I have an extension that needs to access the IP addresses associated with a recent change entry.
From the revision ID, I can access the Revision object and in turn the associated RecentChange but neither have any obvious methods to get the originating IP. It can only get the IP if it was an anonymous edit.
I have set $wgPutIPinRC so the IPs will be in the recentchanges table.
How can I get the IP address for the change?
It is not directly exposed as a property, but it is stored in the class as an attribute.
These can be read using the RecentChange::getAttribute() method passing the field name of rc_ip:
$ip_address = $this->recentchange->getAttribute( 'rc_ip' );
This still requires $wgPutIPinRC to be set for the data to be recorded in the first place.
Related
I am trying to append the list of account Ids since I don't have access to organization, but whenever i am doing it, previous accounts get replaced with new account ID and i only want to append them.
Please let me know how to do it.
aws configservice put-configuration-aggregator --configuration-aggregator-name test-config --account-aggregation-sources "[{\"AccountIds\": [\"xxxxxx\",\"xxxx\"],\"AwsRegions\": [\"us-east-1\"]}]"
From the documentation
accountIds that are passed will be replaced with existing accounts. If you want to add additional accounts into the aggregator, call DescribeAggregator to get the previous accounts and then append new ones.
References :
https://awscli.amazonaws.com/v2/documentation/api/latest/reference/configservice/put-configuration-aggregator.html
So you can first call DescribeAggregator1 to get the previous accounts and store them in some variable.
Then append new accounts to previous accounts variable via jq.
Append JSON Object via jq
Note - I have added links for AWS CLI V2.
My company allows employees to have multiple email addresses in their account.
I am attempting to write an input form where someone can enter any of the emails for a contact and we'll resolve it to the same person.
I've tried doing this via ContactsApp.getContact(email).getPrimaryEmail() to resolve all different inputs to the same primary email, but it doesn't work as expected. Each email I search for returns a different Contact object with only a single email (the one I used to search).
Even if I use ContactsApp.getContact(email).getEmails() to list all emails to the employee, I can see it only returns one at a time.
When going to contacts.google.com, I see the information I expected. Searching for any of the emails will return the same contact, with the same primary email and all other emails listed.
Is there something I'm doing wrong? Or is this how ContactsApp works. If so, is there a workaround?
Thanks!
getPrimaryEmail() will only return an email address if the contact in question has had a default email set and this can only be done via the Google Contacts App, not on the web (go figure).
To solve your problem I would suggest loading all the contacts into an array variable first and then searching this for matching email addresses. I would do the data retrieval on page/view load (so it can be reused without multiple server calls) but have included it all together here for conciseness.
What I found strange about the ContactsApp (and presumable People API too) is that the contacts returned are just empty objects (when logged) with just a bunch of methods on them. However, once you have an array of objects you can write your own properties to those objects for easier access of data.
Therefore I would first of all retrieve all the users contacts, then add a property of .emails to each contact object in the array and then use .some, perhaps, to check if a match appears in .emails (which will also be an array).
Something like:
let strSearch = 'someone#somewhere.net' // EMAIL address to search based on user input
let arrContacts = ContactsApp.getContacts();
let contacts = arrContacts.map(contact => {
let emails = contact.getEmails();
contact.emails = emails.map(email => email.getAddress());
return contact;
});
let foundContact = contacts.filter(contact => contact.emails.some(email => email === strSearch));
Remember .getEmails() returns another array of objects that have the method .getAddress() on them in order to retrieve the actual address, that's why I'm getting an array of email objects with let emails = contact.getEmails(); then using emails.map here to put the actual email addresses into an array stored in the contact.emails property (that doesn't exist so we're actually creating it here).
After that we're filtering the contacts array down to a contact where the searched email address is matched to one of the email addresses in the contact.emails array. I haven't tested it so the last line might need playing around with slightly but I've used something very similar so would expect it to work.
You can then use foundContact[0] to reference the contact found and use the further methods of .getFullname() .getId() etc. to retrieve their data as required. If you need the contacts phone numbers or geographical address that's a whole other process of returning an array of objects using .getPhones() or getAddresses(), but I think that's beyond the scope of this question.
I have a domain mydomain.com. The DNS servers for this domain are under my control and I'm running PowerDNS there. I've set up DNSSEC for my main domain mydomain.com and I've registered the keys at registrar. Everything works fine for the main domain. However when I create subdomains (zones) with PowerAdmin GUI then I get the following error for my subdomains from DNSSEC analysis tool at http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/:
No DS records found for subdomain.mydomain.com in the mydomain.com zone
Question: how to add that DS record to mydomain.com zone with powerdns?
