I'm trying to build a website with bootstrap and other css resources and I'm trying to fix the following issue in the last 2 days and I think I won't be able to fix it.
I have a row of 50 250x250 cards with a left-margin of 30px. When I'm on the full screen, I get no problems. However, when I change the screen size, a huge gap between the latest card and the screen borders occurs. This continues until the browser can fill the empty space with the following card.
I don't want to have this empty space and want the cards to automatically align themselves to the center.
I've also divided the columns to 10 rows but still, there was no change.
Is there a way to fix this issue? Screenshots are attached for fullscreen and smaller screen.
You can also see it yourself from: http://sagtekin.com/letseat/maintest.php
Thank you very much for your valuable help.
I have to say your code is a bit of a mess, I would encourage you to go back and reference the bootstrap documentation for proper semantic and structural code as you have a bunch of unnecessary stuff happening.
In a nutshell you have to make your containing div has a text-align: center applied. I also gave a margin-right and left of 15px to offset spacing and maintain centering.
Secondly make sure your column classes make sense and fit into each other mathematically! I've wrapped your images in a col-lg-12 and wrap your images in a col-lg-4 so that there will be at least 3 up. Adjust image sizing as you see fit I made smaller images so you could see the responsiveness in the fiddle more.
.container {
text-align: center;
}
#card {
background: #FAFAFA;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
margin-left: 15px;
margin-right: 15px;
overflow: hidden;
display: inline-block;
}
#card h2 {
background-color: #3F51B5;
opacity: 0.9;
text-align: center;
position: absolute;
margin: 0px;
width: 150px;
}
img {
float: left;
}
Here is a Fiddle
https://jsfiddle.net/gward90/oygyj9qd/
You have several times id card, use class.
Don't set the width of the column divs, let bootstrap do it. (Fixed size and responsive design don't mix too well.)
Use the img tag unless you really want the image in the background and then put something over it which dictates the size.
If you do it like that, then the container will behave as you expect it.
I am learning CSS and made up a problem for myself. I hope to get some help from CSS masters here :)
This is what I am trying to accomplish: A div with some text inside and a background image. Div's width is 100% of it's parent and height depends on text content. The background image should fill the div and have the minimum possible dimensions. Tried to search for answers but haven't found any.
The application of this could be for example a slider, a hero shot or a title with a responsive background and other responsive design applications.
Question
How to make responsive background image for div with constrained proportions without CSS3 "background-size" feature and without JS? The div's width is 100% and height depends on it's text content. Background image dimensions should equal either div's height or width as shown on illustration (i.e. image should have smallest possible dimensions).
Is this possible to accomplish at all? Or do I need to use some extra techniques to do this? For example extra #meadia queries with different different images (different dimension) or something else?
Illustration
Here is the illustration of how everything should behave:
Illustration
Requirements
The requirements I'm trying to achieve is No "background-size" and No JavaScript. This is for more browser compatibility. The CSS3 background-size:cover does the job almost. Very close. But it isn't compatible with older browsers. The structure is not prescribed. Text and images can be wrapped in any number of divs if needed.
Attempts
I've tried to accomplish the task with the following code:
jsfiddle
The code seems to work ok with smaller images but not with larger images. This presents one of two problems: 1) too low resolution (with small images) OR 2) it isn't clear what the image is about (for larger images).
I haven't used overflow:hidden to make the effect visible.
<div class="box">
<img class="img img11" src="image.jpg" alt="" />
<h1>Some text here</h1>
</div>
And the CSS:
* {
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
}
h1 { font: 600 20pt Arial; }
.box {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
min-height: 70px;
}
.img {
position: absolute;
top: 0px; /* Position it in top left corner */
left: 0px;
z-index: -1; /* Put it behind the text */
border: 2px dashed red;
/* Preserve aspect ratio */
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
What are your closes't solutions? Hope the question is clear enough and isn't too long. Thanks for your replies!
I have a weird background bug on my site, http://www.andytechguy.com/ . You can see that when you go on a mobile browser and search the site, a part of the gradients at the top get chopped off. I have no idea what is going on with that, I didn't add anything to make that happen and it doesn't look good. Please help?
The problem is that #main_part has a fixed width of 1050px. But the rest of the site is assuming the width is about 980px. (980px in my mobile)
Just add a css rule like this:
html {
width: 1050px;
}
And you'll notice that the top bar is not longer chopped off.
However, that annoying horizontal scroll may still be there (but this time without empty space)
Nothing of this is a replacement to actually create a responsive website. That in the end is the real solution. May I suggest that you convert your website to bootstrap?
From what I can tell your h2 text is larger on mobile vs desktop. This probably has to do with font rendering and your reltive size of 1.5em.
