I have been working successfully so far with a database that has a split backend. During development the front and backends have been in the same drive, but now the backend is on a network drive in preparation for multiple users.
My issue is that whenever I now open a linked table (or form that reads data from it) from the frontend, the first table is always slow to load. And if I then close that table and open another table, that's also slow to to load. But if I open any table and then open a second table, the second table and any others thereafter is fast.
It seems it may be that it's related to the locking file having to be created, and then closing when the table closes, meaning there's a delay when that file has to be created again for the next table.
Is there way to create the record-locking file on application launch so that it remains available throughout a user's session?
Thank you
Yes, this is a wide known problem and for years we suggest you adopt what is called a persistent connection.
If you are doing development, then often what one can do is simple click on a table (any linked table) to open it, now you can work, design forms, and not experience huge delays during the development process.
While the above fixes the delays during and when developing, the SAME concept and approach can be used for when you run your application.
Like every applcation, you no doubt have some startup code. This code can go in the first form that you launch on applcation startup.
So, you can create a standard code module. Say it is Module1. In that module, you can place this code:
Option Compare Database
Option Explicit
Public rstPersist As DAO.Recordset
Sub MyOpenPersist()
' opens a back end table to force and keep
' open the connection for greatly improved
' speed
Set rstPersist = CurrentDb.OpenRecordset("tblDefaults")
End Sub
And then in the FIRST form you launch on startup, in the on-load even, you can include this code:
Call MyOpenPersist
Now, this will open a table to a "global" rstPersit recordset.
Now, and from that point on-wards, since the locking file has been created (which takes a long time as you note), then the applcation, forms, and everything will now run without that delay.
It does not matter which table you choose to open - only requirement is that the table is a linked table, since you can (and might) have some local tables in the front end for things like settings or whatever. So, in this case, I open up a table called defaults (and it great to have that table open, since it is a 1 record table with default things like City and default area code for phone numbers etc.). So, I in effect kill two birds with one stone so to speak, since I need a table of defaults for many things in the applcation anyway.
I'm facing a strange issue in MS Access (2016). When I split my database into a frontend and a backend, and encrypt the backend, my frontend fails to open.
As I open my frontend after splitting the database and encrypting the backend, I should see linked tables, which should not open until I relink them by entering the encryption password. Instead, I'm always taken to Access's 'file open' menu (Image), as if the frontend never existed! As soon as I decrypt the backend, the frontend starts working normally, displaying the linked tables.
I tried splitting another database downloaded off the internet, and the issue did not occur. So I've singled the issue down to my database file. But I don't have a development background, so I have no idea how to fix it, or what could be going wrong.
There is some VBA code in the database, which is mostly copied off the internet. I tried searching for a similar issue, but with no luck :(.
Please help!
The database files (FE, BE and unsplit) can be downloaded here.
I just fiddled around and I think I found the answer to solve this issue.
If you have used the code to block the bypass shift key and mouse click to get access to your backend database then the following steps will work for you to fix this issue.
Go to your unsplit database and and go to table view. Then click on All Access Objects Section above the tables and click on option NAVIGATION OPTIONS then tick the boxes "Show hidden objevts " and "Show System Objects"
Now go back to your table list and try to find your hidden table that holds the code to block shift bypass key, in my case my table is cold "UsysRibbons" and then you have to delete it.
Then split your database and you will be able to open your front end database even if your back end database is relocated to other folder.
But if you still want to retain block shift bypass key functionality you have to go to your unsplit database copy this "UsysRibbons" table that holds the code to block shift bypass code and paste it to only to your split back end database don't link it to your split front end, and then everything will work as usual.
If this is not the issue why you can't enter your front end when back end is relocated to other folder then you have to look at all of those hidden system tables try to delete them one by one to figure out which table is the parasite table that causes problem.
Good luck to everyone in the future who encounters the same issue.
