So my problem is this - I have a div with fixed size of 970px. Inside it I want to create a horizontal menu where the first element will be a link to the home page with the logo of the company and the others will be standard links to different parts of the page.
What I want is to make the link with the logo wider than the other links and let the other links occupy the space left equally. Due to the fact that in near future the width of the container div may be changed even though I know the number of links I would like to use percentages to determine their width so the width of one link will be = (width of the div - width of the logo link)/5 (the number of link I'll have.
I tried with something like this
<div id="main-container">
<div id="logo-container">
</div>
<div id="standard-menu-container">
</div>
</div>
But I couldn't make it work (In fact all this is wrapped in one other div that I haven't shown here). So googling about this I get to the understanding that maybe using some sort of table may solve my problem. To be honest I have never used table this way but I followed an example and I got this result : JSFiddle Example where the red rectangle is meant to be my Logo link and the problem is that everything else is stacking under. In this particular example the logo link is excluded from the <ul> but I played around with that case too and simply trying to set one width in pixels and other - in percentage seems to be not what I need to do.
I would appreciate any help, just bare in mind that I tried a lot of styling with divs and display: inline-block and it breaks other parts of my structure so I would prefer a solution where the normal flow is not disturbed (like using a table for example)
You're on the right lines with the display: table-cell. I've made a few changes where you had extra code that wasn't needed, and set the <ul> to display: table, rather than the container. Adding table-layout: fixed will make items in the list (the cells) occupy an equal width.
Then, float the logo left, don't specify a width for #main-menu-navigation because then it will fill remaining space, and give it margin-left: 150px to cater for width of logo.
So that won't make much sense when read. Take a look here:
http://jsfiddle.net/LREbC/1/
Try resizing, the cells will adapt to the width.
Note: When using table-cell you don't need to define a width, the behaviour is the same as actual table cells.
Related
I have this CSS: https://cal-linux.com/styles/tutorial.css
And a sample page that uses it: https://cal-linux.com/tutorials/gswc++.html
When I display this on a smartphone (or when I check it through Google's Mobile friendliness verify service), the layout looks huge (badly cropped, instead of reduced to fit the smartphone's screen.
I only use proportional measures (for example, outsidecontainer's div has width 80%, inside right-most column has min-width 25%). I'm placing Google Ads in there, but it's a "Responsive" add, which is supposed to adapt to the page's available size and layout.
Any tips on this? I figured posting the actual links to the pages might be ideal; but please let me know if a "minimal" instance of code that reproduces the problem would be preferred.
Thanks,
Cal-linux
There are a few things I note here:
You use display:table-row and display:table-cell a bit too much. Those don't respond as well to the resizing especially if you have not specified the width of each item. Instead either use floats with a clear:both on the container's :after pseudo-element or inline-block. Either way you should define percent widths for the containers.
Your css has a lot of white-space:nowrap but doesn't use overflow:auto which forces the element to not resize the content and just stretch its parent container.
Aside from that a few places I see a fixed px width which makes it more difficult to resize. It doesn't seem to be your ads. Although google's script does throw an error about trying to put an ad in an 86px x undefined space. You can set a fixed height or at least a min-height to give the script an idea of how big an ad should be placed there.
The easiest solution is to incorporate bootstrap to do the heavy lifting of setting up a grid for what you want.
You can basically do your two column style like so:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="left-col col-md-11">
<!--- ALL YOUR CONTENT HERE //-->
</div>
<div class="right-col col-md-1">
<!---Google Ads go Here //-->
</div>
</div>
If you want to stick with your own style, by using the code inspector in chrome I was able to get to the following result when resized:
I made the tablerow class be a standard display:block
The first column was set to width:75%; display:inline-block;
The second column was set to width:25%; display:inline-block;
The autosize elements changed to display:block;max-width:100%; overflow:auto;width:auto;padding:0
The div.code blocks were changed to display:block;white-space:nowrap;width:auto;
Everything else stays the same pretty much. That should fix it, however you should note that frameworks like bootstrap help out with mobile sites by making the page columns collapse and go one ontop of another for mobile browsers so that they get maximum space.
I'm having a slight problem. Whenever I hover over the "SEO" option on my navigation in IE, the navigation breaks & moves to the side. This doesn't happen in Firefox. Changing the navigation to position:absolute fixes it, but then the main content becomes merged with the navigation. It all validates. Any help would be much appreciated!
http://www.joemarketeer.com
http://jsfiddle.net/eoJ1/Ra4tR/
Thanks loads!
The navleft and navright divs are resizing independently, which is to be expected given your design structure. But it looks weird as it comes down on top of the content below:
One suggestion I can give you is not to set the navigation bar width in %, which you have done for these two divs. If you set a fixed width (in px) or remove the width specification completely (in which case it will take the width of its inner content), a horizontal scrollbar will appear below the page when the width is small, which I suppose is fine. Also, use as few floats as possible as they break the flow of content in the document and are more prone to breaking layouts. Both these divs have a float:left, which can be dumped for more stable solutions. I'm saying all this because I think the breaking of the layout on hover is occurring due to these reasons. If you can take care of this, your problem might disappear.
So my suggestion is to have a single nav div with width: 100%. Inside this put two divs: navleft and navright with display:inline and widths a.) specified in px or not at all, or b.) specified in % but with some min-width in px. If you don't specify any width for navright, it will expand to fill all of the space on the right.
This way these two divs will not reflow independently.
Basically, toy around more until you get better command over CSS; I think more experience will automatically help you sort out issues like this.
