I've got a strange problem, in Chrome/Safari, the image respects it's max width/height styling inside of a parent with no set width/height. but not in Firefox/Opera.
<div id="container">
<figure>
<img src="http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d90/img/sample/pic_001b.jpg">
</figure>
</div>
That's the image and it's containers. The CSS is as follows:
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#container {
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
margin: auto;
}
figure {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
margin: 0;
vertical-align: top;
line-height: 0;
}
img {
height: auto;
width: auto;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
The figure element is only there to serve as an overlay to the image by using the :before selector, but that doesn't work if it has a set width/height. Is there any way to get Firefox and Opera to respect the grandparents height/width instead?
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/GUrkj/1/
See here on MDN
Specifically:
The max-height CSS property is used to set the maximum height of a
given element. It prevents the used value of the height property from
becoming larger than the value specified for max-height.
And...
The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the
generated box's containing block. If the height of the containing
block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content
height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the percentage
value is treated as none.
What the last part means, is that in Firefox at least, without a height value explicitly stated, max-height becomes none - resulting in the observerd behaviour.
As such you will need to add height and width to the figure element at the least.
In CSS when you use 100% you are always saying "100%" of my parent. If your parent is unconstrained so are you. The trick here is that the height is the only one that matters, set the figure height to 100%, but don't set its width and you should be fine.
Related
I am using plain old css no bootstrap or anything. I want to make an img element responsive,thus shrinking and expanding while maintaining its proportions up to a maximum height. I have looked over several SO responses but have not found something that matches my use case. How would I achieve this. I have it kind of working with the following code.
<div class="imageContainer">
<img src="{{employee._image}}">
</div>
img
:max-width 100%
:height auto
.imageContainer
max-height: 300px
This solution works as the image gets smaller and it works when the image gets bigger up to the maximum height of the div at which point the image image overflows. I want it to stay within that div while maintaining its proportions. I have tried various combinations using max-height on the img and the div, but have not gotten it to work. Thanks for any help that can be provided!
The images have to be set dynamically, so hardcoding the url in css with background image is not an option.
Try setting the css top and bottom properties to 0px.
img
:max-width 100%
:height auto
:top 0px
:bottom 0px
To have an image set to a max-height of a div, the height property of the imager must be inherited from its parent.
The answer and theory around it can be found here: Child with max-height: 100% overflows parent
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 100px;
max-width: 100px;
text-align:center;
}
img {
max-height: inherit;
max-width: inherit;
}
I believe I was able to achieve your goal like this:
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: inherit;
}
I'm working on a mobile site that has a structure that looks something like this:
body
---->Mobile container div (height 100%)
-------->Full page div (height 100%)
------------>Vertically centered div (height 200px)
My problem is that the full page div level comes out as 0px. Here's the relevant CSS:
html, body
{
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.mobile
{
min-height: 100%;
}
.full-page
{
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.center
{
height: 200px;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -100px;
position: absolute;
}
The mobile container is filling the window height, but the full page (100% of the height of the mobile container) is being rendered at 0px height, which ruins the vertical centering.
Why is this happening?
JSFiddle
The red div is the mobile container
The yellow div is the full page div (it's not visible because it's 0px tall)
The green div is the vertically centered div
This is happening because of the following rule:
.mobile {
min-height: 100%;
}
Here's why.
CSS specs tell us the following about percentage height:
The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the generated box's containing block. If the height of the containing block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to auto. A percentage height on the root element is relative to the initial containing block.
This applies to your .fullpage container. You can see that the parent container of .fullpage, which is .mobile, does not have a height set explicitly, but rather via the min-height property:
The min-height property is used to set the minimum height of a given element. It prevents the used value of the height property from becoming smaller than the value specified for min-height.
You would think that the child container, .fullpage would take the min-height property into consideration when determining its height, but it does not. Browsers will not set the child element’s height (specified in percent) based on its parent’s computed height if only min-height is used.
To correct this, you could add height: 100% to:
.mobile {
min-height: 100%;
}
I'm using a table layout and attempting to set the height of the child of table-cell to be 100% of it's container. Why does this not happen and how do you resolve this?
I also tried setting the table-cell height to 100% without success.
I would like to align ONLY the images to the bottom of the container. How can I do that within a table display?
