I have a table that has columns Name, Series and Season.
Name
series
season
abc
alpha
s1
abc
alpha
s2
pqr
alpha
s1
xyz
beta
s2
xyz
gamma
s3
abc
theta
s1
I am trying to extract the number of people who have watched only the series 'alpha', and not any other series.
How to get this count?
On giving the "where series='alpha' " condition, I get the counts of people who watched alpha, but not the counts of those who watched only alpha eg: abc has watched alpha as well as theta, but pqr has watched only alpha.
You could use a subquery to get only the names which have watched only distinct series and then filter in the where condition your specific serie
select count(yt.name) as only_alpha
from yourtable yt
inner join ( select name
from yourtable
group by name
having count(distinct series) = 1
) yt1 on yt.name=yt1.name
where yt.series='alpha';
https://dbfiddle.uk/n0PavP4H
You can use subquery, like this:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT name)
FROM t
WHERE name NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT name
FROM t
WHERE series<>'alpha'
) AND series='alpha'
If you really want to get the number of such people only, without their name or any further information, you can use a NOT EXISTS clause like this:
SELECT COUNT(*) AS desiredColumnName
FROM yourtable y
WHERE series = 'alpha'
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1 FROM yourtable y1 WHERE y.name = y1.name AND series <> 'alpha');
Thus, you can set your condition the person must not appear in any other series but the 'alpha' one.
If the same name can occur in different seasons, you can add a DISTINCT to count them only once. This should only be done if really required because it can slow down the query:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT name) AS desiredColumnName
FROM yourtable y
WHERE series = 'alpha'
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1 FROM yourtable y1 WHERE y.name = y1.name AND series <> 'alpha');
If your description is incorrect and you need also other information, you might do better with a GROUP BY clause etc.
Try out here: db<>fiddle
You can use like below
select sum(Record) as Count from (select count() as Record from yourtable where series='alpha'
group by series,name having count()=1) as data
Check below link
https://dbfiddle.uk/1Y3WZT23
I added some new cases to your table to see other anomalies that can happen. This is how it looks like now:
Name
series
season
abc
alpha
s1
abc
alpha
s2
abc
theta
s1
fgh
alpha
s1
fgh
alpha
s2
klj
gamma
s1
klj
gamma
s2
klj
gamma
s3
pqr
alpha
s1
xyz
beta
s2
xyz
gamma
s3
I maybe overcomplicated, but it can provide the correct result for your problem; you just need to COUNT() it. I tested other SQL queries under your question on my this table, but not all of them showed the correct figure. I doesn't recommend to use NOT IN ( sub query ) for the following reasons:
Strange results when running SQL IN and NOT IN using Redshift
Optimization for Large IN Lists
Consider using EXISTS instead of IN with a subquery
Please find my code here:
WITH helper_table as
(
SELECT "Name",
series,
count(1) as seasons_watched
FROM your_table
GROUP BY 1, 2
)
------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT t1."Name"
FROM
(
SELECT "Name",
count(1) as is_watched_at_least_one_series_of_alpha
FROM helper_table
WHERE series = 'alpha'
GROUP BY 1
) t1
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT "Name",
count(1) as watched_exactly_one_series_so_far
FROM helper_table
GROUP BY 1
HAVING count(1) = 1
) t2
ON t2."Name" = t1."Name"
;
Hope it helps!
(This question is specific to MySQL 5.6, which does not include CTEs)
Let's say I have a table like this (actual table is made from a subquery with several joins and is a fair bit more complex):
ID NAME POWER ACCESS_LEVEL DEPTH
1 Odin poetry 1 0
1 Isis song 2 1
2 Enki water 1 0
2 Zeus storms 2 2
2 Thor hammer 2 3
I want to first group them up by ID (it's actually a double grouping by PRINCIPAL_TYPE, PRINCIPAL_ID if that matters), then select one row from each group, preferring the row with the highest ACCESS_LEVEL, and among rows with the same access, choosing the one with the lowest depth. No two rows will have the same (ID, DEPTH) so we don't need to worry beyond that point.
