I want to SELECT a field based on a ID value.
Products
PRODUCT_ID Name
19 Chair
20 Table
Product_fields
ID PRODUCT_ID TYPE DESCRIPTION
1 19 C White
2 19 S Modern
3 20 C Black
4 20 S Classic
I need a result like:
Product Type_C Type_S
Chair White Modern
Table Black Classic
I am able to produce this using two LEFT JOINs on the product_fields table but this slows down the query too much. Is there a better way?
Slows down the query how much? What is acceptable?
If you really don't want to use joins (you must have one join), then use views or nested queries. But I don't think they will be any faster, though you can give it a try.
See views at sqlfiddle
select p.PRODUCT_ID, p.Name, f.CDescription, f.SDescription
from Products p
join(
SELECT PRODUCT_ID, Max( CDescription ) as CDescription,
Max( SDescription ) as SDescription
FROM(
select PRODUCT_ID,
case Type when 'C' then Description end as CDescription,
case Type when 'S' then Description end as SDescription
from Fields
) x
group by PRODUCT_ID
) f
on f.PRODUCT_ID = p.PRODUCT_ID;
The complete statement is:
SELECT
NL.product_name,
PRD.product_sku AS product_sku,
CF.virtuemart_product_id AS virtuemart_product_id,
GROUP_CONCAT(distinct CFA.customsforall_value_name
ORDER BY CFA.customsforall_value_name ASC
separator ' | ' ) AS Name_exp_3,
ROUND((((prices.product_price * CALC.calc_value) / 100) + prices.product_price),
2) AS Prijs,
VMCF_L.custom_value AS latijn,
VMCF_T.custom_value AS THT
VMCF_B.custom_value AS Batch
from j25_virtuemart_products AS PRD
LEFT join j25_virtuemart_product_custom_plg_customsforall AS CF ON CF.virtuemart_product_id = PRD.virtuemart_product_id
join j25_virtuemart_product_prices AS prices ON PRD.virtuemart_product_id = prices.virtuemart_product_id
join j25_virtuemart_calcs AS CALC ON prices.product_tax_id = CALC.virtuemart_calc_id
join j25_virtuemart_products_nl_nl AS NL ON NL.virtuemart_product_id = PRD.virtuemart_product_id
LEFT join j25_virtuemart_product_customfields AS VMCF ON VMCF.virtuemart_product_id = PRD.virtuemart_product_id
LEFT join j25_virtuemart_custom_plg_customsforall_values AS CFA ON CFA.customsforall_value_id = CF.customsforall_value_id
LEFT JOIN j25_virtuemart_product_customfields AS VMCF_L ON VMCF.virtuemart_product_id = VMCF_L.virtuemart_product_id AND VMCF_L.virtuemart_custom_id = 16
LEFT JOIN j25_virtuemart_product_customfields AS VMCF_T ON VMCF.virtuemart_product_id = VMCF_T.virtuemart_product_id AND VMCF_T.virtuemart_custom_id = 3
LEFT JOIN j25_virtuemart_product_customfields AS VMCF_B ON VMCF.virtuemart_product_id = VMCF_B.virtuemart_product_id AND VMCF_B.virtuemart_custom_id = 18
WHERE
PRD.product_sku like '02.%'
group by PRD.virtuemart_product_id
order by NL.product_name;
Where the three SELECT results named 'Latijn', 'THT', and 'Batch' are the ones which I compared earlier as the black/white and classic/modern values.
Hope this makes any sense.
As you can see this involves a Virtuemart installation, so I cannot fiddle about to much with the schema.
When I exclude the bottom 3 JOINS and there related FIELDS, the query takes approx 0,5 seconds. With the JOINS and FIELDS included, the query takes almost 19 seconds.
I have created a view from this complete query which I query from my labeling application.
