I have a web server running Windows Server R2 Standard, and am experiencing the issue described in this blog post: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/BugAndFixASPNETFailsToDetectIE10CausingDoPostBackIsUndefinedJavaScriptErrorOrMaintainFF5ScrollbarPosition.aspx
In short, .Net is failing to recognise IE10 and is treating it as a downlevel browser without javascript support - if I understand the issue correctly.
I tried the following popular solutions:
Installed both hotfixes for .Net 2 and 4.
Manually updated the browser definition files in the .Net framework config folder and ran aspnet_regbrowsers.exe.
Put the new browser definition files in the App_Browsers directory.
Finally I upgraded to .Net 4.5 which solved the issue for .Net 4 sites running on the server, however .Net 2 sites are still experiencing the issue.
Because this is a live web server it has a lot of windows updates that have not been installed. I thought maybe there was an update that would address the issue. So I've taken a look at the updates but none of the descriptions seem to address the issue, so I cannot justify installing them and potentially causing more problems.
Does anyone have any other solutions or possible reasons why this issue just won't go away?
I have the same problem, and I haven't been able to figure out why none of the fixes work. However, I did find a workaround that might work for you: Setting the Page.ClientTarget attribute to "uplevel" overrides .NET's browser capability detection. Have a look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.page.clienttarget.aspx for more information.
Have come through many microsoft hot fixes, they were working in local environment, but in the live server there was no result.
Setting up Page.ClientTarget = "uplevel" (preferably in a header or footer page) has really solved the issue. I think this the best solution, as your .net application may not detect any other browser in future. But then we may have to wait and see, if this fix has any side effects.
Related
I am currently building an app using the Wordpress API and Framework7 that is solely intended for offline use. The offline app works perfectly in safari with local file restrictions disabled, however I understand a similar option is not available in IE or Chrome.
Unfortunately for me, the project is being developed exclusively for surface pro, so it has to work in IE.
This being the case, are there any alternative solutions in which I can quickly and smoothly serve the local files as a local server? Ideally avoiding the use of the command line and/or MAMP/XAMPP.
Found that tinyweb offered a solution that was almost perfect, however the local files were all 403 forbidden when loaded up.
Any suggestions would be welcome.
You can evaluate to encase your app in a Cordova app for Windows.
Or, if it suits your needs, a quick and dirty solution is pkg.
I have been doing a research for quite a sometime but unable to find a good solution - therefore thought of asking on StackOverflow.
I have automated the testing using Selenium Webdriver for different browser but lately I had seen there were some issues which came for Chrome's older version - now, the question I had was if there is any way through which I could run the script for different versions of browsers e.g. test should run on Chrome 48 - Chrome 59 (covering majors versions only).
The two solution I got from my research was -
1.
Overriding the chrome binary location like the below link:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/16562068/6738995
I then started my research on how to download the binaries for Chrome and I found the official repo also - http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html
2. Use Selenium Webdriver on cloud solution provider like BrowserStack or SauceLabs etc who provides multi-version-browser support
Now, I want to exhaust all the options related to the 1st approach i.e. if there is no proper/easy way to implement the solution then I would have go for the 2nd approach.
The reason I am reluctant to go for 2nd approach is that I might loose control(I am speculating that there might be some restrictions on using that platform, I might be wrong and could only find out the try after tring that) and also there will be learning curve associated with this and I would also have to spend time & resources in order to stabilize with the chosen technology.
Thanks in advance.
If resource isn't a concern/constraint for you, then you can use a Virtual Machine, like VMWare and simulate separate test environments with different web browsers. However, if you are looking for the best solution, then you have to use Cloud solutions like SauceLabs or BrowserStack.
I've got a small experimental project on the go that uses an embedded system to show web pages.
The major draw back is that the embedded system doesn't have any form of server on it (No lovely web server languages allowed).
My current setup for testing any potential winning solution is locally (Just in a document C:/users/me/test/index.html) and then also testing it in wamp.
I've looked into using JS or JQuery but evey resource i've found only ever works when I test it within wamp, which isn't a viable solution for me.
I have a couple of questions:
Is it even possible to read an XML document without any form of
server technology?
If so, could someone post some resources please? I've found a lot of similar topics to mine, but none really cover my predicament.
If this isn't possible, are there any other technologies I could use to give the same output?
Thanks
I am facing issues to run .exe files created in Qt 5.3 on different windows system. I have included all the .dll files. The issue is that on the latest system with graphics card support the application runs without any issues but on older systems it just gives blanck screen.
I suspect that this has something to do with openGL support for the system.
Is there a way where I can make sure that the application runs without any glitches on all the systems?
Or is it possible to have an application created without oprnGL support needed ?
Hoping to hear some solution for this.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
Following is the error I get when I run the code
getProcAddress: Unable to resolve 'glBindFramebuffer'
getProcAddress: Unable to resolve 'glBindFramebufferOES'
getProcAddress: Unable to resolve 'glBindFramebufferARB'
and here is the screenshot of the way the screen looks
NOTE :
Please note that when I run the .exe on a new system with updated graphics, the screens looks perfect.
Did you include any OpenGL headers in your Qt Project?
Because if you did then there is obviously going to be a dependency on OpenGL for each system and if one of them cannot support this then you either need to decrease the minimum version of GL you are using or remove these headers altogether. It is also worth noting that no matter how hard you try - you will never get the same version of OpenGL to run across every piece of hardware without having to change something.
Did you add the QtOpenGL module?
From what is sounds like, you are not using OpenGL in your application. If this is true then you should remove this module from your .pro file and it should remove the dependency.
I hope this answers your question. If not, could you provide a little more detail because your question was slightly vague.
I am developing my first extension for Chrome and as I am working on Ubuntu, I've encountered two awful bugs.
The first thing is that chrome.i18n.getUILanguage is not supported! (console gives me an error about unsupported method). The thing is that this problem is not listed on any WIKI page, which may become tricky for beginners. Anyone had similar issue? For now, I am using window.navigator.language.
The second bug is about rich notifications that are not supported (anyone knows when it will be released?). As far as I know, when the app will be about to send a notification, the scripts will stop due to the error (similar to the first bug). I am not sure if there is possibility to develop different packages for different platforms, but if I want my extension to be truly multi-platform, I will have to give up development of this feature.
Any suggestions or thoughts?
Thanks,
As i said earlier in a comment, it seems to be not supported with linux mint either where i'm developing the chrome extension.
In this link a member of the chrome team said that they submitted it... but this is not true.
Thanks for the window.navigator.language alternative.