I want to have a scene where an image which is 5000 pixels high is moving up 5 pixels each frame-refresh. When the image is all up, I'd like to see the top of the image connected to the bottom of the image. This should be done untill the level is 'done'. How can I 'loop' such an Image?
You can create a copy of that image which you keep hidden/above and the trick is to update the position and loop accordingly so when one image goes bellow the screen it goes back on top and repeats.
Here's a basic snippet to illustrate the idea using the DisplayObject class and the scrollRect property:
//ignore this, you have your content already
var dummyContent:BitmapData = new BitmapData(100,100,false);
dummyContent.perlinNoise(10,10,8,12,true,true);
//important stuff starts here
var container:Sprite = addChild(new Sprite()) as Sprite;//make a container
container.scrollRect = new Rectangle(0,0,dummyContent.width,dummyContent.height);//set a scrollRect/'mask'
var part1:DisplayObject = container.addChild(new Bitmap(dummyContent));//add two copies
var part2:DisplayObject = container.addChild(new Bitmap(dummyContent));//of the same content
part2.y -= part2.height;//set the 2nd at the top of the 1st
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,update);
function update(e:Event):void{
//move both
part1.y += 5;
part2.y += 5;
//check if any reach the bottom so they can be moved back up
if(part1.y >= part1.height) part1.y = -part1.height;
if(part2.y >= part2.height) part2.y = -part2.height;
//the above can also be nicely placed in a loop if you plan on using more seamless looping clips/images
}
Obviously you will have different content, but the principle is the same.
If you're working with images, you can simply use BitmapData's copyPixels method:
var s:int = 5;//scroll speed
//make some content
var w:int = 100;
var h:int = 100;
var dummyContent:BitmapData = new BitmapData(w,h,false);
dummyContent.perlinNoise(10,10,8,12,true,true);
//prepare for stiching
var renderPos:Point = new Point();//position to render the current image to
var prenderPos:Point = new Point();//position to render the previous image (the 'hidden' copy above)
var render:BitmapData = new BitmapData(w,h,false);//create a bitmap data instance to render updated pixels int
addChild(new Bitmap(render));//and add it to the stage
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,update);
function update(e:Event):void{
renderPos.y = (renderPos.y+s)%h;//update the scroll position for the 1st part, % is used to loop back to 0 when the position gets to the content height
prenderPos.y = renderPos.y - h;//update the scroll position for the 2nd part (above)
render.lock();//freeze pixel updates
render.copyPixels(dummyContent,dummyContent.rect,renderPos);//copy pixels from the scroll position to the bottom
render.copyPixels(dummyContent,dummyContent.rect,prenderPos);//copy pixels from the top to the scroll position
render.unlock();//unfreeze/update ALL THE PIXELS
}
You can try to use a Rectangle object which changes height (height-scrollPosition) so you potentially access less pixels each time or you can manually work out single for loops using BitmapData's getVector method, but that's something to look into if performance is actually an issue for such a simple task and it's worth checking what's faster ( copy full bitmap rect vs copy partial bitmap rect vs manually copy values using vector )
Be warned, Flash cannot load an image greater than 16,769,025 pixels (or 4095x4095). The height of 5000 pixels will work as long as the width is not greater than 3353.
That said, I'd loop the image by keeping two copies of the image onstage, move both at the same time with a parent object, and reset to origin once your loop point is met.
Consider the following stage setup:
Stage ¬
0: MainTimeline:MovieClip ¬
0: Container:MovieClip ¬
0: img1:Bitmap
1: img2:Bitmap
Now moving container up, you'd just need to check that the looping second image reaches the origin point of the first image.
function onEnterFrame(e:Event):void {
Container.y = Container.y - 5;
if (Container.y < -5000) {
Container.y = -5;
}
}
Related
I have a button and a small area which is a movieclip.
What i need is, on button press it inserts an image into the movieClip, it would have to be docked into the whole movieclip area essentially.
I have looked through multiple posts yet they have an overwhelming amount of information that I cannot figure out, this is so far what i have done :
B_Background1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, setBackground1);
function setBackground1(event:MouseEvent):void{
var firstPic:MovieClip = new C_1BackgroundPIC();
addChildAt(firstPic, C_MainStage);
}
As I understand it, it adds an event to the button, then in the function it creates a new movieClip instance which has the Picture inside of it, and then adds it to the "MainStage" although using C_MainStage is invalid thus doesn't work, it does add a picture if i just use 0 as the position but it then adds it to the position 0, which i dont want...
