Related
I'm interested in learning some (ideally) database agnostic ways of selecting the nth row from a database table. It would also be interesting to see how this can be achieved using the native functionality of the following databases:
SQL Server
MySQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
Oracle
I am currently doing something like the following in SQL Server 2005, but I'd be interested in seeing other's more agnostic approaches:
WITH Ordered AS (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderID) AS RowNumber, OrderID, OrderDate
FROM Orders)
SELECT *
FROM Ordered
WHERE RowNumber = 1000000
Credit for the above SQL: Firoz Ansari's Weblog
Update: See Troels Arvin's answer regarding the SQL standard. Troels, have you got any links we can cite?
There are ways of doing this in optional parts of the standard, but a lot of databases support their own way of doing it.
A really good site that talks about this and other things is http://troels.arvin.dk/db/rdbms/#select-limit.
Basically, PostgreSQL and MySQL supports the non-standard:
SELECT...
LIMIT y OFFSET x
Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL supports the standard windowing functions:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY key ASC) AS rownumber,
columns
FROM tablename
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber <= n
(which I just copied from the site linked above since I never use those DBs)
Update: As of PostgreSQL 8.4 the standard windowing functions are supported, so expect the second example to work for PostgreSQL as well.
Update: SQLite added window functions support in version 3.25.0 on 2018-09-15 so both forms also work in SQLite.
PostgreSQL supports windowing functions as defined by the SQL standard, but they're awkward, so most people use (the non-standard) LIMIT / OFFSET:
SELECT
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY
somefield
LIMIT 1 OFFSET 20;
This example selects the 21st row. OFFSET 20 is telling Postgres to skip the first 20 records. If you don't specify an ORDER BY clause, there's no guarantee which record you will get back, which is rarely useful.
I'm not sure about any of the rest, but I know SQLite and MySQL don't have any "default" row ordering. In those two dialects, at least, the following snippet grabs the 15th entry from the_table, sorting by the date/time it was added:
SELECT *
FROM the_table
ORDER BY added DESC
LIMIT 1,15
(of course, you'd need to have an added DATETIME field, and set it to the date/time that entry was added...)
SQL 2005 and above has this feature built-in. Use the ROW_NUMBER() function. It is excellent for web-pages with a << Prev and Next >> style browsing:
Syntax:
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY MyColumnToOrderBy) AS RowNum,
*
FROM
Table_1
) sub
WHERE
RowNum = 23
I suspect this is wildly inefficient but is quite a simple approach, which worked on a small dataset that I tried it on.
select top 1 field
from table
where field in (select top 5 field from table order by field asc)
order by field desc
This would get the 5th item, change the second top number to get a different nth item
SQL server only (I think) but should work on older versions that do not support ROW_NUMBER().
Verify it on SQL Server:
Select top 10 * From emp
EXCEPT
Select top 9 * From emp
This will give you 10th ROW of emp table!
Contrary to what some of the answers claim, the SQL standard is not silent regarding this subject.
Since SQL:2003, you have been able to use "window functions" to skip rows and limit result sets.
And in SQL:2008, a slightly simpler approach had been added, using
OFFSET skip ROWS
FETCH FIRST n ROWS ONLY
Personally, I don't think that SQL:2008's addition was really needed, so if I were ISO, I would have kept it out of an already rather large standard.
1 small change: n-1 instead of n.
select *
from thetable
limit n-1, 1
SQL SERVER
Select n' th record from top
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
select n' th record from bottom
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID DESC) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
When we used to work in MSSQL 2000, we did what we called the "triple-flip":
EDITED
DECLARE #InnerPageSize int
DECLARE #OuterPageSize int
DECLARE #Count int
SELECT #Count = COUNT(<column>) FROM <TABLE>
SET #InnerPageSize = #PageNum * #PageSize
SET #OuterPageSize = #Count - ((#PageNum - 1) * #PageSize)
IF (#OuterPageSize < 0)
SET #OuterPageSize = 0
ELSE IF (#OuterPageSize > #PageSize)
SET #OuterPageSize = #PageSize
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(8000)
SET #sql = 'SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#OuterPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#InnerPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM <TABLE> ORDER BY <column> ASC
) AS t1 ORDER BY <column> DESC
) AS t2 ORDER BY <column> ASC'
PRINT #sql
EXECUTE sp_executesql #sql
It wasn't elegant, and it wasn't fast, but it worked.
