Since about an hour, I can't retrieve file content via the download URL attribute.
Each time I try to get it, API answers a 401 (unauthorized error).
Here's the code used: https://gist.github.com/arnaudbreton/5409015
Credentials are stored in GAE datastore and successfully retrieved / refresh.
The first call to file endpoint is working but not the second call to download content.
It was working this morning.
I tried different things so far:
- Revoke client secret (found as a solution in an other thread)
- Create a new client to test
- Disconnect my APP from Drive, accept it again
Nothing seems to solve my issue.
Thanks for your help.
A fix/rollback is in progress, should be back to normal soon.
You can use
resp.alternateLink;
resp.webContentLink;
i got stucked in the same issue a day back , using downloadUrl to get the content but got it with webContentLink.
var request = gapi.client.drive.files.list();
request.execute(function (resp) {
resp.alternateLink;
resp.webContentLink;
});
Related
I am querying a subcollection in Firestore in an Angular6 Web App. On the first run, my function went through, but I was missing some information, so I had to delete it. I deleted the data in the subcollection manually in Firebase.
This is my query:
this.inviteSub = this.afs.collection('groups').doc(myGroup).collection<any>('invitations').valueChanges().subscribe(invites => {
console.log(invites);
});
When I execute my function on the client (Chrome) again, the valueChanges returns me the data that actually has been deleted.
I already tried a hard refresh by CTRL+F5 of the website. I also closed the browser. I also tried to unsubscribe when I at ngOnDestroy. But none of my efforts "cleared" up my 'invites'.
Can anyone help me how I "refresh" my browser / function / 'invites'?
UPDATE:
I still could not figure out what the issue causes, but I changed my App to Angular 6. So, I also changed this in my question.
I found a solution by myself. In my 'app.module.ts' I had the persistence enabled AngularFirestoreModule.enablePersistence() and changed it to AngularFirestoreModule
I am trying to implement Push Notifications on my website (using Pushpad). Therefore I created a "manifest.json" with following content:
{
"gcm_sender_id": "my_gcm_sender_id",
"gcm_user_visible_only": true
}
of course I created a valid GCM-Account and have a sender id
I put the manifest.json into my root directory and I also added this line to my index.php:
<link rel="manifest" href="/manifest.json">
Using Firefox everything works fine and I can send and receive push notifications (so I think the manifest-include works fine), but Chrome won't work...
The console shows following error:
Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: Registration failed - manifest empty or missing
I searched Google for a long time and tried everything I found, but nothing works.
What I tried:
created the manifest.json with "Editor" and saved it as type All Types (so no hidden .txt-file) and also with UTF-8-Encoding.
restarted Chrome
cleared Chrome's cache, history, etc.
I really hope somebody can help me.
For me it was a redirect. The manifest.json must return a 200 status code (must be directly available from the server), without any redirects.
You can check the response via
wget --max-redirect=0 https://example.com/manifest.json
or
curl https://example.com/manifest.json
I faced same issue,added manifest file right after head tag . which worked for me.Cheers!
This may be an issue with your Service Worker scope. I ran into a similar problem when I rearranged my files/directories. Make sure your sw.js is on the same level as your manifest.json, otherwise the service worker won't be able to find your manifest. Try putting them both in the root of your directory. Optionally, you can specify the scope of your service worker by adding it to serviceWorker.register():
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw-test/sw.js', {scope: '/sw-test/'})
.then(function(reg) {
// registration worked
console.log('Registration succeeded. Scope is ' + reg.scope);
}).catch(function(error) {
// registration failed
console.log('Registration failed with ' + error);
});
}
Read more here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Service_Worker_API/Using_Service_Workers
Was wondering if your "manifest.json" is public accessible ?
If not maybe you can try to set it public accessible to see if that helps or not.
And it seems that the current chrome, when getting the "manifest.json" won't supply the cookies.
Because I didn't find an answer anywhere out there in the WWW, but managed to get it working after some time I want to provide my solution/answer for other users, who probably have the same problem:
In the file where I inlcuded the Pushpad files I wrote some PHP-Code before the <head>-Tag to include some files, e.g. for database connection. After I moved the PHP-Code below the <head>-Tag everything worked fine.
