I am Trying to do a Matrix Style Report , where the Rows get Populated from the Query.
Can we Give Values in the Column Field(These are Row Values from the Query) and the data gets Populated from the Query itself.
Why I want to do this is, the query does not show the row if the Value that I want to display in the column field on the report is Null. And Hence in return cannot Display it on the report if the Query itself Does not have the value.
Now there are No values for any member in the Group, the transfers field will not show up. But it has show with a value 0 in all the columns with Row Members.
EDIT:
My query returns a table like this . Parameter: 'YEAR'
Group Group_Items EMP_ID Status
Group1 Alpha 1 Continuing
Group1 Alpha 2 Continuing
Group1 Alpha 6 Continuing
Group1 Beta 8 First Time
Group1 Beta 11 Continuing
Group1 Gamma 14 First Time
Group1 Gammma 15 First Time
Group1 Gamma 10 First Time
Group1 Zeta 12 Continuing
Group1 Zeta 23 Continuing
Group1 Zeta 44 Continuing
Group1 Zeta 56 First Time
So I want to know how we can put this in the BI and count(Emp_ID) according to First Time, Transfer and Continuing. There is transfer value sometimes , but have to show it all the time and if no values come up we have to show it as 0
You could check for NULL/non-existent values in the transfer cell by using an expression like:
=IIf(IsNothing(Sum(Fields!Transfer.Value))
, 0
, Sum(Fields!Transfer.Value))
This will display 0 if there is are no values in that row/group or they're all NULL.
More logic can be added to the first section of the IIf statement if required.
Related
I'm not sure if SSRS is dumb, or I am (I'm leaning towards both).
I have a dataset that (as a result of joins etc) has some columns with the same values duplicated across every row (fairly standard database stuff):
rid cnt bid flg1 flg2
-------------------------------
4 2882 1 17 3
5 2784 1 17 3
6 1293 1 17 3
18 9288 2 4 9
20 762 2 4 9
Reporting based on cnt is straightforward enough. I can also make a tablix that shows the following:
bid flg1 flg2
------------------
1 17 3
2 4 9
(Where the tablix is grouped by Fields!bid.Value and the columns are just Fields!flg1.Value and Fields!flg2.Value respectively.)
What I can't figure out is how to display the sum of these values -- specifically I want to show that the sum of flg1 is 21 and the sum of flg2 is 12 -- not the sum of every row in the dataset (counting each value more than once).
(Note that I'm not looking for a sum of distinct values, as they may not be unique. I want a sum of one value from each bid group, because it's from a table join so they will always have the same value.)
If possible, I'd also like to be able to do a similar calculation at the top level of the report (not in any tablix); although I'd settle for hiding the detail row if that's the only way.
Obviously, Sum(Fields!flg1.Value) isn't the answer, as this either returns 51 (if on the first row inside the group) or 59 (if outside it).
I also tried Sum(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid") but this wasn't considered a valid scope.
I also tried Sum(First(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")) but apparently you're not allowed to sum first values for some weird reason (and may have had the same scope problem anyway).
Using Sum(Max(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")) does work, but feels wrong. Is there a better way to do this?
(Related: is there a good way to save the result of that calculation so that I can later also show a Sum of those totals without an even hairier expression?)
There are two basic ways to do this.
Do what you have already done (Sum(Max(Fields!flg1.Value, "bid")))
Sum the rendered values. To do this check the name of the cell containing the data you want (check it's properties) and then use something like =SUM(ReportItems!flg1.Value) where flg1 is the name of the textbox, which is not necessarily always the same name as the field.
I have two datasets.
One dataset1 has the fields MonthNumber, MonthData.
The other dataset2 has the fields MonthNumber, MonthBase.
I want to use both the MonthData field and MonthBase fields in one dataset to create a chart.
Please help me if anyone has an idea how I can combine both datasets to one or use one field of one dataset into another?