Thanks everyone! With your input I created:
select
NL.product_nameASproduct_name,
PRD.product_skuASproduct_sku,
CF.virtuemart_product_idASvirtuemart_product_id,
group_concat(distinctCFA.customsforall_value_name
order byCFA.customsforall_value_nameASC
separator ' | ') ASName_exp_3,
round((((prices.product_price*CALC.calc_value) / 100) +prices.product_price),
2) ASPrijs,
f.LatijnASLatijn,
f.THTASTHT,
f.BatchASBatch
from
(((((((j25_virtuemart_productsPRD
left joinj25_virtuemart_product_custom_plg_customsforallCFON ((CF.virtuemart_product_id=PRD.virtuemart_product_id)))
joinj25_virtuemart_product_pricespricesON ((PRD.virtuemart_product_id=prices.virtuemart_product_id)))
joinj25_virtuemart_calcsCALCON ((prices.product_tax_id=CALC.virtuemart_calc_id)))
joinj25_virtuemart_products_nl_nlNLON ((NL.virtuemart_product_id=PRD.virtuemart_product_id)))
left joinj25_virtuemart_product_customfieldsVMCFON ((VMCF.virtuemart_product_id=PRD.virtuemart_product_id)))
left joinj25_virtuemart_custom_plg_customsforall_valuesCFAON ((CFA.customsforall_value_id=CF.customsforall_value_id)))
left joinvw_batch_Latijn_THT_groupedfON ((f.virtuemart_product_id=PRD.virtuemart_product_id)))
where
(PRD.product_skulike '02.%')
group byPRD.virtuemart_product_id
order byNL.product_name``
Which takes 1.4 seconds to execute, a whole lot faster then the 19 seconds I started with.
Related
The following query pulls data correctly as expected, however the left join with lnk_cat_isrc table and through that to catalogue table, brings back repeated data if there is more than one item in catalogue which has the same isrcs from isrc table:
SELECT
isrc.ISRC,
isrc.Track_Name,
isrc.ArtistName,
isrc.TitleVersion,
isrc.Track_Time,
`isrc_performer`.`PerformerName` ,
`performer_category`.`PerformerCategory` ,
`isrc_performer`.`PerformerRole` ,
`isrc`.`isrc_ID`,
`isrc_performer`.`Perf_ID`
FROM `isrc`
LEFT JOIN `isrc_performer` ON (isrc.isrc_ID = isrc_performer.isrc_ID)
LEFT JOIN `performer_category` ON (performer_category.PerfCat_ID = isrc_performer.PerfCat_ID)
LEFT JOIN `lnk_cat_isrc` ON (lnk_cat_isrc.isrc_ID = isrc.isrc_ID)
LEFT JOIN `catalogue` ON (catalogue.ID = lnk_cat_isrc.cat_id)
ORDER BY isrc_ID desc LIMIT 0 , 10
";
I cannot use group by on isrc, because the isrc_performer table can have more than one performer to an isrc.
So the relations are like this:
Few items from catalogue table can have several identical items from isrc table. In turn, each isrc can have more than one entry in isrc_performer table.
What I want is to display all corresponding data from isrc_performer in relation to each isrc, but not repeating it for each item from catalogue table.
I also want to display all the rest "empty" isrcs (those which don't have any data in isrc_performer table)
Can you give me any ideas?
P.S. despite I'm not pulling any data from catalogue table itself, I'm using it to search by a catalogue number, when user defines search criteria for $where_condition variable, hence I need to keep it in the query.
i.e. $where_condition = "catalogue.Catalogue LIKE '%test%' OR ISRC LIKE '%test%' OR Track_Name LIKE '%test%' OR ArtistName LIKE '%test%' OR TitleVersion LIKE '%test%' OR PerformerName LIKE '%test%' OR PerformerCategory LIKE '%test%' OR PerformerRole LIKE '%test%'";
------UPD:
trying to graphically represent possible variation in these 3 tables relations:
cat1 - isrc1 - performer1
isrc2 - performer1
- performer2
- performer3
cat2 - isrc2 - performer1
- performer2
- performer3
- isrc3 - performer2
- performer4
cat3 - isrc4
- isrc1 - performer1
UPD (pics added)
Here are screen prints. As you can see on picture 1 there are 9 rows with same isrc number, however there are 3 repeated performers Jason, David, Paul.
This is because 3 different catalogue items have this exact isrc with 3 different performers as per pic 2
= 1(isrc) * 3(catalogue) * 3(performers) = 9 row on output
All I want is that Performers grid would only display 3 rows of this isrc for each performer.
---Rearrange the answer to put the "best" option up top.. .but is all of this for naught.. w/o any data from lnk_cat_isrc or catalogue being returned, why does filtering on catalog make a difference? we're returning all isrc regardless of any filtering because it's a left join...
So this brings into question given sample data what are the expected results.
Possibly more elegant... (but not sure if it would be faster) moving away from exists and simply using a distinct in a subquery so catalog queries always return 1 row per isrc; solving the 1-M problem keeping the left join thereby keeping the isrc records not in the catalog limits.
Return all isrc information performer information if it exists, performer category info if it exists and catalogue information If, and only if it matches the catalog filters.
