When I complete sp.integrate.quad I see a tooltip with the function documentation, but as soon as I accept the completion, the tooltip goes away. I'd prefer to see the the main part of the doc string underneath the function the entire time I'm editing it's arguments. As a stop gap, I tried getting at the documentation another way. jedi:show-doc or company-jedi-show-doc look like promising functions for at least re-displaying the docstring information, but they give an error saying they can't find the documentation. Why can't these procedures see the documentation, yet the initial completion tooltip can? Has anyone used jedi to achieve something close to my desired setup?
Jedi Setup Info:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/11180631
py-install-directory var must be set correctly for jedi:show-doc.
you can simply set the variable directly in your emacs init file as the following sentance.
(setq py-install-directory "~/.emacs.d/elpa/PYTHON-MODE DIRECTORY")
or following sentance for the case python-mode package is updated
(setq py-install-directory (concat "~/.emacs.d/elpa/" (car (directory-files "~/.emacs.d/elpa/" nil "python-mode*"))))
Related
According to the Workflow commands for GitHub Actions documentation, I can pass a col and endColumn parameter to indicate a position in a file where the warning/error occurs. For example, I am writing out the line below, following the docs:
::warning title=Possible spelling mistake found.,file=README.md,line=3,col=30,endColumn=40::Possible replacements: «Docusates»
This does work, to an exent, in annotating the file in the Pull Request as shown in this screenshot:
However, nothing is apparently done with col and endColumn. I was hoping it would highlight the text in some way. I cannot find anything in the docs to indicate what these two parameters are used for, if not for that purpose.
Is this expected behavior? Or, am I doing something wrong?
I'm trying to add some lua functionality to my existing conky setup so that repetitive "code" in my conky text can be cleaned up. For example, I have information for each mounted FS, each core, etc. where each row displayed in my panel differs ONLY by one parameter.
My first skeletal, attempt at using lua functions for this seems to run but displays nothing in my panel. I've only found very simple examples to base this on, so I may have made a simple error, but I don't even know how to diagnose it. My code here is modeled after what I HAVE been able to find regarding writing functions, such as this How to implement a basic Lua function in Conky? , but that's about all the depth I've found on the topic except for drawing and cairo examples.
Here's the code added to my conky config, as well as the contents of my functions.lua file
conky.config = {
...
lua_load = '/home/conky-manager/MyConky/functions.lua',
};
conky.text = [[
...
${voffset 5}${lua conky_test 'test'}
...
]]
file - functions.lua
function conky_test(parm1)
return 'result text'
end
What I would expect is to see is "result text" displayed in my panel at the location where that function call appears, but nothing shows.
Is there a log created by conky as it runs, or a way to provide some debug output? Even if I'd made a simple error here, I'd still like to have the ability to diagnose things as my code gets more complex.
Success!
After cobbling info from several articles together, I figured out my basic flaws -
1. Missing a 'conky_main' function,
2. Missing a 'lua_draw_hook_post' to invoke it, and
3. Realizing that if I invoke conky from a terminal, print statements in lua would appear there.
So, for anyone who sees this question and has the same issues, here's the corrected code.
conky.config = {
...
lua_load = '/home/conky-manager/MyConky/functions.lua',
lua_draw_hook_post = "main",
};
conky.text = [[
...
${lua conky_test 'test'}
...
]]
and the proper basics in my functions.lua file
function conky_test(parm1)
return 'result text'
end
function conky_main()
if conky_window == nil then
return
end
end
A few notes:
I still haven't determined if using 'lua_draw_hook_pre' instead of 'lua_draw_hook_post' makes any difference, but it doesn't seem to in this example.
Also, some examples showed actually calling this 'test' function instead of writing a 'main', but the 'main' seemed to have value in checking to see if conky_window existed.
Some examples seemed to state that naming functions with the prefix 'conky_' was required, but then showed examples of calling those functions without the prefix, so I assume the prefix is inferred during the call.
a major note: you should run conky from the directory containing the lua scripts.
I had gone through a different tutorials and manuals, but still can't put a things together.
