Using MOXy I'm trying to marshal a java class like this to JSON:
#XmlRootElement
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public class Request {
String method;
#XmlAnyElement(lax=true)
Object[] arguments;
}
I would expect something like:
{
"method": "test",
"arguments": ["a", "b"]
}
but the JSON output results to:
{
"method": "test",
"value": ["a", "b"]
}
Where is the value coming from?
If I put a #XmlElementWrapper over the arguments field, it gets even worse:
{
"method":"test",
"arguments":"a""value":["b"]
}
My JUnit TestCase looks like this:
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.xml.bind.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
import org.junit.Test;
public class JsonRequestTest {
#XmlRootElement
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public static class Request {
String method;
#XmlAnyElement(lax=true)
Object[] arguments;
} // InvocationRequest
#Test
public void testObjectArray() throws JAXBException {
System.setProperty(JAXBContext.class.getName(), "org.eclipse.persistence.jaxb.JAXBContextFactory");
Map<String, Object> props= new HashMap<String, Object>();
props.put("eclipselink.media-type", "application/json");
props.put("eclipselink.json.include-root", false);
JAXBContext ctx = JAXBContext.newInstance(new Class<?>[]{Request.class},props);
Marshaller m = ctx.createMarshaller();
StringWriter writer = new StringWriter();
Request req = new Request();
req.method="test";
req.arguments = new Object[]{"a","b"};
m.marshal(req, writer);
assertEquals("{\"method\":\"test\", \"arguments\":[\"a\",\"b\"]}", writer.toString());
}
} // class JsonRequestTest
Note: I'm the EclipseLink MOXy lead and a member of the JAXB (JSR-222) expert group.
TL:DR
You can set the following property to override the value key.
props.put(MarshallerProperties.JSON_VALUE_WRAPPER, "arguments");
Full Test Case
Below is the full working test case. In addition to setting the property I removed an extra space you had in your control document to get the test to pass.
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.xml.bind.*;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;
import org.eclipse.persistence.jaxb.MarshallerProperties;
import org.junit.Test;
public class JsonRequestTest {
#XmlRootElement
#XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public static class Request {
String method;
#XmlAnyElement(lax = true)
Object[] arguments;
} // InvocationRequest
#Test
public void testObjectArray() throws JAXBException {
System.setProperty(JAXBContext.class.getName(),
"org.eclipse.persistence.jaxb.JAXBContextFactory");
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<String, Object>();
props.put("eclipselink.media-type", "application/json");
props.put("eclipselink.json.include-root", false);
props.put(MarshallerProperties.JSON_VALUE_WRAPPER, "arguments");
JAXBContext ctx = JAXBContext.newInstance(
new Class<?>[] { Request.class }, props);
Marshaller m = ctx.createMarshaller();
StringWriter writer = new StringWriter();
Request req = new Request();
req.method = "test";
req.arguments = new Object[] { "a", "b" };
m.marshal(req, writer);
assertEquals("{\"method\":\"test\",\"arguments\":[\"a\",\"b\"]}",
writer.toString());
}
} // class JsonRequestTest
#XmlElementWrapper Issue
I have opened the following bug for the issue with #XmlElementWrapper:
http://bugs.eclipse.org/421977
Related
I am trying to serialise and deserialise a class RuleMessage but can't get it to work. Here is my code:
public class RuleMessage {
private String id;
private SerializableRunnable sRunnable;
public RuleMessage(String id, SerializableRunnable sRunnable) {
this.id = id;
this.sRunnable = sRunnable;
}
}
public interface SerializableRunnable extends Runnable, Serializable {
}
#Test
public void testSerialization() throws JsonProcessingException {
MAPPER.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper.DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL,
JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY);
SerializableRunnable r = () -> System.out.println("Serializable!");
RuleMessage rule = new RuleMessage("1", r);
System.out.println(MAPPER.writeValueAsString(businessRule));
}
I am using Java 8. Can someone tell me if this is possible in the Jackson library?
