body {
background-color: white;
color: #000000;
font-family:"arial",arial;
margin:auto;
}
(header logo EWITA) #header {
position:relative;
left:-150px;
background-color:transparent;
text-align:center;
margin-top:50px;
padding:0;}
(HR LINE) hr.main {
position:relative;
top:-5px;
background-color:#353535;
height:10px;
width:100%;
margin:0;
padding:0;
z-index: -1;
}
#menubar {
position:relative;
background-image: URL('./pictures/menu.png');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
left:730px;
top:-40px;
height:25px;
width:300px;
background-color:transparent;
color:#ffffff;
padding:5 0 0 20;
}
(menu bar) table,tr,td {
border-spacing:0;
border-collapse:collapse;
padding:0 10 0 10;
}
(page after head) #wrapper {
margin:auto;
min-height:500px;
background-image: URL('./pictures/background.png');
background-repeat: repeat-xy;
z-index:-2;
}
#content {
margin:auto;
width:700px;
background-color:#ffffff;
margin-top: 40px;
border:1px solid;
padding: 50 30 50 30;
this is my css i am writing a page for a client and due to some relative positioning it makes me a problem with a background as u see here the white line after the HR line.
Thanks everyone who responds.
Edit:
Wondered how to update this answer, as there is a lot to talk about found it best to take it from bottom up. This will bring you to a layout like this:
Stage one demo.
The menu and logo should stay in place when you re-size the window etc.
Had a look at your code now. It is better, but you still have some trouble:
border is still set on image. Invalid markup.
repeat-xy is still used on background. Invalid property value.
#content still has padding without units. Invalid property value.
<br> tags are still used to make paragraphs in text.
There is an extra } after #content. Invalidates CSS file.
Number 4. should be fixed, but not that important right now.
As we already have discussed 1-3 it is hard to understand why you keep them. Invalid markup and styling makes for unreliable result.
It can look OK in one browser, in one version of one browser, look whack in another, and totally break in a third. You get misinformation between code and result. When or if you fix it to be valid other unexpected things may change and you have to do a lot more work to clean it up. As a whole and rule number one. No matter how wrong markup and styling might be seen from a how to do it perspective one have to keep invalid markup and style out of it.
To validate your work, and as you are where you are in regards to experience, do it all the time. Do small changes: validate. Do small changes: validate. And so on. Use:
For HTML
For CSS
Markup
The markup as it is now is not the easiest to style or get to behave good in a dynamic way. hr's is not the easiest to work with and vary between browsers. Do not use tables for menu's or styling. They are best left for what they are intended to: show tabular data. For your menu you can ask yourself: what is the menu; well, it is a list. A list of options for end-user to navigate trough the site. There is a lot of examples on the web using lists as menus. Search the web for CSS list menu etc. You can create nice looking, cross-browser reliable CSS only, (no JavaScript dependency), menus.
But let us start with the basic markup: You will usually find it good to wrap the whole page inside a wrapper. Then add sub-items into that. To position elements like your main menu, logo etc. it could be good to use a wrapper for each and position them by float, margins etc.
In general use margins and padding.
Page layout
Head Div
Divider Div
Content Div
Footer Div
Head
Div float left Div float left
LOGOmenu
Styling + markup
To make it easy for yourself use temporary borders and background colors to view how the various elements float around. Also use the browsers built-in tools to show various things like margins etc. This is invaluable.
Only remember that if you use borders, and you intend to remove them on finished product, they can take up space.
As an example you could have something like this:
Strong colored first attempt.
HTML:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="head">
<div id="logo">
<a href="index.php">
<img id="logo_img" src="http://cupido.g6.cz/pictures/header.png" alt="EWITA" />
</a>
</div>
<div id="menubar">MENU</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
* {
margin : 0;
padding : 0;
}
body {
font-family: Arial;
height : 100%;
background : orange;
}
#wrap {
position : relative;
background : pink;
width : 100%;
height : 100%;
}
#head {
position : relative;
width : 800px;
height : 131px;
margin : 100px auto 0 auto;
background : blue;
}
#logo {
position : relative;
width : 431px;
float : left;
background : red ;
}
#logo_img {
width : 439px;
height : 131px;
float : left;
}
#menubar {
position : relative;
background : #fff;
width : 300px;
float : left;
margin-top : 107px;
padding : 3px 0 3px 10px;
}
Note: I use a hard reset of margin and padding on all elements by:
* {
margin : 0;
padding; 0;
}
And then set margins and padding on tags and elements as I use them. Often find this to be a much easier way then the other way around. Remember that things like body also has padding etc. and often can result in undesired spacing.