In Oracle 12c, You may use OFFSET..FETCH..ROWS option with ORDER BY
For example, to get the 3rd record from top:
SELECT *
FROM sometable
ORDER BY column_name
OFFSET 2 ROWS FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY;
Here is a fast solution of your confusion.
SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY `id` DESC LIMIT N, 1
Here You may get Last row by Filling N=0, Second last by N=1, Fourth Last By Filling N=3 and so on.
This is very common question over the interview and this is Very simple ans of it.
Further If you want Amount, ID or some Numeric Sorting Order than u may go for CAST function in MySQL.
SELECT DISTINCT (`amount`)
FROM cart
ORDER BY CAST( `amount` AS SIGNED ) DESC
LIMIT 4 , 1
Here By filling N = 4 You will be able to get Fifth Last Record of Highest Amount from CART table. You can fit your field and table name and come up with solution.
ADD:
LIMIT n,1
That will limit the results to one result starting at result n.
Oracle:
select * from (select foo from bar order by foo) where ROWNUM = x
For example, if you want to select every 10th row in MSSQL, you can use;
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ColumnName1 ASC) AS rownumber, ColumnName1, ColumnName2
FROM TableName
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber % 10 = 0
Just take the MOD and change number 10 here any number you want.
For SQL Server, a generic way to go by row number is as such:
SET ROWCOUNT #row --#row = the row number you wish to work on.
For Example:
set rowcount 20 --sets row to 20th row
select meat, cheese from dbo.sandwich --select columns from table at 20th row
set rowcount 0 --sets rowcount back to all rows
This will return the 20th row's information. Be sure to put in the rowcount 0 afterward.
Here's a generic version of a sproc I recently wrote for Oracle that allows for dynamic paging/sorting - HTH
-- p_LowerBound = first row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 11 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
-- p_UpperBound = last row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 20 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
OPEN o_Cursor FOR
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
Column1,
Column2
rownum AS rn
FROM
(
SELECT
tbl.Column1,
tbl.column2
FROM MyTable tbl
WHERE
tbl.Column1 = p_PKParam OR
tbl.Column1 = -1
ORDER BY
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X'),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X') DESC,
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate) DESC
))
WHERE
(rn >= p_lowerBound OR p_lowerBound = -1) AND
(rn <= p_upperBound OR p_upperBound = -1);
But really, isn't all this really just parlor tricks for good database design in the first place? The few times I needed functionality like this it was for a simple one off query to make a quick report. For any real work, using tricks like these is inviting trouble. If selecting a particular row is needed then just have a column with a sequential value and be done with it.
Nothing fancy, no special functions, in case you use Caché like I do...
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM (
SELECT TOP n * FROM <table>
ORDER BY ID Desc
)
ORDER BY ID ASC
Given that you have an ID column or a datestamp column you can trust.
For SQL server, the following will return the first row from giving table.
declare #rowNumber int = 1;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
You can loop through the values with something like this:
WHILE #constVar > 0
BEGIN
declare #rowNumber int = #consVar;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
SET #constVar = #constVar - 1;
END;
LIMIT n,1 doesn't work in MS SQL Server. I think it's just about the only major database that doesn't support that syntax. To be fair, it isn't part of the SQL standard, although it is so widely supported that it should be. In everything except SQL server LIMIT works great. For SQL server, I haven't been able to find an elegant solution.
In Sybase SQL Anywhere:
SELECT TOP 1 START AT n * from table ORDER BY whatever
Don't forget the ORDER BY or it's meaningless.
T-SQL - Selecting N'th RecordNumber from a Table
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from TableName) T where T.Rno = RecordNumber
Where RecordNumber --> Record Number to Select
TableName --> To be Replaced with your Table Name
For e.g. to select 5 th record from a table Employee, your query should be
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from Employee) T where T.Rno = 5
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
table_name
WHERE
column_name IN (
SELECT
top N column_name
FROM
TABLE
ORDER BY
column_name
)
ORDER BY
column_name DESC
I've written this query for finding Nth row.
Example with this query would be
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
Employee
WHERE
emp_id IN (
SELECT
top 7 emp_id
FROM
Employee
ORDER BY
emp_id
)
ORDER BY
emp_id DESC
I'm a bit late to the party here but I have done this without the need for windowing or using
WHERE x IN (...)
