CSS overflow-y is not working as advertised? - html

I'm trying to get my top sentence (<p>geornvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>) to be hidden inside a div and I'm not sure if this is possible but one thing for sure is that the overflow-y style is not working as expected, or maybe I'm doing something terribly wrong. Basically I expect no scroll bar and I get a horizontal one even though Mozilla says it should hide the content horizontally. I'm using Firefox 28 beta but that shouldn't matter no?
Here's the code,
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<style type = "text/css">
#div_1
{
overflow-y:hidden;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
background-color: white;
}
body
{
background-color: black;
}
p
{
font-color: blue;
font-size: 20px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
</style>
<div id = "div_1">
<p>geornvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>eornvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>ornvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>rnvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>nvgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>vgowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>gowegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>owegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>wegnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>egnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>gnoewpgnerognm</p>
<p>noewpgnerognm</p>
<p>oewpgnerognm</p>
<p>ewpgnerognm</p>
<p>wpgnerognm</p>
<p>pgnerognm</p>
<p>gnerognm</p>
<p>nerognm</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

Another way to do it is
1) Visually hide the paragraph tag. It will keep it's space in the div as though its there, just not visible.
#div_1 p:first-child {visibility: hidden;}
or 2) visually remove the paragraph tag. It look as though it's not there, all other paragraph tags will move up in it's place.
#div_1 p:first-child {display: none;}

To get rid of the horizontal scrollbar, use overflow-x:
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y, hides the overflow in the y direction. As in up and down, which would hide a vertical scrollbar.

Related

How do I put a p and an a tag inline in html?

I am trying to put a <p> tag inline with an <a> tag, but I can't figure out how. I've tried several display types in css, but they either don't work or do something weird to it.
(Here is a bunch of unnecessary words because the thing is saying there is too much code and not enough words. I think its pretty dumb because what I said is enough unless someone specifically asks for details about something).
Here's some example code:
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: #efefef;
}
header {
margin: 0;
margin-top: -10px;
background-color: #ffffff;
}
header p {
margin: 0;
font-family: "arial";
font-size: 50px;
color: #3c3c3c;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-left: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
header a {
}
#information {
width: 500px;
height: 250px;
background-color: #ffffff;
box-shadow: 7px 7px 4px grey;
margin-left: 100px;
margin-top: 150px;
}
#information p {
font-family: "arial";
font-size: 20px;
color: #1febff;
}
#delete {
margin-top: 2000px;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>SaHa | Color Scheme</title>
<link href="style.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<header>
<p>SaHa</p>
Menu
</header>
<div id="information">
<p>Pretend that there is a bunch of important information here even though there really isn't.
This is normally where a message that actually means something would go, but this is just a
placeholder because I have nothing important to put here right now.
</p>
</div>
<div id="delete"></div>
</body>
</html>
In your HTML, try directly typing or after whatever text you want it to appear.
For example:<div>When i came<a> ut yiur name</a>so what do i do</div>
In your CSS body, try inline-block or just inline parameters with DISPLAY property to get any image or text into the normal flow of a line.
For example:
a {display:inline-block;}
Could you specify which elements in your example code you want inline?
Generally using display: inline and display: inline-block will make elements flow as if they were text. They will sit next to each other and jump to new lines when their container width gets too narrow. Browsers commonly apply display: block to <p> elements by default.
Assuming we are talking about the contents of your <header>, I added the following rule to your existing CSS. Check it out in action.
header p {
display: inline-block;
}
EDIT: Based on further comments, here is a solution to what you are looking for.
First of all I've wrapped your menu items in a nav element and made your main title a h1 element. Search engines like this better. A h1 element is also displayed inline by default and respects text-align properties on its parent container (which in this case is header).
<h1>SaHa</h1>
<nav>
Menu
Thing
Stuff
</nav>
On the CSS side I've made two crucial changes.
First, I've center-aligned your header text. This centers the new h1 element. Additionally I've set position: relative because we will need it in the next step.
header {
text-align: center;
position: relative;
}
Second, to position your menu to the right side of the screen I've lifted it from the regular flow of content with position: absolute. Now, by specifying either a top or bottom and left or right, we can position the menu anywhere in the header. Why the header? Because it is the nearest parent to nav that has a relative position. This is why we set it earlier!
nav {
position: absolute;
right: 10px;
bottom: 10px;
}
Try changing the values for right and bottom in this Codepen example. Try changing right to left and see what happens. What happens if you remove position: relative from .header?