For example with the above table, we select:
ID NAME POWER ACCESS_LEVEL DEPTH
1 Isis song 2 1
2 Zeus storms 2 2
The groups are (Odin, Isis) and (Enki, Thor, Zeus). In the first group, we prefer Odin over Isis because Odin has a higher ACCESS_LEVEL. In the second group, we take Zeus because Zeus and Thor have higher ACCESS_LEVELs than Enki, and between those two, Zeus has the lower depth.
Worst case Ontario, I can do it at the application level, but doing it at the database level allows for using LIMIT and SORT BY to do paging, instead of fetching the whole result set.
Here is one method that uses a correlated subquery:
select t.*
from t
where (access_level, depth) = (select access_level, depth
from t t2
where t2.id = t.id
order by access_level desc, depth asc
limit 1
);
Could be you need some grouped table based on subquery
select *
my_table m2
inner join (
select id, t.level, min(depth) depth
from my_table m
inner join (
select id, max(ACCESS_LEVEL) level
from my_table
group by id ) t on t.id= m.id and t.level = m.access_level
group by id level ) t2 on t2.id = m2.id
and t2.depth = m2.depth and t2.level = m2.access_level
This may work.
select *
from your_table t1
where (t1.access_level, t1.depth) = (
select t2.access_level, min(t2.depth)
from your_table t2
where (t2.access_level, t2.id) = (
select max(t3.access_level), t3.id
from your_table t3
where t3.id = t1.id
)
)
However, I feel that Gordon's solution will probably lead to a better query plan.
I hope you can help me with this one. I've been looking for ways to set up a MySQL query that selects rows based on the number of times a certain value occurs, but have had no luck so far. I'm pretty sure i need to use count(*) somewhere, but i can only found how to count all values or all distinct values, instead of counting all occurences.
I have a table as such:
info setid
-- --
A 1
B 1
C 2
D 1
E 2
F 3
G 1
H 3
What i need is a query that will select all the lines where a setid occurs a certain number (x) of times.
So using x=2 should give me
C 2
E 2
F 3
H 3
because both setIds 2 and 3 each occur two times. Using x=1 or x = 3 should not give any results, and choosing x=4 should give me
A 1
B 1
D 1
G 1
Because only setid 1 occurs 4 times.
I hope you guys can help me. At this point i've been looking for the answer for so long that i'm not even sure this can be done in MySQL anymore. :)
select * from mytable
where setid in (
select setid from mytable
group by setid
having count(*) = 2
)
you can specify the # of times a setid needs to occur in the table in the having count(*) part of the subquery
Consider the following statement that uses an uncorrelated subquery:
SELECT ... FROM t1 WHERE t1.a IN (SELECT b FROM t2);
The optimizer rewrites the statement to a correlated subquery:
SELECT ... FROM t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM t2 WHERE t2.b = t1.a);
If the inner and outer queries return M and N rows, respectively, the execution time becomes on the order of O(M×N), rather than O(M+N) as it would be for an uncorrelated subquery.
But this time the subquery in Fuzzy Tree's solution is complety superfluous:
SELECT
set_id,
GROUP_CONCAT(info ORDER BY info) infos
COUNT(*) total
FROM
tablename
GROUP_BY set_id
HAVING COUNT(*) = 2
So, interesting problem I've run into. I'm sure there's an easy solution, but I'm not sure what it is. :)
Basically, imagine a very simple database, like so:
----------------
T1
----------------
r | nID
---------------
1 | A
2 | B
----------------
----------------
T2
----------------
nID | val
---------------
A | XXX
B | L
B | M
B | N
B | P
----------------
Basically, Table 2 references Table 1. Now, I'd like to select a random row from either A or B. However, I would like to first randomize the A and B, THEN choose an associated value.
