I am using osgShadow::ShadowMap to create shadows:
shadowedScene = new osgShadow::ShadowedScene;
shadowedScene->setReceivesShadowTraversalMask(ReceivesShadowTraversalMask);
shadowedScene->setCastsShadowTraversalMask(CastsShadowTraversalMask);
sm = new osgShadow::ShadowMap;
//sm->setLight();
int mapres = 8192;
sm->setTextureSize(osg::Vec2s(mapres,mapres));
shadowedScene->setShadowTechnique(sm.get());
I have aircrafts and an airport.
When I have aircrafts moving shadow is vibrating.
When i remove aircrafts there is no problem.
I have tried every possible shadowing tecniques but couldn't find any solution.
I dont know the details of how shadow mapping is used in OSG, but from my experience with implementation of shadow maps in "plain" opengl i have an idea of what can be happening:
one of the steps in shadowmap technique is that the scene is rendered from POV of light sources. The view and projection matrices are configured so that this pass renders all perts of the scene that cast shadows.
if you have moving nodes in your scene, it could be the case. that the matrices need to be recalculated. as scene boundaries(from POV of the light source) have changed, which can lead in the next pass to "vibrating" shadows mentioned by you.
Tryto make it so that the parts of your scene that cast shadows don't change their combined volume boundaries in animation.
Related
I got some strange issues with transparency and 3d particles. A short vid to illustrate:
https://youtu.be/ZHKI1X3MjhY
As you can see I have a 3d particle effect, fire burning. Inside it is a 3 model with no alpha blending and it shows just fine. then in the far distance there is a small skeleton (with blending and alphatest turned on) and it also shows just fine through the fire. Then I turn camera and look at the warrior skeleton and it just disappear and instead you see what is behind him. I turn camera again and the mage skeleton also vanishes, but you can see the trees a bit further away just fine and they have the exact same settings for blending and alpha test. If I move the character say 20 yards away it also starts showing through the fire effect.
So it seems to have something to do with distance from the 3d particle effect...
The 3d particle batch is an extended BillboardParticleBatch like this:
protected Renderable allocRenderable(){
BlendingAttribute ba=new BlendingAttribute(GL20.GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL20.GL_ONE,1f);
Renderable r = super.allocRenderable();
r.material = new Material( ba,
// new DepthTestAttribute(GL20.GL_LEQUAL, 0.0f, 0.5f, true),
// r.material.set(new FloatAttribute(FloatAttribute.AlphaTest, 0.0f),
TextureAttribute.createDiffuse(texture));
return r;
}
All the characters and the trees are created with following attributes:
if (alpha) {
FloatAttribute floatAttribute = new FloatAttribute(FloatAttribute.AlphaTest, 0.5f);
BlendingAttribute blendingAttribute = new BlendingAttribute(GL20.GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL20.GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, 1f);
for (int i = 0; i < bulletEntity.modelInstance.materials.size; i++){
bulletEntity.modelInstance.materials.get(i).set(blendingAttribute);
bulletEntity.modelInstance.materials.get(i).set(floatAttribute);
}
}
The models are drawn first then the particles, I tried changing order but no difference. I have tried a lot of different setups for alphatest, depthtest and blendingattribute but can not find anything that works.
EDIT
I removed the Blending attribute from the 3d-models and now it looks as it should regarding the particle effect. However I need most materials on my character models to have blending set..
Anyone got any clue why this is happening when I enable blending?
I also tried to use the BillboardParticleBatch without extending it in case I had done something there but the effect then is even worse. All models with blending enabled appear in-front of the particle effect even though they stand behind it.
ModelBatch sorts your render calls (check this link, really, it is a must read), to avoid incorrect behavior (as you're experiencing). The actual sorting/rendering happens at the call to ModelBatch#end. By default it uses the DefaultRenderableSorter, which is a default implementation. Of course, because that implementation isn't aware of your scene, it might not fit exactly your needs.
The DefaultRenderableSorter tries to guess the location of each model based on their transformation matrix. Based on that location and the camera's location it will sort them so that:
First all opaque objects are rendered from front to back (because whatever is behind an opaque object isn't visible anyway, so that reduces unneeded calls to the fragment shader).
