cocos2d-x - Apply blur to transparent LayerColor - cocos2d-x

I have investigated how the blur shader is applied to sprite in tests of cocos2d-x (ShaderTest/ShaderTest2.cpp).
Now my problem is a bit different: I have a layer initialized as follows:
LayerColor::initWithColor(Color4B(0, 0, 0, 180)
So it is black but transparent. My intention is to show the content under the layer but with bad visibility.
Now I need to add a blur effect to make visibility under my ColorLayer even worse.
My first question is how I can do that?
The second why cocos2d-x does not support such simple and vastly used effects such blur is without using shaders?
P.S. I usecocos2d-x 3.0.

Related

Pygame collision detection, transparent border

For my pygame project, I must detect collision betweeen various .png image that move on the screen.
I have put the image inside sprite, and the sprite inside group, then I use this :
pygame.sprite.spritecollide(perso, zombie_group, False)
However, sometime, my image don't touch, but pygame detect a collision...
This is due to the fact that my images are png with transparent borders.
The transparent border collide, and pygame detect this :(
Any idea to stop the transparent border from colliding ?
Ok the sprite will take the image he can't detect if it was on a trasnparent BG or a color bg, he basically is just seeing a rectangle right now.
If you are using irregular shapes and a rectangle approximation is not enough I would recommend using collide_mask also check masks it is probably what you want
update
Regarding performance from the tutorial :
There are other ways to do this, with ANDing sprite masks and so on,
but any way you do it in pygame, it’s probably going to be too slow.
For most games, it’s probably better just to do ‘sub-rect collision’ –
create a rect for each sprite that’s a little smaller than the actual
image, and use that for collisions instead. It will be much faster,
and in most cases the player won’t notice the inprecision.

crayon brush effect in processing

I was trying to implement a crayon brush for drawing in processing canvas. This tutorial did the thing using HTML5 canvas. So far, the logic seems to be loading a transparent crayon texture over a particular color. How to achieve this effect in processing?
You could do something like it by creating an image of what you want the crayon to be like, a .PNG whit transparent background, the color and texture of the crayon, all in a circle shape.
Then you just have to draw that image on the method onMousePressed().
Regards

as3 how to ignore MOUSE_DOWN outside mask

I am working on a jigsaw-like game in as3 where irregularly shaped layers imported from photoshop are used to mask parts of their original background.
By setting cacheAsBitmap=true on the mask and its contents the result is a nice irregular shape with its transparent bounding portions left out.
However the invisible bounding areas are still detected at MOUSE_DOWN. I would prefer the mouse not be detected anywhere but on the visible masked part. At the moment I cannot detect the mouse on any other clips on the stage that might appear behind the overlapping transparent areas.
I have seen a solution here involving bitmap pixel detection which I have not found a way to apply as a solution. The contents of my masked areas are either shapes or MovieClips.
I hope someone can help me find a solution
The simplest and the most stable approach to prevent the mouse events on the transparent area of bitmap graphics is to create a separate vector shape as the target for mouse and set the mouseEnabled flag to false to the bitmap or set hitArea property to this shape.
You can create such shape manually in the Flash IDE for the tests and even for the production. Sometimes it's more suitable to write the bitmap tracert script that creates contour shape in runtime by checking the pixel transparency.

HTML 5 canvas image special effects

I'm working on a 2d tile based HTML5 canvas application and I would like to know what kind of special effects I can apply to the images as their being drawn ( context.drawImage(...) ). The only trick I've come across is modifying the canvas.globalAlpha value. This leaves some color from the previous frames, creating a blurring or dazed effect if things on the canvas object are moving from frame to frame.
Is there something for rendering images that is comparable to setting the context.fillStyle to an ARGB value for primitive shapes?
Is there a multiply mode? ie: multiply the image pixel color by the destination color. This could be used for primitive lighting. (I've toyed around with context.globalCompositionOperation but didn't find anything interesting)
Are there any other cool effects you've come across?
NOTE: I don't want to use WebGL for this application, and it's a game. That means it's realtime and I can't modify each pixel with javascript code because that takes too long. (although I could probably do that when the player dies and nothing is moving on the screen anymore)
Canvas doesn't provide any predefined effects.
To manipulate the image shape you can use matrix transformations.
To manipulate the image pixels and colors you should use getImageData method - http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-element.html#pixel-manipulation.
Then use google to find algorithms to apply some effects like swirl, blur, emboss etc.

