I'm trying to implement an algorithm to multiply two bit-lists of 1s and 0s as a simulation to binary multiplication. It should return a like list, but I am having a hard time building on what I already have. Some help would be appreciated...
;;Function designed to accept two bit-list binary numbers (reverse order) and produce their product, a bitlist in reverse order.
;;Example: (multiply '(0 1 1 0 1) '(1 0 1)) should produce '(0 1 1 1 0 1 1)
(define (multiply x y)
(cond
;[(= null? y) 0]
[(zero? y) 0]
(#t (let ((z (multiply x (rest y )))) (cond
[(num_even? y) (cons 0 z)]
(#t (addWithCarry x (cons 0 z) 1)))))))
;This is to check if the current value of parameter x is the number 0
(define (zero? x)
(cond
((null? x) #t)
((=(first x) 1) #f)
(#t (zero? (rest x)))))
;This is to check if the current parameter x is 0 (even) or not.
(define (num_even? x)
(cond
[(null? x) #t]
[(=(first x) 0)#t]
[#t (num_even? (rest x))]))
;To add two binary numbers
(define(addWithCarry x y carry)
(cond
((and (null? x) (null? y)) (if (= carry 0) '( ) '(1)))
((null? x) (addWithCarry '(0) y carry))
((null? y) (addWithCarry x '(0) carry))
(#t (let ((bit1 (first x))
(bit2 (first y)))
(cond
((=(+ bit1 bit2 carry) 0) (cons 0 (addWithCarry (rest x)(rest y) 0)))
((=(+ bit1 bit2 carry) 1) (cons 1 (addWithCarry (rest x)(rest y) 0)))
((=(+ bit1 bit2 carry) 2) (cons 0 (addWithCarry (rest x)(rest y) 1)))
(#t (cons 1 (addWithCarry (rest x) (rest y) 1))))))))
Based on my previous answer for a base-10 multiplication, here's a solution that works for binary numbers (in the correct order):
(define base 2)
(define (car0 lst)
(if (empty? lst)
0
(car lst)))
(define (cdr0 lst)
(if (empty? lst)
empty
(cdr lst)))
(define (apa-add l1 l2) ; apa-add (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/19597007/1193075)
(let loop ((l1 (reverse l1))
(l2 (reverse l2))
(carry 0)
(res '()))
(if (and (null? l1) (null? l2) (= 0 carry))
res
(let* ((d1 (car0 l1))
(d2 (car0 l2))
(ad (+ d1 d2 carry))
(dn (modulo ad base)))
(loop (cdr0 l1)
(cdr0 l2)
(quotient (- ad dn) base)
(cons dn res))))))
(define (mult1 n lst) ; multiply a list by one digit
(let loop ((lst (reverse lst))
(carry 0)
(res '()))
(if (and (null? lst) (= 0 carry))
res
(let* ((c (car0 lst))
(m (+ (* n c) carry))
(m0 (modulo m base)))
(loop (cdr0 lst)
(quotient (- m m0) base)
(cons m0 res))))))
(define (apa-multi l1 l2) ; full multiplication
(let loop ((l2 (reverse l2))
(app '())
(res '()))
(if (null? l2)
res
(let* ((d2 (car l2))
(m (mult1 d2 l1))
(r (append m app)))
(loop (cdr l2)
(cons '0 app)
(apa-add r res))))))
so that
(apa-multi '(1 0 1 1 0) '(1 0 1))
=> '(1 1 0 1 1 1 0)
Related
I want to create a function in LISP
to count the number of 0 in given arguments
Ex
(count_number_of_0 '(1 0 5 9 0 0 0 7 1 0) )
Output : 5
Here is an implementation in Racket, which is a lisp-family language. It would be quite easy to translate into Common Lisp (but a little more verbose in CL):
(define make-counter
(λ (v same?)
(λ (l)
((λ (c)
(c c 0 l))
(λ (c a t)
(if (null? t)
a
(c c (if (same? (first t) v) (+ a 1) a) (rest t))))))))
(define count-zeros
(make-counter 0 =))
And now
> (count-zeros '(1 2 0 3 4 0))
2
one way is:
(defun count-number-of-0 (lst &optional (cnt 0)) ;counter starts at zero
(if lst
(if (and (numberp (car lst)) ;better verify that element is a number
(= 0 (car lst)))
(progn
(setq cnt (+ cnt 1))
(count-number-of-0 (cdr lst) cnt))
(count-number-of-0 (cdr lst) cnt))
cnt)) ;return counter
This should work in all implementations of common-lisp.
