I would like to implement video recording/playback/storage capability for my website. I'm done a bit of research, for HTML5 recording, there is RecordRTC which is based on WebRTC. For playback there's video.js. I want to be able to store them on s3 but I haven't figured out how.
1) Is this the best way to do it without paying for cloud based commercial ones such as ziggeo, nimbb and pipe?
2) are there any alternatives that i should look into?
3) how does storage work after recording using RecordRTC and uploading to s3? Do i need to do any sort of compression?
Any help would be great! Really appreciate it
Video recording is the future of all websites in our eyes - and by our I mean here at Ziggeo (full disclosure, I work at Ziggeo :) ).
In regards to recording there are many ways to do it and it is up to you to go with a specific one or implement all of them, so you could do it through Flash, WebRTC (https://webrtc.org/), or ORTC (https://ortc.org/).
We are currently offering you to record using WebRTC plus fallback with Flash and are working on implementing ORTC as well.
Now as mentioned above, there are many ways to do it and it is up to you, however it is up to your end users also since they might not be able to record over flash due to company policy or your website is on HTTP so you can not use WebRTC, etc.
With your own implementation you need to run the numbers and combine it all together (and work on keeping it up and running), while here at Ziggeo we do that for you and keep improving our SDKs and features.
Further more we also allow you to push the videos to S3 buckets, FTP, YouTube and Facebook - soon to DropBox as well.
So if you are like us, you will probably like to go down the road of do it yourself. If you however want to have time to work on your website, apps, and other things and just have the video, I do suggest using some service.
In regards to compression. It is good to mention that we do transcoding of all videos that are uploaded to our servers (You can see more here: https://ziggeo.com/features/transcoding). There is an original video that is kept and next to it the transcoded video (which can have watermark or some effects, etc. while it does not need to).
In general you want to 'standardize' the uploaded videos since different browsers will give you different video data containers and this would give you the upper hand so that it is easier to make adjustments to them later on for preview depending on the browser that is used.
To summarize:
1) - This depends on what kind of recording/playback and storage you need. If it is professional then using a service such as Ziggeo will help you focus on the important part of your service - like website design, functionality and similar, while if it is for fun and play you still have a free plan on Ziggeo, or you could get your sleeves up and do some codding :)
2) - I would personally look into WebRTC and ORTC if I was making implementation myself to see which one I would need more (or would be easier for me to implement). Once you find the one that you like, they usually offer some suggestions on their forums with what works best for them. (Be prepared however to need flash implementation at some point as well if it is business related setup)
3) It is best to standardize what you store in terms of resolution, video data containers and similar and often it is good to keep the original videos as well, so that you can always re-encode them if that is needed (which can happen in early stages of development).
Per the title, I am looking for a tool or some sort of initiative that's already been undertaken by other developers to simply grab data off of websites so one can navigate them without looking at them in the browser. I am fully aware of how most pages work so what I would like to do is just look at the data that's being pulled from them per windows technology that's already (hopefully) been written. Does this make sense? Here is an example of what I would like to see in a tool:
a windows interface that gives me data about a webpage (menus, submenus,
button names/captions, etc...
be able to execute transactions on those pages by specifying what to do
through the tool's interface (click button, download image, etc..)
does anyone know of a tool out there to do such things?
The closest "program" that comes to mind is
WWW::Mechanize
Advertised as
Handy web browsing in a Perl object
This can in fact be used on Windows, however you
will need Perl.
The question may sound a little odd but I'm currently in a project where this could help solving many problems.
Is it somehow possible to embed an .exe into any web browser? I don't want to run the program directly in the browser (would be major security risk I guess), I just want the window of the .exe being embeded into a browser page. So the .exe is running locally on the system but instead of a "windows window" I have it displayed in the web browser. Think of it like VNC, I only need my "video" and the possiblity of user interaction (the program is an interactive 3D visualization).
I don't have much hope for this being possible so I'm also glad about any suggestion that would allow me to display web pages while my program is running in the same (fullscreen) window. Doesn't necessarily has to be a "real" browser but should allow basic stuff like HTML, CSS etc.
This kinda sound more like a SuperUser question rather than a StackOverflow one.
Anyway, I have a number of possible solutions for you:
You could use a second monitor.
Maybe all you really need is setting the "exe" window to "always be on top".
I could swear that used to be an option in the Windows' default Task Manager in the earlier versions of Windows but I use a 3rd-party piece of software for around 10 years now for that and many other purposes, however there are many such options to be found online.
Can't risk endorsing the one I use here, since it tends to spook people into thinking I'm trying to infect them with HAX.
In case you have the sources for the "exe" you are running, have you considered going the other way around and building a web renderer into your desktop program? Something like WebKit, Servo and suchlike.