There seem to be three ways to fix this bug:
a) No redirects for "manifest.json" file.
b) Put a link to this file at the top of the tag.
c) Be sure, that there is no other manifest file before this one, cause it seems that web push script will try to import the first one and return an error due to the wrong data.
I have tried all three and finally forced Chrome to behave.
Adding the following block fixed this for me:
self.addEventListener('push', (event) => {
const title = 'Get Started With Workbox';
const options = {
body: event.data.text()
};
event.waitUntil(self.registration.showNotification(title, options));
});
I was able to connect and upload videos using the library but when I deleted the app connection on Vimeo.com (as a test) the app didn't authorize again.
the upload looks like it's working but nothing is uploaded as the app is no longer connected.
I deleted the app on the phone and restarted but it still won't re-authorize the app.
This comes up in the output:
Vimeo upload state : Executing
Vimeo upload state : Finished
Invalid http status code for download task.
And this is in OldVimeoUpload.swift: ( didn't include the actual access code!)
import Foundation
class OldVimeoUpload: VimeoUpload
{
static var VIMEO_ACCESS_TOKEN :String! // = "there's a string of numbers here"
static let sharedInstance = OldVimeoUpload(backgroundSessionIdentifier: "") { () -> String? in
return VIMEO_ACCESS_TOKEN // See README for details on how to obtain and OAuth token
}
// MARK: - Initialization
override init(backgroundSessionIdentifier: String, authTokenBlock: AuthTokenBlock)
{
super.init(backgroundSessionIdentifier: backgroundSessionIdentifier, authTokenBlock: authTokenBlock)
}
}
It looks like the access token number is commented out. I deleted the 2 forward slashes to see if that would fix it but it didn't.
I spoke too soon.
It sounds like you went to developer.vimeo.com and created an auth token. Used it to upload videos. And then went back to developer.vimeo.com and deleted the auth token.
The app / VimeoUpload will not automatically re-authenticated in this situation. You've killed the token and the app cannot request a new one for you. You'll need to create a new auth token and plug it into the app.
If this is not accurate and you're describing a different issue let us know.
If you inspect the error that's thrown from the failing request I'm guessing you'll see it's a 401 unauthorized related to using an invalid token.
Edit:
Disconnecting your app (as described in your comment below) has the same effect as deleting your auth token from developer.vimeo.com.
Also, VimeoUpload accepts a hardcoded auth token (as you see from the README and your code sample). It will not automatically re-authenticate, probably ever.
If you'd like to handle authentication in your app check out VimeoNetworking or VIMNetworking. Either of those libraries can be used to create a variety of authentication flows / scenarios. Still, if a logged in user disconnects or deletes their token, you will need them to deliberately re-authenticate (i.e. you will need to build that flow yourself). In that case, the user has explicitly stated that they don't want the app to be able to access information on their behalf. It would go against our security contract with them to automatically re-authenticate somehow.
Does that make sense?
Hello I have got problem I have configured my Jmeter to test performance between play framework version 2.2 and 2.3 to check the speed of controllers but when I post something (here im creating account) in play console I see that account is creating but its not saving in my database, when I have done this same from another laptop by typing my IP Adress it saved it to database and worked good. I dont know where could be the problem cause configuration is the same.
In Jmaker in thread I have made
HTTP Head Manager and i added here
Name: Content-Type Value: application/json
I have made too HTTP Request
Server Adress: localhost Port:9000 Method: Post Content encoding: UTF-8
Path: api/accounts Implementation: HTTPClient 4 Portocol [http]: http
And in parameters I added
name:(nothing),
Value:{"username":"AccountTest1","password":"test6ccou49","email":"AccountTest1#dev.null"}
and I have turned only Include Equals
I added to Constant Timer and jp#gc Response Times over time from plugin which is making chart
I dont know why when I press Start: chart is building, in play console I see account creating but this is not saving to database.
I will be very thankful for every help.
