I am using the djFilteringSelect control to show values in a dropdown as user type a value.
The lookup and typehead is working fine. The user type a letter and the dropdown allow the user to select a value which is then displayed in the dropdown field.
If the user now decide to remove the value first selected so that the combobox is empty and leave the field, then the first value in the list is now automatically filled in.
The consequence of this is that if the user have added a value there is no way to remove the value and leave the box emtpy.
I am using required=false for both the control and the dojo attribute but it does not seem to help. There are also a few other djFilteringSelect attributes I have tried like "Autocomplete" and "trim" but it does not work
Here is the code
<xe:djFilteringSelect id="test" type="select" store="jsondata" searchAttr="data" required="false" labelType="html" invalidMessage="Not valid">
<xe:this.dojoAttributes>
<xp:dojoAttribute name="required" value="false"></xp:dojoAttribute>
</xe:this.dojoAttributes>
</xe:djFilteringSelect>
Initally the field is not required, but if the user have entered a value it is required.
My question is if there a way to prevent the djFilteringSelect control to always populate the field if I have previously added a value
I found someone who solved this in another stack overflow topic, by creating an empty entry in my data store. but I could not get this to work
Dojo: Select of empty value for FilteringSelect while required=false
I do this quite a lot. Right now I don't have a working sample to show you (since I moved to bootstrap - and have to code the selects by manually adding select2 controls) but something like this should do it...
I add an "empty" value at the top of my select - and that seems to work no matter whether I am using a combobox, djCombobox or combobox with select2 from bootstrap. My markup typically looks like:
<xp:comboBox id="inputLocationSelector" value="#{User.catchListType}" disableClientSideValidation="true">
<xp:selectItem itemLabel="(none)" itemValue=""></xp:selectItem>
<xp:selectItems>
<xp:this.value><![CDATA[${Configuration.meta.listLocationTypeOptions}]]></xp:this.value>
</xp:selectItems>
</xp:comboBox>
Then you could specify "(none)", "All" or " " for the "not-selected" value depending on your needs.
Validation is a different thing so just specifying "required=false" does not give you the "empty" value.
/John
Related
i am currently working on to display the value in textboxes after adding row to the table. I am new to angular and seems i could not find the solution. At the moment, everytime i click on the Add button, the table will add new row but somehow the value that i have entered previously are gone. I need to make the value stays in the textbox every time the user adds new row.
Here is the source code that i have done:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hxduqp
Thank you.
That happens when you have multiple inputs with the same name.
One way to fix it is by giving your input names a suffix of your iterator i:
<input ... [name]="'from' + i" ...>
Here is your StackBlitz corrected:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-bgdgpr?file=src/app/app.component.html
You just remove the name from the form control if not required else you need to provide the unique name to each control.
Working copy is here - https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-gpq9nc
I have an edit page where several fields are conditionally disabled, based on the user's role. When the fields are disabled, their values are not posted to the server (as expected), which causes the ModelState to be invalid, as the values are required.
To get around this, I want to add Html.HiddenFor() for the fields; so that a value will still get posted (and so that it will retain those values if the View is returned). However, in the case that those fields are not disabled, I will then have both a TextBoxFor and a HiddenFor going to the same model property.
I have run a couple tests, and it appears that when this happens, the value of the first element on the form will be binded to the model, while the next one just gets ignored. If this is the case, then I should be able to just put the HiddenFor after the TextBoxFor, in which case the value of the hidden input will only be posted when the regular input is disabled.
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.FirstName)
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.FirstName) #*Only gets binded to the model if the above text box is disabled*#
(There is some JavaScript that conditionally disabled the visible TextBox).
So two questions: 1) Is it documented that MVC binding will always work this way; can I safely have both of these fields?
And, 2) Is there a better approach to accomplishing this? I know that I can but the HiddenFor inside an #If statement so that it will only get created if the TextBox is disabled; but that is a lot of extra logic in the View that I'd like to avoid.
The DefaultModelBinder reads the values from the request in order and binds the first matching name/value pair and ignores subsequent matches (unless the property is IEnumerable). This is how the CheckBoxFor() method ensures a true or false value is always submitted to the controller (the method generates a checkbox with value="True" and a hidden input with value="False"), so you can safely add the hidden input after the textbox.
