I created my tile as follows in the hopes that panelId={0} could be resolved at runtime, when I send the tile notification to the phone.
StandardTileData NewTileData = new StandardTileData
{
BackgroundImage = new Uri("tile_medium.png", UriKind.Relative),
};
ShellTile.Create(new Uri("MainPage.xaml?Name=MyTile&panelId={0}", UriKind.Relative), NewTileData);
Then I send the following notification:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<wp:Notification xmlns:wp="WPNotification">
<wp:Tile Id="/MainPage.xaml?Name=MyTile&panelId=106398738">
<wp:BackgroundImage>alarm.png</wp:BackgroundImage>
<wp:Count>72</wp:Count>
<wp:Title>My Title</wp:Title>
<wp:BackContent>Text of the tile</wp:BackContent>
</wp:Tile>
</wp:Notification>
I wanted panelId={0} to be resolved to panelId=106398738 but this doesn't seem to happen. Even though the server confirms that the notification was received, the phone never updates the tile.
I've also tried adding <wp:Param> to the query string as follows, but this didn't work either:
<wp:Param>/MainPage.xaml?Name=MyTile&panelId=106398738"</wp:Param>
Is it possible to deep-link a tile with a variable query string? If so, how?
I would recommend using following snippet:
protected override void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NavigationMode == NavigationMode.New)
{
string textValue;
int value;
if (NavigationContext.QueryString.TryGetValue("panelId", out textValue))
{
if (int.TryParse(textValue, out value))
{
// got it!
}
}
}
base.OnNavigatedTo(e);
}
Related
How to bind device image path windows phone.
Below is image path
"C://Data//Users//Public//Pictures//Camera Roll//WP_20141001_002.jpg"
Thanks
I'm not sure if in your case using string is a good choice - maybe it will be possible to use BitmapImage - obtain a StorageFile from path, open Stream and then set BitmapImage - in this case you perform async operations outside converter.
In case you still want to use string it's possible, but will need some special approach - using async methods along with binding. There is a very good article about aynchronous MVVM, written by Stephen Cleary. Basing on the article and other Stephen's answer I've made such a code:
First of all, we will have to define a Converter - it's little complicated as getting file and stream is asynchronous:
/// <summary>
/// Converter getting an image basing upon delivered path
/// </summary>
public class PathToImage : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, string language)
{
var task = GetImage((String)value);
// the below class you will find in Stephen's answer mentioned above
return new TaskCompletionNotifier<BitmapImage>(task);
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, string language)
{ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
private async Task<BitmapImage> GetImage(string path)
{
StorageFile file = await StorageFile.GetFileFromPathAsync(path);
using (var stream = await file.OpenAsync(FileAccessMode.Read))
{
BitmapImage image = new BitmapImage();
image.SetSource(stream);
return image;
}
}
}
In our page we will need a property, which we will use in binding and set the DataContext:
public sealed partial class MainPage : Page, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string imagePath;
public string ImagePath
{
get { return imagePath; }
set { imagePath = value; RaiseProperty("ImagePath"); }
}
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
}
// rest of the code
Of course we have to define our binding - for example in XAML, it's little tricky as first we have to bind the DataContext to our Task then bind Source to the Result, which will be raised as the image is loaded:
<Image DataContext="{Binding ImagePath, Converter={StaticResource PathToImage}}" Stretch="Uniform"
Source="{Binding Result} HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch"/>
Once we have this all, we can set the property like this:
ImagePath = #"C:\Data\Users\Public\Pictures\Camera Roll\WP_20141001_002.jpg";
and we should see the result on the screen.
I am trying to parse some pois from a xml download from a server and I saw that it is done after the program continues in the main thread. I haven't found a way to solve it because I need it.
using System.Threading;
namespace XML_Parser
{
class XMLParserPOI_Wiki
{
private static XMLParserPOI_Wiki objSingle = new XMLParserPOI_Wiki();
public static XMLParserPOI_Wiki ObjSingle
{
get { return objSingle; }
set { objSingle = value; }
}
private List<POI> places;
public List<POI> Places
{
get { return places; }
}
private XMLParserPOI_Wiki()
{
}
public void parseWikitude(string url)
{
places = new List<POI>();
WebClient wc = new WebClient();
wc.DownloadStringCompleted += HttpsCompleted;
wc.DownloadStringAsync(new Uri(url));
}
private void HttpsCompleted(object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Error == null)
{
XDocument xdoc = XDocument.Parse(e.Result, LoadOptions.None);
XNamespace ns = "http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2";
XNamespace ns2 = "http://www.openarml.org/wikitude/1.0";
var placemarkers = xdoc.Root.Descendants(ns + "Placemark");
places =
(from query in xdoc.Root.Descendants(ns + "Placemark")
select new POI
(
...
