2 div floated but same height - html

Here's my html
<div class="container">
<div class="box">
<div class="float">
<img src='http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/03/9b/2f/db/miami-beach.jpg' />
</div>
<div class="float float_txt">
text here!
<p class"a_p">a</p>
<p class"b_p">b</p>
<p class"c_p">c</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and css
.container{width:400px}
.box{display:inline-block}
.float{width:50%; float:left}
.float img{width: 100%; height:auto;}
.float_txt{background:red}
http://jsfiddle.net/MdtR8/1/
.container has a dynamic width (responsive design) and image will auto-resize itself.
I need to have .float_txt at same height as image, but I need a REAL height because I must divide a b c in percentage. Example:
.a_p, .b_p{height: 20%}
.c_p{height:60%}
How I can to this? only css no js :S

Why don't you solve it with JQuery. Here is the example of JQuery to calculate the height of .float img and add it to float_txt height.
$(".float_txt").css({
'height': $('.float img').height()
});
It's just one solution using JQuery. It's absolutely easier than using only css.
Jsfiddle

Here's one of the approaches.
I don't consider it to be the answer neither an elegant solution but this is one of the workarounds which actually meets the most important condition - it works (with some restrictions).
Here's the fiddle
First, we must assume that everything inside the .float_txt will be wrapped within those three paragraphs - they're meant to be 20%, 20% and 60% which is 100% all together so there's no more space for any other elements. Next, we wrap all three paragraphs with a div and put a copy of the image next to this div. We'll add the id="speculate" to the image.
The whole HTML will look like that:
<div class="container">
<div class="box">
<div class="float">
<img src='http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/03/9b/2f/db/miami-beach.jpg' />
</div><div class="float float_txt">
<img id='speculate' src='http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/03/9b/2f/db/miami-beach.jpg' />
<div class='content'>
<p class="a-p">a</p>
<p class="b-p">b</p>
<p class="c-p">c</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
We'll use the #speculate image to set the height of the .float_txt div. The image will have visibility: hidden which makes it invisible but still occupying_ the space in its container. The .content div will be positioned absolutely and spread to the whole space of the .float_txt with top:0; right:0; bottom:0; left:0.
The paragraphs will be also positoned absolutely and placed with the top property. The disadvantage here is the fact that we must know the percentage heights of the preceding paragraphs, e.g. to position the second paragraph we must set top: 20% because the first paragraph has height: 20%. I hope it's clear.
The whole CSS will look like this:
.box {
display: inline-block;
}
.float {
display: inline-block;
width:50%;
}
.float img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.float_txt {
background: red;
position: relative;
}
#speculate {
width: 100%;
visibility: hidden;
display: block;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
.content p {
margin: 0;
position: absolute;
}
.content .static {
position: static;
}
.a-p {
height: calc(20% + 20px);
top: 20px;
}
.b-p {
height: 20%;
top: calc(20% + 20px);
}
.c-p {
height: 60%;
top: calc(40% + 20px);
}

Related

Content overflowing off page with bootstrap

I am using bootstrap and I am making my website when I created a fixed navigation bar on the left side of my page with the width of 250px and then I have a div to the right of it being my page content, I have set the width of that to 100% and inside that I have a col-lg-12 and the content is leaking off the page, I was wondering if anyone knew a solution to this so that the content box is only the width of the remaining width of the page instead of being always 100% of the page width, If you need the code I can upload it to pastebin or something like that. But I am putting just some lil tid bits of the code here. And if any more info is needed just comment.
.navigationWrapper {
position: absolute;
float: left;
width: 250px;
height: 100%;
background-color: black;
}
.contentWrapper {
left: 255px;
position: absolute;
float: left;
width: 100%;
}
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<div class="navigationWrapper">
<div class="navIcon">
<span>ICON</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="contentWrapper">
<div class="col-sm-12 test">
<h1>Test</h1>
</div>
</div>
you can use Flexbox to do this:
JsFiddle. There are some height properties, which should be fixed.
.wrapper {
display: flex;
}
.navigationwrapper {
flex: 0 0 250px;
}
.contentWrapper {
flex: 1 0 auto;
}
with flex: 1 0 auto you can grantee that the element will grow and take the rest of the space left.
and this is your updated Fiddle https://jsfiddle.net/Marouen/n9v4Ly7e/
You can use calc() in your CSS because the width of your container is not 100% but 100% - menu width
It makes something like : width: calc(100% - 255px); because you are starting your container from 255px left.
updated js fiddle
PS : i also added background-color:black; to your .navNav{} so the background works even if the viewport is smaller than the size of the menu.
The issue you are having is that the width: 100%; you have applied to the .contentWrapper referances the width of it's parent (in this case the body) and not remaining space. You can use width: calc(100% - 255px); (see updated example below) to fix the issue. Flex-box is also reasonable solution, but this is what was causing the issue.
.navigationWrapper {
position: absolute;
float: left;
width: 250px;
height: 100%;
background-color: black;
}
.contentWrapper {
left: 255px;
position: absolute;
float: left;
width: calc(100% - 255px);
}
<link href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<div class="navigationWrapper">
<div class="navIcon">
<span>ICON</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="contentWrapper">
<div class="col-sm-12 test">
<h1>Test</h1>
</div>
</div>