Line right after text

I'd like to have a line that starts right after my text on the same line, I've tried with the following simple code
<html><body>My Text<hr/></body></html>
It seems that <hr> is not an option because it is always on a new line and I'd like the line to start at the right of my text.
Any help ?
The <hr> has default styling that puts it on a new line. However that default styling can be over-ridden, in the same way as it can for any other element. <hr> is in essence nothing more than an empty <div> with a default border setting.
To demonstrate this, try the following:
<div>Blah blah<hr style='display:inline-block; width:100px;' />dfgdfg</div>
There are a number of ways to override the styling of <hr> to acheive your aim.
You could try using display:inline-block; along with a width setting, as I have above. The down-side of this approach is that it requires you to know the width you want, though there are ways around this - width:100%;, and the whole line in a container <div> that has overflow:hidden; might do the trick, for example:
<div style='overflow:hidden; white-space:nowrap;'>Blah blah<hr style='display:inline-block; width:100%;' /></div>
Another option would be to use float:left;. You'd need to apply this to all the elements in the line, and I dislike this option as I find that float tends to cause more problems than it solves. But try it and see if it works for you.
There are various other combinations of styles you can try - give it a go and see what works.
Using FlexBox Property this can be achieved easily.
.mytextdiv{
display:flex;
flex-direction:row;
align-items: center;
}
.mytexttitle{
flex-grow:0;
}
.divider{
flex-grow:1;
height: 1px;
background-color: #9f9f9f;
}
<div class="mytextdiv">
<div class="mytexttitle">
My Text
</div>
<div class="divider"></div>
</div>
Try this:
<html><body>My Text<hr style="float: right; width: 80%"/></body></html>
The inline CSS float: right will keep it on the same line as the text.
You'll need to adjust the width if you want it to fill the rest of the line.
Using inline or float, as far as I tested it doesn't work properly even if this was my first thought. Looking further I used the following css
hr {
bottom: 17px;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
div {
background:white;
position: relative;
width: 100px;
z-index: 10;
}
html
<div>My Text</div><hr/>
Demo http://jsfiddle.net/mFEWk/
What I did, is to add position relative in both elements (to give me the advantage of z-index use). Also from the moment I had position:relative for hr I moved it from the bottom:17px. This move it above the div that contains the text. Applying z-index values and adding background:white for the div puts the text above the the line. Of course don't forget to use a width for the text, otherwise will take the whole width of the parent element.
<div style="float: left">Some text</div>
<hr style="clear: none; position: relative; top: 0.5em;">
Exactly what you want.
Try this. It works
<p style="float:left;">
Hello Text
<hr style="float:left; width: 80%"/>
</p>
You can also use this to draw a line between texts like
Hello -------------------------- Hello
The OP never specified the purpose of the line, but I wanted to share what I ended up doing when I was making an html template where the user needed a line to write on after the document was printed.
Because the hr tag defaults to its own line and defaults to being centered in the line, I decided to use a div and style it instead.
HTML
This is my text.<div class='fillLine'></div>
CSS
.fillLine {
display:inline-block;
width: 200px;
border-bottom: 1px solid black;
}
JSFiddle Demo
Style Div for Line After Text
Hope that helps anyone who had the same goal as me.
hr {
width: {so it fits on the same line as the p tag};
}
p {
float: left;
width: {enough to accomodate the hr};
}
That sort of make sense?
<p>My text</p>
<hr />
Here's one potential approach, but it has some assumptions/requirements. Your question should be edited to give more specific information about what you're building.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Blah</title>
<style type="text/css">
body {
background-color : white;
font-family : Arial;
font-size : 16px;
}
.wrap {
background: transparent url(px.png) repeat-x 0px 85%;
/* Different fonts or text sizes may require tweaking of that offset.
px.png is a one-pixel(though can be thicker if needed) image in whatever color you want the line */
}
.inner {
background-color : white;
/* Should match the background of whatever it's sitting over.
Obviously this requires a solid background. */
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrap"><span class="inner">Here is some text</span></div>
</body>
</html>
I used the following technique:
Give the container div a background-image with a horizontal line.
Put an element (like <h3>) in the container div (I have it on the right so float: right; )
Use the following css:
.line-container {
width: 550px;
height: 40px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-image: url("/images/horizontal_line.png");
}
.line-container h3 {
padding-left: 10px;
float: right;
background-color: white;
}
Below code did the job for me
HTML File:
----------
<p class="section-header">Details</p><hr>
CSS File:
----------
.section-header{
float: left;
font-weight: bold
}
hr{
float: left;
width: 80%;
}
INLINE:
-------
<p style="float: left;font-weight: bold">Details</p><hr style="float: left;width: 80%;">

