I am trying to integrate MOSS 2007 with bootstrap and create my own site design. I met some problems with that and maybe you can help me a little:
I have done my own master template and it looks pretty good on default page, but I have problem with styling for example List View page.
I can give you example of my problem:
this is part of master containing PlaceHolderMain:
<div class="container main-container">
<div id="loginPanel" class="row" >
</div>
<div class="row">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder id="PlaceHolderMain" runat="server" />
</div>
</div>
According to that I have tried to make page max-width of 750px
.container { max-width: 750px; }
This is how it looks with list view(Note that all table is placed in div which has 750px width, and table itself has computed width 791 in this case)
I have been trying to make for example:
.row table{
max-width: 750px;
}
but it does not work. I was also trying to make
table {
table-layout: fixed;
word-wrap: break-word;
}
but it screwed all Sharepoint site
Do you have any hints for that problem?
Help please :)
Related
Description:
I'm having an issue with my website's footer blocking content on mobile browsers (and on longer pages on desktops).
I've seen threads about this before, but these focus on hiding the footer until the user scrolls all the way down. I want to have the footer "float" below the content, but have it go below the content when the user scrolls all the way down the page. I also need this to allow clicking on items right above the footer. On my site, you can't click on a button, even if it's a few lines above the footer - which needs to also be fixed.
Examples:
You can view an example of this issue at my own site: http://mbt.aeio.io/twitter.php
Note that when you scroll all the way down, it is impossible to click "Load More Tweets", even on desktops, where the button is clearly visible.
I cannot find an example of what I'm trying to accomplish; that's why I'm posting about this -- and not just copying someone else's code.
Code:
This is my code for ARRANGING the footer:
<head>
<style type ="text/css" >
.footer{
position: fixed;
text-align: center;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
This is my ACTUAL code for the footer:
<div class="footer">
<div class="content">
<div class="container" style="
/* display: inline-block; */
">
<div class="well animated slideInUp" style="
display: inline-block;
">
<center>Developed with <span class="glyphicon glyphicon-heart" aria-hidden="true"></span> by mario_bros_tech, Arkagaen, and Others | Copyright © 2015-2017 | All Rights Reserved</center>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I know this is super-janky and that I shouldn't be using containers to make a footer, so if you have any suggestions for improving/cleaning up the code too, that would also be appreciated.
And if you need to look at the CSS for whatever reason, it is using Bootstrap and can be found here: http://mbt.aeio.io/assets/css/
Thanks for all the help!
The best thing (and the right thing) to do is to give some bottom padding to body. Giving the following code:
body {
background: #eee;
padding-bottom: 75px;
}
We get this:
I've searched the existing questions and found some similar issues, but the suggestions there didn't solve my problem.
Here is the issue:
We are using the Visual Editor plugin for Wordpress. My boss wanted this plugin to be used for a special promotion area in the header - he wants to display images that are clickable or have a button. I wrote some custom CSS so this plugin will do that. The issue, as you know, is you can't make a link in CSS. So for the background image, I needed a button. However in this particular case there was so much text on the image, a button would not work.
So, I wrote an ID that I could call in HTML. I made a link, called the ID, and then inside the ID I put a text indent that would push the text off the page and the image would be clickable.
The issue here is that for some reason the image would not fully load. It was cutting off height-wise. I had set width: 100%; and height: auto;, but neither of those things worked.
So, I ended up simply inserting the IMG normally, and linking it normally, but now the problem is I need it to be responsive.
I wrote a class called .responsive-image and made the width: 100%; and height: auto; but this still doesn't work.
Do I need to put the responsive image information elsewhere? Do I need to write some other class? I'm at a loss and have looked at this too long at this point.
You can see this header widget right here - 100daysofrealfood.com/carrot-top-almond-pesto-sustainable-almond-recipes/
And if you inspect you can see what I mean about it not being responsive.
Here's what I've written to insert it into the widget:
<div class="days100-background-header-widget"><div class="responsive-image"><a
href="https://www.100daysofrealfood.com/spring-reset-real-food-mini-pledge-
program/?utm_source=headerwidget">
<img src="https://www.100daysofrealfood.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/04/WidgetHeaderAreaMP2017.png" border="0"
class="responsive-image" alt="Real Food Mini Pledge Program" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
I have the class in there two places. Maybe that's the issue?
Here's the CSS for the main header widget class:
.days100-background-header-widget{
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
Any feedback is really appreciated. Thanks for reading this super long question!!
The problem is not on the image itself, but on the parent <div> with the class of .days100-background-header-widget. It is set to display: flex so that div is not 100%.
If you want to center things on the screen you can use margin: 0 auto on a block element.
.days100-background-header-widget{
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.responsive-image {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
<div class="days100-background-header-widget">
<div class="responsive-image">
<a href="https://www.100daysofrealfood.com/spring-reset-real-food-mini-pledge-
program/?utm_source=headerwidget">
<img src="https://www.100daysofrealfood.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/04/WidgetHeaderAreaMP2017.png" border="0"
class="responsive-image" alt="Real Food Mini Pledge Program" />
</a>
</div>
</div>
I have a banner which is scrolling multiple images using MD-Slider module (JCarousel). The website is responsive hence there would be 3 different layouts of any image inside the banner:
Normal Resolution:
Layout for iPads and bigger tablets:
Layout for Mobile:
Currently I have used temporary images in the banner in the following fashion:
banner1.jpg
banner1-iPad.jpg
banner1-mobile.jpg
So, "banner1" is the key here. This is how my div looks for normal layout:
<div class="md-slide-item slide-1" data-timeout="8000" data-thumb="http://xxxxxxxxxx.com/TestWebsite/sites/default/files/styles/md_slider_1_thumb/public/banner1.jpg?itok=y4RT2g4r" style="height: 268px; left: 0px; top: 0px; opacity: 1; display: block;">
<div class="md-mainimg">
<img class = "mdslider-img-tag" src="http://xxxxxxxxxx.com/TestWebsite/sites/default/files/banner1.jpg" alt="" style="width: 100%; height: auto; top: -59.3653846153846px; left: 0px;">
</div>
<div class="md-objects" style="font-size: 99%;">
</div>
</div>
I can use the class mdslider-img-tag to replace the image in CSS using some of the literature mentioned below:
1.https://css-tricks.com/replace-the-image-in-an-img-with-css/
2.http://www.emailonacid.com/blog/details/C13/a_slick_new_image_swapping_technique_for_responsive_emails
However, my problem lies in getting the key "banner1" inside the css before appending -iPad or -mobile part of the text to same so that the right image for the layout is displayed.