Set width of element to width of sibling

I have a slightly unusual CSS challenge to overcome.
I have a two column layout, whereby the width of the left column is set by the width of a main image, and the right allowed to fill the remaining space. There is a container under the main image, which could have a natural width greater than the main image. However, I want this div to be the same width as the main image, and the overflow to be hidden. Here is my effort at attempting this:
.outer {
margin-right: 5px;
position: relative;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.right {
width: auto;
overflow: hidden;
}
.contentOuter {
overflow: hidden;
}
.content {
width: 500px;
}
.inner {
background-color: grey;
color: white;
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
}
<div class="outer left">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
<div class="contentOuter">
<div class="content">
<img src="http://placehold.it/500x50" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="outer right">
<div class="inner">
Hello world!
</div>
</div>
But as you can see, .contentOuter stretches to the width of its contents, regardless of what I attempt.
One major caveat I have is that apart from .content having a fixed width, I don't want any other hard-coded widths in my CSS; everything should be completely fluid, and the dimensions of the columns determined by the dimensions of the .image img.
So, I am after something that visually looks like this, but without the hard-coded max-width on .content:
.outer {
margin-right: 5px;
position: relative;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.right {
width: auto;
overflow: hidden;
}
.contentOuter {
overflow: hidden;
}
.content {
max-width: 350px; /* Hard-coded for demo purposes */
}
.inner {
background-color: grey;
color: white;
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
}
<div class="outer left">
<div class="image">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
<div class="contentOuter">
<div class="content">
<img src="http://placehold.it/500x50" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="outer right">
<div class="inner">
Hello world!
</div>
</div>
One option, though that depends on further requirements you may have, it so simply add to the lower block:
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
This takes it out of the flow, and the enclosing element will not take its width into account for sizing, only that of the image on top. The overflow: hidden will then hide whatever overflows.
The drawback is that the height of the enclosing element (or the position or subsequent elements) will not take into account the size of this element.
jsFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/jacquesc/rsz0hb1g/
A quick way to solve this would be to simply use some jQuery. It would only take two lines of code to achieve this.
var imgWidth = $('.image').width();
$('.content').width(imgWidth);

Vertically and horizontally align content in nested css

OK, I know that this is an old problem and there are some answers here on Stackoverflow, but none seems to contain a solution for my problem or I'm not fit to understand the answers provided.
I want to align content of one div on a page created with the help of Blueprint CSS horizontally and vertically centered as shown in the picture below and I can't figure out how. Most of the variations I tested use some sort of absolute positioning and all divs end up in the middle of the screen.
Try applying these styles to the div in which the text should be centered
.mydiv{
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
I want to propose an alternative solution, using this CSS for the alignment:
.alignh {
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
height: 100%;
}
.alignv {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align:middle;
}
It requires additional markup, as such:
<div class="alignh">
<div class="alignv">
<p>I want to be centered horizontally and vertically</p>
</div>
</div>
Why would it be useful? Because display:table-cell and vertical-align: middle will not work in a div that has position:absolute which is something desirable when making columns and rows. Also, placing a div with the display-table & vertical-align combo inside a div that has absolute position will may be infructuous because you may not be able to make that inner div fill the whole outer div without knowing the size (which may depend on the viewport).
The complete code...
HTML:
<div class="left col">
<p>I want to be left aligned</p>
<p>Me too</p>
<p>More text</p>
</div>
<div class="right col">
<div class="top row">
<div class="alignh">
<div class="alignv">
<p>I want to be centered horizontally and vertically</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bottom row">
<p>Just some more text...</p>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.col {
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
.row {
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
.row, .col {
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.left.col {
left: 0;
width: 250px;
}
.right.col {
left: 250px;
right: 0;
}
.top.row {
top: 0;
height: 100px;
}
.bottom.row {
top: 100px;
bottom: 0;
}
.alignh {
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
height: 100%;
}
.alignv {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align:middle;
}
See at Codepen.