I have to make a Dr. Racket program that removes letters from a list if they are following the same letter as itself. For example: (z z f a b b d d) would become
(z f a b d). I have written code for this but all it does is remove the first letter from the list.
Can anyone help?
#lang racket
(define (remove-duplicates x)
(cond ((null? x)
'())
((member (car x) (cons(car(cdr x)) '())))
(remove-duplicates (cdr x))
(else
(cons (car x) (remove-duplicates (cdr x))))))
(define x '( b c c d d a a))
(remove-duplicates x)
(define (remove-dups x)
(cond
[(empty? x) '()]
[(empty? (cdr x)) (list (car x))]
[(eq? (car x) (cadr x)) (remove-dups (cdr x))]
[else (cons (car x) (remove-dups (cdr x)))]))
(cadr x) is short for (car (cdr x)) in case you didn't know.
Also, pattern matching makes list deconstruction often much more readable. In this case not so much, but it's still better than the other version:
(define (rmv-dups x)
(match x
[(list) (list)]
[(list a) (list a)]
[(cons a (cons a b)) (rmv-dups (cdr x))]
[__ (cons (car x) (rmv-dups (cdr x)))]))
This problem will be simpler if you introduce a helper function.
I recommend something like this (where angle brackets mean you need to fill out the details):
(define (remove-duplicates x)
(cond
[ <x is empty> '()] ; no duplicates in empty list
[ <x has one element> x] ; no duplicates in a list with one element
[ <first and second element in x is equal> (cons (car x) (remove-from-front (car x) (cdr x)))]
[else (cons (car x) (remove-duplicates (cdr x)))]))
(define (remove-from-front e x)
(cond
[ <x is empty> '()] ; e is not the first element of x
[ <e equals first element of x> (remove-from-front e (cdr x))] ; skip duplicate
[else (remove-duplicates x)])) ; no more es to remove
I'm a newbie and I didn't understand very well the language. Could anyone please explain to me what this functions do?
First function:
(define (x l)
(cond
((null? l) 0)
((list? (car l))
(+ (x (car l)) (x (cdr l))))
(else (+ 1 (x (cdr l))))
))
Second function:
(define (x l)
(cond
((null? l) 0)
((list? (car l))
(+ (x (car l)) (x (cdr l))))
(else (+ (car l) (x (cdr l)))
))
I do understand the begining but the conditions I didn't understand. Any help?
I will call your second function y.
Writing in pseudocode,
x [] -> 0
x [a . b] -> x a + x b , if list a
x [a . b] -> 1 + x b , else, i.e. if not (list a)
y [] -> 0
y [a . b] -> y a + y b , if list a
y [a . b] -> a + y b , else, i.e. if not (list a)
So for example,
x [2,3] = x [2 . [3]]
= 1 + x [3]
= 1 + x [3 . []]
= 1 + (1 + x [])
= 1 + (1 + 0 )
and
y [2,3] = y [2 . [3]]
= 2 + y [3]
= 2 + y [3 . []]
= 2 + ( 3 + y [])
= 2 + ( 3 + 0 )
See? The first counts something in the argument list, the second sums them up.
Of course both functions could be called with some non-list, but then both would just cause an error trying to get (car l) in the second clause, (list? (car l)).
You might have noticed that the two are almost identical. They both accumulates (fold) over a tree. Both of them will evaluate to 0 on the empty tree and both of them will sum the result of the same procedure on the car and cdr when the car is a list?. The two differ when the car is not a list and in the first it adds 1 for each element in the other it uses the element itself in the addition. It's possible to write the same a little more compact like this:
(define (sum l)
(cond
((null? l) 0) ; null-value
((not (pair? l)) l) ; term
(else (+ (sum (car l)) (sum (cdr l)))))) ; combine
Here is a generalisation:
(define (accumulate-tree tree term combiner null-value)
(let rec ((tree tree))
(cond ((null? tree) null-value)
((not (pair? tree)) (term tree))
(else (combiner (rec (car tree))
(rec (cdr tree)))))))
You can make both of your procedures in terms of accumulate-tree:
(define (count tree)
(accumulate-tree tree (lambda (x) 1) + 0))
(define (sum tree)
(accumulate-tree tree (lambda (x) x) + 0))
Of course you can make a lot more than this with accumulate-tree. It doesn't have to turn into an atomic value.
