The issue lies within this CSS and HTML. Here is a link to jsFiddle with the sample code.
HTML
<ul>
<li class"complete">1</li>
<li class"complete">2</li>
<li>3</li>
<li>4</li>
</ul>
CSS
li.complete:last-child {
background-color:yellow;
}
li.complete:last-of-type {
background-color:yellow;
}
Shouldn't either of these lines of CSS target the last li element with the "complete" class?
This query in jQuery doesn't target it either:
$("li.complete:last-child");
But this one does:
$("li.complete").last();
li {
background-color: green;
}
li.complete:first-child {
background-color: white;
}
li.complete:first-of-type {
background-color: red;
}
li.complete:last-of-type {
background-color: blue;
}
li.complete:last-child {
background-color: yellow;
}
<ul>
<li class="complete">1</li>
<li class="complete">2</li>
<li>3</li>
<li>4</li>
</ul>
:last-child will not work if the element is not the VERY LAST element
I think it's crucial to add/emphasize that :last-child will not work if the element is not the VERY LAST element in a container. For whatever reason it took me hours to realize that, and even though Harry's answer is very thorough I couldn't extract that information from "The last-child selector is used to select the last child element of a parent."
Suppose this is my selector: a:last-child {}
This works:
<div>
<a></a>
<a>This will be selected</a>
</div>
This doesn't:
<div>
<a></a>
<a>This will no longer be selected</a>
<div>This is now the last child :'( </div>
</div>
It doesn't because the a element is not the last element inside its parent.
It may be obvious, but it was not for me...
Sidebar: This may seem like a ridiculous gotcha, but the devil's always in the details. :last-of-type may fit your needs in most cases (and feels intuitive) but :last-child definitely serves a purpose. It offers greater specificity (targeting only those elements which are, in-fact, the very last child in a parent). It depends on your use-case.
The last-child selector is used to select the last child element of a parent. It cannot be used to select the last child element with a specific class under a given parent element.
The other part of the compound selector (which is attached before the :last-child) specifies extra conditions which the last child element must satisfy in-order for it to be selected. In the below snippet, you would see how the selected elements differ depending on the rest of the compound selector.
.parent :last-child{ /* this will select all elements which are last child of .parent */
font-weight: bold;
}
.parent div:last-child{ /* this will select the last child of .parent only if it is a div*/
background: crimson;
}
.parent div.child-2:last-child{ /* this will select the last child of .parent only if it is a div and has the class child-2*/
color: beige;
}
<div class='parent'>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div>Child w/o class</div>
</div>
<div class='parent'>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child-2'>Child w/o class</div>
</div>
<div class='parent'>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<div class='child'>Child</div>
<p>Child w/o class</p>
</div>
To answer your question, the below would style the last child li element with background color as red.
li:last-child{
background-color: red;
}
But the following selector would not work for your markup because the last-child does not have the class='complete' even though it is an li.
li.complete:last-child{
background-color: green;
}
It would have worked if (and only if) the last li in your markup also had class='complete'.
To address your query in the comments:
#Harry I find it rather odd that: .complete:last-of-type does not work, yet .complete:first-of-type does work, regardless of it's position it's parents element. Thanks for your help.
The selector .complete:first-of-type works in the fiddle because it (that is, the element with class='complete') is still the first element of type li within the parent. Try to add <li>0</li> as the first element under the ul and you will find that first-of-type also flops. This is because the first-of-type and last-of-type selectors select the first/last element of each type under the parent.
Refer to the answer posted by BoltClock, in this thread for more details about how the selector works. That is as comprehensive as it gets :)
I encounter similar situation. I would like to have background of the last .item to be yellow in the elements that look like...
<div class="container">
<div class="item">item 1</div>
<div class="item">item 2</div>
<div class="item">item 3</div>
...
<div class="item">item x</div>
<div class="other">I'm here for some reasons</div>
</div>
I use nth-last-child(2) to achieve it.
.item:nth-last-child(2) {
background-color: yellow;
}
It strange to me because nth-last-child of item suppose to be the second of the last item but it works and I got the result as I expect.