)).ToList();
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Lista");
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(places.Count);
}
}
}
}
In my main class:
XMLParserPOI_Wiki parserXML = XMLParserPOI_Wiki.ObjSingle;
parserXML.parseWikitude("http://myurl.php");
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Lista de pois");
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(parserXML.Places.Count);
for (int i = 0; i < parserXML.Places.Count; i++)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(parserXML.Places[i].getName());
}
It prints Lista de POis and 0, before Lista and X (number of pois)
I guess I should freeze main thread but I tried a couple of times with some examples and they didn't work.
Can you point me to any tutorial about this? More than get an answer I want to understand how to deal with this kind of operations
First of all, you don't want to block (freeze) the UI thread EVER!
This is called asynchronous programming. There are two things you can do to solve your problem (I recommend option 2!):
Use the classic callback model. You basically call some long operation on a background thread and give a function to it, to execute when the long operation is done. Here's how to do it in your case.
At the end of the HttpsCompleted method, invoke what you need on the UI Thread using:
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(delegate() {
//The code here will be invoked on the UI thread
});
If you want to make the parseWikitude method reusable, you should pass an Action to it. This way you can call it from multiple places and tell it what to do on the UI thread when the parsing is done. Something like this:
public void parseWikitude(string url, Action callback) {
places = new List<POI>();
WebClient wc = new WebClient();
wc.DownloadStringCompleted += HttpsCompleted;
wc.DownloadStringAsync(new Uri(url), callback);
}
private void HttpsCompleted(object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Error == null)
{
...
var callback = (Action)e.UserState;
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(callback);
}
}
//And then when you use it, you do it like that
parserXML.parseWikitude("http://myurl.php", delegate() {
//The code here will be executed on the UI thread, after the parsing is done
});
Use the (rather) new asnyc pattern in .NET. You should read about this, as it is one of the best features of .NET if you ask me. :) It basically does the callback thing automatically and makes the code a lot easier to read/maintain/work-with. Once you get used to it, that is.
Here's an example:
public Task<List<POI>> parseWikitude(string url) {
TaskCompletionSource<List<POI>> resultTaskSource = new TaskCompletionSource<List<POI>>();
WebClient wc = new WebClient();
wc.DownloadStringCompleted += HttpsCompleted;
wc.DownloadStringAsync(new Uri(url), resultTaskSource);
return resultTaskSource.Task;
}
private void HttpsCompleted(object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Error == null)
{
//If needed, run the code here in a background thread
//...
var resultTaskSource = (TaskCompletionSource<List<POI>>)e.UserState;
resultTaskSource.SetResult(places);
}
}
//And when you need to use it, do it like that (note, this must be invoked in an async method!)
var places = await parser.parseWikitude("http://myurl.php");
//The code here will be executed on the same thread when the parsing is done, but the thread will not be blocked while the download is happening.
So, these are the two ways you can handle it. Option one is old-school, classic and easy. Option two is the new and cool way of doing async stuff. It really is a must-know. Simplifies a lot of things once you get used to it.
P.S. Sorry if I got carried away. :D
I have a list of theaters and I created a secondary tile from my application to navigate directly to specific theater. I pass the id of the theater in query string :
I load the theaters from a WCF service in the file "MainViewModel.cs"
In my home page, I have a list of theaters and I can navigate to a details page.
But when I want to navigate from the tile, I have an error...
The Tile :
ShellTile.Create(new Uri("/TheaterDetails.xaml?selectedItem=" + theater.idTheater, UriKind.Relative), tile, false);
My TheaterDetails page :
public partial class TheaterDetails : PhoneApplicationPage
{
theater theater = new theater();
public TheaterDetails()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
protected override void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
if (!App.ViewModel.IsDataLoaded)
{
App.ViewModel.LoadData();
}
if (DataContext == null)
{
string selectedIndex = "";
if (NavigationContext.QueryString.TryGetValue("selectedItem", out selectedIndex))
{
int index = int.Parse(selectedIndex);
theater = (from t in App.ViewModel.Theaters
where t.idTheater == index
select t).SingleOrDefault();
DataContext = theater;
....
....
....
The error :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9197067/error.png
Like if the data were not loaded...
Do you have an idea where the problem come from ?
The solution could be easy but I am a beginner... Maybe it's because I load the data asynchronously and the application doesn't wait until it's done...