The amount of text in each table cell is dynamic
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/3u3gpf2n/1/
It seems like you're trying to create a 3-column, 2-row table, but only using single rows in order to keep your markup semantic. Without flexbox, distributing the image to the bottom will require some CSS trickery.
One example, which should fit your requirements of (1) cross-browser, including IE, compatibility (2) allow for arbitrary text in the box is:
*{
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#container{
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
ul{
list-style-type:none;
display: inline-table;
}
li{
position: relative;
/* image width / (image height * column count) */
padding-bottom: 11.764705882%;
display: table-cell;
background: red;
/* 100 / column count */
width: 33.333%;
}
a{
color: white;
}
img{
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<ul>
<li><a href><div class="header">Xiao Huang</div>
<img src="http://3door.com/sites/default/files/styles/ablum_306_108/public/special/xiao_huang_ren_fu_ben_.jpg?itok=cPnwgTyV" /></a></li>
<li><a href><div class="header">Xiao Huang</div>
<img src="http://3door.com/sites/default/files/styles/ablum_306_108/public/special/xiao_huang_ren_fu_ben_.jpg?itok=cPnwgTyV" /></a></li>
<li><a href><div class="header">Xiao Huang Xiao Huang Xiao Haung</div>
<img src="http://3door.com/sites/default/files/styles/ablum_306_108/public/special/xiao_huang_ren_fu_ben_.jpg?itok=cPnwgTyV" /></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
I've added a relative position to the LI, and absolutely positioned the Image. To ensure things work correctly, I've given the cells a percentage-based width. I've also added padding to the bottom.
The one thing that this doesn't include is the cursor all the way down. If the user clicks between the image and text, the anchor will not be triggered.
To fix this, consider removing the UL/LI, and styling the anchor tags as table-cells and the wrapping DIV (or NAV, if you have a JS shim for HTML5 tags) as table.
I'm using a table layout and attempting to set the height of the child
of table-cell to be 100% of it's container. Why does this not happen
and how do you resolve this?
I also tried setting the table-cell height to 100% without success.
When using percentage heights in CSS you need to specify the height for all parent elements, up to and including body and the root element (html).
From the spec:
CSS height property
percentage Specifies a percentage height. The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the generated box's
containing block. If the height of the containing block is not
specified explicitly and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to 'auto'.
auto The height depends on the values of other properties.
In other words, if you have not set an explicit height to the containing block (and the child is not absolutely positioned), then your child element with percentage height will have no frame of reference.
So the problem in your code boils down to this: You're missing a height on parents ul, #container, body and html.
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/sedetcc6/
I would like to align ONLY the images to the bottom of the container. How can I do that within a table display?
Although vertical-align is well-suited for aligning elements in a table cell, in this particular case, because each image has a sibling that must not move, the vertical-align property is not useful.
But the images can be shifted with absolute positioning. Try this:
li{
display: table-cell;
background: red;
height: 100%;
position: relative; /* establish nearest positioned ancestor for abs. positioning */
width: 33.33%; /* new */
}
img{
width: 100%;
position: absolute; /* new */
bottom: 0; /* new */
}
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/sedetcc6/1/
NOTES:
No changes to original mark-up
For the record, this problem could be easily solved with flexbox, but I understand it's not an option here due to a need for IE 8 & 9 browser support.
I hope I am understanding the problem correctly, but my advice would be to make each anchor display: table-cell so they are forced to the same height, and then you can position all elements inside the anchor or even use background images instead of <img />
JS fiddle here
All you need to need is set a height for all your elements, e.g.
*{
height: 50px;
}
You'll get your desired result: http://jsfiddle.net/asimplepeter/3u3gpf2n/10/
If the amount of text is going to be an issue, you can set overflow: auto for your .header class.
Your code and display properties like 'table' and 'table-cell' things are correct.
But, the problem is that tables are rendered with auto height only. Because of this, eventhough you had set your container height, the table structure was not rendered with the proper height. So, along with container class, set height for 'ul' as well
regarding the position of image, you can set your margin-top to 100% or by calculating the size of the image and reducing that from the 500px container height will help you in positioning.
