I have two tables tt1 and tt2 both contains same fields. I want to sort data by no from both table.
Table : tt1
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tt1` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`no` varchar(5) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=4 ;
INSERT INTO `tt1` (`id`, `no`) VALUES
(1, '1A'),
(2, '3A'),
(3, '2A');
Table : tt2
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tt2` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`no` varchar(5) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=4 ;
INSERT INTO `tt2` (`id`, `no`) VALUES
(1, '2A'),
(2, '3A'),
(3, '1A');
Expected output
ID | No
========
1 | 1A
3 | 1A
1 | 2A
3 | 2A
2 | 3A
2 | 3A
I want to ascending order of no field from both table as given output how I can get.
SQLFiddle
In this case using order by after every select is wrong (won't return desired output), because that will order both row-sets separately and union them after that.
What you want here is to order already combined data, therefore you should be using order by only once, after mysql makes union of tables (i.e. combines), because once it combines tables it has all data together but unordered, so when mysql sees order by it orders whole data for you.
Sample:
select * from `tt1`
union all
select * from `tt2`
order by `no`
Note: I've noticed you have wrong syntax in your fiddle. You need to add parentheses:
(select * from tt1 order by no)
union
(select * from tt2 order by no)
Note 2: Thanks #AlmaDo's notice. You should not use * with union queries. Because modification of your tables columns will break query. Use column names that you actually need. E.g. query in sample becomes:
select `id`, `no` from `tt1`
union all
select `id`, `no` from `tt2`
order by `no`
Related
I have very simple table like below
CREATE TABLE `tbl_data` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`won` tinyint(4) NOT NULL,
`time` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT current_timestamp()
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
--
-- Dumping data for table `tbl_data`
--
INSERT INTO `tbl_data` (`id`, `won`, `time`) VALUES
(1, 1, '2022-10-18 05:21:37'),
(2, 2, '2022-10-18 05:21:37'),
(5, 0, '2022-10-18 05:22:02'),
(6, 2, '2022-10-18 05:22:02'),
(7, 2, '2022-10-18 05:22:18'),
(8, 1, '2022-10-18 05:22:18');
--
-- Indexes for dumped tables
--
--
-- Indexes for table `tbl_data`
--
ALTER TABLE `tbl_data`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`);
--
-- AUTO_INCREMENT for dumped tables
--
--
-- AUTO_INCREMENT for table `tbl_data`
--
ALTER TABLE `tbl_data`
MODIFY `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, AUTO_INCREMENT=9;
COMMIT;
What I am trying to achieve is select all rows which contains pattern of won like 0,2,2
so it will select id called 5,6,7 in above example.
if my pattern is like 1,2
it should select ids called 1 and 2 like this.
Database Fiddle is here
https://www.db-fiddle.com/#&togetherjs=RDJuie555L
I am finding solution from last hour but not able to achieve the goal. Let me know if any expert here can help me for same.
Thanks!
WITH cte AS (
SELECT id id0,
LEAD(id) OVER w id1,
LEAD(id,2) OVER w id2,
CONCAT_WS(',',
won,
LEAD(won) OVER w,
LEAD(won,2) OVER w) won_list
FROM tbl_data
WINDOW w AS (ORDER BY id)
)
SELECT tbl_data.*
FROM tbl_data
JOIN cte ON tbl_data.id IN (cte.id0, cte.id1, cte.id2)
WHERE cte.won_list = '0,2,2'
id
won
time
5
0
2022-10-18 05:22:02
6
2
2022-10-18 05:22:02
7
2
2022-10-18 05:22:18
fiddle
PS. If there exists more than one copy of needed pattern then the rows will mix. Add ORDER BY id clause to the outer query for to sort output rows and any of cte.idN (N=0..2) to its output list for to see separate pattern groups.
I have this table called task_status which has the following structure:
CREATE TABLE `task_status` (
`task_status_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`status_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`task_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`date_recorded` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
ALTER TABLE `task_status`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`task_status_id`);
ALTER TABLE `task_status`
MODIFY `task_status_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT;
COMMIT;
INSERT INTO `task_status` (`task_status_id`, `status_id`, `task_id`, `date_recorded`) VALUES
(1, 1, 16, 'Wednesday 6th of January 2021 09:20:35 AM'),
(2, 2, 17, 'Wednesday 6th of January 2021 09:20:35 AM'),
(3, 3, 18, 'Wednesday 6th of January 2021 09:20:36 AM');
and a status_list table that has the possible statuses available
CREATE TABLE `status` (
`statuses_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`status` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;
ALTER TABLE `status`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`statuses_id`);
ALTER TABLE `status`
MODIFY `statuses_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, AUTO_INCREMENT=4;
COMMIT;
INSERT INTO `status` (`statuses_id`, `status`) VALUES
(1, 'Yes'),
(2, 'Inprogress'),
(3, 'No');
Now what I want to do is check which number occurred more inside the status_id column 1 occurred more, 2 occurred more or 3 occurred more? using SQL.
Is it possible to do and if so how to?