One option you might consider rather than a disabled textbox, is to make it readonly, which means it will always submit a value, therefore you only need one input (and you can always style it to look disabled if that is what you want).
I'm quite new to VBA and I've been looking around but cannot seem to find a solution to my problem.
I have made a navigation form (frmNavigation) with 3 buttons, each referring to a different form, let's call them frm1, frm2 and frm3. In the navigationform the control buttons to switch between tabs are all named differently (btn1, btn2, btn3), but the subform that shows either frm1, frm2, or frm3 has the same name: “NavigationSubform” (this shows a different form depending on which tab is clicked on, based on the 'navagation target name' referring to frm1, frm2 and frm3).
When I want to refer to a textbox (txtBox1) on form 1 (first tab) and insert a value i can do this by:
Forms!frmNavigation!NavigationSubform.Form!txtBox1.Value = "insert awesome text"
But how would I refer to txtbox10 on the second tab (frm2)? Just using the following does not work:
Forms!frmNavigation!NavigationSubform.Form!txtBox10.Value
You then get the error 2465 (can't find the field).
I’ve been trying many different things, but can’t seem to get it right. So how do I refer to a textbox on a different tab than the first one?
Help us much appreciated!
Only one subform can be loaded at once. So you've just got to break this process into two steps.
Store the value from txtBox1 somewhere outside of the NavigationSubforms (a textbox on the parent form with visible = no, a global variable or a table works).
In frm2's On Load event, set txtbox10 to be the value you stored.
Just note, that you will need to add conditions in the On Load event if you want to avoid that textbox being set to an empty string or a wrong value if you have a setup where your filter is changing.
Alright, so I'm pretty new to Spring, but I was asked to resolve a bug. So in our application, we have a page that queries a database based on an id. However, not all entries are unique to the id. The id and date pair, on the other hand, do define unique entries.
So this page takes in an id. If there is only a single entry related to this id, everything works fine. However, if there are multiple entries, the page displays a radio button selection of the various dates that pertain to that id. We use something like:
< form:radiobutton id="loadDate" path="loadDate" value="${date}" label="${date}" />
Later on the same page, we want to display the data for that option. As part of it, we display the date of that selection:
< form:input id="aiLoadDate" path="loadDate" maxlength="22" size="22" class="readonly" readonly="true"/>
The problem is that when this happens, the variable (or bean? I'm not quite sure about Spring yet..) loadDate (a string) ends up being the same date twice, seperated with a comma. I'm guessing the problem here is the "path="loadDate"" that is common to both lines.
Instead of appending the date to the already existing one like a csv, I'd like it to overwrite the current entry intead. Is there a way to do this?
Spring is not the direct cause of your problem. When the elements of an HTML form are submitted, each element will appear in the request as a name=value pair. If two or more elements in the form have the same name (not id, name attribute) then those elements appear in the request as name=value,value (with one value per element with a duplicated name).
Option 1: stop using an input as a display element. Just display the date in a span (or div or paragraph or what ever). If you want the look of an input box (border, etc.) use CSS to create a class that has the look you want and attach the class to the span (or div or paragraph, etc) in which you display the date.
Option2: continue using an input as a display element. Disabled input elements are not added to the request when the form is submitted. in the form:imput set disabled="true".
I have access to form field in the administrative view.
Example
<label>Number:</label>
<input type="text" name="title" size="50"/><br/>
I do not have access to modify the html syntax, the only thing i can do is updating the form field with a value.
In the form field i want to update it with a number. I also want to have a link assigned to that number.
So when i click that number it directs us to the link.
Is there a way i can do that?
This method is tedious, but you could use the jQuery nth-selector to select the specific form element that you are dealing with.
http://api.jquery.com/nth-child-selector/
This method is risky, however, since you might add other form elements before it, altering the index of your target input element.
Afterwords, you could use the .val() jQuery method to change your input value.
Nonetheless, again, this method is not safe because the index of the form element could change. I would beg the powers of be to be able to add an ID or some identifying attribute to that form element.