First, the website - http://www.channeltraveldeal.co.uk/blog
Now - That's out the way so lets go... Hi, I'm currently tinkering with a friends WP powered business page. Sadly, I'm not all that experienced with web design, I just know more than my friend and so I'm in need of some assistance if anyone is able to help.
I'm trying to make sure it's viewed correctly across as many platforms as possible, the theme that has been used has responsiveness settings built in which has obviously helped with this, but unfortunately the header image isn't playing ball and is too big (on tablet only).
I read that the best way to sort this out would be to add this to the CSS for the header image -
width: 100%;
height: auto;
... This is the confusing part (for me), I used Firebug to locate the HTML and CSS for the image and this is what I found -
HTML - <img width="1010" height="220" alt="Channel Travel Deal" src="http://channeltraveldeal.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ctdlogotrue.jpg" class="preload-me">
CSS (from the right pane when the linked HTML is clicked on) - http://pastebin.com/6hyN7yTr
I assumed that the "preload.me" img class is the one I needed to amend. I googled for a bit and came up with a few different snippets to try but none of them worked. Here are the ones I tried.
.preload.me {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
preload.me {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
I tried those two variations with [style] added after the class name (with no space) and/or !important after the CSS values.
Nothing worked. Would someone let me know if I'm doing something wrong, or if there is something stopping me from overriding this inline style. Also, if my method is on completely the wrong track, if I can do it some other way.
If class="preload-me"
then you need to use the css as preload-me not preload.me
and it should be:
.preload-me{}
Related
The image doesn't come up on the stylesheet, I've tried so many different things (changing to background
.vegeta {
height: 300px;
width: 300px;
padding: 10px;
background: url("images/vegeta.jpg");
}
However when I put it in the tags on the html page the image shows. The stylesheet is definitely being called by the html document because the other changes show on the page, its just the image that isn't showing up.
Any help would be appreciated, thank you.
First of all you should check all the directory location and spelling, these are the basic problems which we don't notice many time.
Use can use background-image instead of just background because CSS is updated, maybe this can help.
I hope this may help you! Otherwise you can tell me again with all the directory properly.
Today I was trying to create a dummy css rule for testing and investigation.
.dummy {
some-style : somevalue;
}
Ideally the class should have no visible effect. I want to be able to apply the class to elements but cause the least visible effect possible on any elements it is applied to. For example
<div class="dummy"> should look and behaves as much as possible like <div>
I did not want the class to be empty. Can anyone suggest a style that I could add to the class that would have the least visible impact when applied to a general html element? I can't think of anything completely harmless.
UPDATE: I wanted to add the style to some existing html. The reason was to use the style as a marker for diagnostic purposes. It would help me see when and where styles and stylesheets were getting loaded/cached and where and why some styles were getting overridden, sometimes by the browser defaults which seemed odd. At the time I didn't have exclusive use of the system I was working on so I wanted something that was going to be invisible to other users but I could see in Developer Tools.
UPDATE 2 : the html/css wasn't written by me and I didn't have my own environment in which to work. I was trying to investigate some problems in-situ in someone else's system. I had tried using DevTools in the browser but wasn't getting anywhere with that. I wanted to be able to make some small changes to their html/css to aid my diagnostics. I didn't want them to have any obvious effect on the system for other people (except in DevTools, viewed by me).
It was a Wordpress site and they only had two environments, one for live and one for testing. I was working with the test system. There were other people testing at the time, though mainly checking content.
The real thorny problem was why was the font-size in the calendar widget much larger than everything else on the site? Inspecting using DevTools I could see the font-size style was getting overridden by the browser default style when it seemed to me there were other css selectors that should have taken precedence. It looked bizarre. In the end it turned out to be a missing !DOCTYPE tag in the html. So nothing to do with the css itself.
I didn't like this way of working, fiddling in someone's system, but there wasn't much else to do and it did help to resolve the problem for them.
Hopefully I don't have to do this again, but ever since I have been wondering what was the most harmless style that I could have used?
I thought I would ask here as there must be people who know CSS better than me.
You can use this:
.dummy{
min-width: 0;
min-height: 0;
}
If you just need anything beeing set you could assign rules that are default anyway. For block elements like div set
.block-class { display: block; }
And for inline elements like span
.inline-class { display: inline; }
Of course it could be an issue doing so in some rare cases but in general it's quite harmless I guess.
In principle, for any property you can have an arrangement like this:
div {
some-style : a-valid-value-for-some-style;
}
.dummy {
some-style : a-different-valid-value-for-some-style;
}
And .dummy's style will have an effect, no matter what some-style is.
Your best bet is to make use of CSS variables. These are custom properties and start with a double hyphen. so
.dummy {
--dummy-style: foo;
}
will make --dummy-style a property with value "foo". So long as you don't employ the variable as the value in another property, it will have no visible effect.
I had entered the following piece of css coding in my blog template to give a certain width value to all my post images. Essentially I wanted my post images to stretch the full width of the post container so everything looked uniformed.
.post-body img {
float: left;
width: 683px;
height: auto;
}
However the problem that has come about is that the share buttons at the end of the post have all changed to that width also, which I do not want. How do I change the width of my post images without that piece of coding altering the values for any other images in the post.
Do you have a sample of your html code that displays the problem that you are encountering? It would help to diagnose your problem much more easily.