This way you also get rid of the horizontal scroll-bar at bottom.
By using float on thing like logo and menubar the elements align nicely.
Next we can add the divider. Here we could use a div and set border for top and bottom. On content we use padding to make space between header, text and footer. We also add white border to top of content that aligns nicely with the divider.
Added divider, content and footer.
HTML:
<div id="divider"></div>
<div id="main_content">
MAIN CONTENT
</div>
<div id="footer">
FOOTER
</div>
CSS:
#divider {
border-top : 5px solid #353535;
border-bottom: 3px solid #888;
}
#main_content {
position : relative;
background : url('http://cupido.g6.cz/pictures/background.png');
border-top : 2px solid #fff;
padding : 120px 0 130px 0;
}
Next we can add the content text and style it. Also added style to footer.
With content and styled footer.
HTML
<div class="content_text">
<p>
text text text ...
</p>
</div>
CSS:
.content_text {
margin : 0 auto;
width : 700px;
background : #fff;
border : 1px solid;
padding : 50px 30px;
}
.content_text p {
font-size : 16px;
}
Resize window etc. and see it floats nicely around.
Now it is time to add the menu. As mentioned earlier we can use list for the menu. It is much more suited for the task then a table. In that regard also note that a menu might have sub items, as such a list becomes the only sane option.
Also note on the menu: You likely do not want to style visited links with other color. But that is up to you of course.
With added menu and some re-styling on background colors etc.
HTML:
<ul>
<li><a class="menu" href="smaler.php">úvodní stránka</a></li>
<li><a class="menu" href="sluzby.php">služby</a></li>
<li><a class="menu" href="kontakt.php">kontakt</a> </li>
</ul>
CSS:
As we already have set margins and padding to 0 on all elements this is trivial:
#menubar ul {
list-style : none;
}
#menubar li {
padding : 0 10px;
float : left;
}
a.menu {
text-decoration : none;
color : #fff;
}
a.menu:hover,
a.menu:active {
color : #3cc8a8;
}
Remove helping colors etc. and we have a version 0.1 ready for further testing and expansion.
Result.
Result as one page.
Validated markup on result at W3C
Validated CSS on result at W3C
Original answer:
There is more then one problem. Firstly the markup:
XHTML
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="./pictures/favicon.png">
Should be:
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="./pictures/favicon.png" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css">
Should be:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css" />
<img src="./pictures/header.png" width="439" height="131" border="0" alt="">
Should be XHTML 1.0 Strict img tag does not have a border attribute, and need
to be closed:
<img src="./pictures/header.png" width="439" height="131" alt="" />
<hr class="main" /></hr>
Should be:
<hr class="main" />
Use paragraphs to group text, not:
Text<br/><br/>Text<br/><br/>Text ...
but:
<p>Text</p><p>Text</p><p>Text... </p>
CSS
Inline comments are not valid, use:
/* some comment */
Not:
// some comment
You are missing unit on most of your padding values. If a value is non-zero it needs a unit such as pt, px etc. Use:
padding: 5px 0 0 20px;
/* Not: */
padding: 5 0 0 20;
If you do not, it has no/(should not have any) effect.
background-repeat does not have repeat-xy. Use:
background-repeat: repeat;
/* not */
background-repeat: repeat-xy;
or nothing at all, as that is the default.
Fix those first. Then set some color to your things so that it is easier to understand what you want. You can change them back later. Use red, blue etc.
Example.
Regarding zero width no break space bug, as displayed in Vim:
Try adding this CSS:
CSS:
#wrapper {
margin: auto;
min-height: 500px;
background-image: URL('../images/squared_metal.png');
background-repeat: repeat-xy;
z-index: 10;
padding-top:10px;
margin-top:-30px;
}
#content {
margin:auto;
width:700px;
background-color:#ffffff;
margin-top: 10px;
border:1px solid;
padding: 50 30 50 30;
}
I totally overlooked the 'padding-top' css property originally. Thank you all for providing that information!
