Here is an HTML code to reproduce the problem:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<div style="width:800px; margin:0 auto;">
<img src="logo.gif" width="100" height="40" />
</div>
</body>
</html>
When it is rendered in a desktop browser, the height of the only <div> becomes 45 pixels but not 40 as I expect (tested this in IE11 and Opera Next v20). logo.gif is 100x40, and the situation remains the same even if I apply zero border through CSS to the <img> tag (border, border-width, etc).
Why does it happen and how to fix it?
I believe it is not a bug as it is rendered the same way in all major browsers. The problem is fixed if we set just the display:block style. Without this, the image is rendered as an inline element, and its bottom border is aligned to the so called text baseline.
Let's change our code to demonstrate this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body style="background-color: #FFFF99;">
<div style="width:800px; margin:0 auto; background-color: #00CCFF;">
<img src="logo.gif" width="100" height="40" style="border: 3px solid black;" />
Some text yyy qqq
</div>
</body>
</html>
The result is the following:
As you can see, the extra space is needed to render the text without clipping!
I found a confirmation of that in the well-known book by Eric Meyer CSS: The Definitive Guide - in the section dedicated to alignment, when it describes the {vertical-align: baseline} attribute for the <img> tag. Here is the corresponding excerpt:
This alignment rule is important because it causes some web browsers always to put a replaced element's bottom edge on the baseline, even if there is no other text in the line. For example, let's say you have an image in a table cell all by itself. The image may actually be on a baseline, but in some browsers, the space below the baseline causes a gap to appear beneath the image. Other browsers will "shrink-wrap" the image with the table cell and no gap will appear. The gap behavior is correct, according to the CSS Working Group, despite its lack of appeal to most authors.
Same issue in FireFox and IE and Chrome.
You can fix this with a hack and add a Height:40px; to your div (I had to use an image to with the same width/height as your logo so don't be surprised that I have a different picture)
<div style="width:800px; margin:0 auto;border:solid;height:40px;">
<img src="http://a2.mzstatic.com/us/r30/Video/16/96/5f/mzi.rxlappss.100x100-75.jpg" width="100" height="40" />
</div>
Or, add some CSS to your image tag and keep the original code as is (will affect all images which may not be desirable)
img {padding:none;margin:none;display:block;}
http://jsfiddle.net/h6wrA/
Or, you can do this for only certain images with http://jsfiddle.net/h6wrA/2/
The only way I found to fix this problem correctly without height hacks, etc. is to set the container to line-height:0; (see demo example below).
.image { background:red; }
.image-fix { line-height:0; }
Image without Fix:
<div class="image">
<img src="http://via.placeholder.com/100x100" alt="">
</div>
<br>
Image with Fix:
<div class="image image-fix">
<img src="http://via.placeholder.com/100x100" alt="">
</div>
This is not a issue , you just need to write a correct CSS. Try
height:40px;display:block; for div tag and keep margin:0,padding:0
Thats all...
Related
I am building a few websites and always have this same problem with css.
I have two images inside a div container.
When i put for example a text inside a div the div takes the heigth of the text but when i put an image in for some for me unknown reason the div suddenly seems to have a default heigth.
As you can see i have made the size of the images responsive in my css. I ve involved a color on the div just to give a clearer look on what happens.
When i narrow my browser screen the heigth of the div stays equal ( thus not being responsive) and for some reason the images are pushed down inside the div.
How can i solve this.I want the div container height to be responsive as the images inside are and holding the same height as the images and as i narrow the browser screen.
Last but not least ... what is it that i do not understand ?
Thank you for helping me out.
My code
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div style="background-color:red;">
<img style="height:2vw; width:4vw;" src="image.jpg" alt="en">
<img style="height:2vw; width:4vw;" src="image.jpg" alt="en">
</div>
</body>
</html>
If you want the parent div to have a certain size, you should enforce dimension on the div and inherit its properties to its children...
div{
height: 50vh;
width: 50vw;
background: red;
}
div>img{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
<div>
<img src="image.jpg" alt="text">
</div>
you should try adding display: block; to <img> tag.
I hope this help.
If you aren't using Bootstrap or another css framework, maybe you need to add reset.css file to your project. Example of reset: https://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/
Please check this. I think it will help you. codepen
div{background-color:red;width:200px;overflow:hidden;}
div img{height:auto; max-width:100%;display:block;}
<div>
<img src="image" alt="text">
</div>
Try using max-width:100% on the image. This will keep it's size limited to it's parent size.