As I understand, when I need to add a new function to an event while an old functional still saved, I am add a hook by calling add-hook. From the manual entry on the add-hook:
FUNCTION is added (if necessary) at the beginning of the hook list
unless the optional argument APPEND is non-nil
So the hook is just a list of a functions. But how is this list looks like? Works? From my little research I found that every cons cell besides the car and cdr have also an invisible unmentioned slot for a function pointer(may be an index, it doesn't matter). So how can I create manually a list of a functions, and execute it? Probably with add-to-list function, but everything I tried just triggers an errors. Also in the manual mentioned:
You can set a hook variable with setq like any other Lisp variable,
Something is wrong here, because a pointer to a function don't get copied with setq. I.e.:
(defun myfunc1 () (message "hello"))
(setq onemorefunc 'myfunc1)
After I execute the (onemorefunc), debugger triggers, the setq just ignores a value of the unnamed element in which the pointer stored.
To call a function that's in a variable, you have to use funcall or apply:
(funcall onemorefunc)
(apply onemorefunc '())
When Emacs is processing a hook variable, it iterates through the list:
(do ((hooks blah-hook (cdr hooks)))
((null hooks))
(funcall (car hooks)))
In your example, your setq merely makes onemorefunc another name for myfunc1. A hook needs to be a list, and you need to add your hook function to that list using add-hook, which is a glorified version of push, not replace the list completely with your function using setq. The mention of setq has misled you, though it's clear to someone who's familiar with hooks that it is telling you something else correctly. It says you can set a hook variable -- not a hook itself -- using setq, and you can, but what it doesn't make clear is that what you have to set that hook variable to is another list (of zero or more functions) not a function. Thus, assuming my-mode-start-hook is empty to begin:
(add-hook 'my-mode-start-hook #'my-func)
is equivalent to:
(setq my-mode-start-hook (list #'my-func))
In practice, you should always do the former, never the latter unless and until you're really sure you know what you're doing.
I have just started a new version of my Crysis Wars Server Side Modification called InfinityX. For better management, I have put the functions inside tables as it looks neater and I can group functions together (like Core.PlayerHandle:GetIp(player)), but I have ran into a problem.
The problem is that the specified method to get the players' name, player:GetName() is being seen as an invalid method, when the method actually is completely valid.
I would like to know if using the below structure is causing a problem and if so, how to fix it. This is the first time I've used this structure for functions, but it is already proving easier than the old method I was using.
The Code:
Event =
{
PlayerConnect = function(player)
Msg.All:CenteredConsole("$4Event$8 (Connect)$9: $3"..player:GetName().." on channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
System.LogAlways(Default.Tag.."Incoming Connect on Channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
Event:Log("Connect", player);
end;
};
The below code works when I bypass the function and put the code directly where it's needed:
Msg.All:CenteredConsole("$4Event$8 (Connect)$9: $3"..player:GetName().." on channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
System.LogAlways(Default.Tag.."Incoming Connect on Channel "..player.actor:GetChannel());
The Error:
[Warning] [Lua Error] infinityx/main/core.events.lua:23: attempt to call method 'GetName' (a nil value)
PlayerConnect, (infinityx/main/core.events.lua: 23)
ConnectScript, (infinityx/main/core.main.lua: 52)
OnClientEnteredGame, (scripts/gamerules/instantaction.lua: 511)
(null) (scripts/gamerules/teaminstantaction.lua: 520)
Any clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks :)
Well, as PlayerConnect is inside the table Event, and you are calling with a ":", add self as first arg in the function, like:
PlayerConnect = function(self, player)
Clearly, player in the first block of code is not the same as player in the second block of code. The problem must be that the caller of Event.PlayerConnect is not passing the same value.
To test that your Event.PlayerConnect function works, try this in the same place as your second block of code:
Event.PlayerConnect(player)
That should work as you expect.
So, the problem comes down to how Event.PlayerConnect is called without the second block of code. I'm not familiar with that game engine so I don't know how it is done. Perhaps reviewing the documentation and/or debugging that area would help. If you print(player) or call the equivalent log function in both cases, you should see they are different. If you can't run in a debugger, you can still get a stack trace with print(debug.traceback("Accessing player, who's value is: "..player)). If there is indeed some kind of table-based player object in both cases, you can try comparing their fields to see how they are different. You might need to write a simple dumping function to help with that.
Please see #7755661 first. I am using ECL and basically want to execute some code, trap any kind of condition that may occur and then continue execution, without prompting or entering the debugger. This is easy to achieve with the following handler-case macro:
(handler-case
(load "code.lisp") ; this may raise a condition
(error (condition)
(print condition))) ; this prints sth like #<a UNBOUND-VARIABLE>
My only problem is that I cannot find a generic way to print a more meaningful error for the user. Indeed my application is an HTTP server and the output goes to a web page. code.lisp is written by the user and it can raise any kind of condition, I do now want to list them all in my code. I would just like to print the same error message I see on the REPL when I do not use handler-case, but in the HTML page, e.g. for an "unbound variable" error, a string like "The variable VAR is unbound".