Jackson was created to keep object state not behaviour. This is why it tries to serialise POJO's properties using getters, setters, etc. Serialising lambdas break this idea. Theres is no any property to serialise, only a method which should be invoked. Serialising raw lambda object is really bad idea and you should redesign your app to avoid uses cases like this.
In your case SerializableRunnable interface extends java.io.Serializable which gives one option - Java Serialisation. Using java.io.ObjectOutputStream we can serialise lambda object to byte array and serialise it in JSON payload using Base64 encoding. Jackson supports this scenario providing writeBinary and getBinaryValue methods.
Simple example could look like below:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonDeserializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonSerializer;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializerProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonDeserialize;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonSerialize;
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.ObjectInputStream;
import java.io.ObjectOutputStream;
import java.io.Serializable;
public class JsonLambdaApp {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
SerializableRunnable action = () -> System.out.println("Serializable!");
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(new RuleMessage("1", action));
System.out.println(json);
RuleMessage ruleMessage = mapper.readValue(json, RuleMessage.class);
ruleMessage.getsRunnable().run();
}
}
#JsonSerialize(using = LambdaJsonSerializer.class)
#JsonDeserialize(using = LambdaJsonDeserializer.class)
interface SerializableRunnable extends Runnable, Serializable {
}
class LambdaJsonSerializer extends JsonSerializer<SerializableRunnable> {
#Override
public void serialize(SerializableRunnable value, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider serializers) throws IOException {
try (ByteArrayOutputStream byteArrayOutputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ObjectOutputStream outputStream = new ObjectOutputStream(byteArrayOutputStream)) {
outputStream.writeObject(value);
gen.writeBinary(byteArrayOutputStream.toByteArray());
}
}
}
class LambdaJsonDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<SerializableRunnable> {
#Override
public SerializableRunnable deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException {
byte[] value = p.getBinaryValue();
try (ByteArrayInputStream byteArrayInputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(value);
ObjectInputStream inputStream = new ObjectInputStream(byteArrayInputStream)) {
return (SerializableRunnable) inputStream.readObject();
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
throw new IOException(e);
}
}
}
class RuleMessage {
private String id;
private SerializableRunnable sRunnable;
#JsonCreator
public RuleMessage(#JsonProperty("id") String id, #JsonProperty("sRunnable") SerializableRunnable sRunnable) {
this.id = id;
this.sRunnable = sRunnable;
}
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public SerializableRunnable getsRunnable() {
return sRunnable;
}
}
Above code prints JSON:
{
"id" : "1",
"sRunnable" : "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"
}
and lambda:
Serializable!
See also:
How to serialize a lambda?
How to serialize a lambda function in Java?
First, in RuleMessage you have to either create getters / setters or make the fields public in order to provide Jackson access to the fields.
Your code then prints something like this:
{"#class":"RuleMessage","id":"1","sRunnable":{"#class":"RuleMessage$$Lambda$20/0x0000000800b91c40"}}
This JSON document cannot be deserialized because RuleMessage has no default constructor and the lambda cannot be constructed.
Instead of the lambda, you could create a class:
public class Runner implements SerializableRunnable {
#Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Serializable!");
}
}
and construct your pojo like this:
new RuleMessage("1", new Runner())
The Jackson deserializer is now able to reconstruct the objects and execute the runner.
I am working with kafka and spring boot and I need to send JSON object to kafka, the point is that I am able to send an object as JSON configuring KafkaTemplate but just for this object.