Is there an elegant way to achieve this?
Take a look at Interchange by Zurb, this works independent of Foundation themes but works best with them.
http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/interchange.html
While not a CSS solution I think this would actually be your best solution rather than creating a less than ideal CSS hack, CSS just isn't able to do what you want yet.
I've been having a lot of trouble trying to center an external script and I was hoping SO could help me out. I'm designing a page to use a Google widget that uses Google Maps to give directions to an office. Here is my code:
<asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="page_content" runat="server">
<div class="centered">
<span class="header_large_bold">Directions to our office:</span><br /><br />
<span class="header_bold">Please type your address in the top bar and click "Go".</span><br />
<script src="[link to the widget here]"</script>
</div>
</asp:Content>
And here is the CSS for it:
.centered {
width: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
As it is, the text is centered perfectly fine, but the widget from the is left aligned. I can fix this using a tag, but I'm trying to avoid using it as best I can. Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
You can insert the tag in a div
<div id="parent">
<script src='...'></script>
</div>
and then center the div..
#parent {
width: 30%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
But it might depend on the script content
Easily put your code between
<div align=center>
and
</div>
:)
User fa7d0 has the exact solution, but maybe a little unclear for the beginner:
Step 1 - Use a div with a "parent" ID to encapsulate your script as follows:
<div id="parent">
<script src='...'></script>
</div>
Step 2 - Go up to the top of your code, probably inside the area where you are defining the header information, and in the style section place the definitions:
<style>
#parent {
width: 30%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
</style>
I find it helpful to put all the div styling stuff in one area, all the p styling stuff in one area, etc.
I really need help converting this simple table structure to css div's. Is there a simple application or something. CSS divs are driving me insane.
<table width="100%" border="0">
<tr>
<td colspan="3" id="Header"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" id="Nav2"></td>
<td width="40%" id="ContentMiddleLeft"></td>
<td width="40%" id="ContentMiddleRight"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" id="BottomContent"></td>
</tr>
</table>
Test this:
EDIT: http://jsfiddle.net/DCbgg/
<style type="text/css" media="screen">
.container {
width: 100%;
}
.left20 {
width: 20%;
float: left;
background: red;
}
.left40 {
width: 40%;
float: left;
background: green;
}
.clear {
clear: both;
}
</style>
<div class="container">
<div class="left20">
Left
</div>
<div class="left20">
Left
</div>
<div class="left40">
Left
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
<div class="left20">
Left
</div>
<div class="left20">
Left
</div>
<div class="left40">
Left
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
First Things First
There are some very important things to remember when changing from table to div layouts that generally apply to all new learning experiences.
Don't get frustrated just because something's not working. Just take a break, look at something else, remember that it's something new and it won't always work the first time. It may take a number of different approaches and attempts before it finally works. You'll get the hang of it eventually.
Especially in this case, remember that divs are vastly different from tables, especially when using them as a major structural part of a site. The thought process behind each is completely different and can take a lot of getting used to for it to click. Because of this:
Not all designs transfer from table to div. Some things are only really easily and properly accomplished with tables, and others with divs. While this is not one of those cases in particular, be open to having to make some design changes when changing your site structure.
That being said, we can now answer the question properly.
An Answer
This is how I would set up the structure using divs:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content">
<div id="nav2"></div>
<div id="content_right"></div>
<div style="clear: both"></div>
</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
And this is what the css would be:
#wrap {
width: 100%;
}
#header {
width: 100%;
height: /* some height value */;
}
#content {
width: 100%;
height: /* some height value */;
}
#nav2 {
width: 20%;
float: left;
}
#content_right {
width: 40%;
float: right;
}
#footer {
width: 100%;
height: /* some height value */;
}
Notes
As I was saying above, the thought process behind tables and divs are quite a bit different. With tables, you're used to using percentages (%) to define widths. This works and is not necessarily a bad thing. It gets the job done and is easy to do.
But when you're using divs, a more common approach is to have fixed widths defined by pixels (px). This allows for a more constant design that won't stretch across the page, and gives you more design freedom, knowing that the page will always be the same width.
For more information on fixed-width design, I would recommend looking at the 960 grid system. It is extremely easy to follow and leads to clean, good-looking designs that are easy to structure and style.
Most importantly, enjoy the new-found freedom that divs bring. They aren't locked in to anything and can literal do anything, be anywhere, and look like anything on a page. There isn't really a limit to what they can do. I've heard them called the only required part of a webpage (You really can design and create an enter page with just divs, text included).
Have fun on your journey!
CSS3 Style (using "display:table;"):
Check http://jsfiddle.net/reKfe/ (jsFiddle made from http://query7.com/exploring-the-power-of-css3)