CSS Using div to simulate tables

I'm new as webdesigner and I have to create a portion of a page that has 3 columns: a menu on the left side, the central body and a vertical banner. I can't use tables, so I've created a similar HTML:
<div class="Body">
<div class="LeftMenu">My menu</div>
<div class="Content">Foo body</div>
<div class="VerticalBanner">My menu</div>
</div>
While the CSS:
.LeftMenu {
width: 20%;
}
.Content {
margin: auto;
left: 20%;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
width: 60%;
}
.VerticalBanner {
left: 80%;
margin: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0%;
width: 20%;
}
So, my problem using that code is that the parent div (Body) takes the height of the first div (LeftMenu), which is not the bigger. This causes the content of "Content" and "VerticalBanner" to flow out "Body" and to go under the Footer div. If I use the float attribute, the "Body" div collapse without dimensions and then the footer div slides under the three columns inside "Body".
I also tried with display attribute, but Internet Explorer doesn't support this and some columns have strange behaviour.
What is the correct way to do this?
I think you should use floats for your DIVs. It's much easier after that to move them around.
Use display: table-*:
.Body { display: table; }
.Left, .Content, .VerticalBanner { display: table-cell; }
See e.g. this JSfiddle.
To stop the body div from collapsing you can use
.body{ overflow: hidden; }
I'm don't think you need position absolute.
<div class="Body">
<div style="width:20%;float:left;">My menu</div>
<div style="width:60%;float:left;">Foo body</div>
<div style="width:20%;float:left;">My menu</div>
<div style="height:1px;font-size:1px;clear:both;"> </div>
</div>