Please update your site with this CSS and let me know if it works! Since I tested this on my own machine, you should change back the background-url to your custom .png file.
Related
In IE11 and Edge (on Windows 10), the following HTML/CSS displays a strange, transparent border where there shouldn't be.
<!DOCTYPE html><html>
<head>
<style>
body {
background-color:red;
font-size: 10pt;
}
.menu {
background-color: #5f6062;
overflow:hidden; /* To contain floats */
box-sizing: content-box;
}
.right-menu {
float:right;
margin:auto;
padding:0 0 0 20px;
list-style: none;
}
.spacer {
background-color: #ffffff;
height: 20px;
}
.content {
background-color: #ffffff;
border-radius:0 0 10px 10px;
background-clip: content-box;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="menu">
<ul class="right-menu">
<li>Link</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="content">
<div class="content-title">There shouldn't be a 'border' above this...</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
JSFiddle (You may need to resize the window vertically to see the 'border' fade in and out in JSFiddle — which is even stranger.)
The most interesting part is that the issue seems to be caused by border-radius. If I remove it, the 'border' is gone. It will also go away if I remove some other element (the .menu div for example), but that is less of an option since I would prefer not having to mess with the structure of the site having this problem.
I've found mentions of background-clip: content-box or padding-box as a solution, but it doesn't seem to work here.
Also of note, while trying to reduce the size of my demonstration, I ended up with a code that showed the border in JSFiddle, but not in a plain HTML file. This is the smallest I could get to display the 'border' both inside JSFiddle and a plain HTML file.
Found the bug in EDGE's Platform Issues but still would like to find a workaround...
It looks like IE is rendering a transparent border to display the border-radius but picks the 'background' color further down the layers than it should (in my sample, using red instead of white).
So I went with workarounds...
On my actual page, two elements are having this bug. For one my workaround was to set the background-color of another element further behind the one with border-radius and for the other to set an actual border the same color as the element's background.
I'm having trouble with the layout of a simple HTML page. Please help.
Here's the layout I'm going for...
Layout http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/9637/layoutfk5.gif
orange = body
blue/red = frame div
green = header image
black/white = menu div
It looks correct in Internet Explorer, but in Firefox, Safari, and Chrome there's a 4-pixel gap between my image (header) and my div (menu).
Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, and Chrome...
Browsers http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/3292/browserszi8.gif
This is my HTML...
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html>
...
<body>
<div id="frame">
<img id="header" src="images/header.jpg" width="700" height="245" alt="" /><div id="menu">
<strong>One</strong> |
Two |
Three |
Four |
Five |
Six |
Seven |
Eight |
Nine
</div>
<div id="content">
...
</div>
...
</body>
</html>
Notice there's no whitespace between the IMG and the menu DIV.
This is my CSS...
...
div#frame {
background: #FF0000;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
width: 700px;
border: 5px #30AADE solid;
}
div#frame img#header {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
}
div#frame div#menu {
margin: 0 auto 0 auto;
padding: 5px 0 5px 0;
border-top: solid 2px #FFFFFF;
text-align: center;
font-size: small;
color: #88BE34;
background-color: #000000;
}
div#frame div#menu strong {
font-size: medium;
color: #FFFFFF;
}
div#frame div#menu a {
color: #88BE34;
}
Why are Firefox, Safari, and Chrome showing that 4-pixel gap?
It has to do with the default rules for IMG tags.
I recommend always using this in your stylesheet as a default rule:
img{
display:block;
}
My guess is it's the line height of the image-elements line, since IMG is a an inline element. You could probably fix it by giving img#header display: block;.
Anyways, what you should really do is remove the entire image and use a H1-element plus one of the many image replacement-techniques out there.
Edit:
When that is said, your menu should also be marked up as an unordered list (UL).
In "standard" browsers (and in fact IE6 with the proper DOCTYPE!), your image is INLINE mode by default, so it gets spacing as if it was a letter sitting on the baseline of text.
freelookenstein gave the solution to remove the extra spaces due to text alignment of INLINE mode.
It is the solution, but I would be careful about using a display:block by default as most likely that will mess up your typical web page content down the line.
You could either add the display:block property to a class or inline style on your image alone.
