Concept
3 Tables:
Events (INT EventRid, Title, Desc, ....)
Participants (INT ParticipantRid, FirstName, LastName,Address....)
ParticipantEventMap(INT refEventRid,INT refParticipantRid)
Application (without significant re-write) will attempt to submit the data about the event (1 field per Event table field PLUS a field 'Participants' which is a comma separated list of ParticipantRids). The fields in the events table are easy to add/update but I seek a means of submitting a query which will do something along the lines of:
INSERT INTO ParticipantEventMap (refEventRid,refParticipantRid)
VALUES (10003211,(Participants));
Of course this is totally invalid SQL syntax, the idea being that it would expand (10003211,(Participants)) into (10003211,ParticipantRid[1]),(10003211,ParticipantRid[2]),...
Is there a way do this as an SQL query, or am I required to perform all mangling on the PHP side before submitting separate queries?
INSERT IGNORE INTO ParticipantEventMap (
SELECT
1002324 as refProgramEventRid,
ParticipantRid as refParticipantRid
FROM Participants where ParticipantRid in (1,2,3,4));
Thus by replacing 1002324 with {EventID} and 1,2,3,4 with {Participants} in the PHP prepared statement I get the desired result! For those interested the app I'm trying to make this work in is DHTMLx Scheduler module.
Related
Is it possible to achieve something like this?
Suppose name and plural_name are fields of Animal's table.
Suppose pluralise_animal is a helper function which takes a string and returns its plural literal.
I cannot loop over the animal records for technical reasons.
This is just an example
Animal.update_all("plural_name = ?", pluralise_animal("I WANT THE ANIMAL NAME HERE, the `name` column's value"))
I want something similar to how you can use functions in MySQL while modifying column values. Is this out-of-scope or possible?
UPDATE animals SET plural_name = CONCAT(name, 's') -- just an example to explain what I mean by referencing a column. I'm aware of the problems in this example.
Thanks in advance
I cannot loop over the animal records for technical reasons.
Sorry, this cannot be done with this restriction.
If your pluralizing helper function is implemented in the client, then you have to fetch data values back to the client, pluralize them, and then post them back to the database.
If you want the UPDATE to run against a set of rows without fetching data values back to the client, then you must implement the pluralization logic in an SQL expression, or a stored function or something.
UPDATE statements run in the database engine. They cannot call functions in the client.
Use a ruby script to generate a SQL script that INSERTS the plural values into a temp table
File.open(filename, 'w') do |file|
file.puts "CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE pluralised_animals(id INT, plural varchar(50));"
file.puts "INSERT INTO pluralised_animals(id, plural) VALUES"
Animal.each.do |animal|
file.puts( "( #{animal.id}, #{pluralise_animal(animal.name)}),"
end
end
Note: replace the trailing comma(,) with a semicolon (;)
Then run the generated SQL script in the database to populate the temp table.
Finally run a SQL update statement in the database that joins the temp table to the main table...
UPDATE animals a
INNER JOIN pluralised_animals pa
ON a.id = pa.id
SET a.plural_name = pa.plural;
If I have a database having 2 fields, Roll no and name and I have a list (of n values) of roll numbers for which I have to search the corresponding names.
Can this be done using just one query in SQL or HQL?
SELECT name FROM [table] WHERE id IN ([list of ids])
where [list of ids] is for example 2,3,5,7.
Use the IN operator and separate your Roll no's by a comma.
SELECT name
FROM yourtable
WHERE [Roll no] IN (1, 2, 3, 4, etc)
You can use the IN statement as shown above.
There are a couple of minor issues with this. It can perform poorly if the number of values in the clause gets too large.
The second issue is that in many development environments you land up needing to dynamically create the query with a variable number of items (or a variable number of placeholders if using parameterised queries). While not difficult if does make your code look messy and mean you haven't got a nice neat piece of SQL that you can copy out and use to test.
But examples (using php).