A sample of the HTML in question would be beneficial. As #Adam says, it sounds like your share buttons can also be targeted with your CSS selector. If the share button images have another class on them, then you could amend your selector to something like .post-body img:not(.share-img).
This is a relatively small project that I've been working on however it's driving me insane...
I'm trying to port my original website (which was done completely in Dreamweaver, HTML) to a Visual Studio 2013 ASP.NET project where I can add databases, login's etc. for an assignment I have.
The main problem I have is the fact that my CSS code does not want to do what I tell it to do in terms of the layout.
I've tried completely remaking the website entirely step by step, making sure each aspect works correctly before moving on to the next.
This is what my original website looks like:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/sxfeg.png
(Original HTML + CSS) https://gist.github.com/anonymous/7ed94218f9374d41918e
Now, I used a template a long time back in order to get this design and I've experimented to see which CSS code affects the layout and found that the tag main_container (line 13 of the HTML gist) controls the white background of the website.
So if I remove the tag, this will happen: http://i.stack.imgur.com/BFNLE.png
^ This is important in my problem.
When porting over my website, I copied across all the code correctly and adapted it to ASP. (See Gist: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/9c09befeb8950f4c1416)
However, in doing so, I encountered a problem where the CSS code for the main_container was not being used correctly.
#main_container{
width:977px;
background:url(center_bg_repeat.gif) repeat-y center;
The image was not being repeated on the y axis like on the original website and here's the result: http://i.stack.imgur.com/E4TZU.png
Have I got the syntax wrong? Or what is wrong with my code?
I've placed all the images in the same folder as the CSS file for
convenience.
Is this a problem with Visual Studio 2013 or am I doing something
fundamentally wrong?
Is there perhaps another way to port this same design without
causing so many problems?
I'm not entirely clear on what you want to achieve but if it is the same layout as your original site, then it is better to replicate the html and css exactly first to get it working then look at restructuring or refactoring the code. For example, check that all element sizing is the same so that content displays as you expect.
There are a couple of key differences between your original and new code that could affect the behaviour in the new version of your site. In your original css you don't have a repeat style for center_bg_repeat.gif. Also, it looks like #main_container isn't referenced in your original code.
Repeating a background image won't cause content to repeat across the page. You are already including your content in your new html so you just need to use positioning (e.g. floats vs relative/absolute positioning) to get the tiles to layout in the way you want (see code snippet for an example).
html, body, .container
{
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
.tile {
float: left;
width: 20%;
height: 30%;
margin: 10px;
padding: 20px;
background-color: #ccc;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="tile">first</div>
<div class="tile">third</div>
<div class="tile">second</div>
<div class="tile">fourth</div>
<div class="tile">last</div>
</div>
In your case, if you want #main_container to scale to fit the content then set its style to min-height: 100%;
When i open my site in firefox it shows img alt attribute in a black box(see attached image).
it only shows just for a second and when image starts loading its gone.
i want to remove this.
this is my html code
<img alt="alt text" width="650" height="241" src="src url" />
it only shows in firefox.
i have tried using this css code
a img {
border: 0;
}
but this did not help.
how i can remove this?
The short answer is that you can't. The longer answer is that you shouldn't.
You are approaching this in an entirely wrong manner. Expectedly, I guess - in this day and age not many care to think why tag attributes like ALT exist at all, and why Firefox bothers with borders before it renders images. But you should know these things if you want to be serious about web design. They are there for a reason. It is because people are different and user agents are different - some people cannot even see images that well, while they either may read or are read to the page contents by a screen reader, which cannot discern pixel content all that well. Also, in some scenarios (academic, scientific), user agents are configured to ignore images, only displaying ALT content, focusing on textual content instead.
If you take the above into consideration, you can make decisions based on these facts - what does your image actually do? Is it important for your users to see it at all? If it is indeed a picture that is at the heart of it, then you shouldn't bother with how it will be shown to your users - rest assured, they will see it and hopefully be happy.
The IMG element is for image-based data that is part of the content of the document you serve, not part of its style. This is an absolutely essential knowledge, that many never think about. Separators, hyperlink icons before A elements, huge banners on top of your pages, buttons for forms - all this is not part of content, it seldom carries meaning to the reader. That alone decides if these should be put in there with say, CSS instead. You use IMG element for photos, drawings, logos, illustrations and such.
In other words, if it is a decorative part of your web page design, you should instead think whether a background image will do - it will also eliminate your border and ALT problem entirely.
This is all you can do - no CSS will and should rob the user of your page(s) of accessibility just because you don't like borders. Remember - your webpages are not your webpages, they are viewed by your users. Same goes for user agents - they use theirs, and they prefer to set it up their way. Whether you yourself like borders is of little value or concern to them. Give them possibility to make the best use of them. Graphic design is indirectly about compromise - we want to better convey a message of our choosing using methods we have available, while respecting their choices and preferences. Web-design is much because of this a walk on the edge of a knife.
<div style="background-image: url(forest.jpg); width: 600px; height: 200px;">
Tree hugging, anyone?
</div>
I know it's an old question but here is 2017 update with CSS only solution using pseudo elements.
img:after {
content: attr(alt);
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: #fff;
}
<img src="//placehold.foo/200x200" alt="Remove border from this alt text" />