You can try OVER and PARTITION BY clauses, you simply specify the column you want to partition your aggregated results by.
Example code
select status_id,count(*) over (partition by status_id) as Count_1 from task_status
You can count the column first then filter with max
there is a lot of different way to do this but i prefer using cte.
Here is a example :
with cte as(
select status_id,count(*) cnt from task_status
group by status_id
)
select * from cte
where cnt = (select max(cnt) from cte)
also here is db<>fiddle for better examine.
I modify some data to show the much more understandable output. But idea is same.
also I don't really think status table have any work doing here, but remind me if I misunderstand what you mean.
If you want exactly one status that occurs more often than the others, then I would recommend group by with order by and limit:
select status_id, count(*) as cnt
from task_status
group by status_id
order by cnt desc
limit 1;
This always returns one row, so if there are ties for the most common, then you only get one of the ties.
I have 3 tables, but data is only fetch from 2 tables.
I'm trying to get the lowest bids for selected items and display user name with the lowest bid.
Currently query works until when we display user name, it shows wrong user name, which does not match the bid.
Below is working example of structure and query.
SQL Fiddle
MySQL 5.6 Schema Setup:
CREATE TABLE `bid` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`amount` float NOT NULL,
`user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`item_id` int(11) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=7 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
INSERT INTO `bid` (`id`, `amount`, `user_id`, `item_id`) VALUES
(1, 9, 1, 1),
(2, 5, 2, 1),
(3, 4, 3, 1),
(4, 3, 4, 1),
(5, 4, 2, 2),
(6, 22, 5, 1);
-- --------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE `item` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`name` varchar(100) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=5 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
INSERT INTO `item` (`id`, `name`) VALUES
(1, 'chair'),
(2, 'sofa'),
(3, 'table'),
(4, 'box');
-- --------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE `user` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`name` varchar(100) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=5 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
INSERT INTO `user` (`id`, `name`) VALUES
(1, 'James'),
(2, 'Don'),
(3, 'Hipes'),
(4, 'Sam'),
(5, 'Zakam');
ALTER TABLE `bid`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`);
ALTER TABLE `item`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`);
ALTER TABLE `user`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`);
ALTER TABLE `bid`
MODIFY `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,AUTO_INCREMENT=7;
ALTER TABLE `item`
MODIFY `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,AUTO_INCREMENT=5;
ALTER TABLE `user`
MODIFY `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,AUTO_INCREMENT=5;
Query 1:
SELECT b.id, b.item_id, MIN(b.amount) as amount, b.user_id, p.name
FROM bid b
LEFT JOIN user p ON p.id = b.user_id
WHERE b.item_id in (1, 2)
GROUP BY b.item_id
ORDER BY b.amount, b.item_id
Results:
| id | item_id | amount | user_id | name |
|----|---------|--------|---------|-------|
| 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | Don |
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | James |
Explanation of query:
Get the selected items (1, 2).
get the lowest bid for thous items - MIN(b.amount)
display user names, who has given the bid - LEFT JOIN user p on p.id = b.user_id (this is not working or I'm doing something wrong)
[Note] I can't use sub-query, I'm doing this in doctrine2 (php code) which limits mysql sub-query
No, you are not necessarily fetching the user_id who has given the bid. You group by item_id, so you get one result row per item. So you are aggregating and for every column you say what value you want to see for that item. E.g.:
MIN(b.amount) - the minimum amount of the item's records
MAX(b.amount) - the maximum amount of the item's records
AVG(b.amount) - the avarage amount of the item's records
b.amount - one of the amounts of the item's records arbitrarily chosen (as there are many amounts and you don't specify which you want to see, the DBMS simply choses one of them)
This said, b.user_id isn't necessarily the user who made the lowest bid, but just one random user of the users who made a bid.
Instead find the minimum bids and join again with your bid table to access the realted records:
select bid.id, bid.item_id, bid.amount, user.id as user_id, user.name
from bid
join
(
select item_id, min(amount) as amount
from bid
group by item_id
) as min_bid on min_bid.item_id = bid.item_id and min_bid.amount = bid.amount
join user on user.id = bid.user_id
order by bid.amount, bid.item_id;
You can solve this using a subquery. I am not 100% sure if this is the most efficient way, but at least it works.
SELECT b1.id, b1.item_id, b1.amount, b1.user_id, p.name
FROM bid b1
LEFT JOIN user p ON p.id = b1.user_id
WHERE b1.id = (
SELECT b2.id
FROM bid b2
WHERE b2.item_id IN (1, 2)
ORDER BY b2.amount LIMIT 1
)
This first selects for the lowest bid with for item 1 or 2 and then uses the id of that bid to find the information you need.
