I have an instance on stage that has a DropShadowFilter() added by code, when I change rotationXor rotationY of that instance, the angle of DropShadowFilter() goes crazy, so my question
How can I make the angle of the DropShadowFilter() fixed while altering the 3D properties of an instance?
A sprite wrapper should do. You wrap your instance in a Sprite, add a new DropShadowFilter() to the instance, and change rotationX or rotationY on the wrapper sprite. This way the filter will continue to operate in a 2D space and will retain correctness, while the complete object will be rotated in 3D via wrapper.
Related
When you're using the Flash/Animate IDE and you select something on the stage with the Free Transform Tool, then move the transformation point (the white circle), what is it actually doing in frame script? DisplayObjects only have x and y properties, there's no transformX or transformY.
I have a MovieClip place on the stage through the Flash IDE with various transformations applied to it, and I would like to be able to replicate those in Actionscript.
When you're creating a display object in IDE, moving transformation point makes IDE move everything inside that object in reverse direction coordinates wise. It's like if you're moving a zero point of a local coordinates system, leaving everything else intact, the contents will then have their coordinates altered.
In order to simulate this behavior, you can nest your display object being created into a container sprite, then when your user drags transformation center, you move the wrapper sprite to the new coordinates and alter its nested object's ( the one with all the contents) coordinates by negative delta between old and new positions of virtual zero.
I am making a game in AS3 for a school project (using the AIR api). I have about a year's worth of experience in AS3, so i would say i'm proficient but not an expert. Anyway, i have never attempted to do sprite animations in AS3 and i'm not quite sure how to approach it.
If i create a list of bitmaps and call addChild() and removeChild() to display each frame of the animation, it would affect the framerate as these functions are not very efficient (i have tried this before and it tanked my framerate if i had too many animations going at once). I have also tried creating a list of BitmapData objects, adding a bitmap to the display list, and then pointing it to a different BitmapData each frame, but this does not seem to work at all.
So what is the best way to do this? In XNA, for example, i would create a sprite class that draws to the screen using a sprite batch, then i would create a list of sprite objects and cycle through them to create the animation. Is there any way to achieve a similar result in actionscript?
First (simple) method: you can just use multi-frame MovieClip for animation. Put an image in each frame, put a MovieClip on the stage and that's all. You can control this animation using play(), stop(), gotoAndPlay(), gotoAndStop(). It will work without much problems for a generic platform game (I did that myself long ago).
Second (advanced) method: use bitmap blitting. For each animation, create a bitmap image that holds each frame of the animation. Use this image as a source for copying pixels into your current animated object. You just need to copy a particular rectangle area inside a source bitmap that corresponds to the current frame.
The actual blitting happens here
destinationBitmapData.copyPixels(sourceBitmapData, areaRectangle, destinationPoint);
Where destinationBitmapData is your "canvas" that you're blitting to; sourceBitmapData is the source image holding all animation frames; areaRectangle is the Rectangle inside the source image defining which area to copy; destinationPoint is left-top coordinate of the copy area in your canvas.
The destination canvas can be just one small object (like your game character that is moving around) or the entire game screen with all objects. I.e. instead of blitting and adding each object separately, you can just have one big canvas and blit any necessary parts directly to it.
That said, there is already a number of various ready-made engines that use blitting and even advanced techniques like 3D acceleration for 2D sprites.
One of them is Starling.
I'm trying to write a simple flash game like Space Invaders. When the ship shoots I check if bullet hits the enemy with simple if like below:
if (bullet.hitTestObject(enemy)) {
var explosion = new Explosion(enemy.x, enemy.y);
stage.addChild(explosion);
explosions.push(explosion);
//Rest of logic like removing bullet and enemy from stage
}
What I expected to see was an Explosion instance appearing somewhere around the coords where bullet hit the enemy and that it would stay in place. Instead explosion seems to be appearing completely elsewhere and is moving in the same direction the enemy was (opposite direction to bullet). It seems that my assumption about successfully getting coordinates in a way presented above isn't right. Is there any other way to get it at least approximately? It doesn't have to be pixel-perfect, but I don't want explosion to appear on the other side of the stage.
Thanks for any suggestions.
It's not about getting the coordinates but having in mind where your children are added.
If the container is moved around, and you add the explosion to other container, the coordinates will mess up - each object has an internal coordinate system starting from 0,0.
Best advise would be to manually understand where's the difference and where are your children added. Common way to fix this is to add all your children at 0,0. This will give you full control and nevertheless an idea of how Flash works.