Secondly all transparent objects are rendered from back to front (because as soon as a transparent object is rendered then everything that is rendered after that and is behind it, will not be visible).
To decide whether an object is transparent, the BlendingAttribute#blended member is used. (So you could, if you really wanted to, set that member to false to force it to be treated (sorted) as if it was opaque)
So, the order in which you call ModelBatch#render is not necessarily the order in which they are actually executed. If you want to force to render whatever you've added to the batch in between, then call the ModelBatch#flush(). Of course, doing this a lot defeats some of the purpose of ModelBatch in the first place.
Instead you could implement your own RenderableSorter which has more knowledge about your scene and can therefor do a better job sorting than the default implementation. (however if flush() works for you and there's no other issue, then just flush might be the easiest solution for you).
That said, there a various other solutions you could try as well. E.g. the regions of the particles are fully transparent, so the fragment shader might as well discard those all together. Try adding FloatAttribute.AlphaTest with a value of 0.5f to the particles. If that messes with your blending then gradually reduce the value to e.g. 0.05f.
Also, you could add a DepthTestAttribute with depthMask set to false (new DepthTestAttribute(false)). This will prevent the particles from writing to the depth buffer. (but also might cause other things to show in front of the particles).
I'm trying to make a shape available for duplicating. Here's an explanation of what I've done, what I'm trying to do, and where I'm stuck:
Drew a shape manually in the Flash IDE (paintbrush).
Created a new movieclip containing the shape; exports as a class.
Instantiate the class (var mc:MovieClip = new shapeMovieClip()).
Add a reference to the shape in mc that I want (var myShape:Shape = mc.getChildAt(0) as Shape;
This works perfect and I now have my shape, but how can I duplicate it without instantiating the parent MovieClip class - is it possible?
I've tried creating a new shape and using the copyFrom() graphics method with no avail, I believe this method just copies draw calls when they're made on the referenced graphics and instead I just have a reference of a shape that's already been drawn.
Right now I'm extending the movieclip as a sprite instead, instantiating, pulling the shape from the parent and saving its reference, and then nulling the sprite. Does anyone know of a better, more lightweight, strategy for duplicating Shapes in this manner?
Basically depends on whether you need to scale your shapes. If you don't, and you can work it out with a fixed sized bitmap representation of the shape, then you will get much better performance drawing your shape to a BitmapData (it's called rasterisation) and instanciating Bitmap objects (as other commenters have pointed out). The code would go something like this:
var base:Sprite = new shapeMovieClip();
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(base.width, base.height, true, 0);
bmd.draw(base);
var clip1:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
var clip2:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
If you do need to scale the clips, you will get pixelation using bitmaps. When scaling down Bitmap.smoothing can help to some extent (also when rotating), but if you need to scale up, you will probably have to use some kind of mip-mapping. This is basically creating a few bitmaps of the shape at different scale levels, and then swap them depending on the current scale. Coding this has some complexity (using a helper parent to adjust the scale can help) but it will definitely perform better than using many shape symbols (with or without a sprite parent).
This is very old, but it still comes up high in Google, so I just wanted to share a true shape duplicating method:
var shapeonstage:Shape = shapeMadeInIDE;
var g:Vector.<IGraphicsData> = shapeonstage.graphics.readGraphicsData();
var shapecopy:Shape = new Shape();
shapecopy.graphics.drawGraphicsData(g)
And boom. It works. Had to share this because it would have helped me a looooong time ago and in so many ways.
UPDATE:
There is some clarification I'd like to add why you would want to use this method, for duplicating AND for storing references to Shapes that are within an swf.
If you target a Shape object on the stage or in a movie clip, the Flash Rendering engine does something strange. It will RECYCLE Shape objects to render new graphics thus making your Shape reference point to a COMPLETELY different rendering.
For example:
Create an fla with a movieclip.
Inside the movie clip make 10 frames.
On each frame, draw a different shape
In your code, get a reference to the shape (The Shape on Frame 1)
Draw and verify your shape (draw to a bitmap then put the bmp on stage)
Now let the flash engine play for 5 frames
Draw and verify your shape again
The second time you draw your shape without EVER reassigning your shape reference, will SOMETIMES yield a completely different shape.