package com.bankia.apimanager.config;
import com.bankia.apimanager.model.RequestDTO;
import org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.ProducerConfig;
import org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.ProducerFactory;
import org.springframework.kafka.support.serializer.JsonSerializer;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
#Configuration
public class KafkaConfiguration {
#Value("${spring.kafka.bootstrap-servers}")
private String bootstrapServers;
#Bean
public Map<String, Object> producerConfigs() {
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<>();
props.put(ProducerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, bootstrapServers);
props.put(ProducerConfig.KEY_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringSerializer.class);
props.put(ProducerConfig.VALUE_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, JsonSerializer.class);
return props;
}
#Bean
public ProducerFactory<String, RequestDTO> producerFactory() {
return new DefaultKafkaProducerFactory<>(producerConfigs());
}
#Bean
public KafkaTemplate<String, RequestDTO> kafkaTemplate() {
return new KafkaTemplate<>(producerFactory());
}
}
package com.bankia.apimanager.controller;
import com.bankia.apimanager.model.RequestDTO;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate;
import org.springframework.kafka.support.SendResult;
import org.springframework.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture;
import org.springframework.util.concurrent.ListenableFutureCallback;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMethod;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestController;
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/infrastructure")
public class InfraStructureRequestController {
private final static Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger( InfraStructureRequestController.class );
private static final String TOPIC = "test";
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, RequestDTO> sender;
#RequestMapping(value = "/test", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String postMessage(){
ListenableFuture<SendResult<String, RequestDTO>> future = sender.send(TOPIC, new RequestDTO("Hola","Paco"));
future.addCallback(new ListenableFutureCallback<SendResult<String, RequestDTO>>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(SendResult<String, RequestDTO> result) {
LOG.info("Sent message with offset=[" + result.getRecordMetadata().offset() + "]");
}
#Override
public void onFailure(Throwable ex) {
LOG.error("Unable to send message due to : " + ex.getMessage());
}
});
return "OK";
}
}
but what about if now I want to send a new DTO object? do I have to declare a new KafkaTemplate<String,NEWOBJECT> and autowire each kafka template declared in configuration for each object? there is another way to be able to just declare one kafkaTemplate in which I can send any type of object and automatically will be serialized in JSON?
I think, you can specify a generic KafkaTemplate<String, Object> and set the producer value serializer to JsonSerializer like this:
#Configuration
public class KafkaConfiguration {
#Value("${spring.kafka.bootstrap-servers}")
private String bootstrapServers;
#Bean
public Map<String, Object> producerConfigs() {
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<>();
props.put(ProducerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, bootstrapServers);
props.put(ProducerConfig.KEY_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringSerializer.class);
props.put(ProducerConfig.VALUE_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, JsonSerializer.class);
return props;
}
#Bean
public ProducerFactory<String, Object> producerFactory() {
return new DefaultKafkaProducerFactory<>(producerConfigs());
}
#Bean
public KafkaTemplate<String, Object> kafkaTemplate() {
return new KafkaTemplate<>(producerFactory());
}
}
Referring your code:
Value Serializer is correctly defined as JsonSerializer, which will convert objects of any type to JSON.
#Bean
public Map<String, Object> producerConfigs() {
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<>();
props.put(ProducerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, bootstrapServers);
props.put(ProducerConfig.KEY_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringSerializer.class);
props.put(ProducerConfig.VALUE_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, JsonSerializer.class);
return props;
}
Change <String, RequestDTO> to <String, Object> at every place in KafkaConfig & Controller.
Keep in mind that generics remain until compile time (type erasure)
only.
There are two scenario:
Scenario #1
If you want to use KafkaTemplate to send any type(as mentioned in your question) to kafka, so there is no need to declare your own KafkaTemplate bean because Spring boot did this for you in KafkaAutoConfiguration.
package org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.kafka;
...
#Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
#ConditionalOnClass(KafkaTemplate.class)
#EnableConfigurationProperties(KafkaProperties.class)
#Import({ KafkaAnnotationDrivenConfiguration.class, KafkaStreamsAnnotationDrivenConfiguration.class })
public class KafkaAutoConfiguration {
private final KafkaProperties properties;
public KafkaAutoConfiguration(KafkaProperties properties) {
this.properties = properties;
}
#Bean
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(KafkaTemplate.class)
public KafkaTemplate<?, ?> kafkaTemplate(ProducerFactory<Object, Object> kafkaProducerFactory,
ProducerListener<Object, Object> kafkaProducerListener,
ObjectProvider<RecordMessageConverter> messageConverter) {
KafkaTemplate<Object, Object> kafkaTemplate = new KafkaTemplate<>(kafkaProducerFactory);
messageConverter.ifUnique(kafkaTemplate::setMessageConverter);
kafkaTemplate.setProducerListener(kafkaProducerListener);
kafkaTemplate.setDefaultTopic(this.properties.getTemplate().getDefaultTopic());
return kafkaTemplate;
}
}
**Some Note**:
This config class has been annotated with #ConditionalOnClass(KafkaTemplate.class) that means: (from spring docs--->) #Conditional that only matches when the specified classes are on the classpath.
kafkaTemplate bean method is annotated with
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(KafkaTemplate.class) that means: (from spring docs ---->) #Conditional that only matches when no beans meeting the specified requirements are already contained in the BeanFactory.
