I want to target the images and give the odd occurrence different rotation compare to even ones and I am using the following html and css but it does not work. Can anyone let me know what am I missing here:
<div id="blocks" style="overflow-y: scroll; height: 200px; padding: 20px 0 0 20px;">
<div style="height: 150px"><p><img src="mike.jpg" align="left" class="students">
<font color="red">Mike</font>"hello from UK."
</p></div>
<div style="height: 150px"><p><img src="jack.jpg" align="left" class="students">
<font color="red">Jack</font>
"Hello from US"
</p></div>
</div>
And the CSS:
#blocks img:nth-child(even) {
transform:rotate(5deg);
}
#blocks img:nth-child(odd) {
transform:rotate(5deg);
}
Use something like this instead:
#blocks div:nth-child(even) img {
/* styling */
}
#blocks div:nth-child(odd) img {
/* styling */
}
jsFiddle example
The reason this works, is because we are targeting the (even/odd) div elements, as opposed the img elements. The reason :nth-child wasn't working on the img elements was because they weren't siblings, unlike the div elements.
Related
hide div element in iframe1 : I want to hide the div
2: div class which is landing-header-right
how to specific div element {display : none}
You could hide landing-header-right with internal css or external css like:
.landing-header-right {
display: none;
}
You can also hide using inline css like:
<div class="landing-header-right" style="display: none;"></div>
Obviously, first one is more appreciable. If there are many landing-header-right and you wanted to hide that specific one, then you could give id or extra class to hide that element. In html, you could add hide-iframe id in the same div and use the css:
// html
<div id="hide-iframe" class="landing-header-right" style="display: none;"></div>
// css
#hide-iframe {
display: none;
}
In your case:
// Remove extra style
<iframe [src]="urlSafe" style="border: 0px; margin-left: -36px; height: 812px; margin-top: -186px; margin-bottom : -186px; width: 650px; display: none;">
<div id="hide-iframe" class="landing-header-right"></div>
</iframe
I am using Zurb Foundation for page layout. A row on my page needs have some text and then a line that fills the rest of the width, like so:
| Text of Indeterminate Length -------------------------------------- |
I have the desired layout working with <table> and <hr> tags:
<div class="row">
<div class="large-12 columns">
<table style="width:auto;border-collapse:collapse;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;">
<tr>
<td style="white-space:nowrap;padding:0;">
<h3>Text of Indeterminate Length</h3>
</td>
<td style="width:100%;"><hr/></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
I realize that the use of <table> for layout and <hr> for drawing lines are both generally frowned upon in modern web design. I spent a while trying to get the same layout using <div>, <span>, and <p> and couldn't come up with anything simple and straightforward that didn't require what seemed like an excessive use of Javascript. On top of that, most recommended solutions suggest using things like border_bottom which doesn't give me a nice line in the middle like <hr> does.
So my question is this: is there a straightforward way to do this without <table> or <hr>? Perhaps with some sort of a custom <span> style?
A potential solution could be to give your heading a background style with display:block and width:100% and the text with a white background to hide the line from the containing heading? http://jsfiddle.net/9o74jbLh/
<h3><span>{% block hightide_pagename %}{% endblock hightide_pagename %}
</span></h3>
h3 {
display:block;
position:relative;
width:100%;
}
h3:after {
content:"";
height:1px;
width:100%;
background: #000;
position:absolute;
top:50%;
}
h3 span {
background:#fff;
}
I've seen this design element pop up a few times, and the best way that I've seen it done (which is by no means a perfect way) is to use overflow hidden on a container, float the heading (or make it inline-block), and set the left attribute of your absolutely positioned line element (preferably a pseudo-element so as to keep your markup clean). In effect you get this:
/* stuff to make the demo pretty */
table {
border: 1px solid red;
}
table:before {
content: 'bad way';
color: red;
display: block;
}
.good-ish-way {
border: 1px solid green;
margin-top: 1em;
}
.good-ish-way:before {
content: 'good-ish way';
color: green;
display: block;
}
/* the actually useful stuff. */
.good-ish-way {
overflow: hidden;
}
.good-ish-way h3 {
position: relative;
display:inline-block;
}
.good-ish-way h3:after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 100%;
height: 1px;
background: #777;
width: 1000%;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto 0 auto 0.3em;
}
<table>
<tr>
<td style="white-space:nowrap;padding:0;">
<h3>Text of Indeterminate Length</h3>
</td>
<td style="width:100%;"><hr/></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="good-ish-way">
<h3>Text of Indeterminate Length</h3>
</div>
The only major problem with it is the 1000% part. I've seen other devs use a large pixel value, but the thing is, you'll never know if it's enough. You could use 100vw, but then there are some compatibility issues with older browsers.
