How to detect if the area was 100% painted in as3 - actionscript-3

I´m making a game that simulates an industry of pan, and one of the process is Painting.
What I want to do is to let the player paint the pan, but i don´t want it to be easy using FILL, i want that the player paint the pan with an brush and then the game detects if all the area was painted and let the player advance.
For the painting i intend to use that library: http://www.nocircleno.com/graffiti/
But i have no idea how to detect if all the area was painted. Can someone show me some way of doing that?

One of the ways would be - you make a shielding BitmapData that has transparency and is opaque in place which you need your player to paint. (Color it as needed, but make sure the color is fully opaque). Then gather histogram() then query alpha vector for 255th value, this will be the initial value for zero percent filled. These range from 0-255, so you can't use 100 or any other fixed value. Then, while the player is painting, you draw the brush over that BitmapData with blendMode parameter set to BlendMode.ERASE, this will net your BitmapData to gain transparency where the brush was drawn. After your player finishes drawing by any means (say, the paint is used up), you run another histogram() over the BitmapData, and query the 255th value of alpha channel vector. 0 means the bitmap is fully transparent (or at least, only a small amount of pixels is left opaque), thus you can count a zero as 100% fill, for anything greater use the proportion.
var bd:BitmapData=new BitmapData(w,h,true,0x0); // fully transparent initial bitmap
bd.draw(yourPaintBase); // a shape that designates area to be painted. Must be fully opaque
var bm:Bitmap=new Bitmap(bd);
// position it as needed, so the area which should be painted is aligned to wherever you need
addChild(bm);
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,doPaint);
var baseValue:int=bd.histogram()[3][255]; // Vector #3 contains alpha, #255 contains
// percentage of those pixels that have alpha of 255 = fully opaque
function doPaint(e:Event):void {
if (!areWePainting) return;
var sh:Shape=getBrush(); // shuold return an existing Shape object reference for performance
sh.x=e.localX;
sh.y=e.localY; // we are drawing where the mouse is
bd.draw(sh,null,null,BlendMode.ERASE);
decreasePaint(); // we have used some paint
if (noMorePaint()) {
e.target.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME,doPaint);
var endValue:int=Math.floor(100*(1-bd.histogram()[3][255]/baseValue));
// aligning to percentage. This is the value you seek
reportFilledPercentage(endValue);
}
}

You can iterate over the pixels on your BitmapData and use getPixel() to check if the color of all those pixels is not white. If a white one is found, the image is not fully painted.
Something like this:
function containsWhite(bitmapData:BitmapData):Boolean
{
for(var c:int = 0; c < bitmapData.width; c++)
{
for(var r:int = 0; r < bitmapData.height; r++)
{
// Check if pixel is white.
if(bitmapData.getPixel(c, r) >= 0xFFFFFF)
{
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}

Your essentially dealing with a collision detection problem. From looking at their API you could try something like a for loop with getColorAtPoint and try to determine they have drawn at each pixel.
If all else fails look into collision between the objects the library generates using the .hitTestObject method of an object.
See this: http://sierakowski.eu/list-of-tips/39-collision-detection-methods-hittest-and-hittestobject-alternatives.html
And this to see how someone handles collision with pixels: http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2010/08/05/worms-like-destructible-terrain-in-flash-part-2/

