MagicZoom lib claims in the documentation that only the large image for the default image will be initially downloaded and the rest of the large images for each thumbnail will be downloaded after the page is loaded.
However, when I inspect the network traffic (using Firebug Net tab) I can clearly see that all large images are downloaded before the 'full page load' event is triggered.
Is this a bug in the magiczoom lib or is there a a work around this problem?
I reviewed their doc for pre-load and initialization but it doesn't give me want I want (i.e. download only the first large image so the zoom in capability is there right away, and the rest on demand or after full page load):
http://www.magictoolbox.com/magiczoom/integration/#preload
Magic Zoom loads only the first large image by default, assuming you are following the documentation here:
http://www.magictoolbox.com/magiczoom/integration/#multiple
<img src="1small.jpg">
<img src="1tiny.jpg"/>
<img src="2tiny.jpg"/>
<img src="3tiny.jpg"/>
If other large images are loading on page load, then something else on your page is causing them to download. Please post the URL of your page so that the cause can be identified.
Related
Sometimes images are not loading properly in my website. Not completely. Lets say page includes 15 images. Two or three images not loading properly. Showing like this. When I refresh page, all images loading fine.
(Browser cache disabled)
The strange thing is this. If I inspect not loaded images using dev tools, get image url and paste it into new tab. Image is there!
I just want an idea why this is happening. Is this common issue? or bad host? long css file? or other issue?
This website contains more than 13,000 images stored in db.
Is it possible to load an image in HTML and load it like an actual image (Like if it was an image/png mimetype etcetera).
Example:
This is me loading an HTML document that contains <img src="RL_Dark.png">:
Loading the image through an HTML document
But here's me loading it directly from the file:
Loading the image through file
Is it even possible to let the browser handle the image loading as I am not planning on doing anything via the HTML document that would be shown to the user (Statistic collection such as Google Analytics and Alexa Analytics), if it is, would anyone be able to show me an example?
Your browser (presumably chrome) when given the direct image url, loads the image in a gallery style view (where it applies centering and shows checkerboarding) whereas when given an HTML page, chrome shows a rendered HTML page. Chrome (and other browsers) often have built in UIs for handling different types of files (another instance would be music files)
I am getting the strange behavior of image to be broken and coming in green color. This issue is very rare but exist. I have verified the below information but i din't get any solution or reason of problem,
Open the image in new link, which opens successfully.
Clear cache and hit the URL again, Opens site successfully.
Refresh the screen by just hitting f5, keeps the issue on screen.
While login-in css is displaying with HTML and broken images.
All css are downloading with status 200 and coming from cache.
All images are coming from azure cdn.
Network trace
Broken Image
try opening the image url location directly and see if the image is corrupted. Maybe also try to re-upload the image see if that fixes it?
So I was watching this video about responsive design and something in that video is bothering me. At 2:59 he risizes the window to the large screen and then refreshes and then Safari downloads the banner_large.jpg and when he does the same thing with the medium and small screen sizes, then Safari downloads the banner_medium.jpg and banner_small.jpg respectively. But then one can see that he is able to resize the browser and the banners change accordingly (notice the 'jumps' of the image when the threshold reaches). So the question is that if Safari doesn't download the other two images then how is it able to display them? Am I missing something here?
He has the Network Requests section selected in the Web Inspector. This would only show you when the page sends a request to the server to get a file. He had already resized the page at the beginning of the video, which would have requested the files at that time (assuming they weren't cached from a previous time). So, assuming that caching is turned on, when he resizes the page with the inspector open, it won't request the files again.
In order to show the file sizes, he refreshes the page, which forces the browser to re-download all of the files and show them in the Web Inspector. You can tell he's doing this because when he first opens the Network Requests section, it's empty (because nothing is being requested). Following this, he says, "And then hit reload" and he reloads the page which shows all of the files on the page being downloaded. You can tell that they're all being re-downloaded because in the Cached column, it says No for all files and it's displaying the contents for index.html and other files that would have been cached, such as css files and the background gradient.
If I've loaded an image into an html page, when I load it a second time further down in that page will it be instantly available?
Depends on the headers sent with the image, but I believe most browsers will cache images automatically. That should work fine as long as the URL is the same. Check the network request to make sure the image is only being requested once from the server.