It's a good start. When you use addChildAt, it expects a number as the second parameter. Presumably, C_MainStage is your MovieClip (which isn't a number). Presumably you want the current display index of C_MainStage (not C_MainStage itself). This can be had by using getChildIndex
Look at the following:
function setBackground1(event:MouseEvent):void{
var firstPic:MovieClip = new C_1BackgroundPIC();
addChildAt(firstPic, getChildIndex(C_MainStage));
//now, you may need to also resize your picture so it fits in the bounds of C_MainStage, if so, you can do something like this:
if(firstPic.width >= firstPic.height){
//if firstPic is wider than it is tall
//set it's width to the same as C_MainStage
firstPic.width = C_MainStage.width;
//now, to keep the aspect ratio (in case they don't match), make the scaleY the same value as the new scaleX
firstPic.scaleY = firstPic.scaleX
}else{
//do the opposite as above since the height is larger than the width
firstPic.height = C_MainStage.height;
firstPic.scaleX = firstPic.scaleY;
}
//now, you may want to center firstPic in the C_MainStage bounds
firstPic.x = C_MainStage.x + ((C_MainStage.width - firstPic.width) * .5);
firstPic.y = C_MainStage.y + ((C_MainStage.height - firstPic.height) * .5)
}
I want to move a sprite (which happens to be a Rectangle) from any position of the screen and make it stop at exactly the touched position of the screen. Now, I can stop my sprite already, but not at the exact touched position. I cannot find a good way of doing this without sacrificing either accuracy or risking the sprite to not stop at all.
Naturally - the problem arises because the current position is Float, so that Vector will never (or extremely rarely) have the exact same coordinates as the touch point (which is an int).
In the code below, I stop my sprite by simply checking the distance between the current position and the target position (i.e. the touched position Vector3), like so if (touch.dst(currentPsition.x, currentPosition.y, 0) < 4).
For example, if the sprite is at position (5,5) and I touch the screen at (100,100), it will stop at like (98.5352,96.8283).
My question is, how do I stop the sprite at exactly the touch position, without having to approximate?
void updateMotion() {
if (moveT) {
movement.set(velocity).scl(Gdx.graphics.getDeltaTime());
this.setPosition(currentPosition.add(movement));
if (touch.dst(currentPosition.x, currentPosition.y, 0) < 4)
moveT = false;
}
}
public void setMoveToTouchPosition(boolean moveT) {
this.moveT = moveT;
this.touch = new Vector3(Gdx.input.getX(), Gdx.input.getY(), 0);
GameScreen.getCamera().unproject(touch);
currentPosition = new Vector2(this.x, this.y);
direction.set(new Vector2(touch.x, touch.y)).sub(currentPosition).nor();
velocity = new Vector2(direction).scl(speed);
}
Of course sprite can't move smoothly to touch position and then stop in exactly the same position because of many reasons. Just change this
if (touch.dst(currentPosition.x, currentPosition.y, 0) < 4)
moveT = false;
to this
if (touch.dst(currentPosition.x, currentPosition.y, 0) < 2) {
currentPosition.x = touch.x;
currentPosition.y = touch.y;
moveT = false;
}
A quick yet acceptable solution to this could be the use of the Rectangle class. Considering you make a Rectangle surrounding the moving entity and constantly update it's bounds based on its current location, it's texture width, and it's texture height. You could stop it when it overlaps with the "target position". If you do this you guarantee yourself that it will stop exactly at that position. For example:
Texture entityTexture = new Texture("assets/image.png");
Rectangle entityBounds = new Rectangle();
entityBounds.set((currentPosition.x, currentPosition.y, entityTexture .getWidth(), entityTexture .getHeight()));
Rectangle targetBounds = new Rectangle();
targetBounds.set((targetPosition.x, targetPosition.y, 1, 1)); // make width and height 1 by 1 for max accuracy
public void update(){
// update bounds based on new position
entityBounds.set((currentPosition.x, currentPosition.y, entityTexture.getWidth(), entityTexture.getHeight()));
targetBounds.set((targetPosition.x, targetPosition.y, 1, 1));
if(entityBounds.overlaps(targetBounds)){
// do something
}
}
I have searched and simply cannot find what I need (if it exists).
A window will have a large picture.
The picture will be divided into zones (such as border lines that separate states on a map).
When a person clicks within a zone, then I will raise the appropriate event.
I've used AS3 with MXML to create a database program. All is working great except for this last step. I cannot figure out how the user is within a particular area of the picture when he clicks or when he touches.
I've read and tried to come up with an approach, and there must be (hopefully so) an easier way than the muddled nonsense I'm coming up with.
Thanks
VL
Are you drawing it in flash professional CS6? If so then why can't you just have the picture as a symbol and then just self divide the lines and make those divided areas into symbols that are children of the picture symbol. You could keep the individual state symbols right where they so that they stay true to the overall picture.