Just know, this little quirk can leave you pulling your hair out if you don't know what you're looking for :)
I am building a globe with the countries. I have all of the spheres built and everything works fine. The problem is to get the globe to look right I had to put all of the movieclips into one big moveclip then broke down from there. The problem is I cannot get Away3D to recognize the secondary movieclips. If I apply the listener to the whole sphere it works fine (but that isn't functional). Is there a way to use nested movieclips in away3d?
//what works
var materialMovie:MovieClip = new causticsMovie() as MovieClip;
var causticsMaterial:MovieMaterial = new MovieMaterial( materialMovie);
var sphere:Sphere = new Sphere({material:causticsMaterial, radius:300,segmentsH:18,segmentsW:26, interactive:true});
causticsMaterial.interactive = true;
view.scene.addChild(sphere);
sphere.addEventListener(MouseEvent3D.MOUSE_DOWN, NA);
//what doesn't
world_map.northAfrica_mc.addEventListener(MouseEvent3D.MOUSE_DOWN, NA);
Is there a solution to this problem?
If I understand how 3d engines in flash generally work, this won't be possible. They create a texture from the original movieclip(s) which they then transform. So there are no movieclips left to click on.
There is a couple of ways around this I think. You could transform the click location into polar coordinates (I'm not sure about the maths there, but google should be helpful), and figure out which location was clicked that way.
Or, you could (probably) have a second, invisible sphere (off stage or not added as a child, not sure which will work), where you create a different texture where each country has a different color. You would rotate this to the same angles as the visible sphere. Then, on click, render that to a BitmapData and check the pixel value of the point you clicked (translated so the point on the visible sphere and the invisible sphere are the same). I think this way is the easier of the two, and will have better results.
To clarify things, what i am trying to do is to get the openGL coordinates and manipulate them in my mfc code. not to get an openGL object. i'm using the mfc to control the position of the objects in the openGL.
Hi, i'm trying to find the naswer on the web and can't find a full solution that i can use and that will work...
I'm developing a MFC project with static picture as the canvas for an openGL class that draw the grphics for my game.
On moush down, i need to retrive a shape coordinate from the openGL class.
I'm looking for a way to convert the openGL coordinates to MFC coordinates but no matter what i try i get junk after using the gluProject or gluUnProject (i've tried to do both ways but non is working)
GLdouble modelMatrix[16];
glGetDoublev(GL_MODELVIEW_MATRIX,modelMatrix);
GLdouble projMatrix[16];
glGetDoublev(GL_PROJECTION_MATRIX,projMatrix);
int viewport[4];
glGetIntegerv(GL_VIEWPORT,viewport);
POINT mouse; // Stores The X And Y Coords For The Current Mouse Position
GetCursorPos(&mouse); // Gets The Current Cursor Coordinates (Mouse Coordinates)
ScreenToClient(hWnd, &mouse);
GLdouble winX, winY, winZ; // Holds Our X, Y and Z Coordinates
winX; = (float)point.x; // Holds The Mouse X Coordinate
winY; = (float)point.y; // Holds The Mouse Y Coordinate
winY = (float)viewport[3] - winY;
glReadPixels(winX, winY, 1, 1, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT, &winZ);
GLdouble posX=s1->getPosX(), posY=s1->getPosY(), posZ=s1->getPosZ(); // Hold The Final Values
gluUnProject( winX, winY, winZ, modelMatrix, projMatrix, viewport, &posX, &posY, &posZ);
gluProject(posX, posY, posZ, modelMatrix, projMatrix, viewport, &winX, &winY, &winZ);
This is just part of the code i've tried. ofcourse not gluProject and gluUnProject together. just had them both here to show.....and i know there is lots of junk over there, its from some of my tries...
p.s. i've tried many many more combinations and examples from the web and nothing seem to work in my case....
Can any one show me what is the right way to do the transformation?
10x
It looks like you're trying to retrieve the object (or objects) that is/are at a particular point. If this is the case, gluProject and/or gluUnProject isn't really a very suitable tool for the task. OpenGL has a selection mode intended specifically for this kind of task.
