I have a div with a defined height and overflow set to hidden. If there are anchors in the overflow content the visible content of the div will shift up, meaning the content that I want to show will be pushed off the top of the div and the anchor will move to the center of the visible portion of the div. No scrollbars are shown (a good thing) so the content is kind of stuck there.
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="show-content">Click in the box and hit tab</div>
<div class="overflow-content">
Pesky Link
Pesky Link 2
</div>
</div>
CSS
.container{
height: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.show-content{
line-height: 100px;
height: 100px;
font-size: 16px;
}
.overflow-content a{
display: block;
margin-top: 40px;
line-height: 20px;
font-size: 16px;
}
Here is the fiddle. Click inside the box and hit tab to see what I mean
http://jsfiddle.net/2seLJ/1/
My use case for this is that I have a dropdown menu with links that I only want to show on when the user clicks 'show dropdown'. The visible content has an input box so if the user tabs from the input box the links are shown and there is no way to get back to the input box short of tabbing through the entire page. Can this only be solved by adding tabindex="-1" to all the links?
Alternative Solution
When this happens, the parent element that has overflow: hidden applied will scroll to put the focused element in view, and the scrollTop and/or scrollLeft properties become a positive integer, despite the fact that there is no scrollbar.
One way around this issue, that involves no extra markup or DOM manipulation, would be to have an event listener that resets the scroll position of the overflow: hidden parent back to 0.
jQuery Example:
$(document).on('focus', '.some-overflow-hidden-element > *', function() {
$(this).closest('.some-overflow-hidden-element').scrollTop(0).scrollLeft(0);
});
NOTE: If you are going to do this, make sure you are not destroying your accessibility in the process. This is not usually the best option, as the hidden elements can still be focused by things like tab.
It sounds like you want to prevent the tabstop behavior on that anchor. See this: Prevent tabstop on A element (anchor link) in HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="show-content">Click in the box and hit tab</div>
<div class="overflow-content">
Pesky Link
Pesky Link 2
</div>
</div>
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/2seLJ/2/
Alternatively
You can use jQuery to do this programatically for all links inside "overflow-content" divs:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('div.overflow-content a').attr('tabindex', '-1');
});
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/2seLJ/3/
Related
I would like to hide the scrollbar if the the user is not scrolling, meaning if the user scrolls, the scrollbar should appear (only the scrollbar not the scroll track), while if the user does not scroll it should disappear. I sort of had that setup for a long time, but than I made some changes to my page and now the page always shows the scrollbar (if there is more content than one page can cover). Unfortunately I don't know what I did to make this feature go away? I played around with overflow in the css, but overflow: hidden just removes all scrolling possibilities. Here is a fiddle which shows my current setup
https://jsfiddle.net/jsmnsLm7/ (please make the window big, so that you can see all of the features of my navbar setup)
as you can see I use
overflow: hidden
in the body and
overflow: scroll
in the main.
thanks for your help
carl
try following css:
overflow:auto;
It worked for me :)
This will do what you're looking for
http://rocha.la/jQuery-slimScroll
Or you could just show the scrollbar when you hover over the area using CSS only;
This worked for me;
<style>
#ID {
overflow-y: hidden;
}
</style>
#ID:hover, #ID:active, #ID:focus {
overflow-y: auto;
}
</style>
<div class="ID"></div>
There isn't a way to do this outside of a scripting languege as far as I know, but the JavaScript you use for this is super simple.
Start off with a CSS style of:
#ID {
overflow: hidden
}
Then in your div in the HTML use this command
<div id="ID" onmouseover="this.style.overflow='scroll'"
onmouseout="this.style.overflow='hidden'"
this will cause your scroll button to appear when the user hovers over the div, but then disappear again when the user hovers away from the div.
If you are using bootstrap, it is pretty simple - There is a default Scroll class to which you can apply the style overflow: auto.
<div class="Scroll" style="overflow: auto" >
.......
</div>
Based on this https://stackoverflow.com/a/40857678/15992537 answer I made this:
.categorias::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb {
height: 6px;
background: #ff3d1d;
border-radius: 10px;
visibility: hidden;
}
.categorias:active::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb {
visibility: visible;
}
this worked in my case because my div is draggable, so the thumb shows when i drag and move it, but with JS you probably can make it apear based on events like page scroll for example.
use overflow: auto
The overflow property has the following values:
visible - Default. The overflow is not clipped. The content renders outside the element's box
hidden - The overflow is clipped, and the rest of the content will be invisible
scroll - The overflow is clipped, and a scrollbar is added to see the rest of the content
auto - Similar to scroll, but it adds scrollbars only when necessary
I have a iPad frame and want to have a larger image behind it (the page content) that scrolls down as you scroll. My css is more complicated then the example in the fiddle here https://jsfiddle.net/vk0jk37v/ but I cant seem to get even this to work.
in my real webpage I want to scroll down normally until I get to this image, then I want the scroll to effect the "page content" in this image. After I want to allow the user to continue scrolling normally after the "page content" of the image ends.