SELECT TOP 1
--select the value needed from t1
[col2]
FROM
(
SELECT TOP 2 --the Nth row, alter this to taste
UE2.[col1],
UE2.[col2],
UE2.[date],
UE2.[time],
UE2.[UID]
FROM
[table1] AS UE2
WHERE
UE2.[col1] = ID --this is a subquery
AND
UE2.[col2] IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY
UE2.[date] DESC, UE2.[time] DESC --sorting by date and time newest first
) AS t1
ORDER BY t1.[date] ASC, t1.[time] ASC --this reverses the order of the sort in t1
It seems to work fairly fast although to be fair I only have around 500 rows of data
This works in MSSQL
SELECT * FROM emp a
WHERE n = (
SELECT COUNT( _rowid)
FROM emp b
WHERE a. _rowid >= b. _rowid
);
unbelievable that you can find a SQL engine executing this one ...
WITH sentence AS
(SELECT
stuff,
row = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM
SentenceType
)
SELECT
sen.stuff
FROM sentence sen
WHERE sen.row = (ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID())) % 100) + 1
select * from
(select * from ordered order by order_id limit 100) x order by
x.order_id desc limit 1;
First select top 100 rows by ordering in ascending and then select last row by ordering in descending and limit to 1. However this is a very expensive statement as it access the data twice.
It seems to me that, to be efficient, you need to 1) generate a random number between 0 and one less than the number of database records, and 2) be able to select the row at that position. Unfortunately, different databases have different random number generators and different ways to select a row at a position in a result set - usually you specify how many rows to skip and how many rows you want, but it's done differently for different databases. Here is something that works for me in SQLite:
select *
from Table
limit abs(random()) % (select count(*) from Words), 1;
It does depend on being able to use a subquery in the limit clause (which in SQLite is LIMIT <recs to skip>,<recs to take>) Selecting the number of records in a table should be particularly efficient, being part of the database's meta data, but that depends on the database's implementation. Also, I don't know if the query will actually build the result set before retrieving the Nth record, but I would hope that it doesn't need to. Note that I'm not specifying an "order by" clause. It might be better to "order by" something like the primary key, which will have an index - getting the Nth record from an index might be faster if the database can't get the Nth record from the database itself without building the result set.
Most suitable answer I have seen on this article for sql server
WITH myTableWithRows AS (
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY myTable.SomeField)) as row,*
FROM myTable)
SELECT * FROM myTableWithRows WHERE row = 3
I want to select all the rows from my table except the first 20 rows. How it possible? The total number of rows are not static.
SELECT statistics_id,title, user_name FROM (
SELECT statistics_id,title, user_name FROM statistics ORDER BY statistics_id DESC
LIMIT(select count(*)from statistics )-20
) sub
ORDER BY access_statistics_id ASC
I know 'LIMIT(select count(*)from statistics )-20' is not a correct method. Please help.
the documentation says (https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/select.html) the following:
To retrieve all rows from a certain offset up to the end of the result set, you can use some large number for the second parameter. This statement retrieves all rows from the 96th row to the last:
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 95,18446744073709551615;
so you could use something like
LIMIT 20, veryLargeNumber
Try this
DECLARE v_max bigint unsigned default ~0;
SELECT statistics_id,title, user_name
FROM statistics
LIMIT 20, v_max;
After writing the select query u just have to include,
LIMIT 21,100;
21-Offset i.e from which row you want to start selecting and
100- is the Limit[Which you can set according to your need]
You actually need:
SELECT
statistics_id, title, user_name
FROM statistics
ORDER BY
statistics_id ASC
LIMIT 20, 18446744073709551615;
As per MySQL Documentation
To retrieve all rows from a certain offset up to the end of the result
set, you can use some large number for the second parameter. This
statement retrieves all rows from the 96th row to the last:
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 95,18446744073709551615;
If your table grows fast, selecting all rows (with exception of first 20) is not a good idea. In such case, you should batch your query, and handle a subset of entries at a time, some thing like:
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 20,120;
Try using the offset option for the LIMIT syntax. you can read more about the LIMIT syntax at http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/select.html.
SELECT `statistics_id`
, `title`
, `user_name`
FROM `statistics`
ORDER BY `statistics_id` ASC
LIMIT 20, 18446744073709551615
I was answering a question on SO that encountered this issue.
Why I can't use MAX() within a LIMIT?