Hope this answers your all queries
EDIT As setting the margin is expand the table height, alternatively you can use css property like below
transform: translateY(Y);
transform-origin: left top;
In this case, i would think it is better mantain the height of cell according to the img because it's static and set header as absolute.
Something like that:
li{
position: relative;
display: table-cell;
background: red;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
.header{
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
display: block;
color: white;
background: blue;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/3u3gpf2n/12/
I am having a strange rather weird problem. The problem is a small one that is I want to set min-height to 100% that is the content of the page should span whole screen of he user and if possible the page should extend down if content exceeds 100%. A simple way would be to set min-height:100% and to set height:auto that is exactly what I want but regardless of how many times I try it the problem remains there.
I am using height auto and min-height:100% on all the elements but it doesn't work. If I remove min-height to include only height:100% then it works like a charm but then when the content is larger it overflows whole footer.
Please help me here is css:
html, body, container, row, col-lg-3, col-lg-9 {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
}
.container {
max-width: 1170px;
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
}
.col-lg-3 {
min-height:100%;
height:100%;
}
.col-lg-9 {
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Here is the page showing the problem :
http://contestlancer.com/ai/GP/
Yes this is a pain but that's how it works. Height can be inherited from positioned parents but not when these have a min-height property.
Children of elements that have a min-height set to 100% cannot inherit their parent's height via percentage...
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8468131/1491212
CSS2.1 specs :
The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the
generated box's containing block. If the height of the containing
block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content
height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value
computes to 'auto'.
Use position: relative; height: 100% on containers to work around the problem, and add min-height: 100%; to the deepest child.
I am trying to get some divss to expand to fill the screen, but I am struggling. I have broken down the issue on this jsfiddle.
What I really want to know is why does the div, with its 100% min-height, not expand to that height (or at all) when its parent has the same attribute and does expand?
<body>
<div>
stuff
</div>
</body>
body {
min-height: 100%;
background: red;
}
div {
min-height: 100%;
background: grey;
}
The issue is covered in the CSS 2.1 spec:
<percentage>
Specifies a percentage height. The percentage is
calculated with respect to the height of the generated box's
containing block. If the height of the containing block is not
specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content height), and this
element is not absolutely positioned, the value computes to 'auto'. A
percentage height on the root element is relative to the initial
containing block. Note: For absolutely positioned elements whose
containing block is based on a block-level element, the percentage is
calculated with respect to the height of the padding box of that
element. This is a change from CSS1, where the percentage was always
calculated with respect to the content box of the parent element.
So, to clarify, a percentage height will reference the height of its containing block (unless it is position: absolute or position: fixed). If that containing block does not have a specified height, then the percentage will refer to auto, and it won't really do much.
position: absolute changes the referenced containing block to the nearest positioned (absolute, relative, or fixed) element.
position: fixed changes the referenced containing block to the viewport.
So, if you specify a height on your containing block, specify a position other than static on your containing block, or don't mind using the viewport as your containing block, then you can use percentage heights effectively.
Please see my demonstration at jsFiddle
You need to also set the height of the html so that 100% refers to the viewport height instead of the document height (demo):
html,body {
height: 100%;
background: red;
padding: 0;
}
div {
height: 100%;
background: grey;
}
because you can't really use 100% height on a static element. Changing the position attribute from static to absolute will give you 100% height. demo
posted as answer per the request of the the PO.
Percentage heights in CSS don't make a lot of sense to me. I would argue that it doesn't work the way it should, but CSS enthusiasts would insist that it does.
This article discusses both the issue and solution in detail:
http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/equal-height-columns-cross-browser-css-no-hacks
This might help too:
<style>
#outer {position:absolute; height:auto; width:200px; border: 1px solid red; }
#inner {position:absolute; height:100%; width:20px; border:1px solid black; }
</style>
<div id="outer">
<div id="inner"></div>
text
</div>
See here for more details on the above:
How to make a floated div 100% height of its parent?
There are two issues, you'll want to specify the height of the html as well, as in:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
}
Also there appears to be an issue in IE where min-height doesn't do the trick for the div but specifying height on the div does the trick. As such:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
background: red;
}
div {
height: 100%;
background: grey;
}
This will work
body, html {
height: 100vh;
}
aside {
background: green;
width: 200px;
height: 100vh;
}