I have this and it got an HTML img#logo-image, on some occasions it will not be displayed, display:none.
The problem is that the entire div#menu-title should fit the width of the page.
I tried putting width:100%, but when the img#logo-imag" is displayed it breaks the line being below the img#logo-image.
The width:100% does not work with elements float:left
Just unfloat the menu-title div and remove the width.. it will automatically be 100% of the header then.. and if the image is present it will adjust the ul#menu list to make room for it, which is a natural behaviour
if you want the menu-list to really only take the available width (say for a background color or something then you can add overflow: hidden; to ul#menu - though I don't see a need for that in your example code
here's a simplified version of your Fiddle - hover on the header to make the image disappear and see the ul#menu adjust to suit
Example Fiddle
You have both logo-image and menu-title floating left. Since they arent really in separate divs, they are all part of the same div, they appear next to each other. On top of that, you set the menu-title to be 760, which isn't the width of the page. At least that what it looks like you did. Do not use width 100% because resizing the page will shrink that menu title.
You really just have to play around with the divs, but i would say that separating those two divs would make you be able to stack them on top or below each other.
And in using Chrome's inspect element feature, I don't see a display:none for the image's css. I don't know why that would do that.
I'm really not sure of what you are trying to accomplish since making the div#menu-title width: 100% doesn't leave any room for anything else on the same row.
Why not let them both be inline and let the widths be whatever they need to be?
Anyway, I have a guess at what you want. You want those two elements to behave as being in a table, inside a table row, and each in a table-cell so that the image takes a maximum width, and the div#menu-title taking all of the rest of the place. In that case put them in a table, or use display: table-cell for the image and the div and fiddle around with that.
I really hope that you can help me.
I created this fiddle to show what I'm trying to do.
My question is: How do I stretch two div-elements to fill available horizontal space?
As you can see there are 5 div-elements strung together, wrapped by a div-element where I set the background-color and width with 100%.
There are three div-elements with a width of 50px.
The width of the other two div-elements should fill up to the rest availiable space, they should have the same width, too ->50% for each of both divs.
My problem is that the 50% for those both div-elements amount to a 100% total-width. And not to a availiable space width.
I'm trying not to use tables, etc.
Let me know if there is something unclear.
EDIT:
I'd like to hear your comments about this way.
One way to solve this is to treat your divs like the cells of a table. A unique property of tables is that the cells will fill the width of the table no matter what widths you give them. By giving some cells a width the other cells will fill the remaining space. By using display:table and display:table-cell you can take advantage of this without changing your html. Have a look at this example:
http://jsfiddle.net/GyxWm/
I've not tested this but it should work in all "current" browsers. It should work in IE8+ but probably doesn't work in IE7 and certainly won't work in IE6.
You can do it with help of javascript. Change div tags like this:
<div id="part1" class="sectionFillUp">section2</div>
<div id="part2" class="sectionFillUp">section4</div>
And add this javascript somehwere after those tags:
var elem1 = document.getElementById("part1");
elem1.style.width = (screen.width - 150)/2;
var elem2 = document.getElementById("part2");
elem2.style.width = (screen.width - 150)/2;
And remove width:50%; from sectionFillUp in css
Afraid I dont think you can.
The float:left; removes your code from the containing div and all the elements end up next to each other, once an element leaves the screen to the right, it wraps underneath leaving a space (a bit like relative positioning does).
Also, you are attempting to compare a fixed width with a variable width, which is close to impossible.
If you take a look here: http://jsfiddle.net/P5Kjh/5/
First I reduced your code back to 2 divs and got that working.
I've added overflow:hidden to the backgroundG class to make sure there is a grey background and floated both divs left.
Then I set the widths, the cumulative total has to be around 100%, if you add a border to each element you need to work to a smaller percentage.
Then I added back the other 3 in a new backgroundG element and created a separte class for the fillup element so it would be 80% (without a border).
Probably doesnt help you a lot. sorry if not.
Cheers
Here is my site, first of all.
You'll notice that underneath the divider bar in the middle of the page, there are three columns, one with a form, one with text, one with links.
Now, resize the window to slightly smaller, and the right div will drop down to the next line.
Is there anyway to just not display that? So, the divs will adjust (I have a liquid layout) up to the point where they won't fit, then, instead of wrapping the div down to the next line, it just won't be displayed?
You can also achieve that with CSS only.
Just assign the following CSS attributes to #row4:
#row4 {
min-width:1202px; /* the exact value depends on the sum of the width of your 3 column boxes */
overflow:hidden;
}
This differs slightly from your intended solution, since the right box will stay partly visible when sizing down the window and will not immediately disappear completely.
Please be aware that min-width won't work in IE6. However, there are several ways to emulate the min-width property, if you need to support old IEs:
http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/ie6-min-width-solutions
You can give them a wrapper div with a min-width set and force it to use a horizontal scrollbar if it gets too small. The nice thing about a wrapper div is you can give it a max-width as well and keep things from getting wonky on super huge monitors.
I'm not a fan of horizontal scrollbars, but it beats completely removing content.
Ok here is what you should do
Wrap all three floated division on a parent div, something like this
<div id="parent">
<div class="form">......</div>
<div class="text">......</div>
<div class="links">.....</div>
</div>
Now to solve your problem give a fixed height to the parent div like
#parent { height:400px;clear:both; }
You would have to use Javascript to get the width of the viewport, then change the display property of the div that is wrapping to display:none so that it doesn't show up when the browser width is too small.