To combine the fields from two datasets without combining the datasets you need to use the LOOKUP function.
To replicate this I created the datasets...
DataSet1
--------
MonthNumber MonthData
------------ ----------
1 12
2 23
3 11
4 8
DataSet 2
---------
MonthNumber MonthData
------------ ----------
1 10
2 15
3 20
4 25
Create a chart as you would normally for DataSet1.
Set the values to MonthData, and the Category Groups to MonthNumber
Then add a new Series in the Values area, and set the expression to
=Lookup(Fields!MonthNumber.Value, Fields!MonthNumber.Value,
Fields!MonthBase.Value, "DataSet2")
This effectively states join The ID fields DataSet1.MonthNumber, to DataSet2.MonthNumber, returning me DataSet2.MonthBase
The design will look like this
And the output like this
See also the reference here from which I derived this answer
I am working on a ssrs report with column grouping. the followin is my scenario.
Matrix 1:
ID 2012 2013
1 20 40
1 30 50
Total 50 90
Matrix 2:
ID 2012 2013
1 60 70
1 60 80
Total 120 150
I need the sum of matrix1 and matrix2 like below:
ID 2012 2013
1 170 240
But I got the result like :
ID 2012 2013
1 410 410
I have applied column grouping in all the 3 matrices and gave the expression to get sum for matrix 3 as: =Sum(Fields!amount1.Value, "dsmatrix1") + Sum(Fields!Tamount1.Value, "dsmatrix2")
Please help me to get a solution for this.
Thanks!
I think I know what's going on. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Based on what I'm seeing, I'm guessing that Matrix 1 and Matrix 2 only have three fields each, an ID field, an amount field (being "amount1" or "Tamount1"), and a year field.
Your column grouping is manipulating the display of the data to show all values broken out by year. This works fine when looking at data from a single dataset. However, your formula is specifying that the sum of everything in the Amount1 field of dsmatrix1 and the Tamount1 field of dsmatrix2 should be added. This does not take into account the column grouping. Your expression is essentially taking all of the values from both datasets and adding them together.
Not knowing more about your query structure or how the data is filtered, my best guess is that you need another SQL dataset. In this case, you would take the queries from your two previous datasets and union them with the "Union All" command. Note that you will want to use Union All and not just Union. More on that here: What is the difference between UNION and UNION ALL?
Your end result should look something like this:
--This will be your dsmatrix1 query copied and pasted
Select ...
Union All
--This will be your dsmatrix2 query copied and pasted
Select ...
--Place one single Order by clause at the bottom
Order by ...
Note: for your two queries to be unioned properly, you'll need to make sure that each have the same number of fields, each with the same data types. Then you can point your third matrix to the new dataset.
Hope that helps!
I would like help with sql query code to push the consequent data in a specific column down by a row.
For example in a random table like the following,
x column y column
6 6
9 4
89 30
34 15
the results should be "pushed" down a row, meaning
x column y column
6 null or 0 (preferably)
9 6
89 4
34 30
SQL tables have no inherent concept of ordering. Hence, the concept of "next row" does not make sense.
Your example has no column that specifies the order for the rows. There is no definition of next. So, what you want to do cannot be done.
I am not aware of a simple way to do this with the way you are showing the table being formatted. If your perhaps added two consecutively numbered integer fields that provide row number and row number + 1 values, you could join the table to itself and get that information.
After taking a backup of you table:
Make a PHP function that will:
- Load all values of Y into an array
- Set Y = 0 (MYSQL UPDATE)
- load the values back from PHP array to MYSQL
compliment of the day.
Based on the previous feedback received,
After creating a Ticket sales database in MS Access. I want to use a single form to Query the price of a particular ticket at a particular month and have the price displayed back in the form in a text field or label.