I found this helpful trick from CSS Trick
Related
I'm trying to select every element within a wrapper except the elements within one of the children. Consider this:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="this">
<div class="that"></div>
</div>
<div class="foo">
<div class="bar"></div>
<div class="orange">
<div class="ignore"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="hello"></div>
<div class="world">
<div class="ignore">
<div class="this"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
What I want to do is to make the text color of everything inside wrapper white, except the elements that are inside ignore. What I got so far is .wrapper *:not(.ignore *), which doesn't work.
EDIT: I can't accept solutions that include overriding what the color is within .ignore because that color is pre-set, and is out of my control. It is also impossible to know which color is used in the pre-set. Imagine there's a body {color:blue;}, only in my case, it's impossible to know what color it is.
Add color: #fff to .wrapper
Then, add whatever color your want to .ignore
After that, make sure .ignore loads after .wrapper in your style sheet.
.wrapper {
background: #131418;
color: #fff;
font-size: 25px
}
.ignore {
color: #933
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="this">
<div class="that">wrapper</div>
</div>
<div class="foo">
<div class="bar">wrapper</div>
<div class="orange">
<div class="ignore">ignore</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="hello">wrapper</div>
<div class="world">
<div class="ignore">
<div class="this">ignore</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
If you put them in right order you can get this:
.wrapper {
background: green;
}
.wrapper *:not(.ignore) {
color: white;
}
.wrapper *, .wrapper .ignore *{
color: red;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="this">
<div class="that">1</div>
</div>
<div class="foo">
<div class="bar">2</div>
<div class="orange">
<div class="ignore">3</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="hello"></div>
<div class="world">
<div class="ignore">
<div class="this">4</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Note that :not(...) is applied to the current element, so you can't use :not(something [some element inside])
I'd suggest:
.wrapper div:not(.ignore) {
color: white;
}
The reason your posted CSS selector doesn't work – and shouldn't be expected to work – is because:
.wrapper *:not(.ignore *)
Is trying to select all descendent elements that are not descendants of the .ignore elements, whereas in your question it seems that you're trying to select only elements that are not themselves of the .ignore class.
Further, the :not() pseudo-class:
...is a functional notation taking a simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class itself) as an argument. It represents an element that is not represented by its argument.
[Emphasis mmine, https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#negation].
And a 'simple selector' is:
...either a type selector, universal selector, attribute selector, class selector, ID selector, or pseudo-class.
[https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#simple-selectors-dfn]
Which appears to prevent the use of a combinator, the white-space, representing the selection of a descendant; meaning that your selector .ignore * is an invalid selector for the negation (:not()) pseudo-class.
Pure CSS doesn't seem to provide a good solution - at least not one I can think of.
The problem with not is it can only apply to "simple selectors", which basically means the selector it applies to can't contain combinators like whitespace.
For simple cases, you could do what a lot of people are suggesting - just have a second rule that selects .ignore * and undoes what your .wrapper * rule does. But if the .wrapper * rule does a lot, or if the exact state you'd get without the .wrapper * rule is unclear (maybe set by an external resource) then that isn't necessarily practical.
What you could do is use JavaScript (or similar) to propagate the .ignore class down to all of its descendants, then just use :not(.ignore)
My code is as follows:
HTML
<div class="divs">
<div class="row">row 0</div>
<div class="not-row"></div>
<div class="row">row 1</div>
<div class="not-row"></div>
<div class="row">row 2</div>
<div class="not-row"></div>
<div class="row">row 3</div>
<div class="not-row"></div>
</div>
CSS
.row:nth-child(even) {
background: #fff;
}
.row:nth-child(odd) {
background: #eee;
}
This is supposed to paint the background of two of the rows gray and two of the rows white. Unfortunately it paints all of their backgrounds gray. What am I doing wrong?
I tried using nth-of-type instead of nth-child but that didn't change anything.
jsFiddle example
For even just use (as a default)
.row {}
Then override the odd ones with:
.row:nth-child(4n+1) {}
.row {
background: #fff;
}
.row:nth-child(4n+1) {
background: #eee;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/b8ma1hon/3/
More on how nth-child works can be found here:
https://css-tricks.com/how-nth-child-works/
You cannot simply use even/odd in this instance as that is in relation to all child elements, not just the ones with the class row.