CSS: float:left with a margin-right doesn't push all elements away

I'd like all my content to flow around an image. To do this, I simply did
img#me {
width: 300px;
float: left;
margin-right: 30px;
}
This works for text wraping, but other elements go behind it. For example
<style>
h2 {
background: black;
color: white;
}
</style>
<img id="me" src="http://paultarjan.com/paul.jpg" />
<h2>Things!</h2>
Then the h2 background flows right past the 30px margin. How should I do this instead?
I wish I could explain why exactly, but
h2 {
...
overflow: hidden;
...
}
should fix your problem.
I'm not sure I understand the problem, but I'm pretty sure it comes from the h2 being a block element. If it works for you, the easiest cure would be making it display: inline. Otherwise, give the h2 a specific width, and a float: left, as well.

What CSS will prevent overlap of these nested list items?

Please view the following HTML/CSS as a webpage. It displays an outline with borders around the various elements. The containing list intentionally allows for horizontal scrolling within a fixed width. The trouble is that when you scroll to the far right of the outline, you can see that the borders (all hot colors) of the inner elements overlap each other. The desired effect is that they are all perfectly flush (on the right side) with the containing element so that no overlap occurs. What's the most simple CSS to accomplish this?
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>CSS Problem</title>
<style type="text/css">
ul {
padding: 0 0 0 20px !important;
margin: 0 !important;
width: 300px !important;
border: solid 1px orange;
height: auto;
overflow: visible;
}
li, span {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#top {
border: solid 1px black;
}
#top > li {
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
border: solid 1px yellow;
margin-left: -20px;
}
li {
display: block;
border: solid 1px red;
}
li, ul, span {
width: auto;
white-space: nowrap !important;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul id='top'>
<li id='trunk'>
<span>This is the trunk</span>
<ul>
<li><span>This is the first line item</span>
<ul>
<li><span>This is the first subitem</span><ul></ul></li>
<li><span>This is the second subitem</span><ul></ul></li>
<li><span>This is the third subitem</span><ul></ul></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span>This is the second line item</span><ul></ul></li>
<li><span>This is the third line item</span><ul></ul></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
EDIT:
The following image shows a sample outline. Notice that the width is fixed and it can scroll to the right in case the user types a title that is longer than can display in the viewable area. Notice that the highlighted item and it's children are wrapped in light gray. There are some orange markings on the right used for debugging purposes.
http://drop.io/dfhejyj/asset/outline-png
The following image shows that same outline scrolled over to the right. The scrolling is intentional and must not be eliminated. The problem is that when I scroll right the titles protrude outside of the containing UL tag (appearing in light gray). Likewise, with the orange markings. The desired effect is that the orange markings and the gray area would always be flush up agains the right of the select area (delimited by the scroll bar), and that the scrollbar would always remain (so long as any of the titles are long enough to produce it).
http://drop.io/dfhejyj/asset/outline-scrolled-to-right-png
DigruntedGoat's assessment is exactly right. However, I need a corrective approach. This could probably work more easily with the broken box-model used by the old IE browser.
They overlap because each <ul> element is set to 300px width, and it also has a left-padding which creates the "stepped" look. So the first list goes from 0 to 300px horizontally, while the second nested list goes from 20px to 320px, and so on.
I'm not totally sure of the effect you're trying to achieve (maybe you could post a mockup?) but perhaps setting the width on the outermost <ul> only (i.e. the #top selector) would do what you want.
li, span {
overflow: hidden;
}
demo
This is better though:
#top {
width: 300px !important;
}
ul {
padding: 0 0 0 20px !important;
margin: 0 !important;
border: solid 1px orange;
height: auto;
overflow: visible;
}
demo
I was finally able to solve this by adding an extra container:
http://jsbin.com/itevo/2
Thanks to Sam H. and DisgruntedGoat who took the time to offer some guidance. :)

Can you do this HTML layout without using tables?

