This question already has answers here:
Adding Arbitrary fields to json output of an unknown struct
(2 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
Here's the response interface :
type Response interface{}
It's satisfied by a struct like this :
type CheckResponse struct {
Status string `json:"status"`
}
I am getting out []Response as an output which is to be consumed elsewhere.
I want to add a Version string to this JSON, before it's being sent. I've tried using anonymous structs ( but in vain ) :
for _, d := range out {
outd := struct {
Resp Response `json:",inline"`
Version string `json:",inline"`
}{
Resp: d,
Version: "1.1",
}
data, _ := json.Marshal(outd)
log.Infof("response : %s", data)
}
The output I am getting is :
response : {"Resp":{"status":"UP"},"Version":"1.1"}
What I want is
{"status":"UP","Version":"1.1"}
i.e. one single flat JSON.
Assert your d to CheckResponse type and then define dynamic struct like this
outd := struct {
Resp string `json:"status,inline"`
Version string `json:",inline"`
}
This is the full code for this.
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
)
type Response interface {}
type CheckResponse struct {
Status string `json:"status"`
}
func main() {
out := []Response{
CheckResponse{Status: "UP"},
}
for _, d := range out {
res, ok := d.(CheckResponse)
if !ok {
continue
}
outd := struct {
Resp string `json:"status,inline"`
Version string `json:",inline"`
}{
Resp: res.Status,
Version: "1.1",
}
data, _ := json.Marshal(outd)
fmt.Printf("response : %s", data)
}
}
You can run here
inline tag is not supported by encoding/json and embedding interfaces will also not produce the result you want. You'll have to declare a type for the out value and have that type implement the json.Marshaler interface, you can then customize how its fields are marshaled, for example you could marshal the two fields Resp and Version separately and then "merge the result" into a single json object.
type VersionedResponse struct {
Resp Response
Version string
}
func (r VersionedResponse) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) {
out1, err := json.Marshal(r.Resp)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
out2, err := json.Marshal(struct{ Version string }{r.Version})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// NOTE: if Resp can hold something that after marshaling
// produces something other than a json object, you'll have
// to be more careful about how you gonna merge the two outputs.
//
// For example if Resp is nil then out1 will be []byte(`null`)
// If Resp is a slice then out1 will be []byte(`[ ... ]`)
out1[len(out1)-1] = ',' // replace '}' with ','
out2 = out2[1:] // remove leading '{'
return append(out1, out2...), nil
}
https://play.golang.org/p/66jIYXGUtWJ
One way that will work for sure is simply use a map[string]interface{}, iterate over fields in Response via reflect or use a library like structs, update your map with response fields, append your version field to map, and then marshal.
Here is an example
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"github.com/fatih/structs"
)
type Response interface{}
type CheckResponse struct {
Status string `json:"status"`
}
func main() {
resp := CheckResponse{Status: "success"}
m := structs.Map(resp)
m["Version"] = "0.1"
out, _ := json.Marshal(m)
fmt.Println(string(out))
}
I am working with an API that sends JSON data. The problem is that an array of a single element shows up as a single value. For example, consider the following JSON:
{ "names": ["Alice","Bob"] }
The API sends this as an array. But when the names field has a single element, the API sends this:
{ "names": "Alice" }
This is how I would normally decode this of response in Go:
type Response struct {
Names []string `json:"names"`
}
// later
d := &Response{}
_ = json.NewDecoder(resp).Decode(d) // resp would be a http.Response.Body containing the problematic JSON
Go decodes the first JSON correctly. However, after decoding the second JSON, the object contains an empty array.
I don't have any control over the API, so I have to get around this problem. How could I decode this JSON correctly in Go, so that the Names slice contains a single element? Thank you for your help.
You could implement the json.Unmarshaler interface and have it check the 0th raw byte for [ or " to find out whether it's an array or a string respectivelly:
type StringSlice []string
func (ss *StringSlice) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {
if data[0] == '[' {
return json.Unmarshal(data, (*[]string)(ss))
} else if data[0] == '"' {
var s string
if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &s); err != nil {
return err
}
*ss = append(*ss, s)
}
return nil
}
https://play.golang.com/p/2GEJsS2YOLJ
You'll have to decode this into an interface{} and then use a type assertion to check whether the underlying type is a slice or just a string.
type Response struct {
Names interface{} `json:"names"`
}
Then after decoding into d, you'd do something like:
slice, ok := d.Names.([]interface{})
if ok {
// it was a slice. use it.