Note: I haven't used PowerAdmin, so this is a PowerDNS answer.
Assuming you have also signed these subdomains/zones, you would use pdnssec show-zone to see the DS records for them. Then, insert these DS records into the parent zone (mydomain.com), with fields set like this:
domain_id = id of domain.com
name = sub.mydomain.com
type = DS
content = copy/paste from pdnssec show-zone
You also need to insert NS records (as above, but with type=NS and content=name of your server), to get a valid delegation, even if it is local!
If you don't actually care about DNSSEC for the subdomains, just insert the NS records and leave out the DS. This will tell validators that the subdomain is deliberately insecure.
Tinkering around with verifying a couple of domains and found the manual process rather tedius. My DNS controller offers API access so I figured why not script the whole thing.
Trick is I can't figure out how to access the required TXT & CNAME records for DKIMS verification from boto, when I punch in
dkims = conn.verify_domain_dkim('DOMAIN.COM')
it adds DOMAIN.COM to the list of domains pending verification but doesn't provide the needed records, the returned value of dkims is
{'VerifyDomainDkimResponse': {
'ResponseMetadata': {'RequestId': 'REQUEST_ID_STRING'},
'VerifyDomainDkimResult': {'DkimTokens': {
'member': 'DKIMS_TOKEN_STRING'}}}}
Is there some undocumented way to take the REQUEST_ID or TOKEN_STRING to pull up these records?
UPDATE
If you have an aws account you can see the records I'm after at
https://console.aws.amazon.com/ses/home?region=us-west-2#verified-senders:domain
tab: Details:: Record Type: TXT (Text)
tab: DKIM:: DNS Record 1, 2, 3
these are the records required to add to the DNS controller to validate & allow DKIM signatures to take place
This is how I do it with python.
DOMINIO = 'mydomain.com'
from boto3 import Session
session = Session(
aws_access_key_id=MY_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID,
aws_secret_access_key=MY_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY,
region_name=MY_AWS_REGION_NAME)
client = session.client('ses')
# gets VerificationToken for the domain, that will be used to add a TXT record to the DNS
result = client.verify_domain_identity(Domain=DOMINIO)
txt = result.get('VerificationToken')
# gets DKIM tokens that will be used to add 3 CNAME records
result = client.verify_domain_dkim(Domain=DOMINIO)
dkim_tokens = result.get('DkimTokens') # this is a list
At the end of the code, you will have "txt" and "dkim_tokens" variables, a string and a list respectively.
You will need to add a TXT record to your dns, where the host name is "_amazonses" and the value is the value of "txt" variable.
Also you will need to add 3 CNAME records to your dns, one for each token present in "dkim_tokens" list, where the host name of each record is of the form of [dkimtoken]._domainkey and the target is [dkimtoken].dkim.amazonses.com
After adding the dns records, after some minutes (maybe a couple of hours), Amazon will detect and verify the domain, and will send you an email notification. After that, you can enable Dkim signature by doing this call:
client.set_identity_dkim_enabled(Identity=DOMINIO, DkimEnabled=True)
The methods used here are verify_domain_identity, verify_domain_dkim and set_identity_dkim_enabled.
You may also want to take a look a get_identity_verification_attributes and get_identity_dkim_attributes.
I think the get_identity_dkim_attributes method will return the information you are looking for. You pass in the domain name(s) you are interested in and it returns the status for that identity as well as the DKIM tokens.
Using the Box 1.0 REST API, I am trying to work with the functions in SOAP UI.
The API doc for get_managed_users with user_id=12345 (internal id retrieved with get_user_id call correctly) is returning all the users. The docs say that would be the case if you do not specify a user_id value. But my full command is: (Token and API key changed to protect the clueless)
https://www.box.com/api/1.0/rest?user_id=27360&auth_token=blahbalhblah1234&action=get_managed_users&api_key=someKeyYouShouldNotSee
Now I could work with the complete result list, but that won't scale as we get thousands of users into the system.
I can make a call with edit_managed_user, using the same user_id value and the change is reflected in the UI, and in the next get_managed_users call. Thus I do have the correct user_id value, I would so assume.
I tried testuser#gmail.com as the user_id value as well, and get the entire list back. This leads me to believe that somehow I am sending user_id wrong, but I just do not see it.
Any hints? Why, with what seems like a valid user_id value is it acting like it is absent or incorrect?
Most likely you have either called this method with an invalid user_id, or one that is not in your set of managed users. Can you double check that the user comes back in your list of already managed users?