Below are sample tables and used query
CompanyTable
CompID CompName
A Ann
B Bahn
C Can
KK Seven
- --
TicketTable
TicketCode TicketDes
10 Two people
11 Monthly
12 Weekend
14 Daily
TicketPriceTable
ID TicketCode Price ValidFrom
1 10 $35.50 8/1/2010
2 10 $38.50 8/1/2011
3 11 $20.50 8/1/2010
4 11 $25.00 11/1/2011
5 12 $50.50 12/1/2010
6 12 $60.50 1/1/2011
7 14 $15.50 2/1/2010
8 14 $19.00 3/1/2011
9 10 $40.50 4/1/2012
Used query:
SELECT TicketPriceTable.Price
FROM TicketPriceTable
WHERE (((TicketPriceTable.ValidFrom)=[DATE01]) AND ((TicketPriceTable.TicketCode)=[TCODE01]));
In MS Access, a mini boxes pops up to enter the parameters when running the query. How can I use a single form to enter the parameters for [DATE01] and [TCODE01]. and the price displayed in the same form in a textfield (For further calculations).
Such as 'Month' field equals to input to [DATE01] parameter
'Ticket Code' equals to input for [TCODE01] parameter
Textfield equals to output of the query result (Ticket price)
If possible, I would like to use only the Month and Year in this format MM/YYYY.The day is not necessarry. How can I achieve it in MS Access?
If any question, please don't hesitate to ask
Thanks very much for your time and anticipated feedback.
You can refer to the values in the form fields by using expressions like: [Forms]![NameOfTheForm]![NameOfTheField]
Entering up to 300 different types of tickets
Answer to your comment referring to Accessing data from a ticket database, based on months in MS Access)
You can use Cartesian products to create a lot of records. If you select two tables in a query but do not join them, the result is a Cartesian product, which means that every record from one table is combined with every record from the other.
Let's add a new table called MonthTable
MonthNr MonthName
1 January
2 February
3 March
... ...
Now if you combine this table containing 12 records with your TicketTable containing 4 records, you will get a result containing 48 records
SELECT M.MonthNr, M.MonthName, T.TicketCode, T.TicketDes
FROM MonthTable M, TicketTable T
ORDER BY M.MonthNr, T.TicketCode
You get something like this
MonthNr MonthName TicketCode TicketDes
1 January 10 Two people
1 January 11 Monthly
1 January 12 Weekend
1 January 14 Daily
2 February 10 Two people
2 February 11 Monthly
2 February 12 Weekend
2 February 14 Daily
3 March 10 Two people
3 March 11 Monthly
3 March 12 Weekend
3 March 14 Daily
... ... ... ...
You can also get the price actually valid for a ticket type like this
SELECT TicketCode, Price, ActualPeriod AS ValidFrom
FROM (SELECT TicketCode, MAX(ValidFrom) AS ActualPeriod
FROM TicketPriceTable
WHERE ValidFrom <= Date
GROUP BY TicketCode) X
INNER JOIN TicketPriceTable T
ON X.TicketCode = T.TicketCode AND X.ActualPeriod=T.ValidFrom
The WHERE ValidFrom <= Date is in case that you entered future prices.
Here the subquery selects the actually valid period, i.e. the ValidFrom that applies for each TicketCode. If you find sub-selects a bit confusing, you can also store them as query in Access or as view in MySQL and base a subsequent query on them. This has the advantage that you can create them in the query designer.
Consider not creating all your 300 records physically, but just getting them dynamically from a Cartesian product.
I let you put all the pieces together now.
In Access Forms you can set the RecordSource to be a query, not only a table. This can be either the name of a stored query or a SQL statement. This allows you to have controls bound to different tables through this query.
You can also place subforms on the main form that are bound to other tables than the main form.
You can also display the result of an expression in a TextBox by setting the ControlSource to an expression by starting with an equal sign
=DLookUp("Price", "TicketPriceTable", "TicketCode=" & Me!cboTicketCode.Value)
You can set the Format of a TextBox to MM\/yyyy or use the format function
s = Format$(Now, "MM\/yyyy")