Is it somehow possible to add header info (or querystrings) to a wcf request on the fly?
I've been messing around a bit with the IWcfPolicy like this:
var xmlObjectSerializer = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(string));
var addressHeader = AddressHeader.CreateAddressHeader("client", "http://tempuri.org/", "someValue", xmlObjectSerializer);
var endpointAddress = new EndpointAddress(new Uri(url), new AddressHeader[] { addressHeader });
invocation.ChannelHolder.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Address = endpointAddress;
invocation.Proceed();
this does not work however. Any help would be very much apperciated.
ok so here's how to do it:
using (var scope = new OperationContextScope((IContextChannel) (invocation.ChannelHolder.Channel)))
{
OperationContext.Current.OutgoingMessageProperties[HttpRequestMessageProperty.Name] = new HttpRequestMessageProperty
()
{
Headers =
{
{"client", LicenseManager.Instance.GetCurrentLicense().LicenseKey}
}
};
invocation.Proceed();
}
This code goes into Apply method of the IWcfPolicy implementation.
Found solution because of this post: how to add a custom header to every wcf call
Related
I have JSON object loaded to my view model. I want to push that into an observableArray.
function viewModel()
{
var self = this;
self.details = [{"id":1,"first_name":"fname1","last_name":"lname1","salary":1000.0},
{"id":2,"first_name":"fname2","last_name":"lname2","salary":2000.0},
{"id":3,"first_name":"fname3","last_name":"lname3","salary":3000.0}];
self.emp = ko.observableArray([new Model(self.details[0]),new Model(self.details[1]),new Model(self.details[2])]);
//This method works, but is very inefficient...
}
ko.applyBindings(new viewModel());
The solution I found was to feed each element individually, which is not practical.
I'm using JQuery. I found some solutions using knockout.mapping plugin. But I'm unable to add that plugin to my Eclipse workspace correctly.
I'm new to Knockout. Please help me find a solution to add the entire object to the observableArray.
I would probably use the mapping plugin personally, but this should also work
function viewModel()
{
var self = this;
self.details = [{"id":1,"first_name":"fname1","last_name":"lname1","salary":1000.0},
{"id":2,"first_name":"fname2","last_name":"lname2","salary":2000.0},
{"id":3,"first_name":"fname3","last_name":"lname3","salary":3000.0}];
var mapped = self.details.map(m => new Model(m));
//or
//var mapped = self.details.map(function(m) {return new Model(m);});
self.emp = ko.observableArray(mapped);
}
ko.applyBindings(new viewModel());
I would like to change the pitch of a sound file using the HTML 5 Audio node.
I had a suggestion to use the setVelocity property and I have found this is a function of the Panner Node
I have the following code in which I have tried changing the call parameters, but with no discernible result.
Does anyone have any ideas, please?
I have the folowing code:
var gAudioContext = new AudioContext()
var gAudioBuffer;
var playAudioFile = function (gAudioBuffer) {
var panner = gAudioContext.createPanner();
gAudioContext.listener.dopplerFactor = 1000
source.connect(panner);
panner.setVelocity(0,2000,0);
panner.connect(gainNode);
gainNode.connect(gAudioContext.destination);
gainNode.gain.value = 0.5
source.start(0); // Play sound
};
var loadAudioFile = (function (url) {
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
request.open('get', 'Sounds/English.wav', true);
request.responseType = 'arraybuffer';
request.onload = function () {
gAudioContext.decodeAudioData(request.response,
function(incomingBuffer) {
playAudioFile(incomingBuffer);
}
);
};
request.send();
}());
I'm trying to achieve something similar and I also failed at using PannerNode.setVelocity().
One working technique I found is by using the following package (example included in the README): https://www.npmjs.com/package/soundbank-pitch-shift
It is also possible with a biquad filter, available natively. See an example here: http://codepen.io/qur2/pen/emVQwW
I didn't find a simple sound to make it obvious (CORS restriction with ajax loading).
You can read more at http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1234000001552/ch04.html and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/BiquadFilterNode.
Hope this helps!
I am currently trying to figure out how I can retrieve a single value from a sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel
in my main view:
var gConfigModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel();
var getConfigCallback = function(config) {
gConfigModel.setData(config);
};
oController.getConfiguration(getConfigCallback);
console.log(gConfigModel);
in my controller:
getConfiguration : function(callback) {
var sServiceUrl = "/sap/opu/odata/sap/xxx/ConfigurationSet('Initialize')";
var config = {};
callback(config);
$.getJSON(sServiceUrl).done(function(data) {
config = data.d;
callback(config);
});
},
In my console.log statement I can see that the data was successfully passed from the backend and successfully set to the JSON model. My requirement is to store the value of attribute Editable in a single variable.
I already tried gConfigModel.getProperty('/'), didnt work. tried to access gConfigModel.oData was undefined .. How can I store it in a single value?