Your inclusion of .row in the selector is purely an extra criteria and has no impact on the nth-child selector.
Likewise I could state:
.row:nth-child(1):hover {}
This would restrict selection to an element with a class of row, which is the 2nd child, which is currently in a hovered state.
It wouldn't make sense if this was the 2nd element out of all the hovered elements as you can only hover over one at a time.
I hope that makes sense!
It's also worth noting that your selector is now dependant on the not-row existing, or at least some kind of element existing between the row elements.
If this was to change then your selector would also have to change.
Alternatively you could change your element type for the not-row elements to something else so that you can make use of the nth-of-type selector:
<div class="divs">
<div class="row">row 0</div>
<span class="not-row"></span>
<div class="row">row 1</div>
<span class="not-row"></span>
<div class="row">row 2</div>
<span class="not-row"></span>
<div class="row">row 3</div>
<span class="not-row"></span>
</div>
.row {
background: #fff;
}
.row:nth-of-type(odd) {
background: #eee;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/b8ma1hon/5/
I have some nested elements like this:
<div class="foo">
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="not-inside-this">
<div class="one select-this"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="two select-this"></div>
</div>
<div class="three select-this"></div>
I want to select all .select-this which are inside .select-inside-this but not those which are wrapped in .not-inside-this. So in the end, i should be able to select only two.select-this from the above code.
The CSS I've tried but did not work:
.select-inside-this :not(.not-inside-this) .select-this {
/* style here /*
}
or:
.select-inside-this *:not(.not-inside-this) .select-this {
/* style here /*
}
Any workaround here?
I don't want to use JavaScript here. I need pure CSS3 solution.
EDIT: I don't want to use direct child (>) selector. As I've asked, I want to select all those element from any level just without the exception wrapper.
:not(.not-inside-this) and *:not(.not-inside-this) with the * are equivalent; in the case of the former, the universal selector is implied. See the spec.
It is currently not possible to construct a CSS selector that matches elements that are not descendants of specific elements for the reasons given in the following questions:
CSS negation pseudo-class :not() for parent/ancestor elements
Is the CSS :not() selector supposed to work with distant descendants?
The selector
.select-inside-this :not(.not-inside-this) .select-this
matches .select-this elements that are descendants of some element that is not .not-inside-this, which in turn is a descendant of .select-inside-this. It does not match .select-this elements that are not descendants of .not-inside-this within .select-inside-this.
This means, first off, that your selector will incorrectly match the following:
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="bar">
<div class="not-inside-this">
<div class="select-this"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
... because one of the ancestors of .select-this, .bar, is :not(.not-inside-this).
Additionally, this implies at least three levels of nesting (though it could be more). In your example, there are no other elements between .two.select-this and its containing .select-inside-this, so it will never match that element. This is why James Donnelly suggests adding .select-inside-this > .select-this to account for that particular case.
However it is still not possible to write a single complex selector using descendant combinators to match elements without a specific ancestor. The only way is to repeat the child combinator method with as many :not(.not-inside-this) as necessary, but this requires that you account for all possible cases. If you can't do that, then you're out of luck with CSS selectors.
You can use the Child Combinator Selector > to specify direct children:
.select-inside-this :not(.not-inside-this) .select-this,
.select-inside-this > .select-this {
/* style here /*
}
This selects any .select-this element which is not a descendent of any .not-inside-this element and also selects .select-this elements which are direct children of .select-inside-this elements.
body > .select-inside-this :not(.not-inside-this) .select-this,
body > .select-inside-this > .select-this {
color: red;
}
<div class="foo">
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="not-inside-this">
<div class="one select-this">
This should not be selected
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="two select-this">
This should be selected
</div>
</div>
<div class="three select-this">
This should not be selected
</div>
A little bit late to the party, and it might not match your use case, but this is what I ended up doing:
HTML:
<div class="foo">
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="not-inside-this">
<div class="one select-this"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="select-inside-this">
<div class="two select-this"></div>
</div>
<div class="three select-this"></div>
CSS:
.select-inside-this .select-this {
background: blue;
}
.select-inside-this .not-inside-this .select-this {
background: none;
}
The trick is to positively select the negative element and just undo the style.