} else {
// it wasn't a slice - so expect it to be a string
// and use that, etc.
}
Use json.RawMessage as type. RawMessage simply delays the decoding of part of a message, so we can do it ourselves later.
type Response struct {
NamesRaw json.RawMessage `json:"names"`
Names []string
}
First, decode the response and then using json.Unmarshal decode json.RawMessage
x := &Response{}
_ = json.NewDecoder(resp).Decode(x);
x.Names = DecodeName(x.NamesRaw)
DecodeName used for decoding NameRaw data
func DecodeName(nameRaw json.RawMessage) (data []string) {
var s string
if err := json.Unmarshal(nameRaw, &s); err == nil {
v := []string{s}
return v
}
var sn []string
if err := json.Unmarshal(nameRaw, &sn); err == nil {
return sn
}
return
}
My original data format:
id=1, name=peter, age=12
I converted it to JSON string:
{"id" : "1", "name" : "peter", "age" : "12"}
I use the following golang statement to do the conversion:
Regex, err = regexp.Compile(`([^,\s]*)=([^,\s]*)`)
JSON := fmt.Sprintf("{%s}", Regex.ReplaceAllString(inp, `"$1" : "$2"`))
inp is the variable that holds the original data format.
However, now I get a new format:
id=1 name=peter age=12
and I also want to convert to JSON string using similar method that I used above, i.e., use regex to do a one pass formatting.
{"id"="1", "name"="peter", "age"="12"}
How can I achieve that?
UPDATE: One additional requirement. if the input format is
id=1, name=peter, age="12"
I need to get rid of the "" to be or escape \" so I can process in the next step. The double quote can appear at the beginning and the end of any value field.
There are two parts to the question: The easy part is serialising to JSON, Go has standard library methods for doing that. I would use that library rather than trying to encode the JSON myself.
The slightly trickier part of your question is parsing the input into a struct or map that can be easily serialised out, and making it flexible enough to accept different input formats.
I would do it with a general interface for converting text to a struct or map, and then implementing the interface for parsing each new input type.
Sample code: (You can run it here)
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"errors"
"fmt"
"strings"
)
// parseFn describes the function for converting input into a map.
// This could be a struct or something else if the format is well known.
// In real code this would return map[string]interface{}, but for this
// demo I'm just using string
type parseFn func(string) (map[string]string, error)
// parseFormat1 is for fields separated by commas
func parseFormat1(in string) (map[string]string, error) {
data := map[string]string{}
fields := strings.Split(in, ",")
for _, field := range fields {
pair := strings.Split(field, "=")
if len(pair) != 2 {
return nil, errors.New("invalid input")
}
data[strings.Trim(pair[0], ` "`)] = strings.Trim(pair[1], ` "`)
}
return data, nil
}
// parseFormat2 is for lines with no commas
func parseFormat2(in string) (map[string]string, error) {
data := map[string]string{}
fields := strings.Split(in, " ")
for _, field := range fields {
pair := strings.Split(field, "=")
if len(pair) != 2 {
return nil, errors.New("invalid input")
}
data[strings.Trim(pair[0], ` "`)] = strings.Trim(pair[1], ` "`)
}
return data, nil
}
// nullFormat is what we fall back on when we just don't know
func nullFormat(in string) (map[string]string, error) { return nil, errors.New("invalid format") }
// classify just tries to guess the parser to use for the input
func classify(in string) parseFn {
switch {
case strings.Count(in, ", ") > 1:
return parseFormat1
case strings.Count(in, " ") > 1:
return parseFormat2
default:
return nullFormat
}
}
func main() {
testCases := []string{
`id=1, name=peter, age=12`,
`id=1, name=peter, age="12"`,
`id=1 name=peter age=12`,
`id=1;name=peter;age="12"`,
}
for ix, tc := range testCases {
pfn := classify(tc)
d, err := pfn(tc)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("\nerror parsing on line %d: %v\n", ix, err)
continue
}
b, err := json.Marshal(d)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("\nerror marshaling on line %d: %v\n", ix, err)
continue
}
fmt.Printf("\nSuccess on line %d:\n INPUT: %s\nOUTPUT: %s\n", ix, tc, string(b))
}
}
I am getting JSON data from an external source. The field names in this JSON are not something I want to carry with me, so I am converting them to names that make sense to me using the json:"originalname" tags.
When I marshal such an object back to JSON, I naturally get the ugly (original) names again.
Is there a way to ignore tags when marshalling? Or a way to specify a different name for marshall and unmarshall?
To clarify, I have prepared an example in the playground and pasted the same code below.
Thanks in advance.
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
)
type Band struct {
Name string `json:"bandname"`
Albums int `json:"albumcount"`
}
func main() {
// JSON -> Object
data := []byte(`{"bandname": "AC/DC","albumcount": 10}`)
band := &Band{}
json.Unmarshal(data, band)
// Object -> JSON
str, _ := json.Marshal(band)
fmt.Println("Actual Result: ", string(str))
fmt.Println("Desired Result:", `{"Name": "AC/DC","Albums": 10}`)
// Output:
// Actual Result: {"bandname":"AC/DC","albumcount":10}
// Desired Result: {"Name": "AC/DC","Albums": 10}
}
You could implement
type Marshaler interface {
MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)
}
from the standard library's encoding/json package. Example:
type Band struct {
Name string `json:"bandname"`
Albums int `json:"albumcount"`
}
func (b Band) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) {
n, _ := json.Marshal(b.Name)
a, _ := json.Marshal(b.Albums)
return []byte(`{"Name":` + string(n) + `,"Albums":` + string(a) + `}`)
}
It's admittedly not a very nice solution, though.
As a generic solution, you could use reflection to create a new type that removes the json tags and then marshall that.
func getVariantStructValue(v reflect.Value, t reflect.Type) reflect.Value {
sf := make([]reflect.StructField, 0)
for i := 0; i < t.NumField(); i++ {
sf = append(sf, t.Field(i))
if t.Field(i).Tag.Get("json") != "" {
sf[i].Tag = ``
}
}
newType := reflect.StructOf(sf)
return v.Convert(newType)
}
func MarshalIgnoreTags(obj interface{}) ([]byte, error) {
value := reflect.ValueOf(obj)
t := value.Type()
newValue := getVariantStructValue(value, t)
return json.Marshal(newValue.Interface())
}
And you would just call it using:
str, _ := MarshalIgnoreTags(band)
Doing the opposite is a little trickier (ignore tags when unmarshalling JSON), but possible with mapstructure:
func UnmarshalIgnoreTags(data []byte, obj interface{}) error {
rv := reflect.ValueOf(obj)
if rv.Kind() != reflect.Ptr || rv.IsNil() {
return errors.New("unmarshal destination obj must be a non-nil pointer")
}
value := reflect.Indirect(rv)
t := value.Type()
newValue := getVariantStructValue(value, t)
i := newValue.Interface()
err := json.Unmarshal(data, &i)
if err == nil {
// We use mapstructure because i is of type map[string]interface{} and it's the easiest way to convert back to struct type
// See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38939459/2516916
mapstructure.Decode(i, obj)
}
return err
}
See playground here: https://play.golang.org/p/XVYGigM71Cf
One could also use a library as mentioned in this thread: https://stackoverflow.com/a/50966527/5649638
This will give you a structs like this:
type TestJson struct {
Name string `json:"name" newtag:"newname"`
Age int `json:"age" newtag:"newage"`
}
I've created an API in Go that, upon being called, performs a query, creates an instance of a struct, and then encodes that struct as JSON before sending back to the caller. I'd now like to allow the caller to be able to select the specific fields they would like returned by passing in a "fields" GET parameter.
This means depending on the fields value(s), my struct would change. Is there any way to remove fields from a struct? Or at least hide them in the JSON response dynamically? (Note: Sometimes I have empty values so the JSON omitEmpty tag will not work here) If neither of these are possible, is there a suggestion on a better way to handle this?
A smaller version of the structs I'm using are below:
type SearchResult struct {
Date string `json:"date"`
IdCompany int `json:"idCompany"`
Company string `json:"company"`
IdIndustry interface{} `json:"idIndustry"`
Industry string `json:"industry"`
IdContinent interface{} `json:"idContinent"`
Continent string `json:"continent"`
IdCountry interface{} `json:"idCountry"`
Country string `json:"country"`
IdState interface{} `json:"idState"`
State string `json:"state"`
IdCity interface{} `json:"idCity"`
City string `json:"city"`
} //SearchResult
type SearchResults struct {
NumberResults int `json:"numberResults"`
Results []SearchResult `json:"results"`
} //type SearchResults
I then encode and output the response like so:
err := json.NewEncoder(c.ResponseWriter).Encode(&msg)
The question is asking for fields to be dynamically selected based on the caller-provided list of fields. This isn't possible to be done with the statically-defined json struct tag.