Related

setCenter() Method is not properly centering sprite texture on box2d fixture

The past few days I've been trying to figure out a display bug I don't understand. I've been working on a simple 2d platformer with box2d and orthogonal Tiled maps. So far so good, the physics work and using the b2d debug renderer I can assert proper player fixture and camera movement through the level.
Now next step I've tried to load textures to display sprites instead of debug shapes. This is where I stumble. I can load animations for my player body/fixture, but when I use the setCenter() method to center the texture on the fixture it is always out of center.
I've tried approaches via halving texture witdths and heights hoping to center the texture on the player fixture but I get the exact same off position rendering. I've played aorund with world/camera/screen unit coordinates but the misalignement persists.
I'm creating the player in my Player class with the following code.
First I define the player in box2d:
//define player's physical behaviour
public void definePlayer() {
//definitions to later use in a body
BodyDef bdef = new BodyDef();
bdef.position.set(120 / Constants.PPM, 60 / Constants.PPM);
bdef.type = BodyDef.BodyType.DynamicBody;
b2body = world.createBody(bdef);
//Define needed components of the player's main fixture
FixtureDef fdef = new FixtureDef();
PolygonShape shape = new PolygonShape();
shape.setAsBox(8 / Constants.PPM, 16 / Constants.PPM); //size of the player hitbox
//set the player's category bit
fdef.filter.categoryBits = Constants.PLAYER_BIT;
//set which category bits the player should collide with. If not mentioned here, no collision occurrs
fdef.filter.maskBits = Constants.GROUND_BIT |
Constants.GEM_BIT |
Constants.BRICK_BIT |
Constants.OBJECT_BIT |
Constants.ENEMY_BIT |
Constants.TREASURE_CHEST_BIT |
Constants.ENEMY_HEAD_BIT |
Constants.ITEM_BIT;
fdef.shape = shape;
b2body.createFixture(fdef).setUserData(this);
}
Then I call the texture Region to be drawn in the Player class constructor:
//define in box2d
definePlayer();
//set initial values for the player's location, width and height, initial animation.
setBounds(0, 0, 64 / Constants.PPM, 64 / Constants.PPM);
setRegion(playerStand.getKeyFrame(stateTimer, true));
And finally, I update() my player:
public void update(float delta) {
//center position of the sprite on its body
// setPosition(b2body.getPosition().x - getWidth() / 2, b2body.getPosition().y - getHeight() / 2);
setCenter(b2body.getPosition().x, b2body.getPosition().y);
setRegion(getFrame(delta));
//set all the boolean flags during update cycles approprietly. DO NOT manipulate b2bodies
//while the simulation happens! therefore, only set flags there, and call the appropriate
//methods outside the simulation step during update
checkForPitfall();
checkIfAttacking();
}
And my result is
this, facing right
and this, facing left
Update:
I've been trying to just run
setCenter(b2body.getPosition().x, b2body.getPosition().y);
as suggested, and I got the following result:
facing right and facing left.
The sprite texture flip code is as follows:
if((b2body.getLinearVelocity().x < 0 || !runningRight) && !region.isFlipX()) {
region.flip(true, false);
runningRight = false;
} else if ((b2body.getLinearVelocity().x > 0 || runningRight) && region.isFlipX()) {
region.flip(true, false);
runningRight = true;
}
I'm testing if either the boolean flag for facing right is set or the x-axis velocity of my player b2body has a positive/negative value and if my texture region is already flipped or not and then use libGDX's flip() accordingly. I should not be messing with fixture coords anywhere here, hence my confusion.
The coordinates of box2d fixtures are offsets from the position, the position isn't necessarily the center (although it could be depending on your shape definition offsets). So in your case i think the position is actually the lower left point of the box2d polygon shape.
In which case you don't need to adjust for width and height because sprites are also drawn from bottom left position. So all you need is ;
setPosition(b2body.getPosition().x , b2body.getPosition().y );
I'm guessing you flip the box2d body when the player looks left the position of the shape is now bottom right so the sprite offset of width/2 and height/2 is from the bottom right instead. So specifically when you are looking left you need an offset of
setPosition(b2body.getPosition().x - getWidth() , b2body.getPosition().y );
I think looking right will be fixed from this, but i don't know for sure how you handle looking left in terms of what you do to the body, but something is done because the offset changes entirely as shown in your capture. If you aren't doing some flipping you could add how you handle looking right to the question.
EDIT
It seems the answer was that the sprite wasn't centered in the sprite sheet and this additional space around the sprite caused the visual impression of being in the wrong place (see comments).