If you are unable to do so, you can always use globalToLocal and localToGlobal methods that will help you convert those coordinates to a global (Stage) ones, and vise versa.
I'm trying to make a shape available for duplicating. Here's an explanation of what I've done, what I'm trying to do, and where I'm stuck:
Drew a shape manually in the Flash IDE (paintbrush).
Created a new movieclip containing the shape; exports as a class.
Instantiate the class (var mc:MovieClip = new shapeMovieClip()).
Add a reference to the shape in mc that I want (var myShape:Shape = mc.getChildAt(0) as Shape;
This works perfect and I now have my shape, but how can I duplicate it without instantiating the parent MovieClip class - is it possible?
I've tried creating a new shape and using the copyFrom() graphics method with no avail, I believe this method just copies draw calls when they're made on the referenced graphics and instead I just have a reference of a shape that's already been drawn.
Right now I'm extending the movieclip as a sprite instead, instantiating, pulling the shape from the parent and saving its reference, and then nulling the sprite. Does anyone know of a better, more lightweight, strategy for duplicating Shapes in this manner?
Basically depends on whether you need to scale your shapes. If you don't, and you can work it out with a fixed sized bitmap representation of the shape, then you will get much better performance drawing your shape to a BitmapData (it's called rasterisation) and instanciating Bitmap objects (as other commenters have pointed out). The code would go something like this:
var base:Sprite = new shapeMovieClip();
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(base.width, base.height, true, 0);
bmd.draw(base);
var clip1:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
var clip2:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
If you do need to scale the clips, you will get pixelation using bitmaps. When scaling down Bitmap.smoothing can help to some extent (also when rotating), but if you need to scale up, you will probably have to use some kind of mip-mapping. This is basically creating a few bitmaps of the shape at different scale levels, and then swap them depending on the current scale. Coding this has some complexity (using a helper parent to adjust the scale can help) but it will definitely perform better than using many shape symbols (with or without a sprite parent).
This is very old, but it still comes up high in Google, so I just wanted to share a true shape duplicating method:
var shapeonstage:Shape = shapeMadeInIDE;
var g:Vector.<IGraphicsData> = shapeonstage.graphics.readGraphicsData();
var shapecopy:Shape = new Shape();
shapecopy.graphics.drawGraphicsData(g)
And boom. It works. Had to share this because it would have helped me a looooong time ago and in so many ways.
UPDATE:
There is some clarification I'd like to add why you would want to use this method, for duplicating AND for storing references to Shapes that are within an swf.
If you target a Shape object on the stage or in a movie clip, the Flash Rendering engine does something strange. It will RECYCLE Shape objects to render new graphics thus making your Shape reference point to a COMPLETELY different rendering.
For example:
Create an fla with a movieclip.
Inside the movie clip make 10 frames.
On each frame, draw a different shape
In your code, get a reference to the shape (The Shape on Frame 1)
Draw and verify your shape (draw to a bitmap then put the bmp on stage)
Now let the flash engine play for 5 frames
Draw and verify your shape again
The second time you draw your shape without EVER reassigning your shape reference, will SOMETIMES yield a completely different shape.
Just know, this little quirk can leave you pulling your hair out if you don't know what you're looking for :)
Hi to keep it short and simple let's say I have a stage with 400x400 size in pixels, but I've drawn a map of 1000x1000 size in pixels. I want my player to be able to "walk" about the stage, but it appears stage.x and stage.y are read-only? Is there any method or way to have the stage "scroll" about, without having to move each object on the map?
Don't move the stage, move the 1000x1000 object,then it'll look like the whole thing is moving.
You should see the stage like a window. You can see everything behind it depending on the size of the window. You cannot change the size of the stage, or move it.
Just like a window you can measure the size of the stage. You can use this to navigate for example movieclips across the stage with actionscript.
Why don't you put the map and the other objects in a seperate layer, and move the map around. Other objects (for example a big red dot to tell the user its' location on the map) are on a fixed position on the map. Just move the map following a sort of path according the red dot.
Not entirely sure what you want to do, but it isn't possible to move the stage.
You can put all the movieclips (the player and the map, if you want) in one movieclip, put only that movieclip on the stage and move that.
But if you only want the map to scroll, just move the map around.
The other answers are correct, but there's an alternative to moving the map:
ScrollRect
Attach a rectangle to a your map's scrollRect property. Moving that rectangle will have the same apparent effect as moving the stage around.
There are minor pros and cons to using scrollRect vs. moving the world, but try them both and see which works better for you.