If what you want is to always skip a field to json-encode, then of course use json:"-" to ignore the field. (Note also that this is not required if your field is unexported; those fields are always ignored by the json encoder.) This isn't what the question asks.
To quote the comment on the json:"-" answer:
This [the json:"-" answer] is the answer most people ending up here from searching would want, but it's not the answer to the question.
I'd use a map[string]interface{} instead of a struct in this case. You can easily remove fields by calling the delete built-in on the map for the fields to remove.
That is, if you can't query only for the requested fields in the first place.
use `json:"-"`
// Field is ignored by this package.
Field int `json:"-"`
// Field appears in JSON as key "myName".
Field int `json:"myName"`
// Field appears in JSON as key "myName" and
// the field is omitted from the object if its value is empty,
// as defined above.
Field int `json:"myName,omitempty"`
// Field appears in JSON as key "Field" (the default), but
// the field is skipped if empty.
// Note the leading comma.
Field int `json:",omitempty"`
doc : http://golang.org/pkg/encoding/json/#Marshal
Another way to do this is to have a struct of pointers with the ,omitempty tag. If the pointers are nil, the fields won't be Marshalled.
This method will not require additional reflection or inefficient use of maps.
Same example as jorelli using this method: http://play.golang.org/p/JJNa0m2_nw
You can use the reflect package to select the fields that you want by reflecting on the field tags and selecting the json tag values. Define a method on your SearchResults type that selects the fields you want and returns them as a map[string]interface{}, and then marshal that instead of the SearchResults struct itself. Here's an example of how you might define that method:
func fieldSet(fields ...string) map[string]bool {
set := make(map[string]bool, len(fields))
for _, s := range fields {
set[s] = true
}
return set
}
func (s *SearchResult) SelectFields(fields ...string) map[string]interface{} {
fs := fieldSet(fields...)
rt, rv := reflect.TypeOf(*s), reflect.ValueOf(*s)
out := make(map[string]interface{}, rt.NumField())
for i := 0; i < rt.NumField(); i++ {
field := rt.Field(i)
jsonKey := field.Tag.Get("json")
if fs[jsonKey] {
out[jsonKey] = rv.Field(i).Interface()
}
}
return out
}
and here's a runnable solution that shows how you would call this method and marshal your selection: http://play.golang.org/p/1K9xjQRnO8
I just published sheriff, which transforms structs to a map based on tags annotated on the struct fields. You can then marshal (JSON or others) the generated map. It probably doesn't allow you to only serialize the set of fields the caller requested, but I imagine using a set of groups would allow you to cover most cases. Using groups instead of the fields directly would most likely also increase cache-ability.
Example:
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"log"
"github.com/hashicorp/go-version"
"github.com/liip/sheriff"
)
type User struct {
Username string `json:"username" groups:"api"`
Email string `json:"email" groups:"personal"`
Name string `json:"name" groups:"api"`
Roles []string `json:"roles" groups:"api" since:"2"`
}
func main() {
user := User{
Username: "alice",
Email: "alice#example.org",
Name: "Alice",
Roles: []string{"user", "admin"},
}
v2, err := version.NewVersion("2.0.0")
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
o := &sheriff.Options{
Groups: []string{"api"},
ApiVersion: v2,
}
data, err := sheriff.Marshal(o, user)
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
output, err := json.MarshalIndent(data, "", " ")
if err != nil {
log.Panic(err)
}
fmt.Printf("%s", output)
}
Take three ingredients:
The reflect package to loop over all the fields of a struct.
An if statement to pick up the fields you want to Marshal, and
The encoding/json package to Marshal the fields of your liking.
Preparation:
Blend them in a good proportion. Use reflect.TypeOf(your_struct).Field(i).Name() to get a name of the ith field of your_struct.
Use reflect.ValueOf(your_struct).Field(i) to get a type Value representation of an ith field of your_struct.
