We have designed an application using .NET framework. There is a client application and a server application. The client applications, webpages, android/ iphone applications fetch data from the server using the WCF service.
My issue here is that some of the data that can be set by the user on the application is being saved on the server but cannot does not reflect on the client side once the application is restarted, we have designed the application in such a way that every change on the client side will be reflected on the server side, this is done to make this a cloud based application.
Some of the settings changed or value input on the client side is updating on the server successfully but does noes reflect on the client machines using the direct MYSQL service. However there are absolutely no issues while using WAMP as the MYSQL service, i.e the clients using the WAMP server can see the changes made. We have tried matching the versions and also have tried new and old versions of the standalone MYSQL. Firewall settings all seem fine. Since we prefer to install the standalone MYSQL over WAMP on our customers machines, it would be great if you could shed some light on the possible issues. Is there any difference in the initial config of MYSQL and the default config of WAMP MYSQL.
Hence if there is any thing in particular to note or tweak in this regards it will be really helpful.
Thanks in advance.
I don't think you'll get a really good answer to your question, because the term "WAMP" does not refer to a specific package, but rather any package that includes Windows versions of Apache, MySQL and PHP (and sometimes Perl instead of or in addition to PHP). See this link for a list of some of the available packages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_WAMPs
Those packages come with different standard configurations for MySQL. Since you didn't say which WAMP package (and version) you were using, there is no way of knowing in what way their standard configuration differs from a plain MySQL installation (where the version is also important)
Have you tried just running a diff on the respective config files?
Related
I need to make a development version of a cakePHP app with its own db so that a developer can work on it without disturbing the current users.
I thought it would be simple, I just copied the entire director /project to /project_dev and then copied the DB "project_db" to "project_db_dev". Then I went into /project_dev/config/database.php and changed the db to "project_db_dev".
When I went to see what I had done, I saw the app was still connecting to the same db, as if I'd changed nothing. I realized that the original folder name was referenced in /app/webroot/.htaccess so do I need to find/replace all instances of that folder name?
What steps should I follow to duplicate an existing cakePHP app?
You need to setup some kind of development lifecycle.
Generally speaking the developer shouldn't be doing any development on the server. The best way to handle it is locally using a stack of some kind such as Lamp (Linux, Apache, Mysql, PHP) switch out linux with other OS's. There are multiple cloud solution to these environments to such as Koding.com
Using something like Git for version control the developer can develop locally then push the code through to the server after is being thoroughly tested locally or on a dev server or some kind.
Keeping Dev work and Live work away from each other is key.
Could do with a bit more information.
If both databases are hosted on the same server and you have permission to access them both with the same user then all you have to do is change the name of the database in your database.php
If not you will also have to update the IP and any other additional settings port etc.
If you are still having troubles email me simpsond1988#gmail.com
I'm a college student and an amateur in web development. I've been working on a query system to query some foxpro database tables for this company I am interning in. I was asked to implement my project in their local server (running on Windows Server 2003) and I am not sure where to begin since this will be my first time working with a real server and I have almost zero knowledge about it.
The project was done with PHP, Javascript, mySQL and JQuery and is developed in XAMPP. It will be accessed by everyone on the office intranet. I need to set up mySQL database for the login as well.
1) Would it be better to do this on IIS or Apache?
2) I am aware that XAMPP is Apache, but if I implement my project on IIS, will there be any difference or will I need to change my codes?
Any advice is greatly appreciated!
The answer to this question is governed by
the tech your project uses.
your need to coexist with the other services on that company W2003 server.
If your project happens to be the first web app to be served from that server, just set up XAMPP, move your files and database to the server, and be done with it.
But it's unlikely. You need to talk to whomever set up the last web app on that server. It's possible to set up a server so some web pages are served by IIS and others by Apache, but then those pages need different port numbers. That will make things more confusing and less convenient for your users.
php/MySQL/odbc works fine on IIS if that's what you need to use. You may have to monkey around with protections and so forth to get it tweaked out. But it will perform just fine.