SELECT *
FROM table
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 0, MAX(id)
Or
SELECT *, MAX(id) AS m
FROM table
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 0, m
Both give a similar syntax error:
1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'MAX(id)' at line 4
Wanted query:
SELECT *
FROM table
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 0, MAX(id)-5
MAX() is an aggregate function over the result rows, but LIMIT is a clause that constrains the number of result rows. In short, you cannot use a function that depends on the result rows while you are still determining which rows will be in the result -- that simply doesn't make any sense.
According to the documentation, LIMIT arguments must either be integer constants or parameters of a prepared query (emphasis mine):
LIMIT takes one or two numeric arguments, which must both be nonnegative integer constants (except when using prepared statements).
The syntax specification simply does not allow a column or function to be used. You would have to pre-compute the value and then use it in a prepared query (or by string substitution, though I would avoid that).
Based on the query you gave in your question:
SELECT *
FROM table
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 0, MAX(id)-5
I suspect that this is the query you actually want:
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE id <= (SELECT MAX(id) FROM table) - 5
ORDER BY id DESC
Even if it were valid, the first query you gave will not do what you expect if there are gaps in the sequence of the id column (for example, if a row was deleted).
An alternative if you want to get your desired result is to create a dynamic sql.
SET #maxID = (SELECT MAX(ID) FROM tableName);
SET #sql = CONCAT('SELECT *
FROM tableName
ORDER BY ID DESC
LIMIT 0,', #maxID);
PREPARE stmt FROM #sql;
EXECUTE stmt;
DEALLOCATE PREPARE stmt;
The function MAX cannot be used on the limit.
Here is the documentation:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/group-by-functions.html#function_max
The count argument in the limit should be a value so you cannot execute that in one step. Here is the select documentation:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/select.html
You can do is:
SET #a=(SELECT MAX(ID) FROM table);
PREPARE STMT FROM 'SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 0, ?';
EXECUTE STMT USING #a;
So it is a tree step here. Get max in a variable. Prepare a statement and than execute it applying the variable to the statement.
You can use the HAVING clause with MAX(id) to obtain your desired result
SELECT *
FROM table1
HAVING id<((SELECT Max(id) FROM table1)-5)
ORDER BY id DESC
Fiddle http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/16e50/3
ISSUE IS WIth your query::
Select
*
from
myTable,
(SELECT MAX(id) as n
FROM table) temp
ORDER BY id DESC
LIMIT 0, temp.n
I am new to MYSQL, and unable to resolve or even with so many answers on this forum, unable to identiy the error in this statement. I am using MYSQL database.
I have 2 tables: Ratemaster and rates, in which a customer can have 1 product with different rates.
Because of this, there is a duplication of customer and product fields, only the rate field changes.
Now Table Ratemaster has all the fields : id, Customer code, Product, Rate, user
whereas Table Rates has only: id, cust code, Rate, user.
- user field is for checking session_user.
Now Table Ratemaster has 3 records with all field values being same except Rate field empty.
Table Rates has different rates.
I want to have all rates to be updated in Ratemaster from Rates table. I am unable to do this with UPDATE and LIMIT mysql command, it is giving error as:
Incorrect usage of UPDATE and LIMIT
UPDATE Ratemaster, Rates
SET Ratemaster.Rate=Rates.Rate
WHERE Ratemaster.user=Rates.user
LIMIT 1
Usually you can use LIMIT and ORDER in your UPDATE statements, but in your case not, as written in the MySQL Documentation 12.2.10. UPDATE Syntax:
For the multiple-table syntax, UPDATE updates rows in each table named
in table_references that satisfy the conditions. In this case, ORDER
BY and LIMIT cannot be used.
Try the following:
UPDATE Ratemaster
SET Ratemaster.Rate =
(
SELECT Rates.Rate
FROM Rates
WHERE Ratemaster.user = Rates.user
ORDER BY Rates.id
LIMIT 1
)
Salam
You can use this method and work properly !
UPDATE Ratemaster, Rates
SET Ratemaster.Rate=Rates.Rate
WHERE Ratemaster.user=Rates.user
ORDER BY Rates.id
LIMIT 1
Work It 100%
UPDATE table SET Sing='p' ORDER BY sr_no LIMIT 10;
Read article about
How to use ORDER BY and LIMIT on multi-table updates in MySQL
For the multiple-table syntax, UPDATE updates rows in each table named
in table_references that satisfy the conditions. In this case, ORDER
BY and LIMIT cannot be used.