Centering a div block without the width

I have a problem when I try to center the div block "products" because I don't know in advance the div width. Anybody have a solution?
Update: The problem I have is I don't know how many products I'll display, I can have 1, 2 or 3 products, I can center them if it was a fixed number as I'd know the width of the parent div, I just don't know how to do it when the content is dynamic.
.product_container {
text-align: center;
height: 150px;
}
.products {
height: 140px;
text-align: center;
margin: 0 auto;
clear: ccc both;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
<div class="product_container">
<div class="products" id="products">
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Update 27 Feb 2015: My original answer keeps getting voted up, but now I normally use #bobince's approach instead.
.child { /* This is the item to center... */
display: inline-block;
}
.parent { /* ...and this is its parent container. */
text-align: center;
}
My original post for historical purposes:
You might want to try this approach.
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"/>
</div>
Here's the matching style:
.outer-center {
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center {
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
.clear {
clear: both;
}
JSFiddle
The idea here is that you contain the content you want to center in two divs, an outer one and an inner one. You float both divs so that their widths automatically shrink to fit your content. Next, you relatively position the outer div with it's right edge in the center of the container. Lastly, you relatively position the inner div the opposite direction by half of its own width (actually the outer div's width, but they are the same). Ultimately that centers the content in whatever container it's in.
You may need that empty div at the end if you depend on your "product" content to size the height for the "product_container".
An element with ‘display: block’ (as div is by default) has a width determined by the width of its container. You can't make a block's width dependent on the width of its contents (shrink-to-fit).
(Except for blocks that are ‘float: left/right’ in CSS 2.1, but that's no use for centering.)
You could set the ‘display’ property to ‘inline-block’ to turn a block into a shrink-to-fit object that can be controlled by its parent's text-align property, but browser support is spotty. You can mostly get away with it by using hacks (eg. see -moz-inline-stack) if you want to go that way.
The other way to go is tables. This can be necessary when you have columns whose width really can't be known in advance. I can't really tell what you're trying to do from the example code — there's nothing obvious in there that would need a shrink-to-fit block — but a list of products could possibly be considered tabular.
[PS. never use ‘pt’ for font sizes on the web. ‘px’ is more reliable if you really need fixed size text, otherwise relative units like ‘%’ are better. And “clear: ccc both” — a typo?]
.center{
text-align:center;
}
.center > div{ /* N.B. child combinators don't work in IE6 or less */
display:inline-block;
}
JSFiddle
Most browsers support the display: table; CSS rule. This is a good trick to center a div in a container without adding extra HTML nor applying constraining styles to the container (like text-align: center; which would center all other inline content in the container), while keeping dynamic width for the contained div:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
CSS:
.centered { display: table; margin: 0 auto; }
.container {
background-color: green;
}
.centered {
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
Update (2015-03-09):
The proper way to do this today is actually to use flexbox rules. Browser support is a little bit more restricted (CSS table support vs flexbox support) but this method also allows many other things, and is a dedicated CSS rule for this type of behavior:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column; /* put this if you want to stack elements vertically */
}
.centered { margin: 0 auto; }
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column; /* put this if you want to stack elements vertically */
background-color: green;
}
.centered {
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: red;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="centered">This content is centered</div>
</div>
six ways to skin that cat:
Button one: anything of type display: block will assume the full parents width. (unless combined with float or a display: flex parent). True. Bad example.
Button 2: going for display: inline-block will lead to automatic (rather than full) width. You can then center using text-align: center on the wrapping block. Probably the easiest, and most widely compatible, even with ‘vintage’ browsers...
.wrapTwo
text-align: center;
.two
display: inline-block; // instantly shrinks width
Button 3:
No need to put anything on the wrap. So perhaps this is the most elegant solution. Also works vertically. (Browser support for transtlate is good enough (≥IE9) these days...).
position: relative;
display: inline-block; // instantly shrinks width
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
Btw: Also a great way for vertically centering blocks of unknown height (in connection with absolute positioning).
Button 4:
Absolute positioning. Just make sure to reserve enough height in the wrapper, since noone else will (neither clearfix nor implicit...)
.four
position absolute
top 0
left 50%
transform translateX(-50%)
.wrapFour
position relative // otherwise, absolute positioning will be relative to page!
height 50px // ensure height
background lightgreen // just a marker
Button 5:
float (which brings also block-level elements to dynamic width) and a relative shift. Although I've never seen this in the wild. Perhaps there are disadvantages...
.wrapFive
&:after // aka 'clearfix'
content ''
display table
clear both
.five
float left
position relative
left 50%
transform translateX(-50%)
Update: Button 6:
And nowadays, you could also use flex-box. Note, that styles apply to the wrapper of the centered object.
.wrapSix
display: flex
justify-content: center
→ full source code (stylus syntax)
I found a more elegant solution, combining "inline-block" to avoid using float and the hacky clear:both. It still requires nested divs tho, which isnt very semantic but it just works...
div.outer{
display:inline-block;
position:relative;
left:50%;
}
div.inner{
position:relative;
left:-50%;
}
Hope it helps!
<div class="outer">
<div class="target">
<div class="filler">
</div>
</div>
</div>
.outer{
width:100%;
height: 100px;
}
.target{
position: absolute;
width: auto;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.filler{
position:relative;
width:150px;
height:20px;
}
If the target element is absolutely positioned, you can center it by moving it 50% in one direction (left: 50%) and then transforming it 50% in the opposition direction (transform:translateX(-50%)). This works without defining the target element's width (or with width:auto). The parent element's position can be static, absolute, relative, or fixed.