Demo for you to play around with it: http://jsfiddle.net/uru17kox/
Edit: Oh! and here's where I first saw this method illustrated in case you want a different spin on it. https://css-tricks.com/line-on-sides-headers/
I’m trying to recreate this sort of layout:
This is the code I’m currently using to accomplish it:
<table style="border:0px;">
<tbody>
<tr style="border:0px;">
<td><img src="twophones.jpg" alt="" /></td>
<td>
<table style="border:0px;">
<tbody>
<tr width="100%" style="border:0px;">
<td width="100%">
<center>
<h11>DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h11>
<br>
<h33>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h33>
<table style="border:0px; width:410px;">
<tr style="border:0px;"><td style="border:0px;"><img src="dot.png"></td></tr>
<tr style="border:0px;" width="410">
<td style="border:0px;"><img src="app.jpg" alt="" /></td>
<td><img src="android.jpg" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Unfortunately, I’m sick of maintaining this table gunk. How can I maintain the same layout, but using standard CSS techniques?
Here are a couple of my attempts:
<div id="parent"> <div id="viewport">
<a href="#">
<img src="twophones.jpg" style="float:left;> <img src="twophones.jpg" alt="" />
<h11 style="width:100%;float:right; display: table-cell; vertical-align: middle;">DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h11>
<span><h11>DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h11><br>
<h33>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h33>
<br>
<h33 style="width:100%;float:right; display: table-cell; vertical-align: middle;">Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h33>
</span>
</a>
</div> </div>
<div id="parent"> <div id="parent">
<img src="twophones.jpg" style="float:left;"> <img src="twophones.jpg" style="float:left;>
<div style="width:65%;float:right;"> <div style="width:65%;float:right;">
<h11>DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h11>
<h11>DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h11>
<br> <br>
<h33>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h33>
<h33>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h33>
</div> </div>
First thing you want do to when doing a layout with CSS is, well, not touching the CSS and dealing purely with the content. How best could we represent this content? I think this includes all the content rather semantically:
<section>
<img src="twophones.jpg" alt="">
<h2>Discover the brands and styles designed for you</h2>
<p>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play</p>
<ul>
<li class="iphone">
<a href="#">
Available on the
<strong>App Store</strong>
</a>
</li>
<li class="android">
<a href="#">
Available on the
<strong>Android Market</strong>
</a>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
It contains all the content, but it doesn’t look great. It looks sort of like this:
(picture of two phones)
Discover the brands and styles designed for you
Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play
Available on the App Store
Available on the Android Market
Your layout doesn’t quite look like that. First big difference is that nothing’s centered here, but that’s trivial to fix: (take a look)
section {
text-align: center;
}
And what about those buttons? Well, each one functions sort of as a blocky part of the page, but we still want it to be inline, so we’ll apply a display of inline-block. Furthermore, we want the bolded part to be on another line, so we’ll set its display to block, which should force that. Lastly for now, we know it’s got a orangish background and border, and looks like it’s got a little shadow on the text, so putting all this together:
section li a {
display: inline-block;
background: orange; /* fallback for browsers that
don't support gradients */
background: linear-gradient(#f9a60d, #f37111);
color: white;
text-shadow: 0 0 -1px 0 black;
border: 1px solid #e79d48;
border-top-color: #ffe37d;
border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 0 5px 0 #a95511;
padding: 8px;
text-decoration: none; /* no underlines on our link, please */
text-align: left; /* within the button, left-aligned */
}
section li a strong {
display: block;
}
Nice buttons! But we could still use some icons on them—fortunately, that’s easy: just add a little more padding on the left and apply a background image: (try it)
section li a {
padding-left: 50px;
}
section li.iphone a {
background: orange url(iphone-icon.png) no-repeat 10px 10px;
background: linear-gradient(#f9a60d, #f37111), url(iphone-icon.png) no-repeat 10px 10px;
}
/* similar for Android */
Now how do you get the buttons to appear in a line? Fortunately, that’s simple. First, remove any margins and padding on the list, then make each item inline-block (try it):
section ul {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
section li {
display: inline-block;
}
Now how about that image on the side? It turns out CSS has us covered. We just tell it we want to float it to the left. As a common trick, we’ll also set an overflow: hidden on the container, so the float is entirely contained within the container. (You can’t see it standalone, but you may see the effect if you try to embed it in a larger web page.)