Thanks
EDIT :
My LoadData() method :
public void LoadData()
{
client.GetTheatersCompleted += new EventHandler<ServiceReference1.GetTheatersCompletedEventArgs>(client_GetTheatersCompleted);
client.GetTheatersAsync();
// Other get methods...
this.IsDataLoaded = true;
}
private void client_GetTheatersCompleted(object sender, ServiceReference1.GetTheatersCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Theaters = e.Result;
}
You should check to see which variable is actually null. In this case it looks to be Theaters (otherwise the error would have thrown earlier).
Since Theaters is populated from a web call it is most likely being called asynchronously, in other words when you return from LoadData() the data is not yet there (it's still waiting for the web call to come back), and is waiting for the web service to return its values.
Possible solutions:
Make LoadData() an async function and then use await LoadData(). This might require a bit of rewriting / refactoring to fit into the async pattern (general introduction to async here, and specific to web calls on Windows Phone here)
A neat way of doing this that doesn't involve hacks (like looping until the data is there) is to raise a custom event when the data is actually populated and then do your Tile navigation processing in that event. There's a basic example here.
So the solution that I found, thanks to Servy in this post : Using async/await with void method
I managed to use async/await to load the data.
I replaced my LoadData() method by :
public static Task<ObservableCollection<theater>> WhenGetTheaters(ServiceClient client)
{
var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<ObservableCollection<theater>>();
EventHandler<ServiceReference1.GetTheatersCompletedEventArgs> handler = null;
handler = (obj, args) =>
{
tcs.SetResult(args.Result);
client.GetTheatersCompleted -= handler;
};
client.GetTheatersCompleted += handler;
client.GetTheatersAsync();
return tcs.Task;
}
public async Task LoadData()
{
var theatersTask = WhenGetTheaters(client);
Theaters = await theatersTask;
IsDataLoaded = true;
}
And in my page :
protected override async void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
if (!App.ViewModel.IsDataLoaded)
{
await App.ViewModel.LoadData();
}
Project: ASP MVC 4 running under .net 4.0 framework:
When running an application under VS 2010 express (or deployed and running under IIS 7.5 on my local machine) the following (pseudocode) result from an action works as expected
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult PostWord(Model model)
{
....
Response.StatusCode = 400;
Return new JsonResult { data = new {fieldName = "Word", error = "Not really a word!" } };
(and I have assigned ContentType and ContentEncoding properties of the JsonResult object, with no difference in behaviour)
When the deployable is moved onto a web host (using IIS 7), firebug is telling me that the response is as expected (400) but there is no JSON in the response (ie there is no text of any kind). If I remove the line
Response.StatusCode = 400;
from the action, the JSON is perfectly formed in the response, but of course the response status code is 200 (OK), which interferes with the consuming javascript and appropriate function call.
Any thoughts on what might be going on and how to fix this? Thank you
I had this exact same problem; in order to make sure that the correct answer is not buried in the comments (as it was for me), I want to reiterate #Sprockincat's comment:
For me at least, it was indeed an issue with IIS Custom errors, and can be solved with:
Response.TrySkipIisCustomErrors = true;
#Sprockincat - you should get credit for this. I'm just making it more visible because it's such a subtle fix to a problem that is quite difficult to diagnose.
I've created a subclass of JsonResult that allows you to specify the HttpStatusCode.
public class JsonResultWithHttpStatusCode : JsonResult
{
private int _statusCode;
private string _statusDescription;
public JsonResultWithHttpStatusCode(object data, HttpStatusCode status)
{
var code = Convert.ToInt32(status);
var description = HttpWorkerRequest.GetStatusDescription(code);
Init(data, code, description);
}
public JsonResultWithHttpStatusCode(object data, int code, string description)
{
Init(data, code, description);
}
private void Init(object data, int code, string description)
{
Data = data;
_statusCode = code;
_statusDescription = description;
}
public override void ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context)
{
context.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode = _statusCode;
context.HttpContext.Response.StatusDescription = _statusDescription;
base.ExecuteResult(context);
}
}
Then you can return this as your result and the status code will get set on the response. You can also test the status code on the result in your tests.
For anyone looking for this - in ASP.NET Core you can set the StatusCode property of JsonResult.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.aspnetcore.mvc.jsonresult.statuscode
Is it possible to use a simple action method - just like with Caliburn.Micro - instead of a command with MvvmCross bindings?
Example:
public void Action()
{
Tip = 11;
}
<Button
android:text="Button"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:id="#+id/button1"
local:MvxBind="Click Action" />
It doesn't work out of the box, I tested that.
While I found a lot of samples about adding new target bindings, I didn't find a single one about adding a new source binding.
UPDATE:
This works now out of the box with the Rio binding. To use it, add the MvvmCross MethodBinding NuGet package to the Android project.
Up until now, much of the emphasis for MvvmCross has been on allowing multi-platform target binding with the source remaining mainly 'vanilla' INotifyPropertyChanged.