Important! In pure java world, KafkaTemplate<?, ?> is not subtype of for example: KafkaTemplate<String, RequestDTO> so you can't to do this:
KafkaTemplate<?, ?> kf1 = ...;
KafkaTemplate<String, RequestDTO> kf2 = kf1; // Compile time error
because java parameterized types are invariant as mentioned in Effective Java third edition item 31. But is spring world that is ok and will be injected to your own service. You need only to specify your own generic type on your kafkaTemplate properties.
For example:
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Service;
#Service
public class KafkaService {
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<Integer, String> kafkaTemplate1;
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<Integer, RequestDTO> KafkaTemplate2;
}
Scenario #2
If you need to restrict value type of kafka record then you need to specify your own kafka bean something like this:
#Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
#ConditionalOnClass(KafkaTemplate.class)
#EnableConfigurationProperties(CorridorTracingConfiguration.class)
public class CorridorKafkaAutoConfiguration {
#Bean
#ConditionalOnMissingBean(KafkaTemplate.class)
public KafkaTemplate<?, AbstractMessage> kafkaTemplate(ProducerFactory<Object, AbstractMessage> kafkaProducerFactory,
ProducerListener<Object, AbstractMessage> kafkaProducerListener,
ObjectProvider<RecordMessageConverter> messageConverter) {
KafkaTemplate<Object, AbstractMessage> kafkaTemplate = new KafkaTemplate<>(kafkaProducerFactory);
messageConverter.ifUnique(kafkaTemplate::setMessageConverter);
kafkaTemplate.setProducerListener(kafkaProducerListener);
kafkaTemplate.setDefaultTopic(this.properties.getTemplate().getDefaultTopic());
return kafkaTemplate;
}
Now this can be injected only to
KafkaTemplate<String, AbstractMessage> kafkaTemplate, the key type can be anything else instead of String. But you can send any sub type of AbstractMessage to kafka via it.
An example usage:
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Service;
#Service
public class KafkaService {
#Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, AbstractMessage> kafkaTemplate;
public void makeTrx(TrxRequest trxRequest) {
kafkaTemplate.send("fraud-request", trxRequest.fromAccountNumber(), new FraudRequest(trxRequest));
}
}
#Accessors(chain = true)
#Getter
#Setter
#EqualsAndHashCode(callSuper = true)
#ToString(callSuper = true)
public class FraudRequest extends AbstractMessage {
private float amount;
private String fromAccountNumber;
private String toAccountNumber;
...
}
To restrict the key of kafka message follow the same (above) way
I'm getting something like this in my JSON response (I'm having a REST implementation in SpringBoot):
"estimatedDeliveryTimeWindow":{
"window":{}
}
I have set custom HTTPMessageCOnverters and configured objectMapper like this:
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_EMPTY);
Also tried to remove default converters using below code:
#Bean
public HttpMessageConverters converters() {
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter jsonConverter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_EMPTY);
jsonConverter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
return new HttpMessageConverters(false, Arrays.asList(jsonConverter));
}
Nothing seems to work. I still see null objects within objects. These objects are complex objects nested with primitive types and custom objects. What else I can try?
Please add #JsonInclude(Include.NON_NULL) before the class files
#JsonInclude(Include.NON_NULL)
public class MobileLoginVO {
private String otpDetailsId;
public String getOtpDetailsId() {
return otpDetailsId;
}
public void setOtpDetailsId(String otpDetailsId) {
this.otpDetailsId = otpDetailsId;
}
}
You need to inform somehow to spring to use your message converter.