Dynamically draw rectangle between the Dragable objects in AS3

My aim is to highlight the area between the two dragable objects inpoint_mc and scrub_outpoint_mc, so i had created a rectangle between these points, i need to resize this rectangle based on the dragpoints, which indicates the distance between Inpoint and Outpoint, i tried my level best unfortunately i can acheive it
private function startScrubbingIN(_arg1:MouseEvent){
trace("scrubBarIsMovingIN");
this.cueCard.stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_UP, this.stopScrubbingIN);
this.cueCard.stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_MOVE, this.scrubBarIsMovingIN);
this.scrubbing = true;
var _local2:Rectangle = new Rectangle(this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.x, this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.y,
this.controls_mc.scrub_outpoint_mc.x-this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.x, 0);
// now we're limiting in point to current position of out point
this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.startDrag(false, _local2);
this.controls_mc.addChild(_seekIndicator);
_seekIndicator.graphics.beginFill(0x990000);
_seekIndicator.graphics.drawRect(this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.x, this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.y,
this.controls_mc.scrub_outpoint_mc.x-this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.x, 12);
trace("_seekIndicator"+ _seekIndicator);
// _seekIndicator.width = this.controls_mc.scrub_outpoint_mc.x+ this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.y;
}
it giving me the result as like the attached image
but the red rectangle need to be shrink itself between the 2 Points
The rectangle should be redrawn only after you stop dragging, or when you move mouse while dragging. Don't forget to call _seekIndicator.graphics.clear() to delete old rectangle. And finally, use this.controls_mc.scrub_outpoint_mc.x and this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.x for borders, because you're saying the rectangle should be between the in and out point MCs, while you use this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.x in width.
private function scrubBarIsMovingIN(e:MouseEvent):void {
// the startDrag dragged one of the sliders already
// existing code skipped, if any
_seekIndicator.graphics.clear();
_seekIndicator.graphics.beginFill(0x990000);
_seekIndicator.graphics.drawRect(this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.x, this.controls_mc.progressBar_mc.y,
this.controls_mc.scrub_outpoint_mc.x-this.controls_mc.inpoint_mc.x, 12);
}
Should do.

How to determine whether a given object is a mask

Apparently, in Adobe's wisdom, both the object being mask, and the masking object contain a "mask" property. This leads to a cyclical reference that prevents determining which is the actual mask and which is the masked.
For example...
var clip:MovieClip = new MovieClip();
clip.name = "clip";
addChild(clip);
var boundary:Shape = new Shape();
boundary.name = "boundary";
clip.addChild(boundary);
clip.mask = boundary;
trace(clip.mask.name); // outputs "boundary"
trace(clip.mask.mask.name); // outputs "clip"
I've iterated through the properties of both clip and boundary, and there doesn't seem to be anything unique that sets them apart. My first thought was to force a removal of the superfluous "mask" reference in boundary, however, that also sets the mask property in clip to null, thereby removing the mask.
My second thought was to check the parent relationship of a mask. If the parent is the same as the object's mask, then the object in question is itself the mask.
var a:Array = [clip, boundary];
for each (var item in a) {
if (item.mask == item.parent) {
trace(item.name + " is a mask");
}
}
// outputs "boundary is a mask"
Seems to work, and after checking the API reference on masks, it's clear that when caching, a mask will need to be a child of the masked, however... it's also valid to have a mask at the same depth as the masked (I do this from time to time when a mask needs to not travel with the masked content).
For example...
MainTimeline ¬
0: clip ¬
0: boundary
... can also be laid out as ...
MainTimeline ¬
0: clip ¬
1: boundary
So, there's the conundrum. Any ideas on how to resolve this?
The "best" hack I've found so far is to run hitTestPoint on the objects (after making sure they have something to hit under the target). Masks do not appear to ever return true for a full pixel hit test. This seems to work in most basic situations that I've tested:
public function isMask(displayObject:DisplayObject):Boolean {
// Make sure the display object is a Class which has Graphics available,
// and is part of a mask / maskee pair.
if ((displayObject is Shape || displayObject is Sprite) && displayObject.mask) {
// Add a circle at the target object's origin.
displayObject['graphics'].beginFill(0);
displayObject['graphics'].drawCircle(0, 0, 10);
var origin:Point = displayObject.localToGlobal(new Point());
var maskLocal:Point = displayObject.mask.globalToLocal(origin);
// Add a circle at the same relative position on the "mask".
displayObject.mask['graphics'].beginFill(0);
displayObject.mask['graphics'].drawCircle(maskLocal.x, maskLocal.y, 10);
// No matter which is the actual mask, one circle will reveal the other,
// so hit testing the origin point should return true.
// However, it seems to return false if the object is actually a mask.
var hit:Boolean = displayObject.hitTestPoint(origin.x, origin.y, true);
displayObject['graphics'].clear();
displayObject.mask['graphics'].clear();
// Return true if the hit test failed.
return !hit;
} else {
return false;
}
}
Obviously you'd want to cache the graphics in case the objects already have some, and it could do with something more elegant than casting as Sprite so that it can handle Shapes, but it's a start.
Edit: Accessing ['graphics'] lets this accept Shapes, but obviously isn't super efficient. I'm not sure what the best method would be, short of adding an interface.
Great question, haven't run into this before. I wasn't aware of the cyclical reference.
If your masks are exclusively masks, I would suggest just incorporating that into your naming convention. For example calling it clipMask as opposed to boundary.
As noted in the comments, in the situation where the mask is on the same display list, you could use getChildIndex() to compare their position on the display list of the parent.
Typically in that situation I'll have the mask layered over the other display object. This is not enforced obviously, and I don't believe that it has any effect on the result of the mask visually. But it's easier to maintain for a large group than a naming convention.
Still not ideal obviously.