(define (double tree)
(accumulate-tree tree (lambda (x) (* 2 x)) cons '()))
(double '(1 2 ((3 4) 2 3) 4 5)) ; ==> (2 4 ((6 8) 4 6) 8 10)
Is there way to change - (minus) function to + (plus) function?
My homework is to implement sin calculation on Macluaurin series
sin(x) = x-(x^3/3!)+(x^5/5!) -(x^7/7!)+(x^9/9!)-...
Each article has different sign. This is my Lisp code
(defun sinMac (x series n plusminus)
(cond ((= series 0) 0)
(t (funcall plusminus
(/ (power x n) (factorial n))
(sinMac x (- series 1) (+ n 2) plusminus)))))
Is it possible to change plusminus to exchange sign? if I get '+ function send '- to next recursive call. From that call (got '-) I call '+ and so on...
You could do it with a circular list. Like so:
(defun sin-mac (x series n plus-minus)
(cond ((zerop series) 0)
(t (funcall (car plus-minus)
(/ (power x n) (factorial n))
(sin-mac x (1- series) (+ n 2) (cdr plus-minus))))))
(sin-mac x series 1 '#0=(+ - . #0#))
Or even better, wrap up the initial arguments using labels:
(defun sin-mac (x series)
(labels ((recur (series n plus-minus)
(cond ((zerop series) 0)
(t (funcall (car plus-minus)
(/ (power x n) (factorial n))
(recur (1- series) (+ n 2) (cdr plus-minus)))))))
(recur series 1 '#0=(+ - . #0#))))
If the function is a symbol, this is easy:
(defun next-function (function)
(ecase function
(+ '-)
(- '+)))
(defun sinMac (x series n plusminus)
(cond ((= series 0) 0)
(t (funcall plusminus
(/ (power x n) (factorial n))
(sinMac x
(- series 1)
(+ n 2)
(next-function plusminus))))))
I would not swap the function but just the sign. Using a loop for this also seems clearer to me (and is most likely more efficient, although there is still plenty of opportunity for optimization):
(defun maclaurin-sinus (x n)
"Calculates the sinus of x by the Maclaurin series of n elements."
(loop :for i :below n
:for sign := 1 :then (- sign)
:sum (let ((f (1+ (* 2 i))))
(* sign
(/ (expt x f)
(factorial f))))))
A few optimizations make this about 10 times faster (tested with n = 5):
(defun maclaurin-sinus-optimized (x n)
"Calculates the sinus of x by the Maclaurin series of n elements."
(declare (integer n))
(loop :repeat n
:for j :from 0 :by 2
:for k :from 1 :by 2
:for sign := 1 :then (- sign)
:for e := x :then (* e x x)
:for f := 1 :then (* f j k)
:sum (/ e f sign)))
In the following code the values for avg and avg2 change as the code progresses. How can I make it so that the values are constant throughout the function without defining them outside the function? Should I use a helper function?
(define (covariance-list x y)
(let ((avg (average x)))
(let ((avg2 (average y)))
(if (null? x)
'()
(cons (* (- (car x) avg)(- (car y) avg2))
(covariance-list (cdr x) (cdr y)))))))
I don't think you want them constant, since they depend on the parameters of the function. You probably just want them to not be recomputed during each recursive call.
(define (covariance-list x y)
(let ((avg (average x))
(avg2 (average y)))
(let loop ((x x)
(y y))
(if (null? x)
'()
(cons (* (- (car x) avg)
(- (car y) avg2))
(loop (cdr x) (cdr y)))))))
One way would be with an auxiliary function:
(define (covariance-list x y)
(define (covariance-list-aux x y avg-x avg-y)
(if (null? x)
'()
(cons (* (- (car x) avg-x) (- (car y) avg-y))
(covariance-list-aux (cdr x) (cdr y) avg-x avg-y))))
(covariance-list-aux x y (average x) (average y)))