Clear Canvas Rect (but keep background)

I'm trying to animate a circle and just moving it horizontally which works fine. However while the circle is moving, I have to do a clearRect over that circle so that it redraws it self in the horizontal direction. When I do a clearRect it also makes the background have white box around so effectively its going to be one white horizontal line in the direction the circle is moving.
Is there a way to clear the circle without clearRect?
If I have to keep redrawing the background after clearRect the canvas will flicker when theres say 10 circles moving in that area.
Any other approaches to solving this?
function drawcircle() {
clear();
context.beginPath();
context.arc(X, Y, R, 0, 2*Math.PI, false);
context.moveTo(X,Y);
context.lineWidth = 0.3;
context.strokeStyle = "#999999";
context.stroke();
if (X > 200)
{
clearTimeout(t); //stop
}
else
{
//move in x dir
X += dX;
t = setTimeout(drawcircle, 50);
}
}
function clear() {
context.clearRect(X-R, Y-R, 2*R, 2*R);
}
Basics: HTML5 Canvas as a Non-Retained Drawing Mode Graphics API
First, let us discuss the manner in which the HTML5 Canvas works. Like a real-world canvas with fast-drying oil paints, when you stroke() or fill() or drawImage() onto your canvas the paint becomes part of the canvas. Although you drew a 'circle' and see it as such, the pixels of the circle completely replaced the background (or in the case of anti-aliasing at the edges of the circle, blended with and forever changed them). What would Monet say if you asked him to 'move' one of the people in a painting a little bit to the right? You can't move the circle, you can't erase the circle, you can't detect a mouseover of the circle…because there is no circle, there is just a single 2D array of pixels.
Some Options
If your background is fully static, set it as a background image to your canvas element via CSS. This will be displayed and overlaid with content you draw, but will not be cleared when you clear your canvas.
If you cannot do the above, then you might as well just clear the entire canvas and re-paint it every frame. In my tests, the work needed to clear and redraw just a portion of the canvas is not worth the effort unless redrawing the canvas is very expensive.
For example, see this test: http://phrogz.net/tmp/image_move_sprites_canvas.html
In Safari v5.0.4 I see 59.4fps if I clear and re-draw the entire canvas once per frame, and 56.8fps if I use 20 clearRect() calls and 20 drawImage() calls to re-draw just the dirtied part of the background each frame. In this case it's slower to be clever and keep track of small dirty regions.
As another alternative, use a retained-drawing graphics system like SVG or HTML. With these, each element is maintained independently. You can change the position of the item and it will magically move; it is up to the browser to intelligently draw the update in the most efficient manner possible.
You can do this while retaining the power of custom canvas drawing by creating and layering multiple canvases in the same HTML page (using CSS absolute positioning and z-index). As seen in this performance test, moving 20 sprites via CSS is significantly faster than trying to do it all yourself on a single canvas.
Flickering?
You wrote:
If I have to keep redrawing the background after clearRect the canvas will flicker when theres say 10 circles moving in that area.
That has never been my experience. Can you provide a small example showing this 'flicker' problem you claim will occur (please specify OS, browser, and version that you experience this on)? Here are two comments by prominent browser developers noting that neither Firefox nor Safari should ever show any flickering.
This is actually very easy to accomplish by simply positioning more than one canvas on top of each other. You can draw your background on a canvas that is (wait for it...) in the background, and draw your circles on a second canvas that is in the foreground. (i.e. stacked in front of the background canvas)
Multiple canvases is actually one of the best ways to increase performance of anything animation where elements of the final image move independently and do not not necessarily move in every frame. This allows you avoid redrawing items that have not moved in every frame. However, one thing to keep in mind is that changing the relative depth (think z-index) of items drawn on different canvases now requires that the actual <canvas> elements be reordered in the dom. In practice, this is rarely an issue for 2D games and animations.
Contrary to what the accepted answer suggests; yes, you can restore previous draw states, and contrary to what the other answers imply; no, you don't need additional canvases to do so:
The CanvasRenderingContext2D API includes the functions getImageData() and putImageData(). After creating a background image, store the whole thing in a variable const background = context.getImageData(x, y, width, height) (a simple RGBA bitmap of type Uint8ClampedArray), then after wiping the canvas with clearRect() or whatever, restore the background image simply by passing that variable back in the opposite direction: context.putImageData(x, y, background).
There are two ways you can do it that may reduce the flickering, esp if you have many circles.
One is double buffering, and for a brief question on this you can look at:
Does HTML5/Canvas Support Double Buffering?
Basically, you draw on two canvases, and swap them in and out as needed.
This would be the preferable option, esp with many changes per frame, but, the other way I have done this is to just draw over the circle I want to erase, using the background color, then draw with the correct color the new circle.
The only problem is that there is a small chance that you may leave some evidence of the attempted erasing, as it seems that for some shapes it is hard to get it to draw exactly on top.
UPDATE:
Based on a comment you can look at this discussion about double buffering on the canvas:
HTML canvas double buffering frame-rate issues
The basic idea is to keep track of everything you have drawn, with the current position, then on a separate canvas, you redraw everything, then, flip them out, and then I would just redraw again, in the new positions, to ensure that the image looks exactly like it should. Swapping them in and out is a quick operation, the only problem would be if you put event handlers on the canvas, in this case, have them on the div or span surrounding the canvas, so this information doesn't get lost.