In other words, flip a coin: Heads, XXX. Tails, L, M, N, or P.
My current query joins the two tables, orders by RAND(), and then LIMIT 1. However, this makes the odds of a B value being chosen much more likely than an A value being chosen. I'm using PHP, so I could easily just run two queries, but running one query would be much tidier, so I want to see what you guys recommend.
Any solutions? =)
EDIT:
Here's my current query, but it isn't working. Not sure why!
SELECT *
FROM t2
WHERE
nID =
(
SELECT nID
FROM t1
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1
)
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1
EDIT 2:
To demonstrate the issue I'm having, I created a test case. First, I created the following tables:
I want the odds of selecting XXX to be identical to selecting L, M, N, or P. The query I have should do it, right? So I tested it. The followings script runs the query 5000 times, and counts the results. They should be about 50-50, with XXX showing up approximately 2500 times, and everything else showing up about 2500 times as well.
$a = 0;
$b = 0;
$i = 0;
while ($i < 5000)
{
$query = mysql_query("
SELECT *
FROM t2
WHERE
nID =
(
SELECT nID
FROM t1
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1
)
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1
") or die(mysql_error());
$result = mysql_fetch_array($query);
if ($result['val'] == 'XXX')
{
$a++;
}
else
{
$b++;
}
$i++;
}
echo "XXX - $a<br />";
echo "Other - $b<br />";
Here are the results:
XXX - 937
Other - 4063
Let's run it again.
XXX - 968
Other - 4032
And let's run it one more time.
XXX - 932
Other - 4068
This is hardly the 50-50 split we'd expect to see given my query. What on earth's going on? Thanks for your help, guys!
You would expect that the subquery in your question would be run once per outer query, but it looks like that's not the case. I think the below might give you what you're after:
SET #randID = (SELECT nID
FROM T1
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1);
SELECT VAL
FROM T2
WHERE nID = #randID
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1;
(SQL Fiddle)
Your example inner query is evaluated multiple times, if you want it to choose A or B once, you need to rewrite it, for example as a JOIN;
SELECT q2.nID, q2.val
FROM ( SELECT nID FROM T1 ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1 ) q1
JOIN T2 q2 ON q1.nID = q2.nID
ORDER BY RAND()
LIMIT 1
If you're working with small tables, this query should be ok, but read here for example on why you shouldn't use ORDER BY RAND() for large tables.
Demo here.
Please try query given below
SELECT `table2`.* FROM `table2` WHERE table2.field1 = (Select table1.field2 from table1 order by RAND() limit 0,1) LIMIT 0,1
Here i assume column name field1 and field2 for both table so please use field name according your table structure.
thanks
SELECT
CASE rq.r WHEN '1' THEN t1q.r ELSE t2q.nID END AS Col1,
CASE rq.r WHEN '1' THEN t1q.nID ELSE t2q.val END AS Col2
FROM
(SELECT CASE WHEN RAND() < 0.5 THEN '1' ELSE '2' END AS r) AS rq
JOIN (SELECT * FROM T1 ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1) as t1q
JOIN (SELECT * FROM T2 ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1) as t2q
Observation: This query is inefficient because it requires selecting a random row from both tables even though only one is used. Perhaps a better way exists.
We have a database with a table whose values were imported from another system. There is an auto-increment column, and there aren’t any duplicate values, but there are missing values. For example, running this query:
select count(id) from arrc_vouchers where id between 1 and 100
should return 100, but it returns 87 instead. Is there a query I can run that will return the values of the missing numbers? For example, the records may exist for id 1-70 and 83-100, but there aren’t any records with id's of 71-82. I want to return 71, 72, 73, etc.
Is this possible?
A better answer
JustPlainMJS provided a much better answer in terms of performance.