There have been some deviation in terms of ViewModel structure - e.g.:
the MvxCommandCollection - http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/fixing-mvvm-commands-making-hot-tuna.html
some users using Fody - http://twincoders.com/blog/codigo-limpio-con-fody/
Recently, several new feature requests have also been logged in this area:
AutoCommands - I think this is what you are asking about here - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/301
Rio binding sources - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/299
Tibet binding - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/298
Because of these, I do expect more functionality to be exposed in this area in the future...
With that said, if you wanted to get this working today, then MvvmCross Binding is overrideable so you could fairly easily do it:
1. Implement an ICommand that invokes a MethodInfo using reflection (for completeness this should probably also use a parameter if available) - some kind of InvokeMethodCommand (code for this left to the reader!)
.
2. Implement an MyMethodSourceBinding class which wraps the InvokeMethodCommand - something like:
public class MyMethodSourceBinding : MvxSourceBinding
{
private readonly MethodInfo _methodInfo;
protected MyMethodSourceBinding(object source, MethodInfo methodInfo)
: base(source)
{
_methodInfo = _methodInfo;
}
public override void SetValue(object value)
{
// do nothing - not allowed
}
public override Type SourceType
{
get { return typeof(ICommand); }
}
public override bool TryGetValue(out object value)
{
value = new InvokeMethodCommand(source, _methodInfo);
return true;
}
}
3. Override MvvmCross's registered IMvxSourceBindingFactory with your own implementation that can detect when a method is present - sadly most of this is cut and paste coding today - it would be something like
public class MySourceBindingFactory
: IMvxSourceBindingFactory
{
private IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser _propertyPathParser;
private IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser SourcePropertyPathParser
{
get
{
if (_propertyPathParser == null)
{
_propertyPathParser = Mvx.Resolve<IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser>();
}
return _propertyPathParser;
}
}
public IMvxSourceBinding CreateBinding(object source, string combinedPropertyName)
{
var tokens = SourcePropertyPathParser.Parse(combinedPropertyName);
return CreateBinding(source, tokens);
}
public IMvxSourceBinding CreateBinding(object source, IList<MvxPropertyToken> tokens)
{
if (tokens == null || tokens.Count == 0)
{
throw new MvxException("empty token list passed to CreateBinding");
}
var currentToken = tokens[0];
if (tokens.Count == 1)
{
return CreateLeafBinding(source, currentToken);
}
else
{
var remainingTokens = tokens.Skip(1).ToList();
return CreateChainedBinding(source, currentToken, remainingTokens);
}
}
private static MvxChainedSourceBinding CreateChainedBinding(object source, MvxPropertyToken propertyToken,
List<MvxPropertyToken> remainingTokens)
{
if (propertyToken is MvxIndexerPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxIndexerChainedSourceBinding(source, (MvxIndexerPropertyToken) propertyToken,
remainingTokens);
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken)
{
return new MvxSimpleChainedSourceBinding(source, (MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken,
remainingTokens);
}
throw new MvxException("Unexpected property chaining - seen token type {0}",
propertyToken.GetType().FullName);
}
private static IMvxSourceBinding CreateLeafBinding(object source, MvxPropertyToken propertyToken)
{
if (propertyToken is MvxIndexerPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxIndexerLeafPropertyInfoSourceBinding(source, (MvxIndexerPropertyToken) propertyToken);
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken)
{
//**************************
// Special code is here
var propertyToken = (MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken;
if (source != null)
{
var method = source.GetType().GetMethod(propertyToken.PropertyName, BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (method != null)
{
return new MyMethodSourceBinding(source, method);
}
}
return new MvxSimpleLeafPropertyInfoSourceBinding(source,
(MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken);
// Special code ends here
//**************************
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxEmptyPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxDirectToSourceBinding(source);
}
throw new MvxException("Unexpected property source - seen token type {0}", propertyToken.GetType().FullName);
}
}
4. Supply this source binding factory in your own custom binding builder - e.g.:
public class MyAndroidBindingBuilder
: MvxAndroidBindingBuilder
{
protected override IMvxSourceBindingFactory CreateSourceBindingFactory()
{
return new MvxSourceBindingFactory();
}
}
5. Supply this binding builder during your setup
public class Setup : MvxAndroidSetup
{
// ....
protected override MvxAndroidBindingBuilder CreateBindingBuilder()
{
return new MyAndroidBindingBuilder();
}
}
Note: This approach is only for advanced users right now... As suggested in the first part of this question, I do expect the code in this area to change quite a lot so you might also encounter some issues maintaining a fork in this area. (Indeed the code in this area has already changed quite significantly on the Tibet Binding branch within the GitHub repo!)