The take-home lesson for you as you develop this small scale web app is to build things like that to fit the intended production deployment environment. XAMPP is a popular and successful development setup PRECISELY BECAUSE there are approximately Avogadro's Number of $4-per-month Linux-Apache-MySQL-php hosting services in the world that are entirely compatible with it. But that's not your deployment target this time.
Sorry my question might be duplicate but i dint find any correct solution.So im posting this question again...
First i have deployed a DNN website with sql server authentication.Site was working fine.
Later we re installed the sql server 2008. So im trying to give windows authentication to connect the site.
In web config connectionstring:i have removed the username and password and gave Integrated security="true" .
In IIS :Site -> Authentication -> windows Authentication ->enabled and all others disabled.
once i browse the site is redirecting to DNN install Wizard
Need Help.
In SQL Server did you configure the Windows account that the application pool (in IIS) is using to have DBOwner access to the database?
Also make sure to change BOTH connection strings in the database.
Depending on what version of IIS you are on, that account might differ. Older versions likely would use "Network Service" while newer versions might also use "Network Service" or an application pool specific account like "iis apppool\dnndev"
You'll also want to make sure that you aren't trying to assign a DOMAIN account to the database, unless of course that is what IIS is configured to use (as opposed to a local account)
Let's say I have written an application in Java that is programmed to use a MySQL database. The user of the Java application needs to have MySQL on their machine in order for the application to work.
What can I do to make sure that the user has the correct version of MySQL on their machine and if they don't then install it so they can properly run the Java application?
Note: I had sent some links to setup Java and MySQL for a business analyst of a program I am working on and he was not able to decipher the madness that is installing MySQL. He is not computer technical and wouldn't even know what to enter into the forms of the MySQL installation. What could I do to ease this task for the end user?
Update: Unfortunately, for security reasons that are a requirement for this project we have to use MySQL and not SQLite or Derby. Unless there is a way to make sure that no one deletes the SQLite database file or switches it out for another one. We need to guarantee data integrity and I find that using MySQL gives me the best chance at doing that.
What is the target platform?
Assuming something UNIXish, you can either:
1) Include a shell script to download, install, and setup mysql. Complicated, but not impossible.
2) Use an embedded Derby database. On my current project, we have a version where the user can just "download and go." That version uses an embedded Derby database that writes to a file, similar to hsqldb or sqlite3. Any of those are fine options.
The easiest thing for the user is to embed the database in the Java application. No setup required. There's MySQL OEM (not free), so you might consider switching to SQLite instead, which is the de facto standard embedded database. (See this question for more on that.)
Is it possible to use MySQL local? I mean NOT at a server. I read a lot about MySQL on a webserver with PHP, Joomla etc.
I want to program a piece of software and use a database local to store results. Can I use MySQL for that?
If so, is ther anyware on the net a good tutorial how to do that?
You can install MySQL on your workstation, it doesn't need to be on a "server" per se. You still need to use something that can connect to it. From a Java application, for instance, you'd use JDBC; from .Net, you'd probably use ADO.Net; etc.
As far as I know, it will still want to have its server process (mysqld) running and for you to connect to that process via sockets and the like; there's no standard in-process version that I'm aware of. (The server can be listening only on the local interface, though.) There are several alternatives if you want in-process stuff, such as SQLite and HSQLDB.
Of course, if you're feeling really enterprising, there's the open source version of MySQL, which means you could compile it into your app (if you're using C or something that can link to it), but I suspect that's going rather too far. :-)
Yes, works like a charm for this.
Mysqls homepage has lots of info for this.
use SQLite. it is a popular embedded database.
It can be deployed via XCopy and no server installs.
But it can only be used locally. i.e if you later on decide to allow remote access, then you will need to migrate it to MySQL or other databases.
Try xampplite - it will painlessly install MySQL for you (on your local windows machine) as well as apache, php and a few other web apps if you need them.
If you don't want to install a server, you may be interested into Sqlite! It's the most widely deployed embedded database, and it's Public Domain.
http://www.sqlite.org/
Firebird is also an alternative. It's fully ACID-compliant and runs under the Interbase Public License.
http://www.firebirdsql.org/