Capture LLDP packets using tcpdump - tcpdump

What is the format to capture LLDP packets on an interface using tcpdump?
I tried the following format but it dint work:
tcpdump -w test.pcap -i eth0 lldp -vv

tcpdump -w test.pcap -i eth0 ether proto 0x88cc
The Ethernet type for LLDP is 0x88cc, so the filter to see only LLDP packets is ether proto 0x88cc.
-v is useful when used with -w to print a short count of packets matched, like this: Got 11.
-w means "write the raw packets to the file, and don't print anything"; -v means "print verbosely", so ostensibly the arguments don't make sense together but with -w, the -v option provides some utility.

Related

Should I change source IP for tcpreplay to wlan?

I'm using tcpreplay and tcprewrite in openwrt.
And I want to resend captured packet to another node.
Bellow is my description.
External OpenWRT Computer1
eth0 wlan0
119.207.66.08 -----> 192.168.0.180 192.168.4.1 ------> 192.168.4.110
I captured packets from external using tcpdump.
tcpdump -i any -d 192.168.0.180 -w save_packet.pcap
And I tried rewriting packet's source IP and source MAC, destination IP and destination MAC.
tcprewrite -i save_packet.pcap -o rewrite_packet.pcap --enet-smac=[OpenWRT's MAC] \
--enet-dmac=[Computer1's MAC] -S 0.0.0.0/0:192.168.4.1 -D 192.168.0.180:192.168.4.110 -C
And replayed rewrite_packet.pcap
tcpreplay -i wlan0 rewrite_packet.pcap
Up to this, I received rewrite_packet in Computer1.
and Computer1 did response about this packet.
but not to External(119.207.66.08) but to OpenWRT(192.168.0.180)...
I want Computer1 response to External. But when I don't change Source IP, MAC, I cannot send to Computer1.119.207.66.08
please help me...

TCP Dump command for capturing only from 2 specific interfaces

Is there any commands or possibilities to use TCP dump command to listen from only 2 specific interfaces simultaneously as something like below, (instead of using "any" option)
tcpdump -i wlan0 AND -i eth0
or
tcpdump -i wlan0 eth0