Create a CSV file like below sample data:
AccountTest1,test6ccou49,AccountTest1#dev.null
AccountTest2,test6ccou50,AccountTest2#dev.null
AccountTest3,test6ccou51,AccountTest3#dev.null
..... so on
Add->Config Element->CSV Data Set Config
keep settings as mentioned below:
Filename: "Give complete file path with file name e.g. c:\folder1\folder2\file.csv"
File Encoding: "Leave Blank"
Variable Names: "user_name,pass_wd,e_mail"
Delimiter: ","
Allow Quoted Data: "false"
Recycle on EOF: "True"
Stop Thread on EOF: "false"
Sharing mode: "All threads"
Now Post body should look like
{"username":"${user_name}","password":"${pass_wd}","email":"${e_mail}"}
Hope this will help.
Try to use "Post Body" in the HTTP Sampler to post below values
{"username":"AccountTest1","password":"test6ccou49","email":"AccountTest1#dev.null"}
Hope this will help.
I have repaired it already, the problem was in Http Header :), I have got question, now I'm creating accounts by requesting
{"username":"AccountTest1","password":"test6ccou49","email":"AccountTest1#dev.null"}
But this create one account, I was testing some solutions on the Internet but them don't work also is here any way to make a lot of accounts in one time to test performance?
My create account function gets json object {xxx:yyy,bbb:ccc}
Good Evening!
I've been looking into the possibility of using GAS(Google Apps Script) to host a small bit of javascript that lets me use the new Google finance apps api. The intention being that I'll be using the stock information for a project which involves the use of stock data. I know that there are a few ways to get stock information from Google, but the data that the finanace app returns is more in-line with other sources we are using. (One constraint on this project is that we have multiple sources).
I've written the javascript and I can call a httpc:request to the URL for the script given to me from Google. In the browser the JS returns the json object as I want it, however when the call is made from Erlang I'm getting it in a list of ascii. From checking the values it appears to be a document starting like:
Below is the javascript and the url to see the json:
https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbzEvuuQl4jkrbPCz7hf9Zv4nvIOzqAkBxL1ixslLBxmSEhksQM/exec
function doGet() {
var stock = FinanceApp.getStockInfo('LON:TSCO');
return ContentService.createTextOutput(JSON.stringify(stock))
.setMimeType(ContentService.MimeType.JSON);
}
For the erlang, it's a simple request but I've not been doing erlang long, so perhaps I've messed something up here (The URL being the one mentioned above). I've got crypto / ssl / inets when I'm testing this on the command line.
{ok, {Version, Headers, Body}} = httpc:request(get, URL, []}, [], []).
I think it's also worth mentioning that when i curl it from Cygwin, I get a massive load of HTML also, I've included it below, but if you see it you'll thank me for not posting it in here! http://pastebin.com/UtJHXjRm
I've been updating the script as I go with the new versions but I'm at a bit of a loss as to why it's not returning correctly.
If anyone can give me any pointers I'd be very grateful! I get the feeling that it's not intended to be used this way, perhaps only within other Google products and such.
Cheers!
It would be necessary to review how are you deploying the Web App, specifically the Who has access to the app, to access without authentication should be configured as shown in the image:
See Deploying Your Script as a Web App from the documentation.
In my test, by running:
curl -L https://script.google.com/macros/s/************/exec
Get the following result:
{
"priceopen":358,
"change":2.199981689453125,
"high52":388.04998779296875,
"tradetime":"2013-10-11T15:35:18.000Z",
"currency":"GBX",
"timezone":"Europe/London",
"low52":307,
"quote":357.8999938964844,
"name":"Tesco PLC",
"exchange":"LON",
"marketcap":28929273763,
"symbol":"TSCO",
"volumedelay":0,
"shares":8083060703,
"pe":23.4719295501709,
"eps":0.15248000621795654,
"price":357.8999938964844,
"has_stock_data":true,
"volumeavg":14196534,
"volume":8885809,
"changepct":0.6184935569763184,
"high":359.5,
"datadelay":0,
"low":355.8999938964844,
"closeyest":355.70001220703125
}
Possibly your GET is not following the REDIRECT that happens when you use contentService. Look at the html returned there is a redirect in there.