Make an image span the entire width of the Browser using bootstrap - html

I have a large image which I want to display using the entire width of the browser.
My code is:
<html><body>
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<h3> Welcome! </h3>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="main_image">
<img src="..."/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="main_content">....</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>
Bootstrap will automatically create margins/padding to make the image fit in the center of the page.
Is there a way to always allow the main image to fit the entire width of the browser, but keep the padding/margins for everything else on the page?

Your best bet is to assign the image as a background-image.
Here's a JSFiddle (https://jsfiddle.net/qoaqjgpz) with only the most important stuff from http://startbootstrap.com/template-overviews/full-width-pics/.
The .html:
<div class="image-bg-fixed-height">
</div>
The .css:
.image-bg-fixed-height {
background: url('http://lorempixel.com/g/1920/500/') no-repeat center center scroll;
height: 450px;
}
.img-center {
margin: 0 auto;
}
Let me know if this is what you were searching for.

Related

Keep row of images at same height

I am working on a Bootstrap 3 grid (unfortunately, the CMS is not allowing me to use Bootstrap 4). At the moment I cannot link to the page, so maybe this question is too hard to answer.
Here is how the row containing 5 columns is looking in the CMS:
The max-width is 1200px.
The problem is that every time I add a column containing an image, the image height is not the same. In this example I set a height on 255px on all images, but the image in the first column is much taller than the others.
When I enter the code in a JSfiddle it is looking normal
See jsfiddle here
So it must be something in the CMS there is doing it? Is there some kind of clue what I could look after?
Best regards
/* Latest compiled and minified CSS included as External Resource*/
/* Optional theme */
#import url('//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap-theme.min.css');
.padding-y {
padding: 20px;
background-color: #fff;
}
<link href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<div class="section padding-y">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Step 1. Let's reproduce the problem
We don't need the bootstrap-theme.min.css. This file uses for the decoration only. First of all wee need bootstrap.min.css.
The 3.0.0 version is too old. Let'use the 3.4.1. instead. It's the latest Bootstrap 3 version.
Bootstrap assumes the row is inside the container. Sometimes the CMS has its own containers, and then you can get by with them, but to reproduce the problem, we need the correct code with the container.
Looking at your screenshot, I dare to assume that something on your site adds the max-width: 100%; restriction to all images. This is a fairly common solution for different themes.
I removed the block with the section padding-y classes, because the problem was reproduced without it.
So we get an example of a code that reproduces your screenshot.
img {
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
Step 2. What's happened
4 small images are wider than their columns. With a total content width of 1200 pixels, a column in one sixth of the width is 200 pixels. In addition, each column also has a horizontal padding of 15 pixels. There are 170 pixels left for the 233-pixel wide image.
And something adds a limit for the maximum width of images. Because of this, these images become smaller and their height becomes smaller too.
Step 3. What can be done
Since we do not know your layouts for screens of different widths, I can only fantasize.
Suppose you want to put 5 pictures of different sizes in one line on the desktop so that their heights coincide.
Variant with backgrounds
For example you can replace the images with blocks and use the images as a background. Then the height can be set in the CSS, the gaps between the pictures will be the same, but the visible part of the pictures can decrease.
.image-box {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 255px;
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.image-box {
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<div class="image-box" style="background-image:url(https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff)"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
Variant with flexbox
You can also make Bootstrap 3 columns behave like a flexbox. This solution is suitable if the sizes of the images are known in advance and you can calculate which part of the row each of them occupies.
In the comments you have wrote that you wish to stretch the images on mobile. So I use this info in the new solution.
.row-of-images img {
width: 100%;
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.row-of-images {
display: flex;
}
.row-of-images > div {
box-sizing: content-box;
/* images will be resized taking into account the padding of the columns */
flex: 1 1 18.203125%;
/* 18.203125% = 100% * 255px / (348px + 4 * 255px) */
}
.row-of-images > div:first-child {
flex-basis: 27.1875%;
/* 27.1875% = 100% * 348px / (348px + 4 * 255px) */
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row row-of-images">
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/348x255/69c/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/233x255/c69/fff">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.4.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
The reason the images are different heights on the problem page "(domain) dot com slash da-dk/page/sbp" (but not in the posted source above) is because the images on the problem page have the .img-responsive class:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/233x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
</div>
From the Bootstrap 3.3 documentation, .img-responsive applies:
max-width: 100%;, height: auto; and display: block; to the image so that it scales nicely to the parent element.
The first image is scaling to the width of the first column, which is col-sm-4. The other images are scaling to the width of a col-sm-2 column. So it's clear why the images are different height.
The simplest fix is to remove .img-responsive from all the images.
But if you want to keep the images responsive, you'll need to adjust the image aspect ratios so the wider and narrow images end up the same height.
Example with the aspect ratios adjusted:
<link href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.0.0/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-4">
<img src="http://placehold.it/348x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
<div class="col-sm-2">
<img src="http://placehold.it/153x255" class="img-responsive">
</div>
</div>

Why does my image go outside of the bootstrap grid?