How to use wireshark to capture mysql query sql clearly

Because we develop using remote Mysql server , so cannot check query sql easily, if use local server you can tail - f general_log_file to see which sql are executed when call some http interface. So I installed a wireshark to capture these query sql send from local. At first I use local mysql to verify it.
The capture filter is
then I executed two query sql in mysql terminal
select version();
select now();
but very disappointing I cannot find these two sql packets in wireshark
I only found these four packets.
But from a post I knew
To filter out the mysql packets you just use the filter ‘mysql‘ or ‘mysql.query != “”‘ when you only want packets that request a query. After that you can add a custom column with the field name ‘mysql.query’ to have a list of queries that where executed.
and the effect is like this
It's convenient to capture only query sql and very clearly displayed these query sql. So how could I use wireshark to implement this?
hi #Jeff S.
I tried your command, please see below
#terminal 1
tshark -i lo0 -Y "mysql.command==3"
Capturing on 'Loopback'
# terminal 2
mysql -h127.0.0.1 -u root -p
select version();
#result: nothing output in terminal 1
and tshark -i lo0 -Y "mysql.command==3" -T fields -e mysql.query is same with tshark -i lo -Y "mysql.command==3" also nothing output. But if I only use tshark -i lo0, it has output
Capturing on 'Loopback'
1 0.000000 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 57881 → 3306 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=16344 WS=32 TSval=1064967501 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1
2 0.000062 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 68 3306 → 57881 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=16344 WS=32 TSval=1064967501 TSecr=1064967501 SACK_PERM=1
3 0.000072 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 56 57881 → 3306 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=408288 Len=0 TSval=1064967501 TSecr=1064967501
4 0.000080 127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1 TCP 56 [TCP Window Update] 3306 → 57881 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=408288 Len=0 TSval=1064967501 TSecr=1064967501
...
You can use tshark and save to a pcap or just export the fields you're interested in.
To save to a pcap (if you want to use wireshark to view later):
tshark -i lo -Y "mysql.command==3" -w outputfile.pcap
tshark -i lo -R "mysql.command==3" -w outputfile.pcap
-R is deprecated for single pass filters, but it will depend on your version
-i is interface so replace that with whatever interface you are using (e.g -i eth0)
To save to a text file:
tshark -i lo -Y "mysql.command==3" -T fields -e mysql.query > output.txt
You can also use BPF filters with tcpdump (and wireshark pre cap filters). They are more complex, but less taxing on your system if you're capturing a lot of traffic.
sudo tcpdump -i lo "dst port 3306 and tcp[(((tcp[12:1]&0xf0)>>2)+4):1]=0x03" -w outputfile.pcap
NOTE:
*This looks for 03 (similar mysql.command==3) within the TCP payload.
**Since this is a pretty loose filter, I also added 3306 to restrict to only traffic destined for that port.
***The filter is based on your screenshot. I cannot validate it right now so let me know if it doesn't work.
Example Output:
Useful answers here:
https://serverfault.com/questions/358978/how-to-capture-the-queries-run-on-mysql-server
In particular: SoMoSparky's answer of:
tshark -T fields -R mysql.query -e mysql.query
and user1038090's answer of:
tcpdump -i any -s 0 -l -vvv -w - dst port 3306 | strings | perl -e '
while(<>) { chomp; next if /^[^ ]+[ ]*$/;
if(/^(SELECT|UPDATE|DELETE|INSERT|SET|COMMIT|ROLLBACK|CREATE|DROP|ALTER)/i) {
if (defined $q) { print "$q\n"; }
$q=$_;
} else {
$_ =~ s/^[ \t]+//; $q.=" $_";
}
}'
I had similar "problem"
Try to check your mysql ssl
Probably the ssl was turned on hence the traffic was encrypted
You can refer to this post to check the ssl: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/36776/how-can-i-verify-im-using-ssl-to-connect-to-mysql
I tried another tshark command from this post, and it could capture query sql from local to remote mysql server.
tshark -i en0 -d tcp.port==3306,mysql -T fields -e mysql.query 'port 3306'
Capturing on 'Wi-Fi'
select version()
select now()
select rand()
but it also output some blank lines between these sql. I tried below command want to remove blank line but failed
tshark -i en0 -d tcp.port==6006,mysql -Y "frame.len>10" -T fields -e mysql.query 'port 6006'
And unfortunately this command cannot support capturing query sql to local mysql(5.7.12).
tshark -i lo -d tcp.port==3306,mysql -T fields -e mysql.query 'port 3306'
Capturing on 'Loopback'
Nothing output except blank lines.
Wireshark tool supports MySQL protocol:
https://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/m/mysql.html
Then config wireshark
a.menu Analyze --> Decode as --> add "field=tcp_port value=3306 current=MySQL"
b.filter ‘mysql‘ or ‘mysql.query != “”‘

Simple way to verify valid BPF filter

What is the simplest way to verify a BPF filter as a normal user?
Easiest I have found is to run tcpdump with a small pcap file as input to the -r option.
$ tcpdump -r one_packet.pcap -F invalid_bpf.conf 2> /dev/null ; echo $?
1
$ tcpdump -r one_packet.pcap -F valid_bpf.conf 2> /dev/null ; echo $?
0
Returns standard error codes for invalid or valid BPF filters. This requires that I have a PCAP file to provide as input.
Is there a way to do this simple test without a PCAP file or special privileges?
IF you have a shell that has a built-in "echo" command that supports escape sequences, one somewhat-perverse way of doing this would be to do
echo -en "\0324\0303\0262\0241\02\0\04\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0377\0377\0\0\01\0\0\0"|\
./tcpdump -r - -F bpf.conf 2>/dev/null; echo $?
This worked for me on OS X 10.8, which has bash 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin12).
That "echo" command writes out a short pcap file with no packets in it, and with a link-layer header type of DLT_EN10MB. That will test whether the filter is valid for Ethernet; there are filters that are valid for some link-layer header types but not valid for others, such as "not broadcast", which is valid for Ethernet but not for PPP, so you'll need to choose some link-layer header type to use when testing.