Ok, I had a simple layout problem a week or two ago. Namely sections of a page needed a header:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Title Button |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
Pretty simple stuff. Thing is table hatred seems to have taken over in the Web world, which I was reminded of when I asked Why use definition lists (DL,DD,DT) tags for HTML forms instead of tables? Now the general topic of tables vs divs/CSS has previously been discussed, for example:
DIV vs Table; and
Tables instead of DIVs.
So this isn't intended to be a general discussion about CSS vs tables for layout. This is simply the solution to one problem. I tried various solutions to the above using CSS including:
Float right for the button or a div containing the button;
Position relative for the button; and
Position relative+absolute.
None of these solutions were satisfactory for different reasons. For example the relative positioning resulted in a z-index issue where my dropdown menu appeared under the content.
So I ended up going back to:
<style type="text/css">
.group-header { background-color: yellow; width: 100%; }
.group-header td { padding: 8px; }
.group-title { text-align: left; font-weight: bold; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">Title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" name="Button"></td>
</tr>
</table>
And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.
So can anyone do the equivalent without tables?
The requirements are:
Backwards compatible: to FF2 and IE6;
Reasonably consistent: across different browsers;
Vertically centered: the button and title are of different heights; and
Flexible: allow reasonably precise control over positioning (padding and/or margin) and styling.
On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:
Why CSS should not be used for layout; and
Tables vs CSS: CSS Trolls begone
EDIT: Let me elaborate on the float issue. This sort of works:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { float: left; padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { float: right; padding: 8px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="group-title">This is my title</div>
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Thanks to Ant P for the overflow: hidden part (still don't get why though). Here's where the problem comes in. Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered. This is problematic because the elements are of different height. Compare this to:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-header td { vertical-align: middle; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">This is my title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
which works perfectly.
There is nothing wrong with using the tools that are available to you to do the job quickly and correctly.
In this case a table worked perfectly.
I personally would have used a table for this.
I think nested tables should be avoided, things can get messy.
Just float left and right and set to clear both and you're done. No need for tables.
Edit: I know that I got a lot of upvotes for this, and I believed I was right. But there are cases where you simply need to have tables. You can try doing everything with CSS and it will work in modern browsers, but if you wish to support older ones... Not to repeat myself, here the related stack overflow thread and rant on my blog.
Edit2: Since older browsers are not that interesting anymore, I'm using Twitter bootstrap for new projects. It's great for most layout needs and does using CSS.
Float title left, float button right, and (here's the part I never knew until recently) - make the container of them both {overflow:hidden}.
That should avoid the z-index problem, anyway. If it doesn't work, and you really need the IE5 support, go ahead and use the table.
This is kind of a trick question: it looks terribly simple until you get to
Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered.
I want to state for the record that yes, vertical centring is difficult in CSS. When people post, and it seems endless on SO, "can you do X in CSS" the answer is almost always "yes" and their whinging seems unjustified. In this case, yes, that one particular thing is hard.
Someone should just edit the entire question down to "is vertical centring problematic in CSS?".
In pure CSS, a working answer will one day be to just use "display:table-cell". Unfortunately that doesn't work across current A-grade browsers, so for all that you might as well use a table if you just want to achieve the same result anyway. At least you'll be sure it works far enough into the past.
Honestly, just use a table if it's easier. It won't hurt.
If the semantics and accessibility of the table element really matter to you, there is a working draft for making your table non-semantic:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#presentation
I think this requires a special DTD beyond XHTML 1.1, which would just stir up the whole text/html vs application/xml debate, so let's not go there.
So, on to your unresolved CSS problem...
To vertically align two elements on their center: it can be done a few different ways, with some obtuse CSS hackery.
If you can fit within the following constraints, then there is a relatively simple way:
The height of the two elements is fixed.
The height of the container is fixed.
The elements will be narrow enough not to overlap (or can be set to a fixed width).
Then you can use absolute positioning with negative margins:
.group-header { height: 50px; position: relative; }
.group-title, .group-buttons { position: absolute; top: 50%; }
# Assuming the height of .group-title is a known 34px
.group-title { left: 0; margin-top: -17px; }
# Assuming the height of .group-buttons is a known 38px
.group-buttons { right: 0; margin-top: -19px; }
But this is pointless in most situations... If you already know the height of the elements, then you can just use floats and add enough margin to position them as needed.