A first thought would be to make an instance of this picture symbol through the code, and then loop though all the children of that picture and add a click event to each one.
var picture:Picture=new Picture();
for(var i:int=0; i<picture.numChildren-1; i++){
picture.getChildAt(i).addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, mouseEventHandler);
}
Please comment if I am missing something, or this does not work.
EDIT
Well, if you know the dimensions of the image, you could divide its width and height by 3(your number of rows and columns) and this is your zone dimensions. You then could take the mouse's click point relative to the top left of your picture and then divide its width by the zone with, and its height by the zone height, and then get its integer floor value, you could get which region it is. Code it below:
//This is all for a constat region list (like a window, or floor tiles, not things irregular)
import flash.display.Sprite;
var regionsX:int = 3; //Your number of windows across the row
var regionsY:int = 3; // across the column
var regions:Array = new Array(); // an array to hold the values that you will get from where the user clicks
// All of this used a 2D array method
for(var x:int = 0; x < regionX; x++) {
regions[regionsX] = new Array();
for(var y:int = 0; y < regionY; y++) {
regions[regionsX][regionsY] = "region(".concat(x).concat(",").concat(y);
// Here you make this equal to anything you want to get a value of,
//once the correct region is found (I just have a string version here for an example)
}
}
... // other stuff..
var picture:Picture = new Picture(); // your window picture
var regionWidth:Number = picture.width / regionsX; // Gets each region's width
var regionHeight:Number = picture.height / regionsY; // Get each regoin's height
...
picture.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, mouseEventListener); // add a click listener to the picture
function mouseEventListener(event:MouseEvent):void{
var mouseX:Number = picture.globalToLocal(event.stageX); // gets where the user clicked, and then converts it
//to the picture's cordinate space. ( 50,100 acording to the stage, could be (25,200) to the picture)
var mouseY:Number = picture.globalToLocal(event.stageY); // same for the Y
var regionIntX:Number = Math.floor(mouseX / regionWidth); // Dives the point by each region's width, and then
// converts it to a while integer. (For instance, if a region's width is 100 and you click at 288, then if you do the
// math, you clicked in the 3rd region, but it returns 2... why? (becaue the array counter starts at 0, so 0 is the 1st
// region, 1 is the second and so on...
var regionIntY:Number = Math.floor(mouseY / regionHeight); // Same for Y
var yourValue:String = regions[regionIntX][regionIntY]; // This returns that you initialy put into your 2d array
// by using the regionIntX and regionIntY for the array values. You have to decide what is stored in this array...
}
The simplest solution would be to add an event listener for MouseEvent.CLICK to the picture and in the handler check properties mouseX and mouseY of the picture. Define the bounds of each area in an XML or similar and check against current mouseX/Y to see which area has been clicked.
I want to be able to grab a copy of a DisplayObject that is nested within other transformed DisplayObjects (rotated, scaled, stretched objects), and be able to stamp it back into the same visual location, but on the stage layer. Essentially, being able to make a clone of a nested DisplayObject, but be able to add the clone to the stage layer, yet have it perfectly align (visually) with the original (same position, scale, rotation)
I have been working with something along the lines of:
// draw the pixels of a displayobject into a new bitmap object
var bitmapData:BitmapData = new BitmapData(nestedSprite.width, nestedSprite.height, true, 0xFFFFFF);
var bitmap:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bitmapData);
bitmapData.draw(nestedSprite);
// put the copy on the top most layer
stage.addChild(bitmap);
// position the copy to perfectly overlay the original, but on the top stage layer
var point:Point = nestedSprite.localToGlobal(new Point(0, 0));
bitmap.x = point.x;
bitmap.y = point.y;
But this only works well for displayObjects whose parents are not transformed; and for displayObjetcs that are perectly at the (0,0) origin. It falls apart for centered aligned objects or scaled parents, etc.
I am aware that I can add a matrix param to the .draw() method, as well as a clipping rectngle, and scale my bitmap afterwards, or setting the transform of one object to another, or use .transform.concatenatedMatrix, or use nestedObject.getBounds(null), or nestedSprite.getBounds(nestedSprite), etc. But I have unfortunately fallen into doing trial and error programming on this one, and with some many variables, this is never a good way to solve a programming problem.