The (not as fast as possible) answer
Here's a version that works on a table of any size (not just on 100 rows):
SELECT (t1.id + 1) as gap_starts_at,
(SELECT MIN(t3.id) -1 FROM arrc_vouchers t3 WHERE t3.id > t1.id) as gap_ends_at
FROM arrc_vouchers t1
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT t2.id FROM arrc_vouchers t2 WHERE t2.id = t1.id + 1)
HAVING gap_ends_at IS NOT NULL
gap_starts_at - first id in current gap
gap_ends_at - last id in current gap
This just worked for me to find the gaps in a table with more than 80k rows:
SELECT
CONCAT(z.expected, IF(z.got-1>z.expected, CONCAT(' thru ',z.got-1), '')) AS missing
FROM (
SELECT
#rownum:=#rownum+1 AS expected,
IF(#rownum=YourCol, 0, #rownum:=YourCol) AS got
FROM
(SELECT #rownum:=0) AS a
JOIN YourTable
ORDER BY YourCol
) AS z
WHERE z.got!=0;
Result:
+------------------+
| missing |
+------------------+
| 1 thru 99 |
| 666 thru 667 |
| 50000 |
| 66419 thru 66456 |
+------------------+
4 rows in set (0.06 sec)
Note that the order of columns expected and got is critical.
If you know that YourCol doesn't start at 1 and that doesn't matter, you can replace
(SELECT #rownum:=0) AS a
with
(SELECT #rownum:=(SELECT MIN(YourCol)-1 FROM YourTable)) AS a
New result:
+------------------+
| missing |
+------------------+
| 666 thru 667 |
| 50000 |
| 66419 thru 66456 |
+------------------+
3 rows in set (0.06 sec)
If you need to perform some kind of shell script task on the missing IDs, you can also use this variant in order to directly produce an expression you can iterate over in Bash.
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(IF(z.got-1>z.expected, CONCAT('$(',z.expected,' ',z.got-1,')'), z.expected) SEPARATOR " ") AS missing
FROM ( SELECT #rownum:=#rownum+1 AS expected, IF(#rownum=height, 0, #rownum:=height) AS got FROM (SELECT #rownum:=0) AS a JOIN block ORDER BY height ) AS z WHERE z.got!=0;
This produces an output like so
$(seq 1 99) $(seq 666 667) 50000 $(seq 66419 66456)
You can then copy and paste it into a for loop in a bash terminal to execute a command for every ID
for ID in $(seq 1 99) $(seq 666 667) 50000 $(seq 66419 66456); do
echo $ID
# Fill the gaps
done
It's the same thing as above, only that it's both readable and executable. By changing the "CONCAT" command above, syntax can be generated for other programming languages. Or maybe even SQL.
A quick-and-dirty query that should do the trick:
SELECT a AS id, b AS next_id, (b - a) -1 AS missing_inbetween
FROM
(
SELECT a1.id AS a , MIN(a2.id) AS b
FROM arrc_vouchers AS a1
LEFT JOIN arrc_vouchers AS a2 ON a2.id > a1.id
WHERE a1.id <= 100
GROUP BY a1.id
) AS tab
WHERE
b > a + 1
This will give you a table showing the id that has ids missing above it, and next_id that exists, and how many are missing between... E.g.,
id next_id missing_inbetween
1 4 2
68 70 1
75 87 11
If you are using a MariaDB database, you have a faster (800%) option using the sequence storage engine:
SELECT * FROM seq_1_to_50000 WHERE SEQ NOT IN (SELECT COL FROM TABLE);
If there is a sequence having gap of maximum one between two numbers (like
1,3,5,6) then the query that can be used is:
select s.id+1 from source1 s where s.id+1 not in(select id from source1) and s.id+1<(select max(id) from source1);
table_name - source1
column_name - id
An alternative solution that requires a query + some code doing some processing would be:
select l.id lValue, c.id cValue, r.id rValue
from
arrc_vouchers l
right join arrc_vouchers c on l.id=IF(c.id > 0, c.id-1, null)
left join arrc_vouchers r on r.id=c.id+1
where 1=1
and c.id > 0
and (l.id is null or r.id is null)
order by c.id asc;
Note that the query does not contain any subselect that we know it's not handled performantly by MySQL's planner.