Edit: I have updated the fiddle and it rough but essentially what I am looking for except when I set the iPad frame to be on top of the image I am unable to get the content to scroll. the reason I need it under is to keep the image together when resizing the window with out covering the "fixed nav" or black side lines. Any thoughts on this? and thank you Felk for the hint in the right direction
Edit2: the image attached is the context in which I am applying this.
example html
<div class="container">
<img class="frame" src="http://s11.postimg.org/44ejhu0jn/ipad_frame_780.png" />
<div class="inner">
<img src="http://s11.postimg.org/xtwbnx937/ipad_content_660.png" />
</div>
</div>
example css
.container {
width: 70%;
position: relative;
}
.frame {
/* position: absolute; */
width: 100%;
z-index: 100;
}
.inner {
height: 558px;
overflow: scroll;
position: absolute;
top: 14%;
left: 38px;
}
.inner img {
width: 92%;
z-index: -100;
}
Ok. I was trying to fix your fiddle but at the end I have changed too much.
I will explain thought what I would do if I wanted to do your project. (hopefully if I have understood your question well enough).
First at all I would position the image of the ipad at the background with position:fixed and negative z-index. Now we have the image NOT moving at all as the position is placed relative to the window and not to any element. And also we have the first part of your content over the image and scrolling nicely.
Then we focus on the right flow of the html elements when scrolling so basically there will be more content under the first (and later under the image). I have added another div with red background to illustrate better the problem.
The html would look something like this:
<div class="container">
<div class="outer">
<img class="" src="http://s11.postimg.org/xtwbnx937/ipad_content_660.png"/>
</div>
<div class="frame">
<img class="ipad" src="http://s11.postimg.org/44ejhu0jn/ipad_frame_780.png" />
</div>
<div class="moreContent"></div>
</div>
Now we focus just on separate the top content from the bottom content. To do this we just add a big margin-bottom to the first content. Now when scrolling once you reach the end of the first content the image at the background will show then after the margin is over the last content will start flowing over the image (which is what you don't want)
basically we have this: FIDDLE1
Now it's just time to do a very simple jquery (it's always simple if I can use it). We just need to give some orders to the browser so I have used this:
$(window).scroll(function () {
if ($(window).scrollTop() > 1127) {
$(".frame").addClass('relative');
$(".outer").addClass('no-margin');
}
else {
$(".frame").removeClass('relative');
$(".outer").removeClass('no-margin');
}
});
basically I'm telling the browser that when the scroll is higher than 1227px (height) to add a class to frame and another to outer and if you scroll back to remove the classes.
Then The class I add to outer will just remove the big margin between first and last divs while the class add to frame will just make the container of the image relative so the flow of the html is normal and the image will keep scrolling down with the rest of elements.
Of course the 1227px I choose is based on the jsfiddle images you provided but in your future projects it won't be too hard to find the real height of your first content justinpecting it with chrome or simillar. same with the big margin I added.
The rest of changes was to make the sizes correct and center all elements in the window with at 600px width.
Here you have the final FIDDLE
So, I have a number of buttons that will expand a div with some content below it.
I want to place them in an order so that the expanded content is right after the button that will expand it. This is because I want the tab order to be:
tab to a button and click it
tab through the expanded content
tab to the next button or tab to content below
To achieve this I've made the expanding content to be position absolute. So far so good. The problem now is that the content after the expanded container does not get pushed down.
See page and code here: http://niklasholmberg.se/temp/tab1.html
My first solution to this was to measure the height of the expanded div and add that as padding to a container that is before the content that should be pushed down.
See page and code here: http://niklasholmberg.se/temp/tab2.html
I don't quite like the solution and want something that does not require scripting to get the layout right.
Can I somehow make the div with class group also "wrap" the container that is positioned absolute?
Can I somehow position the expanded div in another way that doesn't use position absolute but achieves the same result?
Or maybe someone has a complete other solution to this case.
Thanks
Okay,
you can use position relative to expanded div, ie article in this case.