By inspecting a condition object of type UNBOUND-VARIABLE I see it has two slots: SI:REPORT-FUNCTION, which is a compiled function and SI:NAME, set to the name of the variable in this case. I guess SI:REPORT-FUNCTION could be what I need to invoke but how can I call it? If I try:
(handler-case foo (error (condition) (SI::REPORT-FUNCTION condition)))
it tells me that SI:REPORT-FUNCTION is undefined. SI or SYS in ECL is a package for functions and variables internal to the implementation, but I don't worry if my code is not portable, as long as it works.
BTW in other kinds of condition objects there are also other apparently useful slots for my purpose, named SI:FORMAT-CONTROL and SI:FORMAT-ARGUMENT, but I cannot access any of them from my code too.
I was looking for somethink alike to the getMessage() method of Java exception objects in Lisp, but none of my sources ever mentions something like that.
Moreover, is there any hope to be able to get the line number in code.lisp where the error occurred too? Without that it would be difficult for the user to locate the problem in his code.lisp source file. I would really want to provide this information and stopping at the first error is acceptable for me.
In Common Lisp when print escaping is disabled, the error message is printed.
CL-USER > (handler-case
a
(error (condition)
(write condition :escape nil)))
The variable A is unbound.
#<UNBOUND-VARIABLE 4020059743>
Note that PRINT binds *print-escape* to T.
Using PRINC works - it binds *print-escape* to NIL.
CL-USER > (handler-case
a
(error (condition)
(princ condition)))
The variable A is unbound.
#<UNBOUND-VARIABLE 4020175C0B>
This is described in CLHS 9.1.3 Printing Conditions.
Also note, when you have an object, which has a slot and the value of this slot is a function, then you need to get the slot value using the function SLOT-VALUE and then use FUNCALL or APPLY and call the function with the correct arguments.
If you have a condition of type simple-condition then it has a format-control and a format-argument information. This is described with an example how to use it for FORMAT in CLHS Function SIMPLE-CONDITION-FORMAT-CONTROL, SIMPLE-CONDITION-FORMAT-ARGUMENTS
My answer below is based on one I already gave at the ECL mailing list. Actually I would claim that this is not an embedding problem, but a Lisp one. You want to get some information at the file position of the form which caused the error. This is not attached to a condition because conditions happen independently of whether the form evaluated was interpreted, compiled or part of a function that is already installed in the Lisp image. In other words, it is up to you to know the position of the file which is being read and do some wrapping that adds the information.
The following is nonstandard and prone to change: ECL helps you by defining a variable ext::source-location when LOAD is used on a source file. This variable contains a CONS that should NEVER be changed or stored by the user, but you can get the file as (CAR EXT:*SOURCE-LOCATION*) and the file position as (CDR EXT:*SOURCE-LOCATION*). The plan is then to embed your LOAD form inside a HANDLER-BIND
(defparameter *error-message* nil)
(defparameter *error-tag* (cons))
(defun capture-error (condition)
(setf *error*
(format nil "At character ~S in file ~S an error was found:~%~A"
(cdr ext:*source-location*)
(car ext:*source-location*)
condition)))
(throw *error-tag* *error-message*))
(defun safely-load (file)
(handler-bind ((serious-condition #'capture-error))
(catch *error-tag*
(load file)
nil)))
(SAFELY-LOAD "myfile.lisp") will return either NIL or the formatted error.
In any case I strongly believe that relying on LOAD for this is doomed to fail. You should create your own version of LOAD, starting from this
(defun my-load (userfile)
(with-open-file (stream userfile :direction :input :external-format ....whateverformat...)
(loop for form = (read stream nil nil nil)
while form
do (eval-form-with-error-catching form))))
where EVAL-FORM-.... implements something like the code above. This function can be made more sophisticated and you may keep track of file positions, line numbers, etc. Your code will also be more portable this way.
So please, read the ANSI Spec and learn the language. The fact that you did not know how to print readably a condition and instead tried to play with ECL internals shows that you might face further problems in the future, trying to go with non-portable solutions (hidden slot names, report functions, etc) instead of first trying the standard way.