That will return one entry per centralValue (cValue) that does not have a smaller value (lValue) or a greater value (rValue), i.e.:
lValue |cValue|rValue
-------+------+-------
{null} | 2 | 3
8 | 9 | {null}
{null} | 22 | 23
23 | 24 | {null}
{null} | 29 | {null}
{null} | 33 | {null}
Without going into further details (we'll see them in next paragraphs) this output means that:
No values between 0 and 2
No values between 9 and 22
No values between 24 and 29
No values between 29 and 33
No values between 33 and MAX VALUE
So the basic idea is to do a RIGHT and LEFT joins with the same table seeing if we have adjacents values per value (i.e., if central value is '3' then we check for 3-1=2 at left and 3+1 at right), and when a ROW has a NULL value at RIGHT or LEFT then we know there is no adjacent value.
The complete raw output of my table is:
select * from arrc_vouchers order by id asc;
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
22
23
24
29
33
Some notes:
The SQL IF statement in the join condition is needed if you define the 'id' field as UNSIGNED, therefore it will not allow you to decrease it under zero. This is not strictly necessary if you keep the c.value > 0 as it's stated in the next note, but I'm including it just as doc.
I'm filtering the zero central value as we are not interested in any previous value and we can derive the post value from the next row.
I tried it in a different manner, and the best performance that I found was this simple query:
select a.id+1 gapIni
,(select x.id-1 from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id+1 limit 1) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
left join arrc_vouchers b on b.id=a.id+1
where b.id is null
order by 1
;
... one left join to check if the next id exists, only if next if is not found, then the subquery finds the next id that exists to find the end of gap. I did it because the query with equal (=) is better performance than the greater than (>) operator.
Using the sqlfiddle it does not show so a different performance compared to the other queries, but in a real database this query above results in 3 times faster than the others.
The schema:
CREATE TABLE arrc_vouchers (id int primary key)
;
INSERT INTO `arrc_vouchers` (`id`) VALUES (1),(4),(5),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29)
;
Follow below all the queries that I made to compare the performance:
select a.id+1 gapIni
,(select x.id-1 from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id+1 limit 1) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
left join arrc_vouchers b on b.id=a.id+1
where b.id is null
order by 1
;
select *, (gapEnd-gapIni) qt
from (
select id+1 gapIni
,(select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
order by id
) a where gapEnd <> gapIni
;
select id+1 gapIni
,(select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1) gapEnd
#,coalesce((select id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id=a.id+1),(select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1)) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
where id+1 <> (select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1)
order by id
;
select id+1 gapIni
,coalesce((select id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id=a.id+1),(select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1)) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
order by id
;
select id+1 gapIni
,coalesce((select id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id=a.id+1),concat('*** GAT *** ',(select x.id from arrc_vouchers x where x.id>a.id limit 1))) gapEnd
from arrc_vouchers a
order by id
;
You can see and test my query using this SQL Fiddle:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/6bdca7/1
It is probably not relevant, but I was looking for something like this to list the gaps in a sequence of numbers and found this post that has multiple different solutions depending upon exactly what you are looking for. I was looking for the first available gap in the sequence (i.e., next available number), and this seems to work fine.
SELECT MIN(l.number_sequence + 1) as nextavabile
from patients as l
LEFT OUTER JOIN patients as r on l.number_sequence + 1 = r.number_sequence
WHERE r.number_sequence is NULL
Several other scenarios and solutions discussed there, from 2005!
How to Find Missing Values in a Sequence With SQL
Create a temporary table with 100 rows and a single column containing the values 1-100.
Outer Join this table to your arrc_vouchers table and select the single column values where the arrc_vouchers id is null.