Thanks
When working with an Access .accdb, every time I open the file, I see that the 'date modified' in the filesystem changes to now. This makes me nervous. I want it to stop.
I can't be the only person who has ever saved a working db, and opened it a few weeks or months later to an error. Sure, I probably have backups, and backups to my backups, and table data saved separately from my code, and version history taking up multiple gigabytes of the filesystem or in emails or where ever... but it still makes my heart jump a little whenever I see the date modified update on open, when I haven't touched the DB in some time.
Have I flipped a switch somewhere that makes it do this? Is this expected behavior? How can I stop it?
To replicate this, create a new accdb, save and close. Put something in it, nothing, or close it only a second after creating it. Open an windows explorer for the directory the accdb is saved in, and note the date modified value. Open the file at least a minute after the displayed date modified file. alt-tab back to the explorer window, and you see the date modified has changed.
That's the default behaviour, even with a native Access MDB file. They don't work like a normal file that you have to explicitly modify to update the date - it does some things when you open it up, whether you want it to or not.
Just did a quick test - if you set the database file to read-only, it doesn't update itself.
I construct my MS Access Applications into front end and a back end. The Front end database is made up of all the the application objects like the Queries, Forms, Reports, and Modules. The back end database is made up of the tables and links to other data sources.
Many people consider this a Microsoft Access Generally Accepted Best Practice.
So much so that Microsoft includes a Wizard to do the split for you. Shown here
10 Reasons to Split an Access Database
Once the database has been split, It makes is a whole lot more manageable. The Front End can be marked read-only. The Back End remains writable.
There are two cases where Access autosaves changes:
When the user enters data into a form, this data is autosaved to the linked table
When the form developer modifies a query, form design view, table definition, etc. these changes are autosaved after exiting the editor
I'd like to know how to change the second point so that Access only saves the file if I hit CTRL+S, similar to Word and Excel.
Though Access does ask if I want to save changes when I exit (for example) the form design view, the only way to test changes is to exit design view, which saves the file and clears the undo button. It can be very inconvenient because I have to undo everything manually if I want to revert changes.
I've found threads discussing older versions of Access, but nothing for Access 2013. Is there a way to do this?
Forms, Reports, and Queries can be tested without saving - just switch view.
Tables cannot. If you wish to check out design changes, first create a backup of the database or at least the table.
I have created an MS Access 2003 application, set up as a split front-end/back-end configuration, with a user group of about five people. The front end .mdb sits on a network file server, and it contains all the queries, forms, reports, and VBA code, plus links to all the tables in the back end .mdb and some links to ODBC data sources like an AS/400. The back end sits on the same network file server, and it just has the table data in it.
This was working well until I "went live" and my handful of users started coming up with enhancement requests, bug reports, etc. I have been rolling out new code by developing/testing in my own copy of the front-end .mdb in another network folder (which is linked to the same back-end .mdb), then posting my completed file in a "come-and-get-it" folder, alerting the users, and they go copy/paste the new front-end file to their own folders on the network. This way, each user can update their front end when they're at a 'stopping point' without having to boot everyone out at once.
I've found that when I'm developing now, sometimes Access becomes extremely slow. Like, when I am developing a form and attempt to click a drop-down on the properties box, the drop-down arrow will push in, but it will take a few seconds before the list of options appears. Or there's tons of lag in selecting & moving controls on a form. Or lots of keyboard lag.
Then, at other times, there's no lag at all.
I'm wondering if it's because I'm linked to the same back end as the other users. I did make a reasonable effort to set up the queries, forms, reports etc. with minimal record locking, if any at all, depending on the need. But I may have missed something, or perhaps there is some other performance issue I need to address.
But I'm wondering if there is an even better way for me to set up my own development back-end .mdb, so I can be testing my code on "safe" data instead of the same live data as the rest of the users. I'm afraid that it's only a matter of time before I corrupt some data, probably at the worst possible moment.
Obviously, I could just set up a separate back-end .mdb and manually reconfigure the table links in the front end every time, using the Linked Table Manager. But I'm hoping there is a more elegant solution than that.
And I'm wondering if there are any other performance issues I should be considering in this multi-user, split database configuration.
EDIT: I should have added that I'm stuck with MS Access (not MS-SQL or any other "real" back end); for more details see my comment to this post.
If all your users are sharing the front end, that's THE WRONG CONFIGURATION.
Each user should have an individual copy of the front end. Sharing a front end is guaranteed to lead to frequent corruption of the shared front end, as well as odd corruptions of forms and modules in the front end.
It's not clear to me how you could be developing in the same copy of the front end that the end users are using, since starting with A2000, that is prohibited (because of the "monolithic save model," where the entire VBA project is stored in a single BLOB field in a single record in one of the system tables).
I really don't think the problems are caused by using the production data (though it's likely not a good idea to develop against production data, as others have said). I think they are caused by poor coding practices and lack of maintainance of your front end code.
turn off COMPILE ON DEMAND in the VBE options.
make sure you require OPTION EXPLICIT.
compile your code frequently, after every few lines of code -- to make this easy, add the COMPILE button to your VBE toolbar (while I'm at it, I also add the CALL STACK button).
periodically make a backup of your front end and decompile and recompile the code. This is accomplished by launching Access with the /decompile switch, opening your front end, closing Access, opening your front end with Access (with the SHIFT key held down to bypass the startup code), then compacting the decompiled front end (with the SHIFT key held down), then compiling the whole project and compacting one last time. You should do this before any major code release.
A few other thoughts:
you don't say if it's a Windows server. Linux servers accessed over SAMBA have exhibited problems in the past (though some people swear by them and say they're vastly faster than Windows servers), and historically Novell servers have needed to have settings tweaked to enable Jet files to be reliably edited. There are also some settings (like OPLOCKS) that can be adjusted on a Windows server to make things work better.
store your Jet MDBs in shares with short paths. \Server\Data\MyProject\MyReallyLongFolderName\Access\Databases\ is going to be much slower reading data than \Server\Databases. This really makes a huge difference.
linked tables store metadata that can become outdated. There are two easy steps and one drastic one to be taken to fix it. First, compact the back end, and then compact the front end. That's the easy one. If that doesn't help, completely delete the links and recreate them from scratch.
you might also consider distributing an MDE to your end users instead of an MDB, as it cannot uncompile (which an MDB can).
see Tony Toews's Performance FAQ for other generalized performance information.
1) Relink Access tables from code
http://www.mvps.org/access/tables/tbl0009.htm
Once I'm ready to publish a new MDE to the users I relink the tables, make the MDE and copy the MDE to the server.
2) I specifically created the free Auto FE Updater utility so that I could make changes to the FE MDE as often as I wanted and be quite confident that the next time someone went to run the app that it would pull in the latest version. For more info on the errors or the Auto FE Updater utility see the free Auto FE Updater utility at http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/autofe.htm at my website to keep the FE on each PC up to date.
3) Now when working on site at a clients I make the updates to the table structure after hours when everyone is out of the system. See HOW TO: Detect User Idle Time or Inactivity in Access 2000 (Q210297) http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=210297 ACC: How to Detect User Idle Time or Inactivity (Q128814) http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=128814
However we found that the code which runs on the timer event must be disabled for the programmers. Otherwise weird things start happening when you're editing code.
Also print preview would sometimes not allow the users to run a menu item to export the report to Excel or others. So you had to right click on the Previewed report to get some type of internal focus back on the report so they could then export it. This was also helped by extending the timer to five minutes.
The downside to extending the timer to five minutes was if a person stays in the same form and at the same control for considerable parts of the day, ie someone doing the same inquiries, the routine didn't realize that they had actually done something. I'll be putting in some logic sometime to reset this timer whenever they do something in the program.
4) In reference to another person commenting about scripts and such to update the schema see Compare'Em http://home.gci.net/~mike-noel/CompareEM-LITE/CompareEM.htm. While it has its quirks it does create the VBA code to update tables, fields, indexes and relationships.
Use VBA to unlink and re-link your tables to the new target when switching from dev to prod. It's been to many years for me to remember the syntax--I just know the function was simple to write.
Or use MS-Access to talk to MS-Access through ODBC, or some other data connection that lives outside of the client mdb.
As with all file base databases, you will eventually run into problems with peak usage or when you go over a small magical number somewhere between 2 and 30.
Also, Access tends to corrupt frequently, so backup, compact and repair need to be done on an frequent basis. 3rd party tools used to exist to automate this task.
As far as performance goes, the data is being processed client side, so you might want to use something like netmeter to watch how much data is going over the wire. The same principle about indexing and avoiding table scans apply to file base dbs as well.
Many good suggestions from other people. Here's my 2 millicents worth. My backend data is on server accessed through a Drive mapping. In my case, the Y drive. Production users get the mapping through a login script using active directory. Then the following scenarios are easily done by batch file:
Develop against local computer by doing a subst command in a batch file
run reports against last nights data by pointing Y to the backup server (read only)
run reports against end of month data by pointing to the right directory
test against specialized scenarios by keeping a special directory
In my environment (average 5 simultaneous users, 1000's of rows, not 10,000's.) corruption has occurred, but it's rare and manageable. Only once in the last several years have we resorted to the previous days backup. We use SQL Server for our higher volume stuff, but it's not as convenient to develop against, probably because we don't have a SQL admin on site.
You might also find some of the answers to this question (how to extract schemas from access) to be useful as well. Once you've extracted a schema using one of the techniques that were suggested you gain a whole range of new options like the ability to use source control on the schemas, as well as being able to easily build "clean" testing environments.
Edit to respond to comment:
There's no easy way to source control an Access database in it's native format, but schema files are just text files like any other. Hence, you can check them in and out of the source control software of your choice for easy version control/rollbacks.
Or course, it relies on you having a series of scripts set up to re-build your database from the schema. Once you do, it's normally fairly trivial to create an option/alternative version that rebuilds it in a different location, allowing you to build test environments from any previous committed version of the schema. I hope that clarifies a bit!
If you want to update the back end MDB schema automatically when you release a new FE to the clients then see Compare'Em http://home.gci.net/~mike-noel/CompareEM-LITE/CompareEM.htm will happily generate the VBA code need to recreate an MDB. Or the code to create the differences between two MDBs so you can do a version upgrade of the already existing BE MDB. It's a bit quirky but works.
I use it all the time.
You need to understand that a shared mdb file for the data is not a robust solution. Microsoft would suggest that SQL Server or some other server based database would be a far better solution and would allow you to use the same access front end. The migration wizard would help you make the changeover if you wanted to go that way.
As another uses pointed out, corruption will occur. It is simply a question of how often, not if.
To understand the performance issues you need to understand that to the server the mdb file with the data in it is simply that, a file. Since no code runs on the server, the server does not understand transactions, record locking etc. It simply knows that there is a file that a bunch of people are trying to read and write simultaniously.
With a database system such as SQL Server, Oracle, DB2. MySQL etc. the database program runs on the server and looks to the server like a single program accessing the database file. It is the database program (running on the server) that handles record locking, transactions, concurrency, logging, data backup/recovery and all the other nice things one wants from a database.
Since a database program designed to run on the server is designed to do that and only that, it can do it far better and more efficently that a program like Access reading an writing a shared file (mdb).
There are two rules for developing against live data
The first rule is . . . never develop
against live data. Not ever.
The second rule is . . .never develop
against live data. Not ever.
You can programatically change the bindings for linked tables, so you can write a macro to change your links when you're deploying a new version.
The application is slow because it's MS Access, and it doesn't like many concurrent users (where many is any number > 1).