Here is another method which uses the text baseline to vertically align the two columns as inline blocks. The drawback here is that you need to set fixed widths for the columns to fill out the width from the left edge. Because we need to keep the elements locked to a text baseline, we can't just use float:right for the second column. (Instead, we have to make the first column wide enough to push it over.)
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; }
.valign { display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; width: 384px; }
.group-buttons { padding: 8px; width: 84px; text-align: right; }
</style>
<!--[if lt IE 8]>
<style type="text/css">
.valign { display: inline; margin-top: -2px; padding-top: 1px; }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="valign">
<div class="group-title">This is my title.</div>
</div><!-- avoid whitespace between these! --><div class="valign">
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly, but mind the hacks.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The HTML: We add .valign wrappers around each column. (Give them a more "semantic" name if it makes you happier.) These need to be kept without whitespace in between or else text spaces will push them apart. (I know it sucks, but that's what you get for being "pure" with the markup and separating it from the presentation layer... Ha!)
The CSS: We use vertical-align:middle to line up the blocks to the text baseline of the group-header element. The different heights of each block will stay vertically centered and push out the height of their container. The widths of the elements need to be calculated to fit the width. Here, they are 400 and 100, minus their horizontal padding.
The IE fixes: Internet Explorer only displays inline-block for natively-inline elements (e.g. span, not div). But, if we give the div hasLayout and then display it inline, it will behave just like inline-block. The margin adjustment is to fix a 1px gap at the top (try adding background colors to the .group-title to see).
I would recommend not using a table in this instance, because that is not tabular data; it's purely presentational to have the button located at the far right. This is what I'd do to duplicate your table structure (change to a different H# to suit where you are in your site's hierarchy):
<style>
.group-header { background: yellow; zoom: 1; padding: 8px; }
.group-header:after { content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear: both; visibility: hidden; }
/* set width appropriately to allow room for button */
.group-header h3 { float: left; width: 300px; }
/* set line-height or margins to align with h3 baseline or middle */
.group-header input { float: right; }
</style>
<div class="group-header">
<h3>This is my title</h3>
<input type="button" value="Collapse"/>
</div>
If you want true vertical alignment in the middle (ie, if the text wraps the button is still middle-aligned with respect to both lines of text), then you either need to do a table or work something with position: absolute and margins. You can add position: relative to your drop-down menu (or more likely its parent) in order to pull it into the same ordering level as the buttons, allowing you to bump it above them with z-index, if it comes to that.
Note that you don't need width: 100% on the div because it's a block-level element, and zoom: 1 makes the div behave like it has a clearfix in IE (other browsers pick up the actual clearfix). You also don't need all those extraneous classes if you're targeting things a bit more specifically, although you might need a wrapper div or span on the button to make positioning easier.
Do a double float in a div and use the clearfix. http://www.webtoolkit.info/css-clearfix.html Do you have any padding/margin restrictions?
<div class="clearfix">
<div style="float:left">Title</div>
<input type="button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
</div>
<div class="group-header">
<input type="button" name="Button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
<span>Title</span>
</div>
I've chose to use Flexbox, because it made things so much easier.
You basically need to go to the parent of the children you want to align and add display:box (prefixed of course). To make them sit in the sides, use justify-content. Space between is the right thing when you have elements which need to be aligned to the end, like in this case (see link)...
Then the vertical align issue. Because I made the parent of the two elements, you want to align a Flexbox. It's easy now to use align-items: center.
Then I added the styles you wanted before, removed the float from the title and button in the header and added a padding:
.group-header, .group-content {
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.group-header{
border: 1px solid red;
background: yellow;
overflow: hidden;
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: box;
display: -webkit-flex;
display: -moz-flex;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-justify-content: space-between;
-moz-justify-content: space-between;
-ms-justify-content: space-between;
-o-justify-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
webkit-align-items: center;
-moz-align-items: center;
-ms-align-items: center;
-o-align-items: center;
align-items: center;
padding: 8px 0;
}
.group-content{
border: 1px solid black;
background: #DDD;
}
.group-title {
padding-left: 8px;
}
.group-buttons {
padding-right: 8px
}
See Demo
I agree that one should really only use tables for tabular data, for the simple reason that tables don't show until they're finished loading (no matter how fast that is; it's slower that the CSS method). I do, however, feel that this is the simplest and most elegant solution:
<html>
<head>
<title>stack header</title>
<style type="text/css">
#stackheader {
background-color: #666;
color: #FFF;
width: 410px;
height: 50px;
}
#title {
color: #FFF;
float: left;
padding: 15px 0 0 15px;
}
#button {
color: #FFF;
float: right;
padding: 15px 15px 0 0;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="stackheader">
<div id="title">Title</div>
<div id="button">Button</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The button function and any extra detail can be styled from this basic form. Apologies for the bad tags.