Your background gradient is 70px tall. On mobile it is repeating itself since the header's height is greater than 70px.
I would modify your CSS like so:
CSS
#section h2 {
/* remove this */
padding: 20px;
/* add these two */
height: 70px;
line-height: 70px; /* this will vertically align the text */
}
Move your div inside "container" class and create your own custom class like below:
.custom-container{
min-width: 100%;
padding-right: 0;
padding-left: 0;
}
overall, write this
<div class="container custom-container">
<!-- ... -->
</div>
My blog/website is iamdonle.com
An example of what I want is 13thwitness.com
The images on mine doesn't scale and a scroll bar will appear. On his website the images get smaller with the window. I'm sure it's simple but I'm a noob. Please help!
You images are scaling down, but your logo is not!
Try:
.logo {
max-width: 100%;
}
First, you'll need to make sure your container is able to scale. Right now it has a set width of 1150px, this needs to be either a max-width or percentage based.
First, remove the width declared on #container and add this CSS:
#container {
max-width: 1150px;
padding: 5px 30px 0;
}
Then you'll need to remove the width declared for your header. You can do this by either removing the line completely (line 82 of your CSS file) or by overriding it in your 'Custom CSS' field box in the Customization screen by doing:
#header {
width: 100%;
}
Then, as others have mentioned, you'll need to add a max-width to your logo as well.
#header img {
max-width: 100%;
}
Note: when I viewed the blog you were using the "Quite Big" theme, the code above only applies to that theme.
I've a problem laying out an e-commerce page with very strict layout requirements. We want to show a product image alongside a product description, with some optional extra information about the product below the image. The width is constrained by our overall page layout, while height can be variable. The answer seems to be "you can't do this with pure CSS".
Here's a mock up:
The marked widths are 372+12+178=562 leaving 8px in borders. The image and description areas have 2px borders, making a total of 8px horizontal pixels, and 562+8=570.
I've got the vertical centering of the image mostly sorted, what breaks the design is the optional 'extra info' panel. The site is generated by PHP, which optionally includes the <div> for that extra info if the data is available for the product. I'd be happy to always include the 'extra info' element and style it to be invisible if it's empty, if it helps solve the design problem.
Requirements:
Product image can be any aspect ratio. Some are thin and tall, some wide and short, some square.
Product image should fill its area horizontally and naturally size itself vertically by its aspect ratio.
Product image should be vertically centered in its area (blue). When extra info is not visible, image would be vertically centered alongside the Description area. When extra info is visible, image should be vertically centered in the remaining space.
Extra info can be any amount of text and aligned to bottom of product image area. So, cannot have fixed height.
Product Description can be any amount of text.
The 'image and extra info' column should vertically match the size of the 'description' column and vice versa.
Description and Extra Info boxes employ CSS gradient backgrounds and borders. All these divs must actually size themselves accordingly, I cannot get away with 'faux columns' as described here http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/.
Do not want to use Javascript to align elements. Yes, I'm sure we're all jQuery masters and it's a wonderful tool, but it shouldn't be required for this layout.
My design so far employs pure CSS and no tables, using the table-cell style to center the image, but there is some fudgery to do with min-height that breaks when different size images are used. A jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/GJVbX/
That fiddle is easily broken by e.g. tripling the Product Description text content, or adding "width: 370px; height: 400px;" to the so it's not a nice height.
An example of my design that works well:
However, it's not hard to find an image size that breaks it:
Note how the tall product image makes the image div extend vertically and the Description column cannot keep up.
I've been on #css IRC channel on Freenode and was told that this is possible using pure CSS, using tables for this layout task is a sign I don't understand CSS layout and should hire a professional, and that to achieve the vertical centering I should use "display: table-cell". However, extremely helpful as they were, the discussion was too complex to continue on IRC. I understand that <table> brings with it all sorts of horrible layout mechanics that is simply broken for accurate page layout, however, I can't think of a better solution, mostly because of my requirement to keep the columns the same height.
Would appreciate constructive criticism, alternative solutions, or even just confirmation of my plight :)
EDIT - here is the HTML and CSS content from the jsfiddle given above, for those who prefer this content contained within the stackoverflow question. This is extracted from the live site, cleaned a little for indentation, with a dummy product image (produced by the thumbnailer script employed in the live site) and dummy text.
HTML:
<div class="productInfo">
<div class="productTopWrapper">
<div class="productImgWrapper"><div class="wraptocenter"><span></span><img src="http://nickfenwick.com/hood.jpg"></div></div><div class="extraInfoWrapper gradientBackground"><div class="extraInfoInner">Extra info goes here.</div>
</div>
<div class="productDescription gradientBackground"><div class="productDescriptionInner">
Product Description goes here.<br/>
Product Description goes here.<br/>
Product Description goes here.<br/>
Product Description goes here.<br/>
Product Description goes here.<br/>
Yet the gradient ends too soon because this div doesn't fill its space vertically!