How to Snap linestyle in Actionscript 3.0?

Hai, i am a newbie to actionscript.
i am trying to make a brush tool in actionscript 3, where kids can paint colors inside a circle using the brush. i have achieved this using linestyle. Now i want the brush to snap the color when the kid is about to complete(say when they are 95% to complete the painting). How do i know how much the kid has painted on the circle?
Thanks
How do i know how much the kid has
painted on the circle?
You can:
make your circles and other shapes Sprites to get separate container
render them into bitmap and count number of non-transparent pixels in it (you should know what number corresponds to 100%)
since counting pixels is heavy operation (can take hundreds of milliseconds, depending of shape size), you don't want to run it on every frame. I suggest to do it on MOUSE_UP, right after kid finishes next stroke.
How to count pixels:
function countPixels(shape:DisplayObject):int
{
var bd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(shape.width, shape.height);
bd.draw(shape);
//here you get sequence of ARGB-packed colors in vector
var pixels:Vector.<uint> = bd.getVector(bd.rect);
//AFAIK, fastest method to traverse vector is 'for' loop
var pixel:uint;
var filledCount:int = 0;
for (var i:int = pixels.length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
pixel = pixels[i];
//pixel is 32-bit ARGB color value, test upper 8 bits (alpha):
if ((pixel >> 24) > 0) filledCount++;
}
return filledCount;
}
Run this on filled shape to get total pixel count to compare with.
After pixelCount reaches 95%, you can clear kid's drawing and show filled shape.

Bitmap conversion - Creating a transparent + black image from a B&W source

I have a whole bunch of jpg files that I need to use in a project, that for one reason or another cannot be altered. Each file is similar (handwriting), black pen on white BG. However I need to use these assets against a non-white background in my flash project, so I'm trying to do some client-side processing to get rid of the backgrounds using getPixel and setPixel32.
The code I am currently using currently uses a linear comparison, and while it works, the results are less than expected, as the shades of grey are getting lost in the mix. Moreso than just tweaking my parameters to get things looking proper, I get the feeling that my method for computing the RGBa value is weak.
Can anyone recommend a better solution than what I'm using below? Much appreciated!
private function transparify(data:BitmapData) : Bitmap {
// Create a new BitmapData with transparency to return
var newData:BitmapData = new BitmapData(data.width, data.height, true);
var orig_color:uint;
var alpha:Number;
var percent:Number;
// Iterate through each pixel using nested for loop
for(var x:int = 0; x < data.width; x++){
for (var y:int = 0; y < data.height; y++){
orig_color = data.getPixel(x,y);
// percent is the opacity percentage, white should be 0,
// black would be 1, greys somewhere in the middle
percent = (0xFFFFFF - orig_color)/0xFFFFFF;
// To get the alpha value, I multiply 256 possible values by
// my percentage, which gets multiplied by 0xFFFFFF to fit in the right
// value for the alpha channel
alpha = Math.round(( percent )*256)*0xFFFFFF;
// Adding the alpha value to the original color should give me the same
// color with an alpha channel added
var newCol = orig_color+alpha;
newData.setPixel32(x,y,newCol);
}
}
var newImg:Bitmap = new Bitmap(newData);
return newImg;
}
Since it's a white background, blendMode may give you a better result.