Or you could make the program listen on a port to network packets you can be sending from the page you'd have to make — like a remote control.
Then there's also the cgi-bin option if you run the server.
And, to see what you're controlling, you might wanna stream it to some streaming platform (if you get it to stream an obscured window), embed their player widget in an iframe on your custom local webpage and keep the website you are reaching in another frame.
Maybe even code the program to read XInput and stream it through Mixer using its MixPlay feature to control it.
Hope any of this helps.
I'm looking for a way to allow a user to upload a large file (~1gb) to my unix server using a web page and browser.
There are a lot of examples that illustrate how to do this with a traditional post request, however this doesn't seem like a good idea when the file is this large.
I'm looking for recommendations on the best approach.
Bonus points if the method includes a way of providing progress information to the user.
For now security is not a major concern, as most users who will be using the service can be trusted. We can also assume that the connection between client and host will not be interrupted (or if it is they have to start over).
We can also assume the user is running a browser of supporting most modern features (JavaScript, Flash, etc)
edit
No language requirements. Just looking for the best solution.
There are several ways to handle this,
1. Flash Uploader
Theres plenty of flash uploaders to improve the users GUI so that they can examine the process and the process factors such as time left, KB Done etc.
This is very good if you understand how to improve Flash source code for later developments.
2. Ajax
Theres a few ways using Ajax and PHP (although PHP Does not support it) you can use Perl module to accomplish the same thing http://pecl.php.net/package/uploadprogress, This is only if you wish to show percentage information etc.
3 Basic Javascript.
This method would be just the regular form, but with some ajax styling so when the form is submitted you can show a basic loader saying please wait while you send us the file...
If your using asp, you can take a look at: http://neatupload.codeplex.com/
Hope theres some good information to get you on your way.
Regards
Not sure about your language requirements, but you can look e.g. into
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/gp.fileupload/
Supports progress information also, btw.
I have used the dojo FileUploader widget to reliably upload audio files greater than a gigabyte with a progress bar. Though you said security was not an issue, I'd like to say that I got HTTPS uploads w/cookie based authentication hooked up flawlessly.
See: http://www.sitepen.com/blog/2008/09/02/the-dojo-toolkit-multi-file-uploader/ and
http://api.dojotoolkit.org/jsdoc/1.3/dojox.form.FileUploader
In your experience as a developer, what kinds of things have turned away users and prospective users from using your programs? Also, what kinds of things turn you away from using someone else's programs?
For example, one thing that really bugs me is when someone provides free software, but require you to enter your name and email address before you download it. Why do they need my name and email address? I just want to use the program! I understand that the developer(s) may want to get a feel for how many users they have, etc, but the extra work I have to do really makes me think twice about downloading their software, even if it does really great things.
Requiring lots of information when signing up -- name and email is bad enough, as you say, but some registration forms have many many fields. The fewer the better.
Charging money but refusing to disclose the price unless you speak to a sales rep
Having a web site that only works in certain browsers
No releases since 2003
No documentation
Support forum with many questions and no answers
Here are a few annoyances that I haven't seen anyone else mention:
Programs that auto-launch one or more processes at system startup that run constantly in the background (invisibly, in the clock tray, or otherwise).
While some of these are necessary, most would either be better implemented with a utility that runs periodically (use the system's task scheduler!) or don't need to be launched until the associated program is launched.
Dialog boxes that pop up on top of all open windows (even those of other applications).
This is even more annoying if you run full-screen apps.
Pop-up dialogs that won't let you switch to another app until they are dismissed make me want to throw something.
Stealing my file type associations or changing the icons associated with a MIME type when I already have that type assigned to another application. At an absolute minimum, ask me first.
Storing user data/documents in file types that can't be opened by other applications
The worst is when files are also bound to a specific version of the application
Automatically cluttering my desktop and quick launch menus with icons
Automatically adding a link to your crappy website into my web browser's bookmarks
Assuming I use Internet Explorer and launch it specifically instead of querying the system for the default browser (same goes for media player, email client, etc)
Failing to understand the difference between user-specific settings and system-wide settings
Re-mapping common, near-universal keyboard shortcuts (cut, paste, undo, print, refresh, etc) for no good reason
If you're going to re-map Ctrl+C from "copy" to "close without saving anything", at least pop up a dialog warning people when they use it
Requiring an exact version of a library or framework. I don't want to have to uninstall the .Net 2.0 framework and re-install 1.1 just to run your program.
Spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors in the user interface or documentation. If you can't be bothered to at run (at least) an automated spelling checker, then you probably also didn't bother testing your app properly.
Displaying error messages to the user in a way that isn't useful. I don't care if "unexpected error #3410 occurred", I want to know what on earth that means and what I should do about it.