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
DIV.productInfo {
max-width: 570px;
font-family: Verdana,Geneva,'DejaVu Sans',sans-serif;
font-size: 12px; /* Just for this fiddle */
}
.productInfo .productTopWrapper {
overflow: hidden;
margin-bottom: 12px;
position: relative;
}
.productInfo .productImgWrapper {
width: 372px;
min-height: 353px;
float: left;
border: 2px solid #cbcbcb;
text-align: center;
}
/* BEGIN css wrap from http://www.brunildo.org/test/img_center.html */
.wraptocenter {
display: table-cell;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 372px;
height: 309px;
}
.wraptocenter * {
vertical-align: middle;
}
/*\*//*/
.wraptocenter {
display: block;
}
.wraptocenter span {
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
width: 1px;
}
/**/
*:first-child+html {} * html .wraptocenter span {
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
}
/* END css wrap */
.productInfo .extraInfoWrapper {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 376px;
}
.productInfo .extraInfoInner {
padding: 5px;
border: 2px solid #cbcbcb;
text-align: center;
}
.productInfo .gradientBackground {
background: #999; /* for non-css3 browsers */
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr='#d0d1d3', endColorstr='#fefefe'); /* for IE */
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, from(#d0d1d3), to(#fefefe)); /* for webkit browsers */
background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #d0d1d3, #fefefe); /* for firefox 3.6+ */
background: -ms-repeating-linear-gradient(top, #d0d1d3, #fefefe);
background: repeating-linear-gradient(top, #d0d1d3, #fefefe);
}.productInfo .productDescription {
width: 178px;
min-height: 353px;
margin-left: 388px;
border: 2px solid #cbcbcb;
}
.productInfo .productDescriptionInner {
padding: 5px;
font-size: 1.2em;
line-height: 1.2em;
}
Unfortunately, which versions of IE you are required to support affects more than just CSS3 eye-candy. display: table-cell, for example, isn't avilable in IE7. And a myriad of other things present in other browsers are missing or buggy in IE7 and IE8. IE9 is a considerable improvement however.
To be honest, even if you were restricting yourself to latest version of all browsers, this layout would still be difficult in pure CSS, whatever people on IRC may claim. When new layout managers such as Flexible Box and Grid Layout are ubiquitously available, it will be easy, but we are a few years off from that, I'm afraid.
Anyway, here is my attempt at your required layout:
http://jsfiddle.net/amtiskaw/tNywn/
It requires IE8 and above, as it uses display: table-cell to vertically centre the product image. It also has a quirk where the content of the extra-info box will never overlap vertically with the content of the product-info box, although their borders will look correct.
The stretched borders and gradients are achieved by using additional elements which are sized to vertically fill the product container element using absolute positioning, then placed behind the content using negative z-indexes.
Personally, I'd me more inclined in this case to use tables or a bit of jQuery to get the sizing right, rather than this kind of CSS hackery. If you use a table, you can give it an attribute role="presentation" to indicate to screen readers and other semantic tools that it is being used for layout purposes, rather than to express tabular data. This pattern was approved by the W3C.
You can do this with a tall height set with a negative margin. (your height minus the minimum height of your div, in this case 353px) The only problem is that the border bottom will disappear into the parent's overflow (which should stay hidden). Not sure how important the border is to you or even if that's what you were looking for, but perhaps it might point you in the right direction?
.productInfo .productDescription {
width: 178px;
min-height: 353px;
margin-left: 388px;
border: 2px solid #cbcbcb;
height: 1000px;
margin-bottom: -647px;
}
I remember having this problem some time ago and ended up resorting to JS to resolve it. Unforunately the constraints you have are making it very difficult to come up with a working example with pure CSS. The problem as I see it is that as soon as the image increases in size the containing div no longer has a specific width or height and with CSS alone you can't make the calculations needed to expand the description div to the correct height. Browsers won't do this automatically if the element that's size changes is not the direct parent, leaving children of the parent at the heights they were pre-height / width change.
Yes tables will solve the problem with a fixed row height but as you say, they come at a price that I try to stick clear of as much as possible.
I'm presuming you've considered using JS / Jquery to solve this problem already.
Jquery example
$(function()
{
var height = $('.productImgWrapper').innerHeight();
$('.productDescription').css('height', height);
});
Note that .innerHeight() includes padding but not the border or margin. To include the border use .outerHeight().
I know it's not ideal but I can't see any other way of solving your problem. Maybe someone with higher CSS powers than I can come up with a solution.