I have created a 3 column grid which contains some text and an image in between using Bootstrap 4 for the grid system.
I've noticed that although my image has a img-fluid class assigned the image overflows outside the div.
Can anyone explain the reason for this?
HTML
<div class="row">
<div class="col blue-bg-outter">
<div class="col blue-bg" style="height: 300px;">
<!-- start of content -->
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
<h2> Some line</h2>
</div>
<div class="col img-col">
<img src="https://purepng.com/public/uploads/large/51508089516arw4tqfangou1wmvwzihlw7hxnzjujpulweq1otwrsdcsaxc5kvmu1crkpcyfxezyx4dmcvkbgg5w7oc1sioxib4j044tjwbfcyu.png" alt="" class="img-fluid">
</div>
<div class="col">
<h2> Another line</h2>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.img-fluid {
max-height: 100vh;
}
.blue-bg-outter {
padding: 60px;
}
.blue-bg {
background: #3ad7f7;
}
Might be easier to see on an actual page, please view the CodePen.
Because you have set a height on a parent div to 300px, if you remove height it works. Or you can set the height of img-fluid to 300px as #august suggested:
<div class="col blue-bg">
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/oJKvLp
Or you can keep the height and stop the image overflowing like this:
.blue-bg
{
overflow: hidden;
}

Columns on top of a background-image

I am making a small eastern project. The website is here: My Website.
I need to make some boxes that contain a png picture on top of the background-picture like this:
I set the picture on the col, but I guess I need to make it as a background in CSS, since I cannot build something on top of an img tag:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<center><img src="https://mimsi.dk/images/logo.jpg" class="img-fluid" alt="Eastern"></center>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
<img src="https://mimsi.dk/images/eeg.jpg" alt="Eastern game" class="background">
</div>
</div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12" style="border: 1px solid red;">
<h1 style="text-align: center;">FOOTER</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Instead of using the img src tag, I set this in my HTML and CSS:
<div class="col-md-12 bg">
.bg {
background-image: url("https://mimsi.dk/images/eeg.jpg");
height: 100%;
background-position: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
}
But nothing has worked out yet. How can I set the background-image, so it is not going to the header logo or footer, so I can build my 8 boxes on top?
First there is a mistake in your HTML in this line </div class="row"> i think you got that you can't put class in closing div
Solution
I created a fiddle

Overlapping Columns Bootstrap using Container-Fluid

Trying to build a webpage where I have half page image and other half text.
So far this is what I have, I have it working, just when I shrink the page, the text overlaps the photo.
.css file:
.z-img{
padding: 0 0 10px 0;
border: none;
border-radius: 0;
position: fixed;
}
.z-content {
padding: 70px 0 10px 0;
color: #c0d1ca
}
html file:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="span6">
<div class="z-img">
<img src="...." width="732" height="432">
</div>
</div>
<div class="span6 text-center">
<div class="z-content">
<div class="well">
<h2> About Me: </h2>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<p>............</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I want to ensure when I shrink the page lets say on a mobile, I do not want the text overlapping the image. Also possible to have the image shrink and enlarge according to the screen size instead of having it as a static size? I do want it to cover half the page though
I have figured it out, I just had to add the class="img-responsive" tag to my photo tag.

Grid is flying around on the responsive part

I am struggling a lot with the responsive part of a page.
When I scale down to around 991 px, the book, and the headline text is flying around. Originally I used sm-hidden and sm-visible, because I would like that the text headline came first, and afterwords the picture of the book.
But how can I solve this? I am starting to run low on ideas how to make it fit, so the book is not going under the background picture when I reach around the 991 px. I would like that the headline and book img stayed inside the background picture.
I hope somebody can through the developer console see what is wrong here. My code until now looks like this:
<div class="background-image" #Html.Raw(topImageStyling)>
<div>
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-12 col-md-12 img logo img-responsive">
<img src="https://www.site.dk/img/inovo-logo-white-small.png">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="book container col-sm-12 hidden-sm hidden-xs col-md-3 col-lg-4">
<img src="https://www.site.dk/img/landingpages/.png">
</div>
<div class="container col-sm-12 col-md-9 col-lg-8">
#if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(headerText))
{
if (pageAlias == "Blog")
{
<h1 class="header-xl center">
#Html.Raw(headerText)
</h1>
}
else
{
<p class="header-xl">
#Html.Raw(headerText)
</p>
}
}
#if (CurrentPage.HasValue("imageTeaserText"))
{
<p class="sub-header center">
#Html.Raw(CurrentPage.imageTeaserText)
</p>
}
</div>
<div class="col-sm-12 visible-sm visible-xs">
<img src="https://www.site.dk/img/landingpages/g.png">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12 main-content" id="main-content">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12">
#CurrentPage.GetGridHtml("site")
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
So I think I might have found the solution to your problem. On line 3044 of your CSS, there is the img element. I simply added the following to your code:
img {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
position: relative;
z-index: 1030;}
It works for screen sizes larger than the 960px range and acts up a little from the 760px-440px range. I figured all you have to do now is add a media query for the corresponding viewport widths. To explain the solution is simple. Within CSS all elements that are layered within the HTML document have a z-index that determines there position in the stack. From there, in order to get the z-index to respond, I set the position to relative for that img element. The z-index property only works when the position is set to something other than static which is the default value. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions.