img {
max-width: 100% !important; /* Set a maxium relative to the parent */
width: auto\9 !important; /* IE7-8 need help adjusting responsive images */
height: auto; /* Scale the height according to the width, otherwise you get stretching */
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0;
display: block;
-ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic;
}
The above CSS is taken from Twitter Bootstrap which allows for responsive images. The only problem is this has no effect in Firefox and IE.
In the following case:
<div class="row-fluid">
<div id="logo" class="span4">
<img src="<?= get_template_directory_uri() ?>/assets/images/logo.png" />
</div>
</div>
http://dev.netcoding.net/lowsglass/about-us/ - Here is a page showing the problem.
In Firefox or IE, shrink the page to below 432px and you will see that the images do not follow max-width anymore (while above 764px they do).
How can I fix this – without using image containers – to make responsive images work in Firefox and IE?
I've struggled a lot with Firefox / IE and max-width, specifically when on elements of display: inline-block. I use the CSS only solution below to add my fixes.
// Styles for Firefox
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
#logo img {
width: 100%;
}
}
// Styles for IE10
#media screen and (-ms-high-contrast: active), (-ms-high-contrast: none) {
#logo img {
width: 100%;
}
}
Firefox fails to scale images with max-width/height if width/height is not defined. So there are two ways.
1. Set width and max-width:
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
2. Use max-width and max-height in vw and vh:
max-width: 90vw;
What means the image will have max 90% of visible width. Have fun!
Instead of width:auto, try width:100%.
Best,
Cynthia
Actually, the problem isn't the img tag being affected, but the span* containers. When Bootstrap Responsive gets to a certain point, it turns off floating, and sets width to 100%. When that container pops back to 100%, the child within (your img tag) does exactly what you told it to do, which is expand to max-width of 100%.
Look at this from responsive.css... above the declaration in the stylesheet, you'll see this:
/* Landscape phone to portrait tablet */
#media (max-width: 767px) {
[class*="span"], .uneditable-input[class*="span"], .row-fluid [class*="span"] {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
display: block;
float: none;
margin-left: 0;
width: 100%;
}
That is what is causing the img to "resize" ... its container no longer shrinks past a certain point, due to the way Bootstrap's responsive styles are set up.
To block this, you could either modify the Bootstrap stylesheet (in which case you will have to redo the change anytime you want to update your Bootstrap files), or you can, in your own stylesheet, do something like the following:
/* Landscape phone to portrait tablet */
#media (max-width: 767px) {
[class*="span"], .uneditable-input[class*="span"], .row-fluid [class*="span"] {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
display: inline-block;
float: left;
}
That will put the floating back, however, you're still left with width as an issue, as the default Bootstrap style at that screen-width is trying to set width to 100%. You could try setting width:auto and then hopefully the widths for each specific span-step (.span1, .span2, etc.) will be allowed to take over, but you'll really have to test it out to see what is going to work best for your situation.
Bumped in similar problem after implementing large amount of site design using Bootstrap framework and only Chrome for debug... Biiig mistake © :) It appeared, that cool fluid Bootstrap styles didn't work for images in IE and Mozilla at all. All images were not resized and had original width, sometimes much wider than I've expected to see...
I had a lot of similar places with two columns of divs - span6 for left column and span6 for right one (those are styles for fluid Bootstrap grid). Sometimes in those columns images were placed between text lines, and as you see, images didn't resize well in IE\Mozilla and all of the cool design became not good at all :(
After googling and trying some advices from github I've decided to use jQuery :) I added class to column container (imageContainer for fluid span12 row), and added classes 50perc for images which I needed to resize properly (size of each image should be 50% of container's size). And here's the code:
$(function(){
var cont = $('.imageContainer');
$('.50perc').each(function(i, el){
$(el).width(cont.width() / 2);
});
p.s. Actually it will be much effective to use this function in window.resize event handler :)
Ran into the same problem and still haven't found a fix or CSS only hack, except for forcing width: 100% at small browser sizes, when the natural width of the image will usually be larger than the width of the page (here I've assumed I don't have any images narrower than 480px):
img
{
width: auto;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 480px), only screen and (max-device-width: 480px) and (orientation: portrait)
{
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
/* Firefox doesn't respect max-width in certain situations */
img
{
width: 100%;
}
}
But that will still force images that have naturally smaller widths to get blown up, which is bad. So at that point, if Javascript is feasible or already in use, I would add this to hit every image:
PSEUDO CODE:
$('img').css('max-width', this.actualFullSizeWidth + 'px');
...which should override the CSS max-width rules, and guarantee the image doesn't get larger than it's actual width.
Responsive images for Firefox, IE, Chrome. Simple solution that works in Firefox
<div class="article"><img></div>
.article {background: transparent 0% 0% / 100% auto;}
.article img {max-width: 100%;}
Related
I am using wordpress to develop a website called littleboyauciton.com. I added an image at the top right of my header, and added css code:
img.sslsecure {
max-width: 40%;
min-height: auto;
}
This is displayed normally on my computer screen. But when I use chrome to simulate the ipad screen, the picture cannot be displayed on the header.
I added the css code corresponding to the screen in css, but it still has no any effect:
#media only screen and (max-width: 768px) {
img.sslsecure {
background-attachment: scroll;
}
It is doing exactly what it should do, it takes up 40% of the width of it's parent div. When you inspect the element, you can see that the parent actually almost takes up 100% of the screen width.
You can fix this by adding extra css for different screen sizes. This can be done in the theme you are using.
Or you can add extra css and write a media query yourself.
See:
https://www.w3schools.com/css/css_rwd_mediaqueries.asp
Edit.
