I'm looking for a way to put a child div at the bottom of the parent div. The parent div is placed inside a td which has a dynamic height depending on the content of the row. I tried several attempts including the position: relative and position: absolute solution, but it didn't work because of the dynamic height.
Does anybody has an idea?
Edit:
I'm not using the table for layout. The table is used to display data which is loaded dynamically from the server. I've added a picture which shows how the the two divs should be placed inside the td. The parent div has no specific style at the moment. I don't need to support old versions of IE. The site will be used primarily with latest versions of Firefox, Chrome and Safari.
layout http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5271/e49.png
You should be able to position the child div by using absolute positioning. Set the parent div to relative position, then child to absolute and bottom:0; You will then need to adjust the vertical align of the <td> elements if you want the parent div to also be at the bottom.
your css would be something like -
div#container{width:200px;height:200px;
border:1px solid #666;
position:relative;
}
div#bottom{
width:100px;height:100px;
border:1px solid #f00;
position:absolute;bottom:0;
}
here is a sample jsfiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/LRy6h/
and one where the parent div is also at the bottom - http://jsfiddle.net/LRy6h/1/
and one with resizeable (dynamic) heights - http://jsfiddle.net/LRy6h/2/
and another one to match your updated image - http://jsfiddle.net/LRy6h/3/
I found another way to solve the problem. I set the height of the corresponding tr as well as the height of the td and parent div to 100%. Here is a code snippet:
html + css:
<tr style="height: 100%;" ng-repeat="order in orders">
<td style="height: 100%;" >
<div style="height: 100%; position:relative;">
<span>PARENT - SOME TEXT</span>
<div style="position:absolute; bottom: 0;" >CHILD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
Sorry, but I have to write an answer instead of adding a comment (not enough reputation).
Sounds as if you are using a table for layout - that's no good idea! ;-)
Furthermore it would be helpful, if you post the relevant HTML and CSS code, or even better setup a jsFiddle.
How do you style the parent DIV?
There is no cross-browser way of setting it to the height of the TD (using CSS only). The "modern" way might be using 'flexbox'. But it depends on the Browsers (and versions) you have to support and the layout you would like to achieve.
Using 'position: relative' on table elements does also not work, because the behaviour for this is 'undefined'.
So to really give you some good advice there are some informations missing.
Related
I am having trouble make a jsfiddle that reproduces my problem, but I have one that demonstrates the basic layout I am dealing with.
http://jsfiddle.net/LurUM/4/
<div style="width: 73%; float: left;">
<!-- table here -->
</div>
<div style="width: 23%; float: right;">
<!-- sidebar here -->
</div>
I have a table on a page like this one, but it is not the correct width, it is much wider, colliding with the right side bar and going past it. I tried setting the table's width to 100% and going to a fixed table-layout. The width behaved exactly as I wanted it to, but then some of the texts in the cells of the table were spilling out and colliding with text in other columns. What I want is for the cells to become taller and the text to go onto a new line instead of spilling over, but if I understand correctly the fixed layout is preventing this.
Am I understanding the situation correctly? What's the solution? And why did the table have so much extra width to begin with?
Try this code:
<table style="table-layout: fixed; width: 100%">
<tr>
<td style="word-wrap: break-word">
LongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongLongWord
</td>
</tr>
</table>
The word-wrap: break-word property will wrap long words onto the next line and adjust words so that they don't break mid-word. When used in conjunction with table-layout: fixed; it will prevent the table bounds from overflowing.
If there is other content that must remain aligned with your table then keep the divs, otherwise I would suggest using id names for the tables, and moving all styles to the applicable style sheet. Your tables will then be getting their width setting directly from css instead of overflowing a parent container. I would also suggest that you use only one float, which ever is topmost on your page. This will keep the html cleaner i.e. easier to read and debug.
<div class="leftSide">
<table>html</table>
<p>other stuff that must be aligned with table</p>
</div>
<table id="rightTable">table that will float around other content</table>
<div>other content will continue to float until space is used up</div>
CSS
.leftSide {float: left; width: 40%; margin-right 20px; }
.leftSide table {width: 90%; }
.leftSide p {other css}
The html is easier to read this way, and specificity is used to drill down to the elements within the div, the table will be 90 percent of the width of its parent div and will no longer overflow the container (unless you put some giant image in there). Other CSS can be added including the word-wrap and break-word mentioned in other answers.
w3 has the definitive answers for CSS specificity and other inheritance issues like the one your facing http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors/
Here's the problem. I am trying to place some <div> elements beside each other. The width of the divs are not specified and are dependent on their content. I am using the CSS code below to position the <div>s beside each other:
#div{
height: 50px;
float:left;
margin-left:0;
}
I want the last <div>s width to cover the rest of the page (horizontally). With absolute positioning it is possible to set a left position for the last <div> and then use width:100% for the CSS style. But since I don't know the size of the other <div>s, I can not use this approach.
Can anyone help me with my case?
Depending on your browser support needs, you can either use a table-based layout (either with tables or via css) as #user2519211 has shown, or you can use flexbox, which will be much quicker and flexible (ha) in the long run.