section {
overflow: hidden;
}
section img {
float: left;
}
Try it. Then we have just one minor visual tweak: we want the header to be uppercased. Fortunately, CSS has us covered there, too! Just apply
section h2 {
text-transform: uppercase;
}
And we’re done. Of course, there’s more you could do: adjust the margins and/or padding to change the spacing; change the font if necessary, etc., etc., but I’ve explored a few techniques that are generally applicable:
Floats are used and abused all the time in CSS. They’re useful.
Changing display can be useful to force elements to display in or out
of a line.
Playing with background can put icons on things.
I don’t mean for this to be a huge code dump; rather, I’d hope you’d learn something out of it, and be able to do similar things yourself.
I don't think I can go any more in-depth or explain anything better than the fantastic answer by icktoofay, but here is a simple layout that could also get you started.
Here is the demo.
Let's start with the basic HTML layout:
<div class="wrap">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://www.placehold.it/400X500" />
</div>
<div class="information">
<h1>DISCOVER THE BRANDS AND STYLES DESIGNED FOR YOU</h1>
<h2>Coming soon to the App Store and Google Play.</h2>
<a class="storeLinks">Play store</a>
<a class="storeLinks">APP store</a>
</div>
</div>
Now let's add in some CSS to layout your HTML elements. In this example:
display: table-cell; can be used to vertically align our content in conjunction with vertical-align: middle; and place our image to the left of the text.
html,body { height: 100%; } allows us to give our wrapping .wrap div a height of 100% so that all the content contained within <div class="wrap"> can be vertically centered.
.wrap > div will target only the divs that are directly after <div class="wrap">.
margin: 0 auto;, along with a fixed width, keep all our content horizontally centered.
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,body {
height: 100%;
}
.wrap {
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 900px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.wrap > div {
display: table-cell;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.image {
width: 400px;
}
.information {
width: 500px;
text-align: center;
}
h1 {
text-align: center;
padding: 10px;
margin: 10px;
}
h2 {
padding: 10px;
margin: 10px;
}
.storeLinks {
display: inline-block;
padding: 20px;
background: #DDD;
padding: 10px;
}
I want to hide a div con1 when i hover div con2 and vice versa. I am able to hide con2 when i hover con1 but can't do the same vice-versa. Why it is not working when i hover con2 to hide con1.
Below are the codes:
<html>
<head>
<title>Home</title>
<style type="text/css">
#con1{
float: left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #f00;
}
#con2{
float:left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #808;
}
#con1:hover ~#con2{
visibility:hidden;
}
#con2:hover ~#con1{
display:none;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="con1">
</div>
<div id="con2">
</div>
</body>
</html>
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/s8bbe/
I believe this is not possible with the general sibling selector as it only applies to elements after it in the html-structure. See more: http://css-tricks.com/child-and-sibling-selectors/
A possible (althought not especially elegant solution):
http://jsfiddle.net/s8bbe/4/
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="con1">
</div>
<div id="con2">
</div>
#con1{
float: left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #f00;
}
#con2{
float:left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #808;
}
#con1:hover ~#con2{
visibility:hidden;
}
#wrapper:hover #con1:not(:hover){
visibility:hidden;
}
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/s8bbe/5/
#KnutSv's solution is great. Here's an add-on if using more than 2 divs.
<div id="con-wrapper">
<div id="con1">
</div>
<div id="con2">
</div>
<div id="con3">
</div>
</div>
And a one-line css with :hover, :not(:hover).
#con1{
float: left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #f00;
}
#con2{
float:left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #808;
}
#con3{
float:left;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background: #606;
}
#con-wrapper:hover > div:not(:hover) {
visibility: hidden;
}
Using "> div" will target all #con-wrapper direct div children, which are not hovered, and hide them.