I just saw that you've tried adding a media query. You did it right, yet you have to change the width of the element or the parent element. background-attachment: scroll; only applies to elements with a background-image. Since this is an img, it doesn't apply to this element.
Let'say, I don't want the image to be wider than 100px:
#media only screen and (max-width: 768px) {
img.sslsecure {
max-width: 100px;
}
}
Codepen - https://codepen.io/spaOyst_/pen/bGWagKG
I am attempting to rebuild a site by going mobile-first but I am struggling with what I think is the responsiveness/resizing of the images or the other sections not resizing when browser width is increased, but the images grow quite large and overlap the section below.
I have tried adjusting the width and height of the images, anchor tags and the section below the images
If anybody has any ideas of what the cause would be, I would really appreciate the help.
At line 246 of your CSS, you've set the height of the lightbox section to 700px and this non-responsive height is causing problems at viewport widths of about 490 - 760px.
It isn't clear to me why you even need to see the height of this lightbox section, but if it's necessary, what about adding an extra breakpoint?
#media (max-width: 490px) {
.lightbox-section {
height: 700px;
}
}
#media (max-width: 760px) {
...
.lightbox-section {
padding: 63px 10px;
/* height: 700px; */ Either comment this out or adjust as needed
text-align: center;
}
...
}
https://codepen.io/panchroma/pen/QWvaMEd
I can see that you've set a pixel height for the index-services section as well but the image links are broken so I can't see if there's an issue in this section as well or not.
So first I am doing freecodecamp and this is my Pen I am working on https://codepen.io/chrisalta94/pen/JwdBEq
As you can see the image and the space around it is too big, how can I reduce the size so it will look better, and if anyone knows how can I make it responsive?
CSS
#header-img {
display: flex;
height: 100%;
background:black;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100vh;
margin: auto;
}
You need to add a height attribute to your tag.
For example:
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/73/fb/7f/73fb7fb7b9cd1833e16bb4fcef17a962.png"
alt="Adidas Logo" height="200">
This way you can choose a particular height that works for you.
As for making it responsive, this is usually done by setting several media queries at different widths, that change the design when it breaks down. So this usually includes a lot of experimenting with when the design starts to break down.
Alternatively, what I often find just as effective and much simpler, is using the orientation: portrait media query, like so:
#media (orientation: portrait) {
/* CSS that needs to change here */
}
This will change the specific CSS on every viewport in portrait orientation. This includes phones and tablets for example, but also desktop browsers windows that are resized to a portrait orientation!
The "rh" logo on my site is responsive vertically, ie fits perfectly to a tall thin window, but does not resize to a wide short window. Could anyone help me make the logo responsive to both width and height?
here is the website... (takes a bit to load up)
http://rhwebdesign.co.uk/
Here is my CSS:
img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
To be very specific and address your questions about the logo, consider setting the max-height relative to the window's height.
You have:
img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.hero-logo img {
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
padding: 20px;
}
In order to scale the logo, add in to the latter block:
max-height: 100vh;
This sets the images maximum height to 100% of the viewport height, which appears to be what you desire here. Note that there is some text beneath it, which is not displayed, since it is text wrapped in an H5. These two lines are 68px tall (40px padding plus 28px for the text). So, you can adjust the above to:
max-height: calc(100vh - 68px);
It looks like in landscape mode (480x320), there is a script not calculating the size of margin correctly.
<div class="container hero-content" style="margin-top: -97.5px;">
have a look in main.js for this function:
heroContent.css({
"margin-top" : topContentMargin+"px"
});
Which is this:
topContentMargin = (heroHeight - contentHeight) / 2,
heroHeight = windowHeight,
contentHeight = heroContent.height(),
I haven't really looked into why it is calulating it incorrectly. My guess is that heroContent is too high for landscape mode because the image becomes 441px high with the media query max-width:100%. So it tries to add a negative margin to compensate.
My advice would be to remove the jQuery calculation of the hero content sizing and apply sizes using css and media queries only.
Edit:
You need to be more specific with your css. Learn some more about css specifity. You should include your largest media queries at the top, so the smaller ones will take precedence at the bottom. Makes things easier. Also IMHO, I wouldn't use queries for anything larger than iPad. ie. 1024px. Although you should always test on newer devices if possible.
You will need to specify the height of the video for each specific device size. I can't tell now, but maybe jquery was determining the section heights, so now the css is determining the video height.
So at the bottom of your style sheet, try this.
div#bgVideo.skrollable.skrollable-between video#video_background {
min-height:940px !important;
}
#media (max-width: 480px) {
.hero-logo img {
max-width:55%; /*looks nice at 480 */
padding:20px;
}
div#bgVideo.skrollable.skrollable-between video#video_background {
min-height:320px !important;
}
}
#media (max-width: 320px) {
div#bgVideo.skrollable.skrollable-between video#video_background {
min-height:480px !important;
}
}
But Richard, to be honest, you should be troubleshooting and testing the design yourself. How will you ever learn if you don't try. Remember, firebug is your best friend :)
I have a responsive site which displays form buttons at the standard width at all monitor sizes, down to 481px, where after the width of the button is set to 100% of the containing div.
This works fine in all modern browsers with the following code:
#media screen and (max-width: 480px)
.button {
width: 100%;
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 769px)
.button {
width: initial;
}
As the CSS is mobile-first, "width: initial;" is resetting the button to the original size, exactly as I would like.
However IE8 doesn't recognise this, so it thinks "width: 100%;" is the button's width for all monitor sizes, causing the button to always span the page width. How would you get around this other than giving an absolute pixel value?
IE8 does not respect media queries you will need a polyfill script to add this functionality.
https://github.com/scottjehl/Respond