Why is it so difficult (or as one answer said, "It is not possible.") to center an arbitrary image horizontally? I have had centralized images working for several years; suddenly they sit obstinately at the left. Has there been some recent change in CSS that causes this?
I expect the code below, modified from the CSS DIY, to work, but it does not.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<style>
img { display:block; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Thumbnail Images</h2>
<p> ... </p>
<div style="margin: 0 auto;">
<img src="paris.jpg" alt="Paris"
width=15% >
</div>
</body></html>
I realize that scaling an image by percent width is (for no known) reason disallowed, but Jukka advised me to use it anyway, because it works in all browsers I have tried and does exactly what I want, which is to maintain image size proportional to page width. If I float the image right or left it works fine, and I can run a caption alongside the image, but the obvious 'margin : 0 auto;' fails, for no good reason I can see.
Margin : Auto
You can set the margin property to auto to horizontally center the element within its container.
The element will then take up the specified width, and the remaining space will be split equally between the left and right margins
Add
img {
display:block;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<h2>Thumbnail Images</h2>
<p> ... </p>
<div>
<img src="https://www.w3schools.com/css/trolltunga.jpg" alt="Paris" >
</div>
</body>
</html>
You should add the styles
display:block;
margin: 0 auto;
To your img element
<div style="width:100%;background:skyblue;">
<img style='display:block;width:25%;margin:0 auto;' src='https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQvl0jMbupgXjeP66hak-u3uwUPcqI3Ovx7zqiWkVhav2V8FjeY1A'/>
</div>
I want to create a basic layout for webpage with divs and want to set images for their background.
Since I have smaller images I want to stretch them to fill in the divs.
There are many ways to do that. But I tried following:
</html>
<head>
<style>
img#bg {
top:0;
left:0;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
<style>
<head>
<body>
<img src="body.jpg" alt="background image" id="bg" />
<div id="content"> </div>
<body>
</html>
This worked. Then I tried to make use of it in layout.
<div id="hmenu" style="zindex=1;height:80px;background-color:#007980"></div>
<div id="content" >
<img src="body.jpg" alt="background image" id="bg" />
</div>
This also worked. But when I tried to set image this way for a div with float:left or CSS width set, it did not worked:
<div id="header" style="zindex=1;height:300px;width:100%"></div>
<div id="hmenu" style="zindex=1;height:80px;background-color:#007980"></div>
<div id="content" style="float:right" >
<img src="body.jpg" alt="background image" id="bg" />
</div>
This doesnt work. In last HTML notice float:right.
I will like to stick to this method, not any jQuery method or others and also will like to know what is wrong here and what should be done to get the desired result with CSS modifications as I am learning this.
Seems like you want a background image
A good explanation can be found here
Basically you can make a div have a background using CSS and not having to put an tag inside, this is almost always preferable.
Example code for you could be:
body {
background-image: url('body.jpg');
background-size: cover;
}
In order for height: 100%, Top:0 etc to work you need to have a position applied to the element.
You don't as per the example code given. Give more code and i can help more. But from what you have given this is your problem.
background-size: cover;
Is a nice solution, but I'm not sure about the browser support, because it's CSS3.
I made a fiddle, is this what you were looking for?
http://jsfiddle.net/NQY6B/5/
By the way, change "zindex" to "z-index".
EDIT: I've updated the fiddle with text content in the div
Imagine three images with fixed size:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
div.photos img {
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
background-color: black;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="photos">
<img src="abc" />
<img src="def" />
<img src="ghi" />
</div>
</body>
</html>
When you look at such page in IE or Chrome, you'll see what I expected - threee images with fixed sizes.
In Firefox however, it doesn't work.
But if I set the images to display: block; or remove the DOCTYPE (doesn't show on jsfiddle) it works.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks
This seems to be an old feature in Firefox: I found a discussion about it from year 2007:
So I suppose it’s intentional and won’t go away. I guess they might be thinking this way: Everything is fine if you set dimensions on an image, we’ll scale it. But if the image is missing, we will render the alternative text instead, and this changes the img element from a replaced inline element to a text, a non-replaced inline element, and for it we won’t support height and width, by the spec. Instead, the text determines the dimensions. And presumably the authors of Firefox think this is the right thing to do, and only in Quirks Mdoe do they do as other browsers do.
