System.WindowsRuntimeExtensions missing? - windows-runtime

I'm trying to expose an async method via a windows RT component to my consuming JS.
Without going into too much initial detail, some of the articles I've read point to an extension method AsAsyncOperation() which should be available on Task<T> (example article here: http://marcominerva.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/how-to-expose-async-methods-in-a-windows-runtime-component/ )
Here's the MSDN link for it, so I know it should exist!:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/system.windowsruntimesystemextensions.aspx
What is confusing me at the moment is that I simple don't seem to have the 'AsAyncOperation' function at all.
Is there anything I need to do to ensure these extension methods are available?

Related

Custom JSON renderer in AEM/Sling

I've been playing around with this for a while now, and I think, I've - almost - cracked it, but I am still not fully satisfied with my solution.
So, what I want to do, is having a piece of content, a list of items, which would have two views: The standard HTML one, so people can view and edit it; and then a JSON endpoint for other services to consume.
First I thought it's a simple matter of creating two JSP scripts to render the content:
/apps/my-stuff/components/list-page/html.jsp
/apps/my-stuff/components/list-page/json.jsp
However the Apache Sling DefaultServlet seems to be rather ignorant of the json.jsp script.
As a second attempt, I created another script, in /apps/foundation/components/primary/cq/Page/json.jsp which will be actually called, and renders the page, as I expected. However there are a couple of worries/questions regarding this:
First of all, why is this being honoured by the system, and not the one in the more specific place?
The documentation states, that to find the appropriate renderer, first sling:resourceType will be inspected, then sling:resourceSuperType and then, only as a fallback will jcr:PrimaryType checked. However I think this is rather: jcr:PrimaryType, then the DefaultServlet, and then all the other things.
Most worryingly however, I have to admit, this is rather generic, so it'll break all the contnet with jcr:PrmaryType = Page, so that could have some side-effects.
A solution could be creating a new type: ListPage extends Page; and then create a renderer for that in /apps/foundation.... However I have this bad feeling, that might introduce other problems.
So my question is two fold: What is the proper way of doing this, and/or what am I missing from the way the URL -> script resolution is working in AEM/Sling. (Because it seems to be slightly different that described here and here.)
(Obviously I am trying to keep the default JSON renderer for other pages, as that might be needed for other things in the page. I am not even sure, changing this one page won't break the UI for this particular page...)
However the Apache Sling DefaultServlet seems to be rather ignorant of the json.jsp script.
Have you tried renaming your JSP like so: "list-page.json.jsp"?
If you're using AEM 6.3, you should look at Sling model Exporters. They allow you to automatically register a servlet against your Sling Model (that you can create to model your list content). That servlet can generate a JSON representation of the model for you using Jackson.
If you're not using AEM 6.3, I would suggest you create a servlet registered against your resource type and use an additional selector.
#SlingServlet(
selectors = "json",
resourceType = "my-stuff/components/list-page",
methods = "GET")
More information on Sling Servlets can be found here.

How to activate IWiFiDirectDevice in Win32 Console APP using WRL?

I want to use WinRT API for WiFi Direct from Windows 10 SDK in Win32 Console Application. I know about C++/CX (and even made some progress going that way), but still want to make it work without this extension.
My problem is that I can't activate IWifiDirectDevice interface (from ABI::Windows::Devices::WiFiDirect) to access IWifiDirectDeviceStatics that provides an GetDeviceSelector method.
HStringReference strDevice(RuntimeClass_Windows_Devices_WiFiDirect_WiFiDirectDevice);
ComPtr<IInspectable> insp;
hr = RoActivateInstance(strDevice.Get(), insp.GetAddressOf());
This code ends up with E_NOTIMPL as a result. In Microsoft's example they used factories for activation, but ABI::Windows::Devices::WiFiDirect namespace has no factories.
Worth mentioning that IWifiDirectAdvertisementPublisher works just fine when activated the way I wrote before.
So how to activate IWifiDirectDevice from WRL?
Windows.Devices.WiFiDirect.WiFiDirectDevice is not an activatable class. You can see that by looking at windows.devices.wifidirect.idl.
You will need to use the static methods, e.g.:
HStringReference strDevice(RuntimeClass_Windows_Devices_WiFiDirect_WiFiDirectDevice);
ComPtr<IWiFiDirectDeviceStatics> wiFiDirectDeviceStatics;
hr = Windows::Foundation::GetActivationFactory(
strDevice.Get(),
&wiFiDirectDeviceStatics);
ComPtr<IWiFiDirectDevice> wiFiDirectDevice;
ComPtr<IAsyncOperation<WiFiDirectDevice*>> asyncOperation;
hr = wiFiDirectDeviceStatics->FromIdAsync(deviceId.Get(), &asyncOperation);
Consider taking a look at the Wi-Fi Direct sample.