SELECT isrc.ISRC
, isrc.Track_Name
, isrc.ArtistName
, isrc.TitleVersion
, isrc.Track_Time
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerName`
,`performer_category`.`PerformerCategory`
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerRole`
,`isrc`.`isrc_ID`
,`isrc_performer`.`Perf_ID`
FROM `isrc`
LEFT JOIN `isrc_performer`
ON isrc.isrc_ID = isrc_performer.isrc_ID
LEFT JOIN `performer_category`
ON performer_category.PerfCat_ID = isrc_performer.PerfCat_ID
LEFT JOIN (SELECT distinct lnk_cat_isrc.isrc_ID
FROM `lnk_cat_isrc`
INNER JOIN `catalogue`
ON catalogue.ID = lnk_cat_isrc.cat_id
WHERE...) DCat
ON Dcat.isrc_ID = isrc.isrc_ID
ORDER BY isrc_ID desc
LIMIT 0 , 10;
As you pointed out the join is causing the problem. So eliminate the join and use the exists notation. Distinct would also work since you're not selecting any values from catalog; though exists should be faster.
Fast but doesn't include all isrc records... (not sure why the or not exists should bring them back in...)
SELECT isrc.ISRC
, isrc.Track_Name
,isrc.ArtistName
,isrc.TitleVersion
,isrc.Track_Time
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerName`
,`performer_category`.`PerformerCategory`
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerRole`
,`isrc`.`isrc_ID`
,`isrc_performer`.`Perf_ID`
FROM `isrc`
LEFT JOIN `isrc_performer`
ON (isrc.isrc_ID = isrc_performer.isrc_ID)
LEFT JOIN `performer_category`
ON (performer_category.PerfCat_ID = isrc_performer.PerfCat_ID)
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM `lnk_cat_isrc`
INNER JOIN `catalogue`
ON catalogue.ID = lnk_cat_isrc.cat_id
--and your other criteria
WHERE (lnk_cat_isrc.isrc_ID = isrc.isrc_ID)
)
OR NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM `lnk_cat_isrc`
WHERE lnk_cat_isrc.isrc_ID = isrc.isrc_ID
ORDER BY isrc_ID desc
LIMIT 0 , 10
Or using select distinct simple straight forward; but slow
SELECT isrc.ISRC
, isrc.Track_Name
,isrc.ArtistName
,isrc.TitleVersion
,isrc.Track_Time
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerName`
,`performer_category`.`PerformerCategory`
,`isrc_performer`.`PerformerRole`
,`isrc`.`isrc_ID`
,`isrc_performer`.`Perf_ID`
FROM `isrc`
LEFT JOIN `isrc_performer`
ON (isrc.isrc_ID = isrc_performer.isrc_ID)
LEFT JOIN `performer_category`
ON (performer_category.PerfCat_ID = isrc_performer.PerfCat_ID)
LEFT JOIN `lnk_cat_isrc`
ON (lnk_cat_isrc.isrc_ID = isrc.isrc_ID)
LEFT JOIN `catalogue`
ON (catalogue.ID = lnk_cat_isrc.cat_id)
--AND (other criteria on catalog here, cause in a where clause you left joins will behave like inner joins)
ORDER BY isrc_ID desc
LIMIT 0 , 10;
I trying to get some data for my JavaFX Application from a couple of tables in database with MySQl.
Here's the query:
select veturattable.id, veturattable.vetura,veturattable.modeli,veturattable.ngjyra,
veturattable.targa, renttable.pagesa, hargjimettable.shuma
from veturattable
left join hargjimettable
on hargjimettable.veturaid= veturattable.id
left join renttable
on renttable.veturaid = veturattable.id ;
Here are datas from rentable
And here are datas from hargjimettable
So what I need is to show me this one:
veturaid | pagesa | shuma
1 | 150 | 91
10 | 110 | 40
You actually need to do two subqueries pre-aggregating the sum amounts per respective ID. Then join each individually back to the main. If you don't, you are getting a Cartesian product. For every record in the hargjimettable table for a given ID, it is joined to the renttable for each amount there. So, if you have 2 records in first table and 3 records in the second, you are getting a multiple of 6.