This should work:
select tempid from temptable
left join arrc_vouchers on temptable.tempid = arrc_vouchers.id
where arrc_vouchers.id is null
Although these all seem to work, the result set returns in a very lengthy time when there are 50,000 records.
I used this, and it find the gap or the next available (last used + 1) with a much faster return from the query.
SELECT a.id as beforegap, a.id+1 as avail
FROM table_name a
where (select b.id from table_name b where b.id=a.id+1) is null
limit 1;
Based on the answer given by matt, this stored procedure allows you to specify the table and column names that you wish to test to find non-contiguous records - thus answering the original question and also demonstrating how one could use #var to represent tables &/or columns in a stored procedure.
create definer=`root`#`localhost` procedure `spfindnoncontiguous`(in `param_tbl` varchar(64), in `param_col` varchar(64))
language sql
not deterministic
contains sql
sql security definer
comment ''
begin
declare strsql varchar(1000);
declare tbl varchar(64);
declare col varchar(64);
set #tbl=cast(param_tbl as char character set utf8);
set #col=cast(param_col as char character set utf8);
set #strsql=concat("select
( t1.",#col," + 1 ) as starts_at,
( select min(t3.",#col,") -1 from ",#tbl," t3 where t3.",#col," > t1.",#col," ) as ends_at
from ",#tbl," t1
where not exists ( select t2.",#col," from ",#tbl," t2 where t2.",#col," = t1.",#col," + 1 )
having ends_at is not null");
prepare stmt from #strsql;
execute stmt;
deallocate prepare stmt;
end
A simple, yet effective, solution to find the missing auto-increment values:
SELECT `id`+1
FROM `table_name`
WHERE `id`+1 NOT IN (SELECT id FROM table_name)
Another simple answer that identifies the gaps. We do a query selecting just the odd numbers and we right join it to a query with all the even numbers. As long as you're not missing id 1; this should give you a comprehensive list of where the gaps start.
You'll still have to take a look at that place in the database to figure out how many numbers the gap is. I found this way easier than the solution proposed and much easier to customize to unique situations.
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT * FROM MyTABLE WHERE MYFIELD % 2 > 0) AS A
RIGHT JOIN FROM (SELECT * FROM MyTABLE WHERE MYFIELD % 2 = 0) AS B
ON A.MYFIELD=(B.MYFIELD+1)
WHERE a.id IS NULL;
This works for me:
SELECT distinct(l.membership_no + 1) as nextavabile
from Tablename as l
LEFT OUTER JOIN Tablename as r on l.membership_no + 1 = r.membership_no
WHERE r.membership_no is NULL and l.membership_no is not null order by nextavabile asc;
Starting from the comment posted by user933161,
select l.id + 1 as start from sequence as l inner join sequence as r on l.id + 1 = r.id where r.id is null;
is better in that it will not produce a false positive for the end of the list of records. (I'm not sure why so many are using left outer joins.)
Also,
insert into sequence (id) values (#);
where # is the start value for a gap will fill that start value. (If there are fields that cannot be null, you will have to add those with dummy values.)
You could alternate between querying for start values and filling in each start value until the query for start values returns an empty set.
Of course, this approach would only be helpful if you're working with a small enough data set that manually iterating like that is reasonable. I don't know enough about things like phpMyAdmin to come up with ways to automate it for larger sets with more and larger gaps.
CREATE TABLE arrc_vouchers (id int primary key);
INSERT INTO `arrc_vouchers` (`id`) VALUES (1),(4),(5),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(15),(16);
WITH RECURSIVE odd_num_cte (id) AS
(
SELECT (select min(id) from arrc_vouchers)
union all
SELECT id+1 from odd_num_cte where id <(SELECT max(id) from arrc_vouchers)
)
SELECT cte.id
from arrc_vouchers ar right outer join odd_num_cte cte on ar.id=cte.id
where ar.id is null;