Can an embedded cocos2d-js app call back out to c++?

I'm researching the possibility of using cocos2d-js by embedding it as a view inside an existing iOS app. In order to make this work, I'm going to need 2-way communication between cocos2d and the surrounding application.
After some initial investigation, I have determined that it is possible to call in to cocos using ScriptingCore:
ScriptingCore* sc = ScriptingCore::getInstance();
jsval outVal;
sc->evalString("function()", &outVal);
My question, then, is around doing the reverse. It is possible to (e.g. in response to user input) call back out of cocos2d-js to C++? Ideally, there would be a way to register a callback with ScriptingCore which could be invoked from JavaScript.
I believe it can be done, but I have not tried myself, nor can I find a good and concise example.
All I can do is point you at SuperSuraccoon's Bluetooth example and it's git page, which apparently does both ways communication between C++ and JS code.

Windows Phone 8 Return value from getresponseCallBack method?

I am trying to make a generic connectivity class in my Windows Phone 8 app. This class should be used whenever i need to send a POST request to the service.
In a particular use case i need to call the service, display the response and navigate the user away from the current page.
I am able to successfully achieve the first 2 objectives using the connectivity class. This is because the connectivity class is not part of the UI. So is there a way the GetResponseCallBack method can inform the calling method that it has received the response and then i can navigate the user?
Hope i was able to ask my question clearly.
Thanks!
I have managed to find a work-around for now. Not sure if it is the right way to get the response of the async task. But i am sharing it for the benefit for others who may be facing similar issue.
What i have done is, i have defined the GetResponseCallBack as a public method in the class calling the async task method. Later i pass the same GetResponseCallBack as a parameter to the beginGetResponse method in the GetRequestStreamCallBack method.
This way i am able to bring the control flow back to the phoneApplicationPage after the asyncTask executes, thus allowing me to handle some events on the UI thread.
Hope it helps!

Angular - building a "public" function (newbie)

I'm After several days learning angularJS through converting my standart JS app to a ng one.
I was wondering about this simple scenario:
I have a global function called fb_connect(),
it can be used from any page (or any controller if you like) to make a facebook-based login.
This function makes a simple http call and receives a JSON object contain data to move on (display a pop up, login, etc...)
I read that I can define a Factory or a Service for my app and use it in any controller, which works fine.
So, I created a fb_connect factory function.
The problem is that now, in every page (every controller), I have to define that fb_connect in the constructor of every controller - for example :
function welcome($scope,fb_connect){});
What is the proper way to do this kind of actions using Angular without having to define these functions each and every time in every controller?
Thanks
Setting up factories and services is all part of the dependency injection system of Angular. Using that system is great when you need to create things that depend on other injected things. It's a big tree of dependencies. It's also nice for creating singletons, such that everywhere in your code end up using the same instance of some object.
It sounds to me like neither of these benefits apply in your case. I'd suggest just not using Angular's DI for it. You have some function defined globally, just call it directly and skip the DI. There's nothing wrong with that.
Of course you say it makes an Ajax call, so doesn't depend on the Angular $http service?
Your two options are:
Declare the function on the $rootScope
Inject it as a service
My advice is to go with making it a service. The whole purpose of services is explained in the Angular.js docs, just like this quote:
Angular services are singletons that carry out specific tasks common to web apps... To use an Angular service, you identify it as a dependency for the dependent (a controller, or another service) that depends on the service.
As you mentioned in your question, you'd prefer to not define the service in every controller you wish to use it in. With $rootScope you'll be injecting that also in every controller. So really it's a question of which you prefer, although to answer your question, the proper way of using a factory or service is to inject it into the controller you wish to use it in.
You can always put it in the $rootScope
myApp.run(function($rootScope, fb_connect){
$rootScope.welcome = function(){
};
});