I'm a bit afraid of using floats as I didn't yet understand clearing the floats and all the hacks that are on the internet in regard to that activity so I've used display:inline-block to place two divs in inline fashion. Their container has a
width:auto;
max-width:900px;
and each of the divs has
display:inline-block;
width: 450px;
Now no matter what I do the second div always breaks to another line right below the first div.
Here's the code : http://codepen.io/anon/pen/xgtFd
I have already modified the width of the two divs like for example
width:440px;
but it didn't help. Still the second div is slightly 'off place'. That's weird cause I was making a website and using pretty much the same approach for my header like in this project. Please help me determine the problem.
I would be glad for any help.
The widths are too wide.
Bump the nav down to about 446px, and they come back in line.
Why 444px instead of 450px? Two reasons:
Your border is taking 2px.
There is whitespace between the <div> tags in your markup, which is reflected in the rendering. If you would like it to be able to make it 450px, put the closing div tag and the next opening div tag immediately adjacent, like so: </div><div id="nav">
If you want to be able to keep the border, and set the width to 450px, then you should check out box-sizing, and utilize box-sizing: border-box;.
Edit:
To address your vertical alignment issues, you need to apply vertical-align: top; to the div elements (the nav and logo divs).
And, the ul isn't centered because when you apply display:block to it, it fills the full width. So you could either make the contents of the div centered with text-align: center on the ul, or you could make the ul display: inline-block.
Related
When I switch off the blog part and sidebars in the terrifico theme in Wordpress I don't seem to be able to place a full width slider anywhere.
The theme looks like this in the form that I'm talking about: http://vpthemes.com/preview/Terrifico/page-full-width/
As you can see all the text is 'bounded' by a box (the black line). Is there any way in which I can make the metaslider go OUTSIDE of this box (i.e. to span the FULL width of the page)? I don't necessarily want to get rid of the box all toghether, the text can stay within it.
I have seen on the Metaslider website that some solutions for certain themes are given (here - but I am not sure how to adapt this to the theme that I'm using.
Thanks in advance!
Disclaimer
Before I suggest a solution, I'd like to point out that what you're asking is to break the Box flow model. I wouldn't recommend that because you're likely to run into inconsistent results across browsers.
That said, what you're trying to accomplish is possible. You could use javascript to do this and it may in fact be easier in some respects but here's a CSS solution.
1. Break out of the box model
float: left;
width: 200%;
margin-left: -50%;
text-align: center;
The float CSS property specifies that an element should be taken from the normal flow and placed along the left or right side of its container, where text and inline elements will wrap around it.
The width of the container is still relative to its parent so if you use % units to scale it up you would need to compensate for the responsiveness of the parent. Here, I'm just overcompensating.
To ensure that our element remains centered, we use a negative margin that is half of the overflow. That is, we want our box to be 100% wide, we have 100% overflow to ensure that so half the overflow is 50% (comment below if that doesn't make sense).
We use text-align to put the element we add in step 3 in the center of the viewport.
2. Allow Overflows
This is where you may well break themes. The parent elements will hide elements that float outside of them if they have the overflow: hidden property (note overflow can also be used to show scrollbars).
You will need to ensure that the parent elements have:
#post-body, .content-posts-wrap {
overflow: visible;
}
As far as I can see that affects #post-body and .content-posts-wrap
3. Add an element that will be the right size
Now we have an oversized container for our slider but we need it to be the width of the page. Inside the div or whatever it is you want to put your slider into you will need to nest another element that will be the correct width. That element will need the following css:
display: inline-block;
width: 100vw;
text-align: left;
You need display because we are back to the box model now and we want our block to obey the width rule we give to it.
We set our width using vw (viewport width) units to make this a bit easier (but they may not be supported on your target browser). There may be some ingenius way to do this without vw units but I would probably just use javascript if it's not an option for you.
Finally, since we set our text-align above, we need to reset it here.
4. Add a Clearing Div
Because you've broken out of the flow, elements aren't too sure what to do. You probably want to add another element after your parent slider that
specifies whether an element can be next to floating elements that precede it or must be moved down (cleared) below them. source
It can be as simple as a <div> element with:
clear: both
write your code something like this...
html like that...
<div id="parent_for_slider">
<div id="slider">
//place your slider code
</div>
</div>
Css for that
#parent_for_slider{
position:relative;
}
#slider{
position:absolute;
width:100% !important;
height:auto;
}
i am recommending to use ResponsiveSlides.js for full width slider with responsiveness
Please see this pen for an example of my problem http://codepen.io/MarkRBM/pen/EmlJC
I cant get the 3 divs that say book now, subscribe, contact to display inline with the div with with the header and paragraph. I have been trying for a while and looking at learn layout.com. This is part of a larger project and I have tried to float it but it messes up the styling of everything else if I do that so I figured there must a way with inline block
edit I have updated the pen with the full scss file the css in question is on lines 866-894. There may be too much going wrong for you to figure it out and if so thats not a problem I will keep plugging away at it.