If you add alt attributes (as you should, every img should have one), you’ll see how the box size varies by text length. Apparently Firefox treats a missing alt here as equivalent to alt="", implying zero width.
This would explain why setting display to inline-block (or block) changes the behavior: then width and height are applied.
I think firefox wont be applying height and width to <img> element which are empty and hence it must be rendering like that, so use CSS display: block;
Here's my fiddle
Or use an image and see...
Updated : fiddle
I have an issue with the HTML <br /> tag.
I have 2 images above each other.
With no <br /> between the two, the bottom border of the top image touches the top border of the bottom image which seems to be what it is supposed to be.
Then if I put 1 <br />, there should be some space between the 2 images. If I put 2 <br />, there should be even more space.
Here is the problem
Firefox version 3.5 seems to ignore the first <br />. If I put 2 then it puts some space between the 2 images.
IE7 puts some space between the 2 images even if I don't put any <br />
Things work fine in Chrome or Safari, i.e. there is no space with no <br />, some space with 1 <br />, more space with 2, etc...
I have not tested in IE8.
Is there a way to get around the fact that browsers don't seem to interpret the <br /> tag the same way?
Thanks for your insight!
Try using css to position the images rather than relying on the br tag.
img { display: block; margin: 0 0 20px 0; }
For example.
First of all you should make sure that you have a valid doctype on the page, so that it renders in standards compliant mode. That will minimise the differences. W3C: Recommended list of DTDs
The <br /> tag is not HTML, it's XHTML. If you are using HTML you should use a <br> tag instead.
If you don't have any break between the images, they would be displayed on the same line. If there isn't room for that, the browser will break the line and place one image on the next line. If you add a break between images that has already been broken into two lines, that makes no difference.
However, in some modes some browsers make a difference between images that are by themselves and images that are part of a text. Adding a break between the images means that they are part of a text, and the browser will display the image placed on the base line of a text line. This means that there is some space below the image that is the distance from the base line of the text line to the bottom of the text line, the space used for hanging characters like g and j. Depending in the size of the images and the line height, there may also be some space above the image.
To ensure that the images are not displayed as part of a text you should turn them into block elements. You can use the style display:block; for this. You can also use float:left; or float:right; to make an image float, that will automatically make it a block element.
The size of the br element depends on the font size/line height. Have you considered just setting display block on the image elements and setting a bottom margin, and maybe adding a 'last' class on the last one so it doesn't have a bottom margin?
<!doctype html>
<style>
body { background:gray; }
div#gallery .row img { display:block; margin:0 0 1em; }
div#gallery .last img { margin-bottom:0; }
div#gallery .row .thumb { float:left; width:5em; }
div#gallery .row { clear:both; width:50em; overflow:hidden; }
</style>
<div id="gallery">
<div class="row">
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
</div>
<div class="row last">
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
<div class="thumb"><img src=http://col.stb.s-msn.com/i/B4/BA27E3F44CD76DFB45ECCF070C722.jpg></div>
</div>
</div>
Though in this example it'd be easier to set a bottom margin on the row itself.
if you want to use the tag you can do it so :
<br style="line-height:?px; height:?px" />
where ?px = how many px it`s needed to show the result you need
OR
you could use:
<br clear="all" />
it should work...
if you want to use CSS you could do it so :
<style>
img.newline{
display:table-row;
}
</style>
<img src="1.jpg" class="newline"/>
<img src="2.jpg" class="newline"/>
it should work.. these are quick ways to do it.. you can use css and make something great.. but what i wrote here are "quickies" and most simple/fastest ways i thought of.
The br element is a presentation element that offers no descriptive value. Most browsers tend to apply default presentation to different elements that can differ slight from browser to browser. So, I would strongly recommend not using the br element and instead using a span tag and CSS to ensure your presentation is uniform across various browsers.
Are you set up like this?
<img src="1.jpg" />
<img src="2.jpg" />
The correct behavior is actually to not line break between the images, they should appear on the same line. The first BR tag added should bring the second image to a new line, then the second BR should create a gap.
It might fix it if you specifically tell your images to line-break themselves, so they appear on separate lines even without a BR.
I would add one thing to DanTdr's response. If you don't add a small font size for the BR tag then you run into problems in IE because of it's hasLayout behavior. The BR would be a minimum of 1em.
<br style="line-height: ?px; height: ?px; font-size: 1px;" />
After being frustrated for some time with not getting BR tags to render the same in Firefox and IE this font-size: 1px; style finally made my layout appear the same in both browsers.