If you thought the error was important enough to program in a unique error message, why did you instead program error-handling code that could gracefully handle the situation? Only let me know about an error if I caused it directly or if I can fix it.
On a related note, aren't all errors unexpected?
Sending me to a website when I click "Help" instead of including help files with the local installation. I don't mind if you periodically download updated help files from the web, but people still need documentation when an Internet connection isn't available.
Bulleted lists that are way too long.
Setup programs that come bundled with all sorts of freeware (even things like Google toolbar) that are selected by default. I just want the program I downloaded, not all sorts of other programs. I can understand that developers might get something in return for including these add-ons in their setups but I hate it when they are selected to be installed by default.
Automatic updates and "information" screens that pop up every single system startup.
Yes, you updated yourself good job but I don't care nor want to know that you have. Do I really have to click "No, I don't want to upgrade to the pricier version" every single time I start my computer?
Ad infections. You know the kind where if you scroll your mouse over the text your reading it'll pop up a thing so you can't read it anymore. And flash ads that have sound(especially that you can't turn off. this was the reason I installed adblock plus) and pop up windows that happen multiple times while your sitting on a page.
Also, pop ups telling me to join a sites news letter mailing list. (where the "no" button is very small)
I will rethink downloading something if I think they will start sending me SPAM if I give them my e-mail address.
At a previous employer we had a program I helped write that was online as a "free" download. They had to put something in for Name, address, phone, and e-mail. Oh, and no opt-out checkbox. It annoys me when other companies do this, but I didn't have any say in the matter.
The info needed for free things gets me too, but other than that:
Bundled software, most of the time adware or browser bars
Having to click too many times to do a simple action
Websites that advertise "Free Download!" for something that turns out to be a paid app. Wow, so generous to allow me to transfer data over the internet for free.
Putting an icon in the taskbar when I don't want it there.
I installed an app called Pamella that records Skype calls. I'm fine with 1 icon in the taskbar -- Skype's icon -- but Pamela adding a second just got me angry and I uninstalled it.
Ugly / unfit user-interface. For me, this is really important.
Having to register to download the program (specially if it's freeware)
Browser-specific / requiring special/other applications to work properly
Bloated applications that start with a few MBs and finally grow to 100's of MBs and huge mem consumption.
That'd be most of the things that turn me away from a program.
One of the things that bugs me the most (using, not downloading to try in the first place...):
I download or buy software it is because I want to USE it for something. If it is so friendly that it is 100% intuitive and needs no documentation before being useful, great! If it has comprehensive on-line or other help that answers all my questions as they come up, that's OK too.
However, if it has any kind of learning curve at all and nothing but my own persistent trial and error before I can do anything with it.... Off the drive it goes, within the first 5 minutes. Well, maybe I will use it if I am being paid to, but even in these cases I would probably recommend something else.
A user interface that is so simple that practically no documentation is required, or that has documentation that is accessible is a joy to use. If the program is complex and requires non-trivial documentation, that documentation should explain EVERYTHING a user might want to know, making no assumptions about his or her prior knowledge. That also puts my appreciation meter way up there.
Make your software actually do something people want done, and make it painless for them to do that with it, and you will have lots of satisfied users and word of mouth recommendations.
I left this on my list but it's a big enough annoyance that it probably stands on its own:
Software that requires users to pay for bug fixes, security patches, or critical updates.
If you have a patch that adds some new feature that I want, I don't mind paying for it. If you made a mistake and you are trying to get me to pay you to fix your mistake, then that's where we have a problem. Any physical product manufactured and sold would call this a "recall" and wouldn't dare charge customers to fix it.
In the past, some software products have shipped with known flaws to encourage users to buy the "critical updates subscription". This is downright evil.
How much pain am I going to endure to develop a conscious competence in using the program? Some computer games I tried to play but after a few hours if I haven't figured things out, I'll stop playing. If a program is hard to use and I don't have a really good motivation to resolve it, that will stop me right there.
How complicated is the installation process? How many minutes will I spend getting the basics of the program understood so I can be productive with it? How close to other programs is it, so that I can leverage how I use other programs to use this,e.g. if I've used Microsoft Office for years are the menus similar to that or is it someone else's idea of the ultimate menu system? Those are the questions I tend to wrestle with in a new program.
If something takes hours to install and then more hours to configure for my use, this really makes me question how useful is the software, really. I can understand the appeal of software that can be customized in a bazillion ways, but if I'm just getting used to the software, do I want these options at this point? To give an example of how absurd this would be in other situations, imagine if you had to list all the ingredients in a pizza or an automobile before getting to the options that mattered to you? You have to list everything in the pizza dough or car's body that most people don't think twice about what is there.