By default, div elements are displayed as block elements, so they have 100% width, making centering them meaningless. As suggested by Arief, you must specify a width and you can then use auto when specifying margin in order to center a div.
Alternatively, you could also force display: inline, but then you'd have something that pretty much behaves like a span instead of a div, so that doesn't make a lot of sense.
This will center an element such as an Ordered List, or Unordered List, or any element.
Just wrap it with a Div with the class of outerElement and give the inner element the class of innerElement.
The outerelement class accounts for IE, old Mozilla, and most newer browsers.
.outerElement {
display: -moz-inline-stack;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
zoom: 1;
position: relative;
left: 50%;
}
.innerElement {
position: relative;
left: -50%;
}
use css3 flexbox with justify-content:center;
<div class="row">
<div class="col" style="background:red;">content1</div>
<div class="col" style="">content2</div>
</div>
.row {
display: flex; /* equal height of the children */
height:100px;
border:1px solid red;
width: 400px;
justify-content:center;
}
Slight variation on Mike M. Lin's answer
If you add overflow: auto; ( or hidden ) to div.product_container, then you don't need div.clear.
This is derived from this article -> http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
Here is modified HTML:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
</div>
And here is modified CSS:
.product_container {
overflow: auto;
/* width property only required if you want to support IE6 */
width: 100%;
}
.outer-center {
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center {
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
The reason, why it's better without div.clear (apart that it feels wrong to have an empty element) is Firefox'es overzealous margin assignment.
If, for example, you have this html:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
</div>
<p style="margin-top: 11px;">Some text</p>
then, in Firefox (8.0 at the point of writing), you will see 11px margin before product_container. What's worse, is that you will get a vertical scroll bar for the whole page, even if the content fits nicely into the screen dimensions.
Try this new css and markup
Here is modified HTML:
<div class="product_container">
<div class="products" id="products">
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div id="product_15" class="products_box">
<img src="/images/ecommerce/card_default.png">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
And here is modified CSS:
<pre>
.product_container
{
text-align: center;
height: 150px;
}
.products {
left: 50%;
height:35px;
float:left;
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
width:auto;
}
.products .products_box
{
width:auto;
height:auto;
float:left;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
<div class="product_container">
<div class="outer-center">
<div class="product inner-center">
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
.outer-center
{
float: right;
right: 50%;
position: relative;
}
.inner-center
{
float: right;
right: -50%;
position: relative;
}
.clear
{
clear: both;
}
.product_container
{
overflow:hidden;
}
If you dont provide "overflow:hidden" for ".product_container" the "outer-center" div will overlap other nearby contents to the right of it. Any links or buttons to the right of "outer-center" wont work. Try background color for "outer-center" to understand the need of "overflow :hidden"
I found interesting solution, I was making slider and had to center slide controls and I did this and works fine. You can also add relative position to parent and move child position vertical. Take a look http://jsfiddle.net/bergb/6DvJz/
CSS:
#parent{
width:600px;
height:400px;
background:#ffcc00;
text-align:center;
}
#child{
display:inline-block;
margin:0 auto;
background:#fff;
}
HTML:
<div id="parent">
<div id="child">voila</div>
</div>
Do display:table; and set margin to auto
Important bit of code:
.relatedProducts {
display: table;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
No matter how many elements you got now it will auto align in center
Example in code snippet:
.relatedProducts {
display: table;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
a {
text-decoration:none;
}
<div class="row relatedProducts">
<div class="homeContentTitle" style="margin: 100px auto 35px; width: 250px">Similar Products</div>
test1
test2
test3
</div>
I'm afraid the only way to do this without explicitly specifying the width is to use (gasp) tables.
Crappy fix, but it does work...
CSS:
#mainContent {
position:absolute;
width:600px;
background:#FFFF99;
}
#sidebar {
float:left;
margin-left:610px;
max-width:300;
background:#FFCCCC;
}
#sidebar{
text-align:center;
}
HTML:
<center>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<div id="mainContent">
1<br/>
<br/>
123<br/>
123<br/>
123<br/>
</div><div id="sidebar"><br/>
</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
Simple fix that works in old browsers (but does use tables, and requires a height to be set):
<div style="width:100%;height:40px;position:absolute;top:50%;margin-top:-20px;">
<table style="width:100%"><tr><td align="center">
In the middle
</td></tr></table>
</div>
<style type="text/css">
.container_box{
text-align:center
}
.content{
padding:10px;
background:#ff0000;
color:#ffffff;
}
use span istead of the inner divs
<div class="container_box">
<span class="content">Hello</span>
</div>
I know this question is old, but I'm taking a crack at it. Very similar to bobince's answer but with working code example.
Make each product an inline-block. Center the contents of the container. Done.
http://jsfiddle.net/rgbk/6Z2Re/
<style>
.products{
text-align:center;
}
.product{
display:inline-block;
text-align:left;
background-image: url('http://www.color.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/New_Product.jpg');
background-size:25px;
padding-left:25px;
background-position:0 50%;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
}
.price {
margin: 6px 2px;
width: 137px;
color: #666;
font-size: 14pt;
font-style: normal;
border: 1px solid #CCC;
background-color: #EFEFEF;
}
</style>
<div class="products">
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
<div class="product">
<div class="price">R$ 0,01</div>
</div>
</div>
See also: Center inline-blocks with dynamic width in CSS
This is one way to center anything within a div not know the inner width of the elements.
#product_15{
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
display: table;
}
.price, img{
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
my solution was:
.parent {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.product {
width: 240px;
margin-left: auto;
height: 127px;
margin-right: auto;
}
add this css to your product_container class
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 0px;
border:0;
width: 700px;