Yes, it's certainly possible, and you're on the right track. Just a few errors in the css:
First, .locinfo is inline-block, but it's inside .loc, which is not (so it's block by default) — so set .loc to inline-block as well.
You're also missing a semicolon after inline-block in the definition of .locbook, which is causing that rule to be ignored.
Without knowing exactly what you want the result to look like, I'm not sure if there's more that needs fixing. But those changes seem to get at least most of the way there.
Edit: more detail in response to comment:
.locinfo is alone by itself in its container, so set its width to 100% instead of 49%. The key is that this is the element's width as a percentage of its container. Its container (a .loc) has 49% of the page, so if you give .locinfo 49% of that, it will only have 24% of the page.
Similarly, set .locbook to 32%. Those three divs will then lie side-by-side in their container's 49% of the page.
Finally, set vertical-align: top on .loc and margin: 0 on .locbook, and you'll get everything nicely aligned to the top.
you forgot to add semicolon after display:inline-block
.locbook{
/*width: 49%;*/
background-color: #3475b3;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
You might try switching them to spans. Div's are by default {display: block}, while spans are {display: inline}. Block elements cannot be placed on the same line as other elements. Inline elements' width cannot be specified however, in which case you'll want to style either div or span, whichever you choose (it doesn't really matter) to {display: inline-block}
I have something similar to below:
<div style="float:left;margin-left:5px;">Test</div>
The issue is that I need to have this div repeat multiple times. If it repeats to many times, instead of forcing you to scroll right to see the rest of it (like I want it to), it instead goes down to the next line.
Example of the issue: http://jsfiddle.net/ruh7z/1/
Any help with this would be great, thanks
That behavior is exactly what floating is supposed to do. If you use table-cell for your display style, that may give you more of what you're expecting. Note that you'll have to use padding instead of margins if you use table-cell.
.container div
{
display: table-cell;
padding-left: 5px;
}
Here's a sample of this in use.
put the div's in a "fixed width" container div and prevent overflow. then have buttons or whatever at each end of the container div to "slide" the child divs left or right.
I have this:
http://jsfiddle.net/UHrLH/1/
I set the height on the box element to auto, but min-height is 200px;
Now if i try to make more content in the first box, the height expands but it creates a big white space under it. I do not want that, i want to have the box under eachother like you can see above, where the height on all boxes is 200px
See the issue here:
http://jsfiddle.net/UHrLH/2/
http://jsfiddle.net/chricholson/UHrLH/10/
This will give you boxes inline but unfortunately the pairs will not extend to match the height of it's partner. To do this you will need to use tables or a javscript overwrite to capture the height. Also, bear in mind display: inline-block will not work on divs in IE7 and below, it would work on a span though: http://www.quirksmode.org/css/display.html#t03
http://jsfiddle.net/UHrLH/11/
I have added an additional div if that is ok for you...
<div class="box_Container">
I have this and it got an HTML img#logo-image, on some occasions it will not be displayed, display:none.
The problem is that the entire div#menu-title should fit the width of the page.
I tried putting width:100%, but when the img#logo-imag" is displayed it breaks the line being below the img#logo-image.
The width:100% does not work with elements float:left
Just unfloat the menu-title div and remove the width.. it will automatically be 100% of the header then.. and if the image is present it will adjust the ul#menu list to make room for it, which is a natural behaviour
if you want the menu-list to really only take the available width (say for a background color or something then you can add overflow: hidden; to ul#menu - though I don't see a need for that in your example code
here's a simplified version of your Fiddle - hover on the header to make the image disappear and see the ul#menu adjust to suit
Example Fiddle
You have both logo-image and menu-title floating left. Since they arent really in separate divs, they are all part of the same div, they appear next to each other. On top of that, you set the menu-title to be 760, which isn't the width of the page. At least that what it looks like you did. Do not use width 100% because resizing the page will shrink that menu title.
You really just have to play around with the divs, but i would say that separating those two divs would make you be able to stack them on top or below each other.
And in using Chrome's inspect element feature, I don't see a display:none for the image's css. I don't know why that would do that.
I'm really not sure of what you are trying to accomplish since making the div#menu-title width: 100% doesn't leave any room for anything else on the same row.
Why not let them both be inline and let the widths be whatever they need to be?
Anyway, I have a guess at what you want. You want those two elements to behave as being in a table, inside a table row, and each in a table-cell so that the image takes a maximum width, and the div#menu-title taking all of the rest of the place. In that case put them in a table, or use display: table-cell for the image and the div and fiddle around with that.