Or something like this:
img { display:block; }
p img, ul img, td img /* etc*/ { display:inline; }
Personally I would recommend to limit display:block only to those images you know are used for the site layout, or those that are specifically inset in boxes. In which case often you have already a class on the parent element like:
<div class="imagebox">
<img .... />
</div>
.imagebox img { display:block; }
You should wrap your menu links in an unordered list and then style the items with CSS. There are some reason for doing this:
Structuring your navigation links as a list results in more semantic markup. It better represents the content you are presenting. If you were to view the site with no CSS styles at all (you can do this with the Web Developer Toolbar for Firefox), you would still get a meaningful representation of your site layout. This is especially meaningful if you intend the site to be viewable by mobile browsers.
This may also (slightly) help search engines prioritize the content and boost your ranking.
You can define a style for your list items with a border on one side and some margins to get the "pipe delimited" effect. This will be reusable and makes it easier to change the menus to some other style in the future.
See A List Apart - CSS Design: Taming Lists
There is an example there showing complete CSS for achieving this effect.
I have a website design that includes text input fields that look like this:
Input Field http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/4453/picture1ts2.png
I'm wondering what the best solution for creating this input field is.
One idea I have is to always have a div around the input with a background image and all the borders disabled on the input field and specified width in pixels, such as:
<div class="borderedInput"><input type="text" /></div>
I have tried to discourage them from using this format, but they won't be discouraged, so it looks like I'm going to have to do it.
Is this best or is there another way?
--
Trial:
I tried the following:
<style type="text/css">
input.custom {
background-color: #fff;
background:url(/images/input-bkg-w173.gif) no-repeat;
width:173px;
height:28px;
padding:8px 5px 4px 5px;
border:none;
font-size:10px;
}
</style>
<input type="text" class="custom" size="12" />
but in IE (6 & 7) it does the following when you type more than the width:
Over Length http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/1417/picture2kp8.png
I'd do it this way:
<style type="text/css">
div.custom {
background:url(/images/input-bkg-w173.gif) no-repeat;
padding:8px 5px 4px 5px;
}
div.custom input {
background-color: #fff;
border:none;
font-size:10px;
}
</style>
<div class="custom"><input type="text" class="custom" size="12" /></div>
You just have to adjust the padding values so everything fits correctly.
It is - in my eyes- definitely the best solution since in any other case you're working with a whole input field. And the whole input field is - by definition - a box where users can enter text.
If you can rely on JavaScript you could wrap such div-Elements around your input fields programatically.
Edit:
With jQuery you could do it this way:
$( 'input.custom' ).wrap( '<div class="custom"></div>' );
CSS:
div.custom {
background:url(/images/input-bkg-w173.gif) no-repeat;
padding:8px 5px 4px 5px;
}
input.custom {
background-color: #fff;
border:none;
font-size:10px;
}
And your HTML:
<input class="custom" ... />
You don't need the div element, you can assign a background to the input directly.
Edit: Here is the working code. I tested it, but you'll have to adjust it for your needs. As far as I can tell, everything here is needed.
input {
background: #FFF url(test.png) no-repeat bottom right;
width: 120px;
height: 20px;
line-height:20px;
padding:0;
text-indent:3px;
margin:0;
border: none;
overflow:hidden;
}
Edit2: I'm not quite sure why I'm getting downvoted, but this method should work unless you need an image bigger than the input element itself. In that case, you should use the extra div element. However, if the image is the same size as the input, there is no need for the extra markup.
Edit3: Ok, after bobince pointed out a problem, I'm getting a little closer. This will be work in IE6&7 and it's close in FF, but I'm still working on that part.
input {
background: #FFF url(test.png) no-repeat 0px 0px;
background-attachment:fixed;
width: 120px;
height: 20px;
line-height:20px;
padding:0px;
text-indent:3px;
margin:0;
border: none;
}
body>input {
background-position:13px 16px;
}
Edit4: Ok, I think I got it this time, but it requires use of a CSS3 selector, so it won't validate as CSS 2.1.
input {
background: #FFF url(test.png) no-repeat 0px 0px;
background-attachment:fixed;
width: 120px;
height: 20px;
line-height:20px;
padding:0px;
text-indent:3px;
margin:0;
border: none;
}
body>input {
background-position:13px 16px;
}
body>input:enabled {
background-position:9px 10px;
}
body>input will target everything except for IE6, body>input:enabled will target any form elements that aren't disabled for all browsers except for IE 6, 7, & 8. However, because :enabled is a CSS3 selector, it doesn't validate as CSS2.1. I wasn't able to find an appropriate CSS2 selector that would allow me to separate IE7 from the other browsers. If not validating (yet, until the validator switches to CSS3) is a problem for you, then I think your only option is the extra div element.