<article id="content1" class="expandarticle">
<h1>Content 1</h1>
aa
<button>bb</button>
<input type="text">
</article>
your css should be
.expandarticle {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #ccc;
display: table;
left: 0;
padding: 10px;
position: relative;
right: 0;
}
I was reading source code of an template and i got code
<html class="js" style="overflow: hidden">
My question is why would someone will apply overflow:hidden on html tag. what benefit it will give.`
You would use overflow:hidden when you have dynamic, responsive content, for the most part, or at least, that is what I use it for. For example, if you have a page with content that grows in height as you shrink the page, you may want to just hide whatever is not visible in the regular height of the div
It's most likely to remove all scroll bars.
When you set overflow: hidden, anything that is outside of the element is hidden, obviously. What this does when you attach it to the html element is hides everything that is not on the screen. The browser then sees that because everything that is not on the screen is hidden, there is nowhere to scroll to, so it hides the scroll bars.
Templates that want a clean, full browser look will remove scroll bars if they feel that there is nothing that the user should need to scroll to.
Overflow hidden can be used to clear floats http://jsfiddle.net/PRwVT/1/ add
.wrapper {
border: 1px solid;
padding: 3px;
background: red;
overflow: hidden;
}
to overwrite the .wrapper class in that fiddle and you will see what I mean. That being said the only element that could have floats and be a direct child of the html element is the body tag.
This disables the page from scrolling. So for example when you might open an overlay on a page and you would like to be able to scroll the overlay content but not scroll the page behind it at the same time.
In this case you might add a class onto the html element that sets 'overflow:hidden' when you click a button to open the modal, then remove that class when you click the close button on the modal.
The modal would have to have a fixed position for this to work.
I've got the following HTML group.
<div id="item-groups">
<!-- Section to select product types -->
<div class="item-group-button">
<!-- Item Group Selection Button -->
<h3>Beverage</h3>
</div>
<div class="item-group-button">
<!-- Item Group Selection Button -->
<h3>Tobacco</h3>
</div>
</div>
I've designed the following CSS for the above elements..
#item-groups{
height: 75px;
}
.item-group-button{
width:130px;
height:40px;
float:left;
margin:17px 0px 0px 20px;
border-radius:10px;
background:#4e5154;
}
.item-group-button h3{
padding:0px;
margin:8px 0px 0px 29px;
color:white;
}
How Can I design the CSS so that the item-groups div can act as a frame. To explain a little bit, The item-group-butons are loaded from a DB and the amount of elements are dependent on the number of DB records. when the elements exceed a certain limit, the excess elements go out of order. How can I stop this? I went through a method where making other elements position absolute then the needed element can act as a frame. but in my case that is not possible.
I tried removing the width limit of the item-groups element but no use!
Update:
As you can see the first images displayes correctly but the second images shows that with more buttons, other elements go out of the order. How can I fix this. I want the buttons to stick to one line rather than going to the second line.
When using html frames, when there is more elements to show, there will be a scroll bar! How can I use that functionality in a Div.
It's a simple CSS trick that can be done bu using the following codes.
for the parent element :
#item-groups{
height: 80px;
width: inherit;
overflow-x: scroll; <-- Make the scrolling horizontal
white-space: nowrap; <-- Handle the white space in the element
}
for the child element :
.item-group-button{
width: 130px;
height: 40px;
margin: 17px 0px 0px 20px;
border-radius: 10px;
background: #4e5154;
display: inline-block; <-- this will display the excess elements in a line
}
removing the float from the child element is necessary.
Thank you guys for your effort!
To get the scroll bar, you would use overflow-x: scroll; on the container, which allows the elements within to expand beyond its bounds, and creates a scroll bar when that happens.
I would like to point out that for a menu this might not be the best option. The scroll bar just won't mesh with the design well. I see two alternatives:
Re size buttons if the container can not fit them. Basically, you would define the max-width: property, and give them a percentage width:, thus all the buttons will look normal until there is overflow. Obviously this could be a problem with labeling. You may need to do overflow-x: hidden; on the label text to make it look right. Or try. . .
Create your own scrolling. If you are comfortable with a little JavaScript, you can use overflow-x: hidden; and position: relative; on the container, then have a "slider" inside of it that holds the buttons, and has position: absolute;. Then, on either end of the container would be hover-buttons, that would trigger JS to adjust the position of the slider, thus scrolling. This will only work if JS is enabled, though you can simply fall back to the overflow-x: scroll; method in such a case. The advantage here is that everything looks nice and uniform.
I generally try to stray away from forcing scroll bars, as each OS/browser can render them very differently. Now you can style scroll bars, as CSS3 provides a number of pseudo-elements to deal with them. Unfortunately browser support is sketchy, and requires special browser specific codes, which means it really isn't a very good option.