It'll work for simple use cases, at the very least.
I ended up
styling but hiding the styles by default, and then
revealing them on the nested element only.
Example with image backgrounds:
.box{
height:100px;
background-image: url("img.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: top 100px left 0; /*hide by default (here by shifting position)*/
}
.container .box{
background-position: top left; /*reveal in the nested*/
}
Hope you find a way to hide the style you need in place in a similar way.
What I'm trying to achieve sounds really simple, but is not. I don't even know if I can accomplish what I'm trying todo.
Ok so we got our element with the classname .parent, .parent got two div children, one is immediate and the other one is put into the first one like so:
<div class="parent">
<div>First child
<div>Second child</div>
</div>
</div>
Targeting the first child should be as simple as:
.parent > div {
color: green;
}
but it isn't, as "Second child" also get affected.
Is this achieveable?
Sidenote:
Some CSS-properties like "color" is inheriting from parents, even though the element does not got the direct style. I guess this is what causing the issue. But still, I don't want it to cascade.
Parent element color is inherited to children element. First set div color and then use direct children's color:
.parent div{
color: #000;
}
.parent > div {
color: green;
}
<div class="parent">
<div>First child
<div>Second child</div>
</div>
</div>
The css is in cascade so the changes you do to an element effect the children. You could, however put a css class to the second child to override the css.
When you use div > p it means that Selects all p elements where the parent is a div element
But if you set one element with a property, all children will inherit that property if you don't override it. For example:
<div class="parent">
<div>First child
<div>Second child</div>
</div>
</div>
In your case, all divs will have the property color:green by inheritance. If you want to change the property of the second div you have to do the following: div.parent div div { color: red }. This means Select all div which parent is a div which parent is a div with class "parent".
This is how stylesheets work.
No, you can't.
CSS color property is Inherited by default.
It's not possible to do it in the way you want.
But more important: It's not an ISSUE, it's the way that supposed to be.
Remember: CSS => Cascade Style Sheet.
Now, for your question... the simple, easy and the right way to "solve" this... is the one that already told you #Bhojendra Nepal in his previous answer.
Edit:
Another option would be wrapping that flying text in a span tag.. or similar:
.parent > div > span {
color: green;
}
<div class="parent">
<div>
<span>First child</span>
<div>
<span>Second child</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I have this HTML Code:
<div id="loggedin">
</div>
<div id="notloggedin">
</div>
<div>
</div>
I want two identify the last div which is not "loggedin" and "notloggedin". How will I do that through css?
This uses CSS3's :not() selector. It will work for all DIV that do not have an id attribute present.
div:not([id]){
color:green;
}
<div id="loggedin">
text
</div>
<div id="notLoggedIn">
text
</div>
<div>
this should come out green
</div>
Another Example that came up as a result of comments
Since we are unaware of what your HTML looks like, this may be a bit better suited for your needs.
.container > div:not([id]) {
color: green;
}
<div class="container">
<div id="loggedin">
Logged In
</div>
<div id="notloggedin">
Logged Out
</div>
<div>
This text should be green
</div>
</div>
<div>
this text should not be green because it isn't a child of the container div.
</div>
You can target the last div with CSS using three ways.
First way:
div:last-child {
//styles come here
}
Second way:
div:nth-child(3) {
//styles come here
}
Third way:
div:not([id]){
//styles come here
}
There might be other ways as well using psuedo-selectors.
Try to be a bit more clear in your question, to revise my answer, if you want to refer to the 3rd div (that's not what you asked at all). then as the others said, you need to wrap the three div's in a parent-div and refer to it using either nth-child, or [not]. You also asked this same question (worded differently) like 2 minutes before asking this one.
nth-child
div:nth-child(3) {
}
not
div:not([id]){
}
PS. I don't see any reason why you can't give the last div an id or class anyways.
use :last-child in your css for the div tag.
HTML:
CSS:
div:last-child
{
//your styles for last div here.
}