Use #con-wrapper:hover > div[id^=con]:not(:hover) if only cons needed to be targeted.
Putting the divs in one container div you can hide all contained divs on hoover, but not the actually 'hovered over' one with:
div:hover div {
visibility: hidden;
}
div:hover div:hover {
visibility: visible;
}
See demo: http://jsfiddle.net/TcPJZ/3/
EDIT: It actually works well for arbitrary number of divs (see demo).
Maybe you are using wrong selectors
try this
.con2:hover ~ div {display:none}
But this is "Hard code" if you will want to add more divs before con-2 they will be dissappearing too
I try it on jsfiddle and I get the problem.
When you have this:
<div id="con1">
</div>
<div id="con2">
</div>
Hover on "con1" works, but when you change the positions:
<div id="con2">
</div>
<div id="con1">
</div>
Now it's "con2" which is working and now not "con1".
So , I don't know how to fix it, but I can tell you about make it by Javascript/Jquery.
I think that can be solve the problem.
CSS doesn't support previous sibling selection. If you still want to have a previous sibling selector then you should look in to javascript.
var con1 = document.getElementById('con1');
var con2 = document.getElementById('con2');
function displayElem(el, property, value){
el.style[property] = value;
}
con1.onmouseover = displayElem.bind(null, con2, 'display', "none");
con1.onmouseout = displayElem.bind(null, con2, 'display', "");
con2.onmouseover = displayElem.bind(null, con1, 'visibility', "hidden");
con2.onmouseout = displayElem.bind(null, con1, 'visibility', "");
Working Fiddle
In the above fiddle, I even moved the next sibling selection to javascript so that to let you keep the code structured. if you don't want to do so, then happily don't events to the first element :)
it will be easily done by using below code using jquery , why you depend only on css
$("#con1").hover(function(){
$("#con2").css("visibility","hidden");
},function(){
$("#con2").css("visibility","visible");
});
here is the working sample http://jsfiddle.net/5jRXm/
I'm working on Blaze, an app that uses the SE API to grab recent content. It works great for finding NAAs, but there's one problem. When someone has put a whole bunch of code or even an entire sentence in an inline code block, this happens:
When it should look like this (non-SO site):
Essentially, the inline code blocks aren't breaking, and thus are pushing the td out to the right. This is the HTML that is generated:
<tr>
<td style="vertical-align:top" class="col-md-1">
<div class="score">
<h2 style="color:rgba(0,0,0,0.6); pull:right">0</h2>
</div>
</td>
<td class="">
<div class="post col-md-9">
<h3>How can I insert PHP into a webpage using Javascript</h3>
<hr>
<span class="post-body" style="color:rgba(70,70,70,1)">
<p><code>Is it possible to insert PHP code into a webpage using javascript after the page has loaded?</code> The simple answer is no. The page has already been rendered, the only way to change it is using javascript running within the user's browser.</p>
...
</span>
<p style="color:grey; float:right">posted by MjrKusanagi <span>a minute ago</span></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
This is all the non-Bootstrap CSS I'm using:
<style>
img
{
max-width:100%;
}
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
#wrap
{
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
margin: 0 auto -50px;
padding: 0 0 50px;
}
#footer
{
height: 50px;
background-color: clear;
border-top:1px dashed rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
}
.navbar .navbar-nav
{
display: inline-block;
float: none;
}
.navbar .navbar-collapse
{
text-align: center;
}
.flag-button:hover
{
background-color:red;
color: white
}
</style>
Does anyone have any idea how to either (a) Make the td stronger than the inline code blocks, or (b) allow the code blocks to wrap?
Bootstrap sets code whitespace to no-wrap by default. You can override this by simply overriding it with a value that allows for wrapping.
http://jsfiddle.net/nNry2/
CSS
code {
white-space: normal;
}
I used a variation of #thgaskell's answer, taken from here (changing pre to code).
/* Browser specific (not valid) styles to make preformatted text wrap */
code {
white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-3 */
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; /* Mozilla, since 1999 */
white-space: -pre-wrap; /* Opera 4-6 */
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; /* Opera 7 */
word-wrap: break-word; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */
}