This should do the work:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationFeature;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.EnableWebMvc;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurer;
import java.util.List;
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
public class WebConfig implements WebMvcConfigurer {
public MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter messageConverter() {
MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter jsonConverter = new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter();
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
objectMapper.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_EMPTY);
jsonConverter.setObjectMapper(objectMapper);
return jsonConverter;
}
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
converters.add(messageConverter());
}
}
I'm trying to serialize and deserialize flex.messaging.io.amf.ASObject to JSON. ASObject extends HashMap and adds an additional type property. By default Jackson correctly serializes all the keys and values under the object, but doesn't preserve the ASObject.getType().
Using Jackson I've managed to create a custom serializer for ASObject and am now serializing as:
[{"#type":"org.me.MyClass","map":{"key":"value"}}]
This was by adding an additional type field then delegating back to the standard handler for java.util.Map. However I'm not sure how I can configure Jackson to allow custom deserialization to allow custom handling of this.
Perhaps I'm going about this the wrong way!
Maybe you want to create custom deserializer as well? You may not really need that type field as long as type is known from context when deserializing (property has ASOBject type).
Here's one approach.
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import org.codehaus.jackson.JsonGenerator;
import org.codehaus.jackson.JsonNode;
import org.codehaus.jackson.JsonParser;
import org.codehaus.jackson.JsonProcessingException;
import org.codehaus.jackson.Version;
import org.codehaus.jackson.annotate.JsonAutoDetect.Visibility;
import org.codehaus.jackson.annotate.JsonMethod;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.DeserializationContext;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonDeserializer;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonSerializer;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.ObjectMapper;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.SerializerProvider;
import org.codehaus.jackson.map.module.SimpleModule;
public class JacksonFoo
{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
{
ASObject asObject = new ASObject();
asObject.type = Bar.class;
asObject.put("1", "alpha");
asObject.put("TWO", "beta");
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule("SimpleModule", Version.unknownVersion());
module.addSerializer(ASObject.class, new ASObjectSerializer());
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper().withModule(module).setVisibility(JsonMethod.FIELD, Visibility.ANY);
String asObjectJson = mapper.writeValueAsString(asObject);
System.out.println(asObjectJson);
// output: {"type":"com.stackoverflow.q8158528.Bar","map":{"1":"alpha","TWO":"beta"}}
module = new SimpleModule("SimpleModule", Version.unknownVersion());
module.addDeserializer(ASObject.class, new ASObjectDeserializer());
mapper = new ObjectMapper().withModule(module).setVisibility(JsonMethod.FIELD, Visibility.ANY);
ASObject asObjectCopy = mapper.readValue(asObjectJson, ASObject.class);
System.out.println(asObjectCopy.equals(asObject));
// output: true
}
}
class ASObjectDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<ASObject>
{
#Override
public ASObject deserialize(JsonParser jp, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException
{
ASObject asObject = new ASObject();
JsonNode tree = jp.readValueAsTree();
try
{
asObject.type = Class.forName(tree.get("type").asText());
}
catch (ClassNotFoundException e)
{
System.exit(42);
}
asObject.putAll(jp.getCodec().treeToValue(tree.get("map"), Map.class));
return asObject;
}
}
class ASObjectSerializer extends JsonSerializer<ASObject>
{
#Override
public void serialize(ASObject value, JsonGenerator jgen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException,
JsonProcessingException
{
jgen.writeStartObject();
jgen.writeStringField("type", value.type.getName());
jgen.writeObjectField("map", new HashMap(value));
jgen.writeEndObject();
}
}
class ASObject extends HashMap
{
Class type;
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o)
{
ASObject a = (ASObject) o;
return type.equals(a.type) && super.equals(a);
}
}
class Bar
{
}
Does anyone know if there is a Spring MVC mapping view for Gson? I'm looking for something similar to org.springframework.web.servlet.view.json.MappingJacksonJsonView.
Ideally it would take my ModelMap and render it as JSON, respecting my renderedAttributes set in the ContentNegotiatingViewResolver declaration
We plan to use Gson extensively in the application as it seems safer and better than Jackson. That said, we're getting hung up by the need to have two different JSON libraries in order to do native JSON views.