The problem is that LIMIT is only to be used with SELECT statements, as it limits the number of rows returned by the query.
From: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/select.html
The LIMIT clause can be used to constrain the number of rows returned by
the SELECT statement. LIMIT takes one or two numeric arguments, which
must both be nonnegative integer constants, with these exceptions:
Within prepared statements, LIMIT parameters can be specified using ? placeholder markers.
Within stored programs, LIMIT parameters can be specified using integer-valued routine parameters or local variables as of MySQL 5.5.6.
With two arguments, the first argument specifies the offset of the
first row to return, and the second specifies the maximum number of
rows to return. The offset of the initial row is 0 (not 1):
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 5,10; # Retrieve rows 6-15
To retrieve all rows from a certain offset up to the end of the result
set, you can use some large number for the second parameter. This
statement retrieves all rows from the 96th row to the last:
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 95,18446744073709551615;
With one argument, the value specifies the number of rows to return
from the beginning of the result set:
SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT 5; # Retrieve first 5 rows
In other words, LIMIT row_count is equivalent to LIMIT 0, row_count.
For prepared statements, you can use placeholders. The following
statements will return one row from the tbl table:
SET #a=1; PREPARE STMT FROM 'SELECT * FROM tbl LIMIT ?'; EXECUTE STMT
USING #a;
The following statements will return the second to sixth row from the
tbl table:
SET #skip=1; SET #numrows=5; PREPARE STMT FROM 'SELECT * FROM tbl
LIMIT ?, ?'; EXECUTE STMT USING #skip, #numrows;
For compatibility with PostgreSQL, MySQL also supports the LIMIT
row_count OFFSET offset syntax.
If LIMIT occurs within a subquery and also is applied in the outer
query, the outermost LIMIT takes precedence. For example, the
following statement produces two rows, not one:
(SELECT ... LIMIT 1) LIMIT 2;
I'm interested in learning some (ideally) database agnostic ways of selecting the nth row from a database table. It would also be interesting to see how this can be achieved using the native functionality of the following databases:
SQL Server
MySQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
Oracle
I am currently doing something like the following in SQL Server 2005, but I'd be interested in seeing other's more agnostic approaches:
WITH Ordered AS (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderID) AS RowNumber, OrderID, OrderDate
FROM Orders)
SELECT *
FROM Ordered
WHERE RowNumber = 1000000
Credit for the above SQL: Firoz Ansari's Weblog
Update: See Troels Arvin's answer regarding the SQL standard. Troels, have you got any links we can cite?
There are ways of doing this in optional parts of the standard, but a lot of databases support their own way of doing it.
A really good site that talks about this and other things is http://troels.arvin.dk/db/rdbms/#select-limit.
Basically, PostgreSQL and MySQL supports the non-standard:
SELECT...
LIMIT y OFFSET x
Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL supports the standard windowing functions:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY key ASC) AS rownumber,
columns
FROM tablename
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber <= n
(which I just copied from the site linked above since I never use those DBs)
Update: As of PostgreSQL 8.4 the standard windowing functions are supported, so expect the second example to work for PostgreSQL as well.
Update: SQLite added window functions support in version 3.25.0 on 2018-09-15 so both forms also work in SQLite.
PostgreSQL supports windowing functions as defined by the SQL standard, but they're awkward, so most people use (the non-standard) LIMIT / OFFSET:
SELECT
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY
somefield
LIMIT 1 OFFSET 20;
This example selects the 21st row. OFFSET 20 is telling Postgres to skip the first 20 records. If you don't specify an ORDER BY clause, there's no guarantee which record you will get back, which is rarely useful.
I'm not sure about any of the rest, but I know SQLite and MySQL don't have any "default" row ordering. In those two dialects, at least, the following snippet grabs the 15th entry from the_table, sorting by the date/time it was added:
SELECT *
FROM the_table
ORDER BY added DESC
LIMIT 1,15
(of course, you'd need to have an added DATETIME field, and set it to the date/time that entry was added...)