Use fieldValue.Interface() to retrieve the actual value (upcasted to type interface{}) of the fieldValue of type Value (note the bracket use - the Interface() method produces interface{}
If you luckily manage not to burn any transistors or circuit-breakers in the process you should get something like this:
func MarshalOnlyFields(structa interface{},
includeFields map[string]bool) (jsona []byte, status error) {
value := reflect.ValueOf(structa)
typa := reflect.TypeOf(structa)
size := value.NumField()
jsona = append(jsona, '{')
for i := 0; i < size; i++ {
structValue := value.Field(i)
var fieldName string = typa.Field(i).Name
if marshalledField, marshalStatus := json.Marshal((structValue).Interface()); marshalStatus != nil {
return []byte{}, marshalStatus
} else {
if includeFields[fieldName] {
jsona = append(jsona, '"')
jsona = append(jsona, []byte(fieldName)...)
jsona = append(jsona, '"')
jsona = append(jsona, ':')
jsona = append(jsona, (marshalledField)...)
if i+1 != len(includeFields) {
jsona = append(jsona, ',')
}
}
}
}
jsona = append(jsona, '}')
return
}
Serving:
serve with an arbitrary struct and a map[string]bool of fields you want to include, for example
type magic struct {
Magic1 int
Magic2 string
Magic3 [2]int
}
func main() {
var magic = magic{0, "tusia", [2]int{0, 1}}
if json, status := MarshalOnlyFields(magic, map[string]bool{"Magic1": true}); status != nil {
println("error")
} else {
fmt.Println(string(json))
}
}
Bon Appetit!
I created this function to convert struct to JSON string by ignoring some fields. Hope it will help.
func GetJSONString(obj interface{}, ignoreFields ...string) (string, error) {
toJson, err := json.Marshal(obj)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
if len(ignoreFields) == 0 {
return string(toJson), nil
}
toMap := map[string]interface{}{}
json.Unmarshal([]byte(string(toJson)), &toMap)
for _, field := range ignoreFields {
delete(toMap, field)
}
toJson, err = json.Marshal(toMap)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return string(toJson), nil
}
Example: https://play.golang.org/p/nmq7MFF47Gp
You can use tagging attribute "omitifempty" or make optional fields pointers and leave those you want skipped uninitialized.
Here is how I defined my structure.
type User struct {
Username string `json:"username" bson:"username"`
Email string `json:"email" bson:"email"`
Password *string `json:"password,omitempty" bson:"password"`
FullName string `json:"fullname" bson:"fullname"`
}
And inside my function set user.Password = nil for not to be Marshalled.
I didn't have the same problem but similar. Below code solves your problem too, of course if you don't mind performance issue. Before implement that kind of solution to your system I recommend you to redesign your structure if you can. Sending variable structure response is over-engineering. I believe a response structure represents a contract between a request and resource and it should't be depend requests.(you can make un-wanted fields null, I do). In some cases we have to implement this design, if you believe you are in that cases here is the play link and code I use.
type User2 struct {
ID int `groups:"id" json:"id,omitempty"`
Username string `groups:"username" json:"username,omitempty"`
Nickname string `groups:"nickname" json:"nickname,omitempty"`
}
type User struct {
ID int `groups:"private,public" json:"id,omitempty"`
Username string `groups:"private" json:"username,omitempty"`
Nickname string `groups:"public" json:"nickname,omitempty"`
}
var (
tagName = "groups"
)
//OmitFields sets fields nil by checking their tag group value and access control tags(acTags)
func OmitFields(obj interface{}, acTags []string) {
//nilV := reflect.Value{}
sv := reflect.ValueOf(obj).Elem()
st := sv.Type()
if sv.Kind() == reflect.Struct {
for i := 0; i < st.NumField(); i++ {
fieldVal := sv.Field(i)
if fieldVal.CanSet() {
tagStr := st.Field(i).Tag.Get(tagName)
if len(tagStr) == 0 {
continue
}
tagList := strings.Split(strings.Replace(tagStr, " ", "", -1), ",")
//fmt.Println(tagList)
// ContainsCommonItem checks whether there is at least one common item in arrays
if !ContainsCommonItem(tagList, acTags) {
fieldVal.Set(reflect.Zero(fieldVal.Type()))
}
}
}
}
}
//ContainsCommonItem checks if arrays have at least one equal item
func ContainsCommonItem(arr1 []string, arr2 []string) bool {
for i := 0; i < len(arr1); i++ {
for j := 0; j < len(arr2); j++ {
if arr1[i] == arr2[j] {
return true
}
}
}
return false
}
func main() {
u := User{ID: 1, Username: "very secret", Nickname: "hinzir"}
//assume authenticated user doesn't has permission to access private fields
OmitFields(&u, []string{"public"})
bytes, _ := json.Marshal(&u)
fmt.Println(string(bytes))
u2 := User2{ID: 1, Username: "very secret", Nickname: "hinzir"}
//you want to filter fields by field names
OmitFields(&u2, []string{"id", "nickname"})
bytes, _ = json.Marshal(&u2)
fmt.Println(string(bytes))
}
I also faced this problem, at first I just wanted to specialize the responses in my http handler. My first approach was creating a package that copies the information of a struct to another struct and then marshal that second struct. I did that package using reflection, so, never liked that approach and also I wasn't dynamically.