Thanks in advance!
[cross-posted to Spring forums]
aweigold got me most of the way there, but to concretely outline a solution for Spring 3.1 Java based configuration, here's what I did.
Grab GsonHttpMessageConverter.java from the spring-android-rest-template project.
Register your GsonHttpMessageConverter with the message converters in your MVC config.
#EnableWebMvc
public class WebConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configureMessageConverters(List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converters) {
converters.add(new GsonHttpMessageConverter());
}
}
The Spring docs outline this process, but aren't crystal clear. In order to get this to work properly, I had to extend WebMvcConfigurerAdapter, and then override configureMesageConverters. After doing this, you should be able to do the following in your controller method:
#Controller
public class AppController {
#RequestMapping(value = "messages", produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public List<Message> getMessages() {
// .. Get list of messages
return messages;
}
}
And voila! JSON output.
I would recommend to extend AbstractView just like the MappingJacksonJsonView does.
Personally, for JSON, I prefer to use #Responsebody, and just return the object rather than a model and view, this makes it easier to test. If you would like to use GSON for that, just create a custom HttpMessageConverter like this:
import com.google.gson.Gson;
import com.google.gson.GsonBuilder;
import com.google.gson.JsonParseException;
import com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken;
import com.vitalimages.string.StringUtils;
import org.springframework.http.HttpInputMessage;
import org.springframework.http.HttpOutputMessage;
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractHttpMessageConverter;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotReadableException;
import org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotWritableException;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.nio.charset.Charset;
import java.sql.Timestamp;
#Component
public class GSONHttpMessageConverter extends AbstractHttpMessageConverter<Object> {
public static final Charset DEFAULT_CHARSET = Charset.forName("UTF-8");
private GsonBuilder gsonBuilder = new GsonBuilder()
.excludeFieldsWithoutExposeAnnotation()
.setDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ")
.registerTypeAdapter(Timestamp.class, new GSONTimestampConverter());
public GSONHttpMessageConverter() {
super(new MediaType("application", "json", DEFAULT_CHARSET));
}
#Override
protected boolean supports(Class<?> clazz) {
// should not be called, since we override canRead/Write instead
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
#Override
public boolean canRead(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
return MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON.isCompatibleWith(mediaType);
}
public boolean canWrite(Class<?> clazz, MediaType mediaType) {
return MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON.isCompatibleWith(mediaType);
}
public void registerTypeAdapter(Type type, Object serializer) {
gsonBuilder.registerTypeAdapter(type, serializer);
}
#Override
protected Object readInternal(Class<? extends Object> clazz, HttpInputMessage inputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotReadableException {
try {
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
return gson.fromJson(StringUtils.convertStreamToString(inputMessage.getBody()), clazz);
} catch (JsonParseException e) {
throw new HttpMessageNotReadableException("Could not read JSON: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
#Override
protected void writeInternal(Object o, HttpOutputMessage outputMessage) throws IOException, HttpMessageNotWritableException {
Type genericType = TypeToken.get(o.getClass()).getType();
BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(outputMessage.getBody(), DEFAULT_CHARSET));
try {
// See http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=199 for details on SQLTimestamp conversion
Gson gson = gsonBuilder.create();
writer.append(gson.toJson(o, genericType));
} finally {
writer.flush();
writer.close();
}
}
}
And then add it to your converter list in your handler adapter like this:
#Bean
public HandlerAdapter handlerAdapter() {
final AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter handlerAdapter = new AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter();
handlerAdapter.setAlwaysUseFullPath(true);
List<HttpMessageConverter<?>> converterList = new ArrayList<HttpMessageConverter<?>>();
converterList.addAll(Arrays.asList(handlerAdapter.getMessageConverters()));
converterList.add(jibxHttpMessageConverter);
converterList.add(gsonHttpMessageConverter);
handlerAdapter.setMessageConverters(converterList.toArray(new HttpMessageConverter<?>[converterList.size()]));
return handlerAdapter;
}