SQL 2005 and above has this feature built-in. Use the ROW_NUMBER() function. It is excellent for web-pages with a << Prev and Next >> style browsing:
Syntax:
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY MyColumnToOrderBy) AS RowNum,
*
FROM
Table_1
) sub
WHERE
RowNum = 23
I suspect this is wildly inefficient but is quite a simple approach, which worked on a small dataset that I tried it on.
select top 1 field
from table
where field in (select top 5 field from table order by field asc)
order by field desc
This would get the 5th item, change the second top number to get a different nth item
SQL server only (I think) but should work on older versions that do not support ROW_NUMBER().
Verify it on SQL Server:
Select top 10 * From emp
EXCEPT
Select top 9 * From emp
This will give you 10th ROW of emp table!
Contrary to what some of the answers claim, the SQL standard is not silent regarding this subject.
Since SQL:2003, you have been able to use "window functions" to skip rows and limit result sets.
And in SQL:2008, a slightly simpler approach had been added, using
OFFSET skip ROWS
FETCH FIRST n ROWS ONLY
Personally, I don't think that SQL:2008's addition was really needed, so if I were ISO, I would have kept it out of an already rather large standard.
1 small change: n-1 instead of n.
select *
from thetable
limit n-1, 1
SQL SERVER
Select n' th record from top
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
select n' th record from bottom
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID DESC) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
When we used to work in MSSQL 2000, we did what we called the "triple-flip":
EDITED
DECLARE #InnerPageSize int
DECLARE #OuterPageSize int
DECLARE #Count int
SELECT #Count = COUNT(<column>) FROM <TABLE>
SET #InnerPageSize = #PageNum * #PageSize
SET #OuterPageSize = #Count - ((#PageNum - 1) * #PageSize)
IF (#OuterPageSize < 0)
SET #OuterPageSize = 0
ELSE IF (#OuterPageSize > #PageSize)
SET #OuterPageSize = #PageSize
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(8000)
SET #sql = 'SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#OuterPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#InnerPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM <TABLE> ORDER BY <column> ASC
) AS t1 ORDER BY <column> DESC
) AS t2 ORDER BY <column> ASC'
PRINT #sql
EXECUTE sp_executesql #sql
It wasn't elegant, and it wasn't fast, but it worked.
In Oracle 12c, You may use OFFSET..FETCH..ROWS option with ORDER BY
For example, to get the 3rd record from top:
SELECT *
FROM sometable
ORDER BY column_name
OFFSET 2 ROWS FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY;
Here is a fast solution of your confusion.
SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY `id` DESC LIMIT N, 1
Here You may get Last row by Filling N=0, Second last by N=1, Fourth Last By Filling N=3 and so on.
This is very common question over the interview and this is Very simple ans of it.
Further If you want Amount, ID or some Numeric Sorting Order than u may go for CAST function in MySQL.
SELECT DISTINCT (`amount`)
FROM cart
ORDER BY CAST( `amount` AS SIGNED ) DESC
LIMIT 4 , 1
Here By filling N = 4 You will be able to get Fifth Last Record of Highest Amount from CART table. You can fit your field and table name and come up with solution.
ADD:
LIMIT n,1
That will limit the results to one result starting at result n.
Oracle:
select * from (select foo from bar order by foo) where ROWNUM = x
For example, if you want to select every 10th row in MSSQL, you can use;
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ColumnName1 ASC) AS rownumber, ColumnName1, ColumnName2
FROM TableName
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber % 10 = 0
Just take the MOD and change number 10 here any number you want.
For SQL Server, a generic way to go by row number is as such:
SET ROWCOUNT #row --#row = the row number you wish to work on.
For Example:
set rowcount 20 --sets row to 20th row
select meat, cheese from dbo.sandwich --select columns from table at 20th row
set rowcount 0 --sets rowcount back to all rows
This will return the 20th row's information. Be sure to put in the rowcount 0 afterward.
Here's a generic version of a sproc I recently wrote for Oracle that allows for dynamic paging/sorting - HTH
-- p_LowerBound = first row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 11 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
-- p_UpperBound = last row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 20 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
OPEN o_Cursor FOR
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
Column1,
Column2
rownum AS rn
FROM
(
SELECT
tbl.Column1,
tbl.column2
FROM MyTable tbl
WHERE
tbl.Column1 = p_PKParam OR
tbl.Column1 = -1
ORDER BY
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X'),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X') DESC,
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate) DESC
))
WHERE
(rn >= p_lowerBound OR p_lowerBound = -1) AND
(rn <= p_upperBound OR p_upperBound = -1);
But really, isn't all this really just parlor tricks for good database design in the first place? The few times I needed functionality like this it was for a simple one off query to make a quick report. For any real work, using tricks like these is inviting trouble. If selecting a particular row is needed then just have a column with a sequential value and be done with it.
Nothing fancy, no special functions, in case you use Caché like I do...
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM (
SELECT TOP n * FROM <table>
ORDER BY ID Desc
)
ORDER BY ID ASC
Given that you have an ID column or a datestamp column you can trust.
For SQL server, the following will return the first row from giving table.
declare #rowNumber int = 1;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
You can loop through the values with something like this:
WHILE #constVar > 0
BEGIN
declare #rowNumber int = #consVar;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
SET #constVar = #constVar - 1;
END;
LIMIT n,1 doesn't work in MS SQL Server. I think it's just about the only major database that doesn't support that syntax. To be fair, it isn't part of the SQL standard, although it is so widely supported that it should be. In everything except SQL server LIMIT works great. For SQL server, I haven't been able to find an elegant solution.
In Sybase SQL Anywhere:
SELECT TOP 1 START AT n * from table ORDER BY whatever
Don't forget the ORDER BY or it's meaningless.
T-SQL - Selecting N'th RecordNumber from a Table
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from TableName) T where T.Rno = RecordNumber
Where RecordNumber --> Record Number to Select
TableName --> To be Replaced with your Table Name
For e.g. to select 5 th record from a table Employee, your query should be
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from Employee) T where T.Rno = 5
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
table_name
WHERE
column_name IN (
SELECT
top N column_name
FROM
TABLE
ORDER BY
column_name
)
ORDER BY
column_name DESC
I've written this query for finding Nth row.
Example with this query would be
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
Employee
WHERE
emp_id IN (
SELECT
top 7 emp_id
FROM
Employee
ORDER BY
emp_id
)
ORDER BY
emp_id DESC
I'm a bit late to the party here but I have done this without the need for windowing or using
WHERE x IN (...)
SELECT TOP 1
--select the value needed from t1
[col2]
FROM
(
SELECT TOP 2 --the Nth row, alter this to taste
UE2.[col1],
UE2.[col2],
UE2.[date],
UE2.[time],
UE2.[UID]
FROM
[table1] AS UE2
WHERE
UE2.[col1] = ID --this is a subquery
AND
UE2.[col2] IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY
UE2.[date] DESC, UE2.[time] DESC --sorting by date and time newest first
) AS t1
ORDER BY t1.[date] ASC, t1.[time] ASC --this reverses the order of the sort in t1
It seems to work fairly fast although to be fair I only have around 500 rows of data
This works in MSSQL
SELECT * FROM emp a
WHERE n = (
SELECT COUNT( _rowid)
FROM emp b
WHERE a. _rowid >= b. _rowid
);
unbelievable that you can find a SQL engine executing this one ...
WITH sentence AS
(SELECT
stuff,
row = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM
SentenceType
)
SELECT
sen.stuff
FROM sentence sen
WHERE sen.row = (ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID())) % 100) + 1
select * from
(select * from ordered order by order_id limit 100) x order by
x.order_id desc limit 1;
First select top 100 rows by ordering in ascending and then select last row by ordering in descending and limit to 1. However this is a very expensive statement as it access the data twice.
It seems to me that, to be efficient, you need to 1) generate a random number between 0 and one less than the number of database records, and 2) be able to select the row at that position. Unfortunately, different databases have different random number generators and different ways to select a row at a position in a result set - usually you specify how many rows to skip and how many rows you want, but it's done differently for different databases. Here is something that works for me in SQLite:
select *
from Table
limit abs(random()) % (select count(*) from Words), 1;
It does depend on being able to use a subquery in the limit clause (which in SQLite is LIMIT <recs to skip>,<recs to take>) Selecting the number of records in a table should be particularly efficient, being part of the database's meta data, but that depends on the database's implementation. Also, I don't know if the query will actually build the result set before retrieving the Nth record, but I would hope that it doesn't need to. Note that I'm not specifying an "order by" clause. It might be better to "order by" something like the primary key, which will have an index - getting the Nth record from an index might be faster if the database can't get the Nth record from the database itself without building the result set.
Most suitable answer I have seen on this article for sql server
WITH myTableWithRows AS (
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY myTable.SomeField)) as row,*
FROM myTable)
SELECT * FROM myTableWithRows WHERE row = 3