I believe this function should work, the only extra step was offsetting the concatenated matrix so that the target would draw with its top left at (0, 0) on the Bitmap even if its origin was somewhere else. Hopefully the rest is self explanatory, but I can add more comments if anything doesn't make sense.
function createBitmapClone(target:DisplayObject):Bitmap {
var targetTransform:Matrix = target.transform.concatenatedMatrix;
var targetGlobalBounds:Rectangle = target.getBounds(target.stage);
var targetGlobalPos:Point = target.localToGlobal(new Point());
// Calculate difference between target origin and top left.
var targetOriginOffset:Point = new Point(targetGlobalPos.x - targetGlobalBounds.left, targetGlobalPos.y - targetGlobalBounds.top);
// Move transform matrix so that top left of target will be at (0, 0).
targetTransform.tx = targetOriginOffset.x;
targetTransform.ty = targetOriginOffset.y;
var cloneData:BitmapData = new BitmapData(targetGlobalBounds.width, targetGlobalBounds.height, true, 0x00000000);
cloneData.draw(target, targetTransform);
var clone:Bitmap = new Bitmap(cloneData);
// Move clone to target's global position, minus the origin offset.
clone.x = targetGlobalPos.x - targetOriginOffset.x;
clone.y = targetGlobalPos.y - targetOriginOffset.y;
return clone;
}
Unfortunately, pixelBounds seems to return an origin of (0, 0) if there are any filters on the DisplayObjects, which obviously breaks things.
Edit: Replaced target.transform.pixelBounds with target.getBounds(target.stage) as a slight improvement. This keeps the position correct if there are filters, but filters on parent DisplayObjects still won't be included, and filters on the target can overlap the edges of the Bitmap. I'm not sure if there's a simple way to work around that.
Update: Jimmi Heiserman spotted that this function is broken if the swf is scaled. Without stage.scaleMode = StageScaleMode.NO_SCALE; though, the stageWidth and stageHeight parameters seem to stay unchanged, so the only (rather hacky) workaround I've found is to add an "unscaled" test Sprite and use its concatenatedMatrix to adjust the clone's position and scale:
function createScaledBitmapClone(target:DisplayObject):Bitmap {
var targetTransform:Matrix = target.transform.concatenatedMatrix;
var targetGlobalBounds:Rectangle = target.getBounds(target.stage);
var targetGlobalPos:Point = target.localToGlobal(new Point());
// Calculate difference between target origin and top left.
var targetOriginOffset:Point = new Point(targetGlobalPos.x - targetGlobalBounds.left, targetGlobalPos.y - targetGlobalBounds.top);
// Create a test Sprite to check if the stage is scaled.
var testSprite:Sprite = new Sprite();
target.stage.addChild(testSprite);
var testMatrix:Matrix = testSprite.transform.concatenatedMatrix;
target.stage.removeChild(testSprite);
// Move transform matrix so that top left of target will be at (0, 0).
targetTransform.tx = targetOriginOffset.x * testMatrix.a;
targetTransform.ty = targetOriginOffset.y * testMatrix.d;
var cloneData:BitmapData = new BitmapData(targetGlobalBounds.width * testMatrix.a, targetGlobalBounds.height * testMatrix.d, true, 0x00000000);
cloneData.draw(target, targetTransform);
var clone:Bitmap = new Bitmap(cloneData);
// Move clone to target's global position, minus the origin offset, and cancel out stage scaling.
clone.x = targetGlobalPos.x - targetOriginOffset.x;
clone.y = targetGlobalPos.y - targetOriginOffset.y;
clone.scaleX = 1 / testMatrix.a;
clone.scaleY = 1 / testMatrix.d;
return clone;
}
Have you tried passing the parents transform into draw? draw takes a transform matrix as the second param.
If you have a handle on the parent you can use something like this
bitmapData.draw(nestedSprite, parent.transform.matrix);
I have an array of sprites:
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
var newLine:Sprite = new Sprite();
newLine.graphics.beginFill(0xFFFFFF);
newLine.graphics.drawRect((uiSizeX * (.25 + .25 * i)) + (doorSizeX - lineLengths[0][i]) / 2, uiSizeY * .5, lineLengths[0][i], lineHeight);
newLine.name = "lines" + i;
lines.push(newLine);
}
I later add each to a background Sprite:
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
uiContainer.addChild(doors[i]);
uiContainer.addChild(lines[i]);
}
And later wish to change the width of the rectangles contained in each. When I set the width property using the array reference:
lines[i].width = lineLengths[trialNumber][i];
The rectangle moves towards the center of the stage and uiContainer. Trying to set the x value results in even stranger behavior. I've gathered from answers to other questions that this is because the sprite is empty, which is confusing since it seems like it should have a rectangle in it. How do I access or change the properties of the rectangle or make it so the sprite is not empty?
Never try to directly change the width or height of a sprite, unless you really really have to, because it leads to all sorts of unexpected behavior.
If you want to resize the sprite, then redraw the rectangle:
var sprite = lines[i];
sprite.graphics.beginFill(0xFFFFFF);
sprite.graphics.drawRect(newWidth, newHeight);
Also don't forget to call endFill:
sprite.graphics.endFill();
You should probably wrap all this logic into a separate class so that you can redraw your sprites more easily. Even better, create a class that extends Sprite and that contains all the logic to redraw/resize.