I have a question I want to merge 2 databases into another one but the problem is there are duplicate rows. So how can I merge the 2 databases into another one without duplicate records? I hope someone can help me.
Database 1
Name | Number | Code
Demo | 0293 | 827
Test | 0482 | 923
Database 2
Name | Number | Code
Lol | 0223 | 182
Stack| 1923 | 829
Demo | 0293 | 827
Thanks
This should really be done with a unique key and ON DUPLICATE KEY. If not willing to do that, the following would also work:
Assuming the tables are identical and that you only want to exclude a row when ALL columns are the same as a row in the target table.
INSERT into Table1
SELECT * from Table2
WHERE concat(Name,'|',Number,'|',Code) not in (
SELECT concat(Name,'|',Number,'|',Code)
FROM Table1
)
Select A.*,B.* from TABLE1 AS A,TABLE2 AS B where A.code=B.code GROUP BY A.code;
I think you are talking about TABLE not DATABASE. Use GROUP BY clause or find DISTINCT value with the query. And you have not specified any primary key..so read mysql tutorial first..
Related
I'm trying to update one MySQL table based on information from another.
My original table looks like:
id | value
------------
1 | hello
2 | fortune
3 | my
4 | old
5 | friend
And the tobeupdated table looks like:
uniqueid | id | value
---------------------
1 | | something
2 | | anything
3 | | old
4 | | friend
5 | | fortune
I want to update id in tobeupdated with the id from original based on value (strings stored in VARCHAR(32) field).
The updated table will hopefully look like:
uniqueid | id | value
---------------------
1 | | something
2 | | anything
3 | 4 | old
4 | 5 | friend
5 | 2 | fortune
I have a query that works, but it's very slow:
UPDATE tobeupdated, original
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
WHERE tobeupdated.value = original.value
This maxes out my CPU and eventually leads to a timeout with only a fraction of the updates performed (there are several thousand values to match). I know matching by value will be slow, but this is the only data I have to match them together.
Is there a better way to update values like this? I could create a third table for the merged results, if that would be faster?
I tried MySQL - How can I update a table with values from another table?, but it didn't really help. Any ideas?
UPDATE tobeupdated
INNER JOIN original ON (tobeupdated.value = original.value)
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
That should do it, and really its doing exactly what yours is. However, I prefer 'JOIN' syntax for joins rather than multiple 'WHERE' conditions, I think its easier to read
As for running slow, how large are the tables? You should have indexes on tobeupdated.value and original.value
EDIT:
we can also simplify the query
UPDATE tobeupdated
INNER JOIN original USING (value)
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
USING is shorthand when both tables of a join have an identical named key such as id. ie an equi-join - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_(SQL)#Equi-join
It depends what is a use of those tables, but you might consider putting trigger on original table on insert and update. When insert or update is done, update the second table based on only one item from the original table. It will be quicker.
Considering two tables with a many-to-many relation :
Company Speciality
--------- ---------
id id
--------- ---------
1 21
2 22
3 23
4
CompanySpeciality
--------------------------
company_id | speciality_id
--------------------------
1 | 21
1 | 22
4 | 21
4 | 23
I want to delete company 4, and associate its specialities to the company 1.
If I use a simple UPDATE statement on CompanySpeciality to set "company_id = 1 WHERE company_id=4", I'm facing the primary contraint violation because the pair 1|21 already exists.
Is the a way to update the relation table with a single query ? This query should only affect rows that will not be duplicated.
The result would be :
CompanySpeciality
--------------------------
company_id | speciality_id
--------------------------
1 | 21
1 | 22
1 | 23
something to the effect of:
UPDATE CompanySpecialty
SET company_id=1
WHERE company_id=4
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM CompanySpecialty cs WHERE cs.company_id=1 AND cs.specialty_id=CompanySpecialty.specialty_id);
should work for you. (i haven't tested the exact syntax, but using a NOT EXISTS clause should help you eliminate the problem of violating primary key restraints).
you will then have to remove the extra records left in the table for company 4 in a separate query:
DELETE FROM CompanySpecialty
WHERE company_id=4;
You don't want to UPDATE, you want to INSERT and ignore dupes:
INSERT IGNORE INTO CompanySpeciality (company_id, speciality_id)
SELECT 1, speciality_id
FROM CompanySpeciality
WHERE company_id=4
you won't be able to both update and delete records in a single query. You can use transactions:
mysql: select, insert, delete and update in one query
I've a database called test and i've tables called x,y,z.
How do i select x,y,z and there is a column called date IN X,Y,Z check whether there is a particular date.
Is there any build in function that does this?
update
SELECT column date from all tables which is in a database called test
Thanks in advance!!