kvm net devices sharing traffic

Using linux KVM/QEMU, I have a virtual machine with two NICs presented at the host as tap interfaces:
-net nic,macaddr=AA:AA:AA:AA:00:01,model=virtio \
-net tap,ifname=tap0a,script=ifupbr0.sh \
-net nic,macaddr=AA:AA:AA:AA:00:02,model=virtio \
-net tap,ifname=tap0b,script=ifupbr1.sh \
In the guest (also running linux), these are configured with different subnets:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:aa:aa:aa:00:01
inet addr:10.0.0.10 Bcast:10.0.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:aa:aa:aa:00:02
inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Routes only go to the expected places:
ip route list
default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 metric 100
10.0.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.10
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.10
But somehow don't seem to be treated by KVM as being connected to distinct networks.
If I trace the individual interfaces, they both see the same traffic.
For example, if I ping on the 10.0.0.0/16 subnet, ping -I eth0 10.0.0.1
And simultaneously trace the two tap interfaces with tcpdump , I see the pings coming through on both tap interfaces:
sudo tcpdump -n -i tap0a
10:51:56.308190 IP 10.0.0.10 > 10.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 867, seq 1, length 64
10:51:56.308217 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.10: ICMP echo reply, id 867, seq 1, length 64
sudo tcpdump -n -i tap0b
10:51:56.308190 IP 10.0.0.10 > 10.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 867, seq 1, length 64
10:51:56.308217 IP 10.0.0.1 > 10.0.0.10: ICMP echo reply, id 867, seq 1, length 64
That seems strange to me since it's pretty clear that the guest OS would have only actually sent this on the tap0a interface.
Is this expected behavior? Is there a way to keep the interfaces separate as I expected?
Is this some misconfiguration issue on my part?
Additional info, here are the two ifupbr0.sh and ifupbr1.sh scripts:
% cat ifupbr1.sh
#!/bin/sh
set -x
switch=br0
echo args = $*
if [ -n "$1" ];then
sudo tunctl -u `whoami` -t $1
sudo ip link set $1 up
sleep 0.5s
sudo brctl addif $switch $1
exit 0
else
echo "Error: no interface specified"
exit 1
fi
% cat ifupbr1.sh
#!/bin/sh
set -x
switch=br1
echo args = $*
if [ -n "$1" ];then
sudo tunctl -u `whoami` -t $1
sudo ip link set $1 up
sleep 0.5s
sudo brctl addif $switch $1
exit 0
else
echo "Error: no interface specified"
exit 1
fi
I see this problem even if I detach the "tap0b" interface from the br1. It still shows the traffic that I'd expect only for tap0a. That is, even when:
% brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.26a2d168234b no tap0a
br1 8000.000000000000 no
br2 8000.000000000000 no
It looks like I answered my own question eventually, but I'll document it for anyone else that hits this.
Evidently this really is the intended behavior of KVM for the options I was using.
At this URL:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking
I found:
QEMU previously used the -net nic option instead of -device DEVNAME
and -net TYPE instead of -netdev TYPE. This is considered obsolete
since QEMU 0.12, although it continues to work.
The legacy syntax to create virtual network devices is:
-net nic,model=MODEL
And sure enough, I'm using this legacy syntax. I thought the new syntax was just more flexible but it apparently actually has this intended behavior:
The obsolete -net syntax automatically created an emulated hub (called
a QEMU "VLAN", for virtual LAN) that forwards traffic from any device
connected to it to every other device on the "VLAN". It is not an
802.1q VLAN, just an isolated network segment.
The vlans it supports are also just emulated hubs, and don't forward out to the host at all as best I can tell.
Regardless, I reworked the QEMU options to use the "new" netdev syntax and obtained the behavior I wanted here.
What do you have in the ifupbr0.sh and ifupbr1.sh scripts? What bridging tool are you using? That is the important piece which segregates your traffic to the interfaces desired.
I've used openvswitch to handle my bridging stuff. But before that I used bridge-utils in Debian.
I wrote some information about bridge-utils at http://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/index.php?/archives/31-QEMUKVM-BridgeTap-Network-Configuration.html. I have other posts regarding what I did with bridging on the OpenVSwitch side of things.