You only need to set the container of the elements that you want to cover the page to have display: flex (with browser prefixes included)
Here's a JS Bin showing this: http://jsbin.com/uqepit/2/edit
From there you can do any number of things, including reordering, baseline shifting, etc. If flexbox is an option, Chris Coyer has done some great research on what's currently supported (and behind what syntax). You can see that here:
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
http://css-tricks.com/using-flexbox/
You can either use a table to do this:
<table>
<tr>
<td>asdf</td>
<td>asdf</td>
<td>asdf</td>
<td style="width: 100%;">asdf</td>
</tr>
</table>
Or the display: table css declaration if you must use divs:
<div style="display: table; width: 100%;">
<div style="display: table-cell;">asdf</div>
<div style="display: table-cell;">asdf</div>
<div style="display: table-cell;">asdf</div>
<div style="display: table-cell; width: 100%;">asdf</div>
</div>
I am trying to line this bottom shadow up as in the top shadow but I cannot seem to get the firgured out. The only time it collapses is when I remove the line-height or font-size much further down in the css file using Developer Toolbars but of course this affects everything else too. Here's my basic html structure:
<div class="banner-image">
<div class="banner-image-wrapper">
<div class="shadow-top"></div>
<a class="header-image">
<img />
</a>
<div class="shadow-bottom"></div>
</div>
</div>
On the tag, if I remove the font-size and line-height, everything collapses nicely on itself but I cannot seem to force this just on the tag.
I know this is going to be a ridiculous issue once it's been solved.
Thanks!
The answer is actually pretty simple, you just need to use some clever positioning & take advantage of the parent's box-model:
.banner-image{
position:relative;
}
.shadow-bottom{
position:absolute;
height: x;
bottom: -x;
}
Here's the formula you need:
Take the height of the bottom shadow ( some value x )
Then make sure the parent of that element has a position of 'relative' (~important~)
Make the position of the bottom shadow 'absolute'
Position it at the bottom minus the value of it's height ( -x )
Here's a jsFiddle illustrating the effect: http://jsfiddle.net/k7CmJ/
I know this is old, but for anybody else looking for an answer to this, where absolute positioning won't work, setting display:block on the img tag will get rid of that space:
.header-image > img {
display:block;
}
Normally an image is an inline block, and because it's inline, white-space around it is preserved.
Here is the problem: http://jsfiddle.net/3Kd3f/
And here is the exact same code, only with display:block added to the img tag: http://jsfiddle.net/3Kd3f/1/
I have a html page which looks like the following:
I want to display some text on the left pane, but the problem is that the text should be inside the oval shaped area only. How do I achieve this? Note that the oval shaped image is the background image, however if required, I can also use a <img> tag for it if it would help. One lame way is to use <p> tags with padding, but that is not an efficient way, so kindly suggest some good methods.
EDIT: HTML:
<div id="leftStage" class="rounded-corners">
<div id="questionDisp" align="center">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#leftStage {
position: relative;
width: 34%;
height:86%;
float: left;
}
#questionDisp {
display:none;
}
JS: (When the appropriate function is called: )
$("#questionDisp").fadeIn(1000);
$("#questionDisp").html(quesArr.q1); //data read from xml
EDIT: What I need is a div or something above the oval background, & the text should fit in it. I am getting the text from an xml file, so it is not that I have a fixed text size to be displayed
There's actually a pure CSS/XHTML code generator on csstextwrap that does exactly what you want.
EDIT:
The concept here is to float <div>'s on either side of your text so that your content is forced to "flow" in between them. By setting the width of your floated <div>'s, you can create a wide variety of cascading "stencils."
See concept illustrated here: fiddle
If it is background-image then use the position:absolute with proper margins (top and left), and set the width less than that the oval background-image. Then display property 'block'.
Maybe you could try the jQuery plugin Text Fill
also see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/688362/753676
I removed my answer since only the left float worked.
If you paste this code: it'll show you exactly how it works. I did a border-radius instead of creating a circle png.
<div style="width:250px;height:230px; border-radius:125px;background:#efefef;padding-top:20px; text-align:center">
The code for my<br /> fix isn't pretty but it should<br />work It's not automatic, but it<br /> does the job that you need it<br /> to do.
</div>
You have not shared any HTML, The working code is with some assumption
The HTML is,
<div id="main">
<div class="text">This is text</div>
</div>
Where div with classtext is the text container.
The CSS for same will be,
#main{
background-image:url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/bw2HK.png');
height:563px;
width:691px;
}
#main .text{
color:#FF0000;
width:240px;
text-align:center;
top:100px;
border:1px solid;
float:left;
position:absolute;
}
Here .text is the class that represent the text styling. The main part is position:absolute;. This will set the text div position to absolute. Now you can move the div above image div using top and left styles.
Please do review working example here
P.S. The border, color and other styles can be changed as per your need.
I've set float for one of my table's cells. But now I can't change vertical alignment of it's contents. By default, it moves the contents to the top of the div. I tried valign: middle, vertical-align: middle with no success. Here are the results:
With float: left
Without float: left
How can I align vertically cell's contents with float?
And markup looks like that
<td id="top_logo">
<a href="index.php">
<img src="core/design/img/logo.png" style="height:40px; padding:3px;"/>
</a>
</td>
<td id="name" valign="middle"><?php include "core/code/includes/pr.name.php";?></td>
I don't know if this will help (I've left Table based layouts behind now) , but to solve a similar issue using straight divs you can do the same using the line-height rule.
<div id="tableRow">
<div id="leftCell"><img src="mylogo" /></div>
<div id="middleCell"> </div>
<div id="rightCell">User Name Here</div>
</div>
Your CSS would be created to set widths/heights etc, which I guess you won't need for a table, and for your "rightCell", you'd set the line height to be the same as the row height:
#rightCell
{
height: 30px;
line-height: 30px;
}
What then happens is the text is centred vertically in the line space, which because it's the same as the height, gives the impression it's in the centre of the element too.
Now like I say, I've NEVER tried this on a table-cell, however any modern browser should let you change the display property to say block or inline-block using:
display: block;
Changing block for any of the other types where needed. This will set the display type of the cell to be like a div (or a span, or some other element) but I DON'T KNOW what effect it will have on the table.
Note also, that I'm not addressing older browsers Like IE6 here, to make this work across the board you may have to make some hacks for older browsers if support is required.