As far as I know, in SQL you cannot 'select a table', you can select some
column(s) from one or many tables at once. The result of such a query is an another table (temporary table) that you retrieve the data from.
Please be more specific about what exactly you want to do (e.g.: "I want to select a column 'z' from table 'tableA' and column 'y' from table 'tableB'") - then I'm sure your question has a pretty simple answer :)
SELECT x.date AS x_date, y.date AS y_date, z.date AS z_date FROM x,y,z;
That produces a result:
+---------+---------+---------+
| x_date | y_date | z_date |
+---------+---------+---------+
| | | |
| | | |
+---------+---------+---------+
Alternatively you can get everything in one column by ussuing a query:
SELECT date FROM x
UNION ALL
SELECT date FROM y
UNION ALL
SELECT date FROM z;
That produces a result:
+-------+
| date |
+-------+
| |
| |
+-------+
In the example above you would get also duplicate values in the single column. If you want to avoid duplicates replace 'UNION ALL' with 'UNION'
I'm still not sure if I undestood what you really want ot achieve, but I still hope that helps
Also take a look at:
http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_union.asp
http://www.sql-tutorial.net/SQL-JOIN.asp
I have a table:
+--------+-------------------+-----------+
| ID | Name | Order |
+--------+-------------------+-----------+
| 1 | John | 1 |
| 2 | Mike | 3 |
| 3 | Daniel | 4 |
| 4 | Lisa | 2 |
| 5 | Joe | 5 |
+--------+-------------------+-----------+
The order can be changed by admin hence the order column. On the admin side I have a form with a select box Insert After: to entries to the database. What query should I use to order+1 after the inserted column.
I want to do this in a such way that keeps server load to a minimum because this table has 1200 rows at present. Is this the correct way to save an order of the table or is there a better way?
Any help appreciated
EDIT:
Here's what I want to do, thanks to itsmatt:
want to reorder row number 1 to be after row 1100, you plan to leave 2-1100 the same and then modify 1 to be 1101 and increment 1101-1200
You need to do this in two steps:
UPDATE MyTable
SET `Order` = `Order` + 1
WHERE `Order` > (SELECT `Order`
FROM MyTable
WHERE ID = <insert-after-id>);
...which will shift the order number of every row further down the list than the person you're inserting after.
Then:
INSERT INTO MyTable (Name, `Order`)
VALUES (Name, (SELECT `Order` + 1 FROM MyTable WHERE ID = <insert-after-id>));
To insert the new row (assuming ID is auto increment), with an order number of one more than the person you're inserting after.
Just add the new row in any normal way and let a later SELECT use ORDER BY to sort. 1200 rows is infinitesimally small by MySQL standards. You really don't have to (and don't want to) keep the physical table sorted. Instead, use keys and indexes to access the table in a way that will give you what you want.
you can
insert into tablename (name, `order`)
values( 'name', select `order`+1 from tablename where name='name')
you can also you id=id_val in your inner select.
Hopefully this is what you're after, the question isn't altogether clear.
I'm trying to update one MySQL table based on information from another.
My original table looks like:
id | value
------------
1 | hello
2 | fortune
3 | my
4 | old
5 | friend
And the tobeupdated table looks like:
uniqueid | id | value
---------------------
1 | | something
2 | | anything
3 | | old
4 | | friend
5 | | fortune
I want to update id in tobeupdated with the id from original based on value (strings stored in VARCHAR(32) field).
The updated table will hopefully look like:
uniqueid | id | value
---------------------
1 | | something
2 | | anything
3 | 4 | old
4 | 5 | friend
5 | 2 | fortune
I have a query that works, but it's very slow:
UPDATE tobeupdated, original
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
WHERE tobeupdated.value = original.value
This maxes out my CPU and eventually leads to a timeout with only a fraction of the updates performed (there are several thousand values to match). I know matching by value will be slow, but this is the only data I have to match them together.
Is there a better way to update values like this? I could create a third table for the merged results, if that would be faster?
I tried MySQL - How can I update a table with values from another table?, but it didn't really help. Any ideas?
UPDATE tobeupdated
INNER JOIN original ON (tobeupdated.value = original.value)
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
That should do it, and really its doing exactly what yours is. However, I prefer 'JOIN' syntax for joins rather than multiple 'WHERE' conditions, I think its easier to read
As for running slow, how large are the tables? You should have indexes on tobeupdated.value and original.value
EDIT:
we can also simplify the query
UPDATE tobeupdated
INNER JOIN original USING (value)
SET tobeupdated.id = original.id
USING is shorthand when both tables of a join have an identical named key such as id. ie an equi-join - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_(SQL)#Equi-join
It depends what is a use of those tables, but you might consider putting trigger on original table on insert and update. When insert or update is done, update the second table based on only one item from the original table. It will be quicker.