Solution Comment: If you catch data from a backend, you have to take care how long it takes. data can be available later then expected, in my case I added 1s timeout, afterwards I can access the property easily
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(gConfigModel.getProperty('/Editable'));
}, 1000);
I wouldn't advise using the model's getData() method since it is deprecated.
A much better solution is to use gConfigModel.getProperty("/Editable")
(I'm using the root slash here since your property resides in the root of your model)
In the same way, you can also set your data:
gConfigModel.setProperty("/Editable", <your new value>) instead
First of all, thanks for the effort to find solutions of our Problems! (at least, those regarding It stuff.. :) )
I've found a solution which I think is a little bit more save because the timeout is maybe somewhat arbitrary - it would depend on the machine or the amount of data that is to be fetched?
Therefore, I am using an attachRequestCompleted function:
with sUrl_2="path-to-my-service";
var oModel_2 = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel(sUrl_2);
oModel_2.attachRequestCompleted(function(data) {
//now, i can access the data stored in the oModel_2, either by getProperty, or by DOM: oModel_2.oData.d.Vendor
gv_selLieferant = oModel_2.getProperty("/d/Vendor");
gv_selEinkOrg = oModel_2.getProperty("/d/PurchOrg");
gv_selEinKGru = oModel_2.getProperty("/d/PurGroup");
});
<script src="https://openui5.hana.ondemand.com/resources/sap-ui-core.js" id="sap-ui-bootstrap" data-sap-ui-theme="sap_bluecrystal" data-sap-ui-libs="sap.m"></script>
<script>
function getConfiguration(callback) {
var sServiceUrl = "/sap/opu/odata/sap/xxx/ConfigurationSet('Initialize')";
var config = {};
var data = {
"d": {
"_metadata": "",
"Backup01": "01",
"Editable": "True"
}
};
setTimeout((function() {
config = data;
callback(config);
})(), 2000);
};
var gConfigModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel();
var getConfigCallback = function(config) {
gConfigModel.setData(config);
alert(gConfigModel.getProperty("/d/Editable"));
};
getConfiguration(getConfigCallback);
</script>
i use fetch from backbone.js to load a json model but success will not hit.
var DialogModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
url : function() {
return '/messages/getDialog';
},
parse : function(res) {
return res.dialog;
}
});
var DialogView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: $("#page"),
initialize: function() {
var onDataHandler = function() {
this.render();
};
this.model = new DialogModel();
this.model.fetch({ success : onDataHandler});
},
render: function(){
var data = {
dialogModel : this.model
};
var form = new Backbone.Form({
model: data
});
$(this.el).html(form.render().el);
}
});
What happens now:
DialogView initialize is called.
this.model.fetch is called but the onDataHandler function will not be hit if success.
/messages/getDialog throws a json file back.
The json file is loading well as i can see in the network browser.
Thanks for your help!
Oleg
The problem you're having is due to a typical JS gotcha and not related to Backbone itself. Try
var that = this;
this.model.fetch({
success : function () {
that.render();
}
});
The way you're currently passing onDataHandler is problematic as it will cause this to refer to the global object instead of the DialogView, when the function is called.
This fiddle demonstrates the problematic version vs one that works.
(You may also want to take a look at JS strict mode which can shield you from this type of errors.)
Even better is to listen for an event:
this.model.on("sync", this.render).fetch();
I ran across this question while looking for something else, but the currently accepted answer drives me nuts. There's no good reason to be sprinkling this and that all over your code. Backbone (underscore) includes a context parameter that you can bind to.
that = this makes no sense. If you must implement obsolete 2007-era Crockford patterns, then say var self = this. Saying that = this is like saying left = right. Everyone Stop.
Can anyone confirm that HTML widgets accept ClickHandlers on the Server side ? I can't get my below code to work.
I create a serverHandler (and for good measure I have even added a useless callback element). Subsequently, I add it to a HTML.addClickHander (for good measure I have even added it to .addMouseUpHandler as well). The function is NOT executed.
var mouseclick = app.createServerHandler("handleTrainingClick_").addCallbackElement(lstFilter);
var params = [ "fromOrg", "trainingTitle", "dueDate", "medical", "status" ];
var resultSet = blSelectActiveTrainings_();
while (resultSet.hasNext()) {
var training = resultSet.next();
var html = TRAINING_ROW;
for (var pI in params) {
html = html.replace("$"+params[pI], training[params[pI]]);
}
pnlList.add(app.createHTML(html).setId(training.id).addClickHandler(mouseclick).addMouseUpHandler(mouseclick)
.addMouseMoveHandler(mousemove).addMouseOutHandler(mouseout).addMouseOverHandler(mouseover));
}
function handleTrainingClick_(e) {
Logger.log(e.source);
var app = UiApp.getActiveApplication();
return app;
}
HTML widgets server side handlers work just fine. It was an incorrect reference in my code. Thanks all.