Have you evaluated using background image like this:
<style type="text/css">
input{
background-color: #AAAAAA;
background-image: url('http://mysite.com/input.gif');
border: 0px;
font-family: verdana;
font-size: 10px;
color: #0000FF;
}
I have done this a few times. I have the background image inside a div and use css to position the input field accordingly.
Have a peek at the following site I created that used this technique and use the code: http://www.ukoffer.com/ (Right hand side Newsletter)
AFAIK, the background scrolling problem can be solved either in Firefox and friends, OR Internet Exploder; but not make everyone happy at once.
I would normally have said to style the input directly, but now that I think of it that div example doesn't sound too bad and should take care of your background image scrolling problem.
In that case you'd set a div as position:relative, and put the input inside it with proper padding and width (or 100% width if padding is 0), background transparent, and put an image on the div.
okoman has gotten the CSS aspect correct. May I suggest using a <label> to improve the semantic structure of the markup?
<label id="for-field-name" for="field-name">
<span class="label-title">Field Name <em class="required">*</em></span>
<input id="field-name" name="field-name" type="text" class="text-input" />
</label>
<style type="text/css">
label, span.label-title { display: block; }
</style>
Not only is this more accessible, but it provides numerous hooks that you can use for any type of DOM manipulation, validation or field-specific styling in the future.
Edit: If you don't want the label title displayed for some reason, you can give it a class of 'accessibility' and set the class to display: none; in the CSS. This will allow screen readers to understand the input but hide it from regular users.
The easiest way to get rid of the overflow without JavaScript is simple:
Create a 3 spans, and set their heights to the height of the
image.
Cut the image into 3 parts, ensuring you cut the image such that
the left and right round parts will be on the 1st and 3rd images
respectively.
Set the background of the 1st span to the image
with the left border, and set it to no-repeat.
Set the background
of the third span to the image with the right border and set it to
no-repeat.
Put the input inside the middle span, remembering to
set its height to the height of the spans, and its background to the
2nd image, and repeat-x only.
That will ensure that the input
will seem to expand horizontally once the input is being filled. No
overlapping, and no JS needed.
HTML
Assuming the image height is 60px, the width of the first and third span is 30px,
<span id="first">nbsp;</span><br />
<span id="second"><input type="text" /></span><br />
<span id="third">nbsp;</span>
CSS
span#first{background:url('firstimage') no-repeat; height:60px; width:30px;}
span#third{background:url('thirdimage') no-repeat; height:60px; width:30px;}
span#second input{background:url('second image') repeat-x; height:60px;}
That should resolve your issue.
Is there a nicer way of styling a <hr /> tag using CSS, that is cross-browser consistent and doesn't involve wrapping a div around it? I'm struggling to find one.
The best way I have found, is as follows:
CSS
.hr {
height:20px;
background: #fff url(nice-image.gif) no-repeat scroll center;
}
hr {
display:none;
}
HTML
<div class="hr"><hr /></div>
The classic way of doing this is creating a wrapper around the <hr> and styling that. But I have come up a CSS trick for image replacing the element without the need for extra markup:
For non MSIE browsers:
hr {
border : 0;
height : 15px;
background : url(hr.gif) 0 0 no-repeat;
margin : 1em 0;
}
Additionally for MSIE:
hr {
display : list-item;
list-style : url(hr.gif) inside;
filter : alpha(opacity=0);
width : 0;
}
See entry on my blog for further info and an example of the trick in action.
If you set display to block it should behave more like a <div>.
Your answer you should remove hr altogether and just use the div
You could apply the background image to the bottom of the preceding element, perhaps with a bit of extra padding. That way you can get rid of any surplus / non-semantic markup.
I know this is probably the dumbest question ever, however I am a total beginner when it comes to CSS; how do you hyperlink an image on a webpage using an image which is sourced from CSS? I am trying to set the title image on my website linkable to the frontpage. Thanks!