Here the IN is just dynamically created with the SQL. Assuming the roll numbers can only be integers it is applying intval() to each member of the array to avoid any non integer values being used in the SQL.
<?php
$list_of_roll_no = array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9);
$sql = "SELECT FROM some_table WHERE `Roll no` IN (".implode(", ", array_map ('intval', $list_of_roll_no)).")";
?>
Using mysqli bound parameters is a bit messy. This is because the bind parameter statement expects a variable number of parameters. The 2nd parameter onwards are the values to be bound, and it expects them to be passed by reference. So the foreach here is used to generate an array of references:-
<?php
$list_of_roll_no = array(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9);
if ($stmt = $mysqli->prepare("SELECT FROM some_table WHERE `Roll no` IN (".implode(",", array_fill(0, count($list_of_roll_no), '?')).")"))
{
$bind_arguments = [];
$bind_arguments[] = str_repeat("i", count($list_of_roll_no));
foreach ($list_of_roll_no as $list_of_roll_no_key => $list_of_roll_no_value)
{
$bind_arguments[] = & $list_of_roll_no[$list_of_roll_no_key]; # bind to array ref, not to the temporary $recordvalue
}
call_user_func_array(array($statement, 'bind_param'), $bind_arguments);
$statement->execute();
}
?>
Another solution is to push all the values into another table. Can be a temp table. Then you use an INNER JOIN between your table and your temp table to find the matching values. Depending on what you already have in place then this is quite easy to do (eg, I have a php class to insert multiple records easily - I just keep passing them across and the class batches them up and inserts them occasionally to avoid repeatedly hitting the database).
I have this union statement when I try to take parameters from a form and pass it to a union select statement it says too many parameters. This is using MS ACCESS.
SELECT Statement FROM table 1 where Date = Between [Forms]![DateIN]![StartDate]
UNION
SELECT Statement FROM table 2 where Date = Between [Forms]![DateIN]![StartDate]
This is the first time I am using windows DB applications to do Database apps. I am Linux type of person and always use MySQL for my projects but for this one have to use MS Access.
Is there anther way to pass parameters to UNION Statement because this method of defining values in a form can work on Single SELECT statements. But I don't know why this problem exist.
Between "Determines whether the value of an expression falls within a specified range of values" like this ...
expr [Not] Between value1 And value2
But your query only gives it one value ... Between [Forms]![DateIN]![StartDate]
So you need to add And plus another date value ...
Between [Forms]![DateIN]![StartDate] And some_other_date
Also Date is a reserved word. If you're using it as a field name, enclose it in brackets to avoid confusing the db engine: [Date]
If practical, rename the field to avoid similar problems in the future.
And as Gord pointed out, you must also bracket table names which include a space. The same applies to field names.
Still getting problems when using this method of calling the values or dates from the form to be used on the UNION statement. Here is the actual query that I am trying to use.
I don't want to recreate the wheel but I was thinking that if the Date() can be used with between Date() and Date()-6 to represent a 7 days range then I might have to right a module that takes the values from the for and then returns the values that way I can do something like Sdate() and Edate() then this can be used with Between Sdate() and Edate().
I have not tried this yet but this can be my last option I don't even know if it will work but it is worth a try. But before i do that i want to try all the resources that Access can help me make my life easy such as its OO Stuff it has for helping DB programmers.
SELECT
"Expenditure" as [TransactionType], *
FROM
Expenditures
WHERE
(((Expenditures.DateofExpe) Between [Forms]!Form1![Text0] and [Forms]![Form1]![Text11]))
UNION
SELECT
"Income" as [TransactionType], *
FROM
Income
WHERE
(((Income.DateofIncom) Between [Forms]!Form1![Text0] and [Forms]![Form1]![Text11] ));
Access VBA has great power but I don't want to use it as of yet as it will be hard to modify changes for a user that does not know how to program. trying to keep this DB app simple as possible for a dumb user to fully operate.