Edit
You are saying that Doctrine does not support subqueries. I have not used Doctrine a lot, but something like this should work:
$subQueryBuilder = $entityManager->createQueryBuilder();
$subQuery = $subQueryBuilder
->select('b2.id')
->from('bid', 'b2')
->where('b2.item_id IN (:items)')
->orderBy('b2.amount')
->setMaxResults(1)
->getDql();
$queryBuilder = $entityManager->createQueryBuilder();
$query = $queryBuilder
->select('b1.id', 'b1.item_id', 'b1.amount', 'b1.user_id', 'p.name')
->from('bid', 'b1')
->leftJoin('user', 'p', 'with', 'p.id = b1.user_id')
->where('b1.id = (' . $subQuery . ')')
->setParameter('items', [1, 2])
->getQuery()->getSingleResult();
This is what I would like to achieve:
Show 50 last students and their cheapest products.
If product doesn't exist present empty values.
Here is the SELECT query:
SELECT
students.*,
cs.cheapest_id,
cs.cheapest_price
FROM students
LEFT JOIN (SELECT iqs.* FROM (
SELECT
student_id,
id AS cheapest_id,
price AS cheapest_price
FROM products
ORDER BY price ASC
) AS iqs
GROUP BY iqs.student_id) AS cs ON cs.student_id = students.id
ORDER BY students.name DESC
LIMIT 50;
Creating tables:
CREATE TABLE `students` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`name` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=3 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `students` VALUES ('1', 'Mark');
INSERT INTO `students` VALUES ('2', 'Chris');
CREATE TABLE `products` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`student_id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
`price` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `student_id` (`student_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=4 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `products` VALUES ('1', '1', '2');
INSERT INTO `products` VALUES ('2', '1', '3');
Result:
id name cheapest_id cheapest_price
1 Mark 1 2
2 Chris (NULL) (NULL)
Here is the problem:
If there are many records in both tables query is very slow(minutes).
If I use INNER JOIN instead of LEFT JOIN or if I remove "ORDER BY students.name DESC" query is fast.
I have set index on student_id but still it is very slow.
Can anyone please help? I've been struggling with this for days...
Edit: The result of EXPLAIN
1 PRIMARY students ALL 3 Using temporary; Using filesort
1 PRIMARY <derived2> ALL 2
2 DERIVED <derived3> ALL 4 Using temporary; Using filesort
3 DERIVED products ALL 4 Using filesort
Try adding these indexes:
ALTER TABLE `students` ADD INDEX (`id`, `name`);
ALTER TABLE `products` ADD INDEX (`student_id`, `id`, `price`);
and write your query like this:
SELECT students.*,
MIN(products.id) AS cheapest_id,
MIN(products.price) AS cheapest_price
FROM students
LEFT JOIN products ON student_id = students.id
GROUP BY students.id
ORDER BY students.name DESC
LIMIT 50;
You should definately read about the EXPLAIN SELECT syntax and how to index properly:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/explain.html
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization-indexes.html
With EXPLAIN SELET %YOUR QUERY% you can see how MySQL is optimizing the query and how the engine is actually reading your datasets.
I have problem with my query,
I have tables below:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `klik_zona` (
`kode_zona` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`klik` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`kode_zona`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `klik_zona` (`kode_zona`, `klik`) VALUES
(1, 45);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tampil_zona` (
`kode_zona` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
`tanggal` date NOT NULL,
`tampil` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`kode_zona`,`tanggal`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `tampil_zona` (`kode_zona`, `tanggal`, `tampil`) VALUES
(1, '2014-03-16', 100),
(1, '2014-03-17', 23);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `zona_iklan` (
`kode_zona` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
PRIMARY KEY (`kode_zona`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=4 ;
INSERT INTO `zona_iklan` (`kode_zona`) VALUES
(1),
(2),
(3);
I have query:
SELECT z.kode_zona, SUM( tz.tampil ) , SUM( kz.klik )
FROM zona_iklan z
LEFT JOIN tampil_zona tz ON tz.kode_zona = z.kode_zona
LEFT JOIN klik_zona kz ON kz.kode_zona = z.kode_zona
GROUP BY z.kode_zona
but it give result:
kode_zona SUM(tz.tampil) SUM(kz.klik)
1 123 90
2 NULL NULL
3 NULL NULL
I want get result:
kode_zona SUM(tz.tampil) SUM(kz.klik)
1 123 45
2 NULL NULL
3 NULL NULL
please help me.. how to make query so that I get result that I hope it..
thanks,
In your example you join two records from tampil_zona on to one record from zona_iklan, which essentially causes that one record to duplicate. Then you are joining one record in klik_zona on to both of those duplicated records, causing the doubling of results that you want to avoid.
Instead, you need to aggregate the records before you join them, to ensure that you are always joining the records 1-to-1.
SELECT
z.kode_zona, tz.tampil, kz.klik
FROM
zona_iklan AS z
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT kode_zona, SUM(tampil) AS tampil FROM tampil_zona GROUP BY kode_zona) AS tz
ON tz.kode_zona = z.kode_zona
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT kode_zona, SUM(klik) AS klik FROM klik_zona GROUP BY kode_zona) AS kz
ON kz.kode_zona = z.kode_zona
Try removing the GROUP BY and look at the result. You will see that there are two records with kode_zona = 1. This because there are two records in tampil_zona matching that id. You could divide by count(*) but that seems futile. You probably want to think about how to modify the join.