Edit: Just to make it clear, I'm sourcing my image from CSS, the CSS code for the header div is as follows:-
#header
{
width: 1000px;
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 0px 15px 0px 15px;
border: none;
background: url(images/title.png) no-repeat bottom;
width: 1000px;
height: 100px;
}
I want to know how to make this div hyperlinked on my webpage without having to make it an anchor rather than a div.
You control design and styles with CSS, not the behavior of your content.
You're going to have to use something like <a id="header" href="[your link]">Logo</a> and then have a CSS block such as:
a#header {
background-image: url(...);
display: block;
width: ..;
height: ...;
}
You cannot nest a div inside <a> and still have 'valid' code. <a> is an inline element that cannot legally contain a block element. The only non-Javascript way to make a link is with the <a> element.
You can nest your <a> tag inside <div> and then put your image inside :)
If you don't want that, you're going to have to use JavaScript to make your <div> clickable:
Document.getElementById("header").onclick = function() {
window.location='...';
}
To link a css-sourced background-image:
#header {
display:block;
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 0px 15px 0px 15px;
border: none;
background: url(images/title.png) no-repeat bottom;
width: 1000px;
height: 100px;
}
<a id="header" href="blah.html" class="linkedImage">
The key thing here is to turn the anchor tag into a block element, so height and width work. Otherwise it's an inline element and will ignore height.
That's really not a CSS thing. You still need your A tag to make that work. (But use CSS to make sure the image border is either removed, or designed to your required spec.)
<img src="foo" class="whatever" alt="foo alt" />
EDIT: Taking original intent (updated question) into account, a new code sample is below:
<img id="header" alt="foo alt" />
You're still in an HTML world for links, as described by other answers on this question.
sorry to spoil your fun ladies and gentlemen, it is possible.
Write in your header: [link](http://"link here")
then in your css:
#header a[href="https://link here"] {
display: inline-block;
width: 75px;
height: 75px;
font-size: 0;
}
.side .md a[href="link here"] {
background: url(%%picture here%%) no-repeat;
}
then in your css
.titleLink {
background-image: url(imageUrl);
}
You still create links in HTML with 'a' (anchor) tags just like normal. CSS does not have anything that can specify if something is a link to somewhere or not.
Edit
The comments of mine and others still apply. To clarify, you can use JavaScript to make a div act as a link:
<div id="header" onclick="window.location='http://google.com';">My Header</div>
That isn't really great for usability however as people without JavaScript enabled will be unable to click that and have it act as a link.
Also, you may want to add a cursor: pointer; line to your CSS to give the header div the correct mouse cursor for a link.
CSS is for presentation only, not content. A link is content and should be put into the HTML of the site using a standard <a href=""> tag. You can then style this link (or add an image to the link) using CSS.
You have to use an anchor element, wrapped in a container. On your homepage, your title would normally be an h1, but then on content pages it would probably change to a div. You should also always have text in the anchor element for people without CSS support and/or screen readers. The easiest way to hide that is through CSS. Here are both examples:
<h1 id="title"><a title="Home" href="index.html>My Title</a></h1>
<div id="title"><a title="Home" href="index.html>My Title</a></div>
and the CSS:
#title {
position:relative; /*Makes this a containing element*/
}
#title a {
background: transparent url(../images/logo.png) no-repeat scroll 0 0;
display:block;
text-indent:-9999px; /*Hides the anchor text*/
height:50px; /*Set height and width to the exact size of your image*/
width:200px;
}
Depending on the rest of your stylesheet you may need to adjus it for the h1 to make it look the same as the div, check out CSS Resets for possible solutions to this.
Try this - use an H1 as the seat of your graphic instead. Saved my butt time and time again:
<h1 class="technique-six">
CSS-Tricks
</h1>
h1.technique-six {
width: 350px;
padding: 75px 0 0 0;
height: 0;
background: url("images/header-image.jpg") no-repeat;
overflow: hidden;
}
Accessible, and also solid across browsers IE6 and > . You could also link the H1.
HTML is the only way to create links - it defines the structure and content of a web site.
CSS stands for Cascading Style Sheets - it only affects how things look.
Although normally an <a/>; tag is the only way to create a link, you can make a <div/> clickable with JavaScript. I'd use jQuery:
$("div#header").click(function() {window.location=XXXXXX;});