Any comments is much appreciated.
hi i am executing nested "select" query in mysql .
the query is
SELECT `btitle` FROM `backlog` WHERE `bid` in (SELECT `abacklog_id` FROM `asprint` WHERE `aid`=184 )
I am not getting expected answer by the above query. If I execute:
SELECT abacklog_id FROM asprint WHERE aid=184
separately
I will get abacklog_id as 42,43,44,45;
So if again I execute:
SELECT `btitle` FROM `backlog` WHERE `bid` in(42,43,44,45)
I will get btitle as scrum1 scrum2 scrum3 msoffice
But if I combine those queries I will get only scrum1 remaining 3 atitle will not get.
You Can Try As Like Following...
SELECT `age_backlog`.`ab_title` FROM `age_backlog` LEFT JOIN `age_sprint` ON `age_backlog`.`ab_id` = `age_sprint`.`as_backlog_id` WHERE `age_sprint`.`as_id` = 184
By using this query you will get result with loop . You will be able to get all result with same by place with comma separated by using IMPLODE function ..
May it will be helpful for you... If you get any error , Please inform me...
What you did is to store comma separated values in age_sprint.as_backlog_id, right?
Your query actually becomes
SELECT `ab_title` FROM `age_backlog` WHERE `ab_id` IN ('42,43,44,45')
Note the ' in the IN() function. You don't get separate numbers, you get one string.
Now, when you do
SELECT CAST('42,43,44,45' AS SIGNED)
which basically is the implicit cast MySQL does, the result is 42. That's why you just get scrum1 as result.
You can search for dozens of answers to this problem here on SO.
You should never ever store comma separated values in a database. It violates the first normal form. In most cases databases are in third normal form or BCNF or even higher. Lower normal forms are just used in some special cases to get the most performance, usually for reporting issues. Not for actually working with data. You want 1 row for every as_backlog_id.
Again, your primary goal should be to get a better database design, not to write some crazy functions to get each comma separated number out of the field.
I am developing a PHP script and I have a table like this:
TABLE_CODE
code varchar 8
name varchar 30
this code column has to be a code using random letters from A to Z and characters from 0 to 9 and has to be unique. all uppercase. Something like
A4RTX33Z
I have create a method to generate this code using PHP. But this is a intensive task because I have to query the database to see if the generated code is unique before proceeding and the table may have a lot of records.
Because I know mySQL is a bag of tricks but not having advanced knowledge about it now, I wonder if there's some mechanism that could be built in a table to run a script (or something) every time a new record in created on that table to fill the code column with a unique value.
thanks
edit: What I wonder is if there's a way to created the code on-the-fly, as the record is being added to the table and that code being unique.
Better generate these codes in SQL. This is 8-character random "Promo code generator":
INSERT IGNORE INTO
TABLE_CODE(name, code)
VALUES(
UPPER(SUBSTRING(MD5(RAND()) FROM 1 FOR 8)), -- random 8 characters fixed length
'your code name'
)
Add UNIQUE on code field as #JW suggested, and some error-handling in PHP, because sometimes generated value may be not UNIQUE, and MySQL will raise error in that situation.
Adding a UNIQUE constraint on the code column is the first thing you would need to do. Then, to insert the code I would write a small loop like this:
// INSERT IGNORE will not generate an error if the code already exists
// rather, the affected rows will be 0.
$stmt = $db->prepare('INSERT IGNORE INTO table_code (code, name) VALUES (?, ?)');
$name = 'whatever name';
do {
$code = func_to_generate_code();
$stmt->execute(array($code, $name));
} while (!$stmt->rowCount()); // repeat until at least one row affected
As the table grows the number of loops may increase, so if you feel it should only try three times, you could add it as a loop condition and throw an error if that happens.
Btw, I would suggest using transactions to make sure if an error occurs after the code generation, rolling back will make sure the code is removed (can be reused).