In typical use, you specify a small square (e.g., 5x5 pixels) around the mouse click spot with gluPickMatrix, set selection mode with glRenderMode, set a buffer with glSwelectBuffer, and then draw your scene. The drawing doesn't go to the screen, but fills the buffer you specified wiyh records of what was drawn within the specified area.
I know that there are people out there creating classes for this (ie http://coreyoneil.com/portfolio/index.php?project=5). But I want to learn how to do it myself so I can create everything I need the way I need.
I've read about BitMap and BitMapData. I should be able to .draw the MovieClips onto a BitMap so I could then cycle the pixels looking for the collisions. However, It's weird and confusing dealing with the offsets.. And it seams like the MyBitMap.rect has always x = 0 and y = 0... and I can't seam to find the original position of the things...
I'm thinking of doing a hitTestObject first, then if this was positive, I would investigate the intersection betwen the movieclips rectangles for the pixel collisions.
But then there is also another problem (the rotation of movieclips)...
...I need some enlightment here on how to do it.
Please, any help would be appreciated..
If you're using BitmapData objects with transparency you can use BitmapData.hitTest(firstPoint:Point, firstAlphaThreshold:uint, secondObject:Object, secondBitmapDataPoint:Point = null, secondAlphaThreshold:uint = 1):Boolean.
You'll have to change from global coords to the local BitmapData coords which will require a bit of math if it is rotated. That's easily achieved (look up affine transform for more info on wiki):
var coordTransform:Matrix = new Matrix();
coordTransform.rotate(rotationRadians);
coordTransform.translate(x, y);
coordTransform.transformPoint(/* your point */);
A classic reference for pixel perfect collision detection in flash is this Grant Skinner's article. It's AS2, but the logic is the same for AS3 (there are ports available if you google a bit).
If I recall correctly, this particular implementation worked as long as both tested objects had the same parent, but that can be fixed.
About BitmapData x and y values, I understand it could be confusing; however, the way it works makes sense to me. A BitmapData is just what the name implies: pixel data. It's not a display object, and cannot be in the display list; so having x or y different than 0 doesn't really make sense, if you think about it. The easiest way to deal with this is probably storing the (x,y) offset of the source object (the display object you have drawn from) and translate it to the global coordinate space so you can compare any objects, no matter what's their position in the display list (using something like var globalPoint:Point = source.parent.localToGlobal(new Point(source.x,source.y)).
I've previously used Troy Gilbert's pixel perfect collision detection class (adapted from Andre Michelle, Grant Skinner and Boulevart) which works really well (handles rotation, different parents, etc.):
http://troygilbert.com/2007/06/pixel-perfect-collision-detection-in-actionscript3/
http://troygilbert.com/2009/08/pixel-perfect-collision-detection-revisited/
and from there he has also linked to this project (which I've not used, but looks really impressive):
http://www.coreyoneil.com/portfolio/index.php?project=5
I managed to do it after all, and I already wrote my class for collision detections,/collisions angle and other extras.
The most confusing process is maybe to align the bitmaps correctly for comparing. When whe draw() a movieclip into a a BitmapData, if we addChild() the corresponding Bitmap we can see that part of it is not visible. it appears to be drawn from the center to right and down only, leaving the top and left parts away from beeing drawn. The solution is giving a transform matrix in the second argument of the draw method that aligns the bitmap and makes it all be drawn.
this is an example of a function in my class to create a bitmap for comparing:
static public function createAlignedBitmap(mc: MovieClip, mc_rect: Rectangle): BitmapData{
var mc_offset: Matrix;
var mc_bmd: BitmapData;
mc_offset = mc.transform.matrix;
mc_offset.tx = mc.x - mc_rect.x;
mc_offset.ty = mc.y - mc_rect.y;
mc_bmd = new BitmapData(mc_rect.width, mc_rect.height, true, 0);
mc_bmd.draw(mc, mc_offset);
return mc_bmd;
}
in order to use it, if you are on the timeline, you do:
className.createAlignedBitmap(myMovieClip, myMovieClip.getBounds(this))
Notice the use of getBounds which return the rectangle in which the movie clip is embedded. This allows the calculation of the offset matrix.
This method is quite similar to the on shown here http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2009/06/24/using-bitmapdata-hittest-for-collision-detection/
By the ways, if this is an interesting matter for you, check my other question which I'll post in a few moments.