So I decided to modify the encoding/json package to do this. The functions Marshal, MarshalIndent and (Encoder) Encode additionally receives a
type F map[string]F
I wanted to simulate a JSON of the fields that are needed to marshal, so it only marshals the fields that are in the map.
https://github.com/jtorz/jsont
package main
import (
"fmt"
"log"
"net/http"
"github.com/jtorz/jsont/v2"
)
type SearchResult struct {
Date string `json:"date"`
IdCompany int `json:"idCompany"`
Company string `json:"company"`
IdIndustry interface{} `json:"idIndustry"`
Industry string `json:"industry"`
IdContinent interface{} `json:"idContinent"`
Continent string `json:"continent"`
IdCountry interface{} `json:"idCountry"`
Country string `json:"country"`
IdState interface{} `json:"idState"`
State string `json:"state"`
IdCity interface{} `json:"idCity"`
City string `json:"city"`
} //SearchResult
type SearchResults struct {
NumberResults int `json:"numberResults"`
Results []SearchResult `json:"results"`
} //type SearchResults
func main() {
msg := SearchResults{
NumberResults: 2,
Results: []SearchResult{
{
Date: "12-12-12",
IdCompany: 1,
Company: "alfa",
IdIndustry: 1,
Industry: "IT",
IdContinent: 1,
Continent: "america",
IdCountry: 1,
Country: "México",
IdState: 1,
State: "CDMX",
IdCity: 1,
City: "Atz",
},
{
Date: "12-12-12",
IdCompany: 2,
Company: "beta",
IdIndustry: 1,
Industry: "IT",
IdContinent: 1,
Continent: "america",
IdCountry: 2,
Country: "USA",
IdState: 2,
State: "TX",
IdCity: 2,
City: "XYZ",
},
},
}
fmt.Println(msg)
http.HandleFunc("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
//{"numberResults":2,"results":[{"date":"12-12-12","idCompany":1,"idIndustry":1,"country":"México"},{"date":"12-12-12","idCompany":2,"idIndustry":1,"country":"USA"}]}
err := jsont.NewEncoder(w).Encode(msg, jsont.F{
"numberResults": nil,
"results": jsont.F{
"date": nil,
"idCompany": nil,
"idIndustry": nil,
"country": nil,
},
})
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3009", nil)
}
The question is now a bit old, but I came across the same issue a little while ago, and as I found no easy way to do this, I built a library fulfilling this purpose.
It allows to easily generate a map[string]interface{} from a static struct.
https://github.com/tuvistavie/structomap
To extend chhaileng answer, here is the version that remove all occurrences of a field with recursion
// GetJSONWithOutFields - Description: return a string representation of an interface with specified fields removed
func GetJSONWithOutFields(obj interface{}, ignoreFields ...string) (string, error) {
toJson, err := json.Marshal(obj)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
if len(ignoreFields) == 0 {
return string(toJson), nil
}
toMap := map[string]interface{}{}
err = json.Unmarshal(toJson, &toMap)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
for _, field := range ignoreFields {
DeleteField(toMap, field)
}
toJson, err = json.Marshal(toMap)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return string(toJson), nil
}
// DeleteField - Description: recursively delete field
func DeleteField(toMap map[string]interface{}, field string) {
delete(toMap, field)
for _, v := range toMap {
if m, isMap := v.(map[string]interface{}); isMap {
DeleteField(m, field)
}
}
}