It looks like it doesn't say that I CAN'T use list-style-image on an li tag, but the examples don't show that.
I believe docs you are referring to is when you want the bullets to follow a certain format, which is why the class is applied at the parent tag
<ul>
in those cases. Since you have two images that each you want to have its own bullet I see nothing wrong with what you are doing
The CSS 2.1 standard gives examples where list-style is applied directly to an li.
Although authors may specify 'list-style' information directly on list item elements (e.g., "li" in HTML), they should do so with care.
Followed by:
ol.alpha li { list-style: lower-alpha } /* Any "li" descendant of an "ol" */
ol.alpha > li { list-style: lower-alpha } /* Any "li" child of an "ol" */
So I would draw the conclusion that it is OK to apply list-style-type or list-style-image to list items directly, as long as you are careful and understand the cascade of your CSS rule.
Following up to your edit...
If you look at the default style sheet for CSS, you will see that li is defined as follows:
li { display: list-item }
In the link you provided, list-style-image is valid on any element with display: list-item. Therefore, according to the standard, what you are doing is valid.
I've run into inconsistencies when it comes to the spacing of a list-image from browser to browser. As a result, I would usually skip the whole issue, and do something like this instead:
li {list-style: none; padding-left: 15px;}
li.done {background: url(images/tick.gif) no-repeat left top;}
li.notdone {background: url(images/cross.gif) no-repeat left top;}
The end result is a bullet using the same images you intended in the first place, but you have much more control over the actual placement and spacing. Tweaking needed probably, but that's the general idea.
I don't see a problem with what you are doing. What docs are you talking about?
In theory all entries in a list have the same bullet style. Those lists are historically found in things like outlines where at any level you have 1,2,3 or A,B,C and it would make no sense to mix the different ordinal types with one another. I don't think there's anything wrong with doing what you are doing stylistically. But I don't know if it is correct CSS.