By pre-querying each grouping by the one ID key respectively, you will only have at most, one record for each possible summation. So grab that record if it exists. The left-join prevents some IDs from not showing up. Using coalesce() prevents nulls from showing.
select
v.id,
v.vetura,
v.modeli,
v.ngjyra,
v.targa,
COALESCE( RSum.SumPagesa, 0 ) as AllPagesa,
COALESCE( HSum.SumShuma, 0 ) as AllShuma
from
veturattable v
left join
( select
h.veturaid,
SUM( h.shuma ) as SumShuma
from
hargjimettable h
group by
h.veturaid ) HSum
ON v.id = HSum.veturaid
left join
( select
r.veturaid,
SUM( r.pagesa ) as SumPagesa
from
renttable r
group by
r.veturaid ) RSum
ON v.id = RSum.veturaid
You actually want the MAX() and SUM() along the GROUP BY like
select max(veturattable.id) as id, max(veturattable.vetura) as vetura,
max(veturattable.modeli) as modeli,
max(veturattable.ngjyra) as ngjyra,
max(veturattable.targa) as targa,
max(renttable.pagesa) as pagesa,
sum(hargjimettable.shuma) as shuma
from veturattable
left join hargjimettable
on hargjimettable.veturaid= veturattable.id
left join renttable
on renttable.veturaid = veturattable.id
group by veturattable.id;
I have query like this:
SELECT cs_event.*, cs_file.name, cs_file.extension, cs_user.first_name, cs_user.last_name
FROM cs_event
LEFT JOIN cs_file ON cs_event.idfile = cs_file.idfile
LEFT JOIN cs_user ON cs_event.iduser = cs_user.iduser
WHERE type != 51
AND idportal = 1
UNION DISTINCT
SELECT cs_event.*, cs_file.name, cs_file.extension, cs_user.first_name, cs_user.last_name
FROM cs_event
LEFT JOIN cs_file ON cs_event.idfile = cs_file.idfile
LEFT JOIN cs_user ON cs_event.iduser = cs_user.iduser
WHERE shared_with_users LIKE '%i:2;%'
AND idportal = 1
ORDER BY add_date DESC
LIMIT 6
The problem is following:
Regular user can't see certain types of events (for now it is type 51) and he can see only things which are shared with him.
shared_with_users column can be null or have value - this column have value only for one type of event (type = 50) and for other events it is null.
I need to perform following:
User can access all events except event with type 51 and if the the event is type of 50, I need to check if the event is shared with him (shared_with_users column), and collect that also. Is it possible to make this kind of query?
Try this
SELECT cs_event.*, cs_file.name, cs_file.extension, cs_user.first_name, cs_user.last_name
FROM cs_event
LEFT JOIN cs_file ON cs_event.idfile = cs_file.idfile
LEFT JOIN cs_user ON cs_event.iduser = cs_user.iduser
WHERE type != 51 o or (type = 50 and shared_with_users LIKE '%i:2;%')
AND idportal = 1
ORDER BY add_date DESC
LIMIT 6
I think you can do this as a single query, with logic in the WHERE clause:
SELECT e.*, f.name, f.extension, u.first_name, u.last_name
FROM cs_event e LEFT JOIN
cs_file f
ON e.idfile = f.idfile LEFT JOIN
cs_user u
ON e.iduser = u.iduser
WHERE idportal = 1 AND
(type <> 51 OR shared_with_users LIKE '%i:2;%');
Some notes:
I don't think the LEFT JOINs are necessary. The WHERE clause may be turning them into inner joins anyway, but it is hard to tell without qualified column names.
I added table aliases so the query is easier to write and to read.
The logic for shared_with_users suggests that you have stored a list of values in a string. That is a bad choice.
I'd need to optimize the following query which takes up to 10 minutes to run.
Performing the explain it seems to be running on all 350815 rows of the "table_3" table and 1 for all the others.
General rules to place indexes the propper way? Should I think about using multidimensional indexes? Where should I use them at first on the JOINS, the WHERE or the GROUP BY, if I remember right there should be a hierarchy to follow. Also If I have 1 row for all tables but one (in the row column of the explain table) how can I optimize usually my optimization consists in ending up with only one row for all columns but one.
All tables average from 100k to 1000k+ rows.
CREATE TABLE datab1.sku_performance
SELECT
table1.sku,
CONCAT(table1.sku,' ',table1.fk_container ) as sku_container,
table1.price as price,
SUM( CASE WHEN ( table1.fk_table1_status = 82
OR table1.fk_table1_status = 119
OR table1.fk_table1_status = 124
OR table1.fk_table1_status = 141
OR table1.fk_table1_status = 131) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
/ COUNT( DISTINCT id_catalog_school_class) as qty_returned,
SUM( CASE WHEN ( table1.fk_table1_status In (23,13,44,65,6,75,8,171,12,166))
THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
/ COUNT( DISTINCT id_catalog_school_class) as qt,
container.id_container as container_id,
container.idden as container_idden,
container.delivery_badge,
catalog_school.id_catalog_school,
LEFT(catalog_school.flight_fair,2) as departing_country,
catalog_school.weight,
catalog_school.flight_type,
catalog_school.price,
table_3.id_table_3,
table_3.fk_catalog_brand,
MAX( LEFT( table_3.note,3 )) AS supplier,
GROUP_CONCAT( product_number, ' by ',FORMAT(catalog_school_class.quantity,0)
ORDER BY product_number ASC SEPARATOR ' + ') as supplier_prod,
Sum( distinct( catalog_school_class.purch_pri * catalog_school_class.quantity)) AS final_purch_pri,
catalog_groupp.idden as supplier_idden,
catalog_category_details.id_catalog_category,
catalog_category_details.cat1 as product_cat1,
catalog_category_details.cat2 as product_cat2,
COUNT( distinct catalog_school_class.id_catalog_school_class) as setinfo,
datab1.pageviewgrouped.pv as page_views,
Sum(distinct(catalog_school_class.purch_pri * catalog_school_class.quantity)) AS purch_pri,
container_has_table_3.position,
max( table1.created_at ) as last_order_date
FROM
table1
LEFT JOIN container
ON table1.fk_container = container.id_container
LEFT JOIN catalog_school
ON table1.sku = catalog_school.sku
LEFT JOIN table_3
ON catalog_school.fk_table_3 = table_3.id_table_3
LEFT JOIN container_has_table_3
ON table_3.id_table_3 = container_has_table_3.fk_table_3
LEFT JOIN datab1.pageviewgrouped
on table_3.id_table_3 = datab1.pageviewgrouped.url
LEFT JOIN datab1.catalog_category_details
ON datab1.catalog_category_details.id_catalog_category = table_3_has_catalog_minority.fk_catalog_category
LEFT JOIN catalog_groupp
ON table_3.fk_catalog_groupp = catalog_groupp.id_catalog_groupp
LEFT JOIN table_3_has_catalog_minority
ON table_3.id_table_3 = table_3_has_catalog_minority.fk_table_3
LEFT JOIN catalog_school_class
ON catalog_school.id_catalog_school = catalog_school_class.fk_catalog_school
WHERE
table_3.status_ok = 1
AND catalog_school.status = 'active'
AND table_3_has_catalog_minority.is_primary = '1'
GROUP BY
table1.sku,
table1.fk_container;
rows per table :
.table1 960096 to 1.3mn rows
.container 9275 to 13000 rows
.catalog_school 709970 to 1 mn rows
.table_3 709970 to 1 mn rows
.container_has_table_3 709970 to 1 mn rows
.pageviewgrouped 500000 rows
.catalog_school_class 709970 to 1 mn rows
.catalog_groupp 3000 rows
.table_3_has_catalog_minority 709970 to 1 mn rows
.catalog_category_details 659 rows
Too much to put into a single comment, so I'll add here and adjust later as possibly needed... You have LEFT JOINs everywhere, but your WHERE clause is specifically qualifying fields from the Table_3, Catalog_School and Table_3_has_catalog_minority. This by default changes them to INNER JOINs.
With respect to your where clause
WHERE
table_3.status_ok = 1
AND catalog_school.status = 'active'
AND table_3_has_catalog_minority.is_primary = '1'
Which table / column would have the smallest results based on these criteria. ex: Table_3.Status_ok = 1 might have 500k records but table_3_has_catalog_minority.is_primary may only have 65k and catalog_school.status = 'active' may have 430k.
Also, some of your columns are not qualified with the table they are coming from. Can you please confirm... such as "id_catalog_school_class" and "product_number"
SOMETIMES, changing the order of the tables, with good knowledge of the makeup of the data and in MySQL adding a "STRAIGHT_JOIN" keyword can improve performance. This was something I've had in the past working with gov't database of contracts and grants with 20+ million records and joining to about 15+ lookup tables. It went from hanging the server to getting the query finished in less than 2 hrs. Considering the amount of data I was dealing with, that was actually a good time.
AFTER dissecting this thing some, I restructured a bit more for readability, added aliases for table references and changed the order of the query and have some suggested indexes. To help the query, I tried moving the Catalog_School table to the first position and added the STRAIGHT_JOIN. The index is based on the STATUS first to match the WHERE clause, THEN I included the SKU as it is first element of the GROUP BY, then the other columns used to join to the subsequent tables. By having these columns in the index, it can qualify the joins without having to go to the raw data.
By changing the group by to the Catalog_School.SKU instead of table_1.SKU the index from catalog_school can be used to help optimize that. It is the same value since the join from the catalog_school.sku = table_1.sku. I also added index references for table_1 and table_3 that are suggestions -- again, to preemptively qualify the joins without going to the raw data pages of the tables.
I would be interested in knowing the final performance (better or worse) from your data.
TABLE INDEX ON...
catalog_school ( status, sku, fk_table_3, id_catalog_school )
table_1 ( sku, fk_container )
table_3 ( id_table_3, status_ok, fk_catalog_groupp )
SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN
CS.sku,
CONCAT(CS.sku,' ',T1.fk_container ) as sku_container,
T1.price as price,
SUM( CASE WHEN ( T1.fk_table1_status IN ( 82, 119, 124, 141, 131)
THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
/ COUNT( DISTINCT CSC.id_catalog_school_class) as qty_returned,
SUM( CASE WHEN ( T1.fk_table1_status In (23,13,44,65,6,75,8,171,12,166))
THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
/ COUNT( DISTINCT CSC.id_catalog_school_class) as qt,
CS.id_catalog_school,
LEFT(CS.flight_fair,2) as departing_country,
CS.weight,
CS.flight_type,
CS.price,
T3.id_table_3,
T3.fk_catalog_brand,
MAX( LEFT( T3.note,3 )) AS supplier,
C.id_container as container_id,
C.idden as container_idden,
C.delivery_badge,
GROUP_CONCAT( product_number, ' by ',FORMAT(CSC.quantity,0)
ORDER BY product_number ASC SEPARATOR ' + ') as supplier_prod,
Sum( distinct( CSC.purch_pri * CSC.quantity)) AS final_purch_pri,
CGP.idden as supplier_idden,
CCD.id_catalog_category,
CCD.cat1 as product_cat1,
CCD.cat2 as product_cat2,
COUNT( distinct CSC.id_catalog_school_class) as setinfo,
PVG.pv as page_views,
Sum(distinct(CSC.purch_pri * CSC.quantity)) AS purch_pri,
CHT3.position,
max( T1.created_at ) as last_order_date
FROM
catalog_school CS
JOIN table1 T1
ON CS.sku = T1.sku
LEFT JOIN container C
ON T1.fk_container = C.id_container
LEFT JOIN catalog_school_class CSC
ON CS.id_catalog_school = CSC.fk_catalog_school
JOIN table_3 T3
ON CS.fk_table_3 = T3.id_table_3
JOIN table_3_has_catalog_minority T3HCM
ON T3.id_table_3 = T3HCM.fk_table_3
LEFT JOIN datab1.catalog_category_details CCD
ON T3HCM.fk_catalog_category = CCD.id_catalog_category
LEFT JOIN container_has_table_3 CHT3
ON T3.id_table_3 = CHT3.fk_table_3
LEFT JOIN datab1.pageviewgrouped PVG
on T3.id_table_3 = PVG.url
LEFT JOIN catalog_groupp CGP
ON T3.fk_catalog_groupp = CGP.id_catalog_groupp
WHERE
CS.status = 'active'
AND T3.status_ok = 1
AND T3HCM.is_primary = '1'
GROUP BY
CS.sku,
T1.fk_container;
Here is current SQL:
http://www.copypastecode.com/22205/
It takes 70 new rows from table ads.
But it doesn't take proper amount(for example 5) of rows for each mr.region_id from joined table map_regions.
For example if I will add 50 ads in one region, it will take all 50 of them and leave 20 slots for the rest regions.
Please help me to upgrade current SQL, so it would take 5 rows from table ads for each mr.region_id in map_regions table.
Try
SELECT a.id,a.country,a.region,a.rajons,a.town AS town_id,a.pagasts,i.t0_1, mt.town, mp.pagasts, c.link
FROM ads a
INNER JOIN categories c ON a.category = c.cat_id
RIGHT JOIN images i ON a.id = i.ad_id
LEFT JOIN (select * from map_regions where region_id = a.region LIMIT 5) as mr
LEFT JOIN map_towns mt ON a.town = mt.town_id
LEFT JOIN map_pagasts mp ON a.pagasts = mp.pagasts_id
WHERE a